-Original Message-
From: Chris Dent
Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Date: March 2, 2017 at 06:50:11
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][swg] per-project "Business only"
moderat
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, Clint Byrum wrote:
So, I'll ask more generally: do you believe that the single openstack-dev
mailing list is working fine and we should change nothing? If not, what
problems has it created for you?
No, it is not working fine, but that may be normal and the best we
can do.
On 13:04 Feb 27, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2017-02-27 15:43:12 -0500:
> >
> > As a person who sends a lot of process-driven email to this list,
> > it is not working for my needs to communicate with others.
> >
> > Over the past few cycles when I was the releas
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2017-03-01 10:03:34 -0800:
> Excerpts from Jonathan Bryce's message of 2017-03-01 11:49:38 -0600:
> >
> > > On Feb 28, 2017, at 4:25 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> > >
> > > Clint Byrum wrote:
> > So, I'll ask more generally: do you believe that the singl
Excerpts from Jonathan Bryce's message of 2017-03-01 11:49:38 -0600:
>
> > On Feb 28, 2017, at 4:25 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> >
> > Clint Byrum wrote:
> So, I'll ask more generally: do you believe that the single openstack-dev
> mailing list is working fine and we should change nothi
> On Feb 28, 2017, at 4:25 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>
> Clint Byrum wrote:
So, I'll ask more generally: do you believe that the single openstack-dev
mailing list is working fine and we should change nothing? If not, what
problems has it created for you?
>>>
>>> As a person who
Clint Byrum wrote:
>>> So, I'll ask more generally: do you believe that the single openstack-dev
>>> mailing list is working fine and we should change nothing? If not, what
>>> problems has it created for you?
>>
>> As a person who sends a lot of process-driven email to this list,
>> it is not wor
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2017-02-27 15:43:12 -0500:
> Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2017-02-27 09:35:21 -0800:
> > Excerpts from Dean Troyer's message of 2017-02-27 09:32:09 -0600:
> > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > > > This is not for users who
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2017-02-27 09:35:21 -0800:
> Excerpts from Dean Troyer's message of 2017-02-27 09:32:09 -0600:
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > > This is not for users who only want to see some projects. That is a well
> > > understood space and th
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Shamail wrote:
>
>
> The single openstack-dev list works fine for me. I am not using anything to
> filter either beyond what my default mail clients offer.
>
> Could we modify the question slightly to also ask how people are dealing with
> reading through the s
On 2017-02-27 12:54:33 -0500 (-0500), Shamail wrote:
[...]
> Could we modify the question slightly to also ask how people are
> dealing with reading through the single list? That might help us
> write a page that newcomers could read to get tips on how to best
> handle the mailing list traffic (wh
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 06:26:48PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2017-02-27 09:35:21 -0800 (-0800), Clint Byrum wrote:
> [...]
> > do you believe that the single openstack-dev mailing list is
> > working fine and we should change nothing? If not, what problems
> > has it created for you?
> [...
On 2017-02-27 09:35:21 -0800 (-0800), Clint Byrum wrote:
[...]
> do you believe that the single openstack-dev mailing list is
> working fine and we should change nothing? If not, what problems
> has it created for you?
[...]
Perhaps my case is unusual, but I find the current activity on this
ML to
Excerpts from Matthew Treinish's message of 2017-02-27 13:03:56 -0500:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 06:18:10PM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> > > Dean Troyer wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > >> This is not for users who only want to see some projects. That is a we
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Thanks for your reply. The proposed change is meant to benefit
> readers of openstack-dev who do not have access to, or ability with,
> sup/procmail/sieve/IMAP/etc., but do want to be able to be able to keep
> up with the general flow of discu
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 06:18:10PM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> > Dean Troyer wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> >> This is not for users who only want to see some projects. That is a well
> >> understood space and the mailman filtering does handle it. This is for
> On Feb 27, 2017, at 12:35 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Dean Troyer's message of 2017-02-27 09:32:09 -0600:
>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>>> This is not for users who only want to see some projects. That is a well
>>> understood space and the mailman fil
Excerpts from Dean Troyer's message of 2017-02-27 09:32:09 -0600:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > This is not for users who only want to see some projects. That is a well
> > understood space and the mailman filtering does handle it. This is for
> > those who want to moni
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Thierry Carrez
wrote:
> Dean Troyer wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> >> This is not for users who only want to see some projects. That is a well
> >> understood space and the mailman filtering does handle it. This is for
> >> those
-Original Message-
From: Thierry Carrez
Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Date: February 27, 2017 at 11:19:25
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][swg] per-project "Business only"
moderated mailing lis
Dean Troyer wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>> This is not for users who only want to see some projects. That is a well
>> understood space and the mailman filtering does handle it. This is for
>> those who want to monitor the overall health of the community, address
>
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> This is not for users who only want to see some projects. That is a well
> understood space and the mailman filtering does handle it. This is for
> those who want to monitor the overall health of the community, address
> issues with cross-proje
Le 27/02/2017 15:50, Matt Riedemann a écrit :
> On 2/26/2017 11:25 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>>
>> You have taken the folder approach, and that is a bit less complicated
>> to set up than sup+offlineimap, but still does require that you know
>> how to filter by tag. It also means that you are experi
On 2/26/2017 11:25 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
You have taken the folder approach, and that is a bit less complicated
to set up than sup+offlineimap, but still does require that you know
how to filter by tag. It also means that you are experiencing one of
the problems with cross posting whenever anyb
Excerpts from Luigi Toscano's message of 2017-02-27 03:02:45 -0500:
>
> - Original Message -
> > Excerpts from Shamail Tahir's message of 2017-02-27 00:44:44 -0500:
> > > Hi Clint,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:25 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > >
> > > > Excerpts from Matt Riedeman
- Original Message -
> Excerpts from Shamail Tahir's message of 2017-02-27 00:44:44 -0500:
> > Hi Clint,
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:25 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> >
> > > Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2017-02-26 19:48:50 -0600:
> > > > On 2/26/2017 6:52 PM, Clint Byrum
Thanks Clint!
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 2:41 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Shamail Tahir's message of 2017-02-27 00:44:44 -0500:
> > Hi Clint,
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:25 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> >
> > > Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2017-02-26 19:48:50 -0600:
> > >
Excerpts from Shamail Tahir's message of 2017-02-27 00:44:44 -0500:
> Hi Clint,
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:25 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
> > Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2017-02-26 19:48:50 -0600:
> > > On 2/26/2017 6:52 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > > > During some productive discus
Hi Clint,
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:25 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2017-02-26 19:48:50 -0600:
> > On 2/26/2017 6:52 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > > During some productive discussions in the Stewardship Working Group PTG
> > > room, the subject of the mailing
Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2017-02-26 19:48:50 -0600:
> On 2/26/2017 6:52 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > During some productive discussions in the Stewardship Working Group PTG
> > room, the subject of the mailing list came up. The usual questions
> > around whether or not we should have
On 2/26/2017 6:52 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
During some productive discussions in the Stewardship Working Group PTG
room, the subject of the mailing list came up. The usual questions
around whether or not we should have per-project lists came up and the
reasons we don't were re-affirmed. To recap th
During some productive discussions in the Stewardship Working Group PTG
room, the subject of the mailing list came up. The usual questions
around whether or not we should have per-project lists came up and the
reasons we don't were re-affirmed. To recap those reasons:
* Cross posting is the pits
32 matches
Mail list logo
