On 01/03/2014 10:10 AM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote:
I think that we can actually do a little bit better and remove many of
the #noqa tags without forfeiting automatic checking. I submitted a
patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64832/
This basically adds a h302_exceptions option to
On 03/01/14 16:18, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 01/03/2014 10:10 AM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote:
I think that we can actually do a little bit better and remove many of
the #noqa tags without forfeiting automatic checking. I submitted a
patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64832/
This basically
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 10:18:58AM -0500, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 01/03/2014 10:10 AM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote:
I think that we can actually do a little bit better and remove many of
the #noqa tags without forfeiting automatic checking. I submitted a
patch:
On 01/03/2014 10:35 AM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote:
On 03/01/14 16:18, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 01/03/2014 10:10 AM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote:
I think that we can actually do a little bit better and remove many of
the #noqa tags without forfeiting automatic checking. I submitted a
patch:
So Tatiana pointed
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-June/thread.html#9993
to me, and from there i went on to read
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-August/thread.html#13074
and i can see valid points for H302, even if it annoy me sometime, if
it's
