Dean Troyer wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
mailto:thie...@openstack.org wrote:
One area where we could work to remove noise would be to move new core
reviewers nomination/suggestion threads out of the ML. They are mostly
useless IMHO
Kuvaja, Erno wrote:
[...]
This is one of the benefits/caveats of having a single dev mailing list.
There is lots of noise for everyone, but this particular noise is one of
those I think we should not get rid of.
One area where we could work to remove noise would be to move new core
On 03/23/2015 10:47 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Kuvaja, Erno wrote:
[...]
This is one of the benefits/caveats of having a single dev mailing list.
There is lots of noise for everyone, but this particular noise is one of
those I think we should not get rid of.
One area where we could work
Excerpts from Russell Bryant's message of 2015-03-23 07:51:43 -0700:
On 03/23/2015 10:47 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Kuvaja, Erno wrote:
[...]
This is one of the benefits/caveats of having a single dev mailing list.
There is lots of noise for everyone, but this particular noise is one of
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
wrote:
One area where we could work to remove noise would be to move new core
reviewers nomination/suggestion threads out of the ML. They are mostly
useless IMHO (only +1s), and PTLs are empowered to make the call anyway.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015, at 01:22 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-03-13 08:06:43 -0700:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015, at 06:57 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Clint Byrum wrote:
I spend a not-insignificant amount of time deciding which threads to
read and
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-03-13 08:06:43 -0700:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015, at 06:57 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Clint Byrum wrote:
I spend a not-insignificant amount of time deciding which threads to
read and which to fully ignore each day, so extra threads mean extra
On 2015-03-13 20:09:40 +0100 (+0100), Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
[...]
PS: I am not subscribed to announce list. Though I am ok to do so
if we push announcements there.
You might want to consider subscribing regardless of the outcome of
this discussion. There is often helpful community information
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/12/2015 09:22 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
I spend a not-insignificant amount of time deciding which threads
to read and which to fully ignore each day, so extra threads mean
extra work, even with a streamlined workflow of
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015, at 06:57 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Clint Byrum wrote:
I spend a not-insignificant amount of time deciding which threads to
read and which to fully ignore each day, so extra threads mean
Clint Byrum wrote:
I spend a not-insignificant amount of time deciding which threads to
read and which to fully ignore each day, so extra threads mean extra
work, even with a streamlined workflow of single-key-press-per-thread.
So I'm wondering what people are getting from these
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015, at 06:57 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Clint Byrum wrote:
I spend a not-insignificant amount of time deciding which threads to
read and which to fully ignore each day, so extra threads mean extra
work, even with a streamlined workflow of single-key-press-per-thread.
Clint,
Personally I am quite interested in new releases of python clients and oslo
stuff, but I believe
that oslo releases announcement should be merged to single email with rate
limit 1 email per week.
It will be much simpler at least for me to track stuff.
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-03-12 20:22:04 +:
I spend a not-insignificant amount of time deciding which threads to
read and which to fully ignore each day, so extra threads mean extra
work, even with a streamlined workflow of single-key-press-per-thread.
So I'm wondering
On 2015-03-12 13:22:04 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote:
[...]
So I'm wondering what people are getting from these announcements
being on the discussion list.
[...]
The main thing I get from them is that they're being recorded to a
(theoretically) immutable archive indexed by a lot of other
I spend a not-insignificant amount of time deciding which threads to
read and which to fully ignore each day, so extra threads mean extra
work, even with a streamlined workflow of single-key-press-per-thread.
So I'm wondering what people are getting from these announcements being
on the
On 12/03/15 23:31 +0300, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
Clint,
Personally I am quite interested in new releases of python clients and oslo
stuff, but I believe
that oslo releases announcement should be merged to single email with rate
limit 1 email per week.
It will be much simpler at least for me to
Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2015-03-12 13:58:20 -0700:
On 2015-03-12 13:22:04 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote:
[...]
So I'm wondering what people are getting from these announcements
being on the discussion list.
[...]
The main thing I get from them is that they're being
On 13 March 2015 at 12:22, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2015-03-12 13:58:20 -0700:
On 2015-03-12 13:22:04 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote:
[...]
So I'm wondering what people are getting from these announcements
being on the discussion list.
19 matches
Mail list logo
