+1 I think this is a good exception for the same reasons.
On 03/29/2016 12:27 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:05:00AM -0400, Pradeep Kilambi wrote:
>> Hi Everyone:
>>
>> As Mitaka branch was cut yesterday, I would like to request a backport
>> exception to get gnocchi patches[
+1 for me, Gnocchi is bringing great features to improve Ceilometer
deployments at scale. It would be a first iteration and brings
interesting feedback by having it. Go for it!
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Pradeep Kilambi wrote:
> Hi Everyone:
>
> As Mitaka branch was cut yesterday, I would
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:05:00AM -0400, Pradeep Kilambi wrote:
>> Hi Everyone:
>>
>> As Mitaka branch was cut yesterday, I would like to request a backport
>> exception to get gnocchi patches[1][2][3] into stable/mitaka. It
>> should low ri
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:05:00AM -0400, Pradeep Kilambi wrote:
> Hi Everyone:
>
> As Mitaka branch was cut yesterday, I would like to request a backport
> exception to get gnocchi patches[1][2][3] into stable/mitaka. It
> should low risk feature as we decided not to set ceilometer to use
> gnocc
Hi Everyone:
As Mitaka branch was cut yesterday, I would like to request a backport
exception to get gnocchi patches[1][2][3] into stable/mitaka. It
should low risk feature as we decided not to set ceilometer to use
gnocchi by default. So ceilometer would work as is and gnocchi is
deployed along s