Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] gnocchi backport exception for stable/mitaka

2016-03-29 Thread John Trowbridge
+1 I think this is a good exception for the same reasons. On 03/29/2016 12:27 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:05:00AM -0400, Pradeep Kilambi wrote: >> Hi Everyone: >> >> As Mitaka branch was cut yesterday, I would like to request a backport >> exception to get gnocchi

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] gnocchi backport exception for stable/mitaka

2016-03-29 Thread Emilien Macchi
+1 for me, Gnocchi is bringing great features to improve Ceilometer deployments at scale. It would be a first iteration and brings interesting feedback by having it. Go for it! On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Pradeep Kilambi wrote: > Hi Everyone: > > As Mitaka branch was cut

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] gnocchi backport exception for stable/mitaka

2016-03-29 Thread James Slagle
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:05:00AM -0400, Pradeep Kilambi wrote: >> Hi Everyone: >> >> As Mitaka branch was cut yesterday, I would like to request a backport >> exception to get gnocchi patches[1][2][3] into stable/mitaka.

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] gnocchi backport exception for stable/mitaka

2016-03-29 Thread Steven Hardy
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:05:00AM -0400, Pradeep Kilambi wrote: > Hi Everyone: > > As Mitaka branch was cut yesterday, I would like to request a backport > exception to get gnocchi patches[1][2][3] into stable/mitaka. It > should low risk feature as we decided not to set ceilometer to use >

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] gnocchi backport exception for stable/mitaka

2016-03-29 Thread Pradeep Kilambi
Hi Everyone: As Mitaka branch was cut yesterday, I would like to request a backport exception to get gnocchi patches[1][2][3] into stable/mitaka. It should low risk feature as we decided not to set ceilometer to use gnocchi by default. So ceilometer would work as is and gnocchi is deployed along