Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Things to tackle in Liberty

2015-04-17 Thread Fox, Kevin M
: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Things to tackle in Liberty On 17/04/15 17:24, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:16:25PM -0400, Jay Pipes wrote: On 04/10/2015 11:48 AM, Neil Jerram wrote: What I imagine, though, is that the _source_ of the plugging information could move from Nova

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Things to tackle in Liberty

2015-04-17 Thread Neil Jerram
On 17/04/15 17:16, Jay Pipes wrote: On 04/10/2015 11:48 AM, Neil Jerram wrote: What I imagine, though, is that the _source_ of the plugging information could move from Nova to Neutron, so that future plugging-related code changes are a matter for Neutron rather than for Nova. The plugging

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Things to tackle in Liberty

2015-04-17 Thread Neil Jerram
On 17/04/15 17:24, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:16:25PM -0400, Jay Pipes wrote: On 04/10/2015 11:48 AM, Neil Jerram wrote: What I imagine, though, is that the _source_ of the plugging information could move from Nova to Neutron, so that future plugging-related code

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Things to tackle in Liberty

2015-04-17 Thread Jay Pipes
On 04/10/2015 11:48 AM, Neil Jerram wrote: What I imagine, though, is that the _source_ of the plugging information could move from Nova to Neutron, so that future plugging-related code changes are a matter for Neutron rather than for Nova. The plugging would still _happen_ from within Nova, as

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Things to tackle in Liberty

2015-04-17 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:16:25PM -0400, Jay Pipes wrote: On 04/10/2015 11:48 AM, Neil Jerram wrote: What I imagine, though, is that the _source_ of the plugging information could move from Nova to Neutron, so that future plugging-related code changes are a matter for Neutron rather than for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Things to tackle in Liberty

2015-04-14 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 4/10/2015 10:29 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 4/8/2015 4:07 PM, Michael Still wrote: I just wanted to send a note about John running in the PTL election for Nova. I want to make it clear that I think having more than one candidate is a good thing -- its a healthy part of a functional

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Things to tackle in Liberty

2015-04-09 Thread Russell Bryant
On 04/08/2015 05:07 PM, Michael Still wrote: There are still a few idle cores, particularly people who haven’t done less than ten reviews in the last 90 days. We should drop those people from core and thank them for their work in the past noting once again that this is a natural part of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Things to tackle in Liberty

2015-04-09 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Le 08/04/2015 23:07, Michael Still a écrit : I just wanted to send a note about John running in the PTL election for Nova. I want to make it clear that I think having more than one candidate is a good thing -- its a healthy part of a functional democracy, and it also means regardless of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Things to tackle in Liberty

2015-04-09 Thread Neil Jerram
On 08/04/15 22:07, Michael Still wrote: priorities and specs === I think the current spec process is starting to work well for us, and that priorities was a success. We should continue with specs, but with an attempt to analyse why so many approved specs don’t land [...]

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Things to tackle in Liberty

2015-04-08 Thread Michael Still
I just wanted to send a note about John running in the PTL election for Nova. I want to make it clear that I think having more than one candidate is a good thing -- its a healthy part of a functional democracy, and it also means regardless of the outcome we have at least one succession planning