On Aug 24, 2015, at 8:21 AM, Anne Gentle | Just Write Click
annegen...@justwriteclick.com wrote:
I understand the workflow to be necessary due to the scale at which we're
governing now. With over 40 PTL positions plus the six TC spots rotating, I
sense we need to adopt tooling that ensures
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
On 08/22/2015 04:35 PM, Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote:
+1 To what Joshua said.
I would also like to understand what is the goal we are trying to
accomplish by moving this to a repo and submitting a CR and what does
On 08/24/2015 01:37 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Tristan Cacqueray's message of 2015-08-21 14:20:00 +:
Hello folks,
as discussed previously, we'd like to improve elections workflow using
gerrit:
* A new repository to manage elections: openstack/election
* Candidates submit
Excerpts from Tristan Cacqueray's message of 2015-08-21 14:20:00 +:
Hello folks,
as discussed previously, we'd like to improve elections workflow using
gerrit:
* A new repository to manage elections: openstack/election
* Candidates submit their candidacy through a file as a CR, e.g.:
Excerpts from Tristan Cacqueray's message of 2015-08-24 13:59:32 +:
On 08/24/2015 01:37 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Tristan Cacqueray's message of 2015-08-21 14:20:00 +:
Hello folks,
as discussed previously, we'd like to improve elections workflow using
gerrit:
*
On 21/08/15 16:58 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Tristan Cacqueray wrote:
Hello folks,
as discussed previously, we'd like to improve elections workflow using
gerrit:
* A new repository to manage elections: openstack/election
* Candidates submit their candidacy through a file as a CR, e.g.:
On 08/22/2015 04:35 PM, Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote:
+1 To what Joshua said.
I would also like to understand what is the goal we are trying to
accomplish by moving this to a repo and submitting a CR and what does
this solve or improve on the current way we are doing things?
The point when I
+1 To what Joshua said.
I would also like to understand what is the goal we are trying to
accomplish by moving this to a repo and submitting a CR and what does
this solve or improve on the current way we are doing things?
Will it reduce noise? marginally (IMHO).
Maish
On 08/22/15 06:02,
On 08/21/2015 11:02 PM, Joshua Hesketh wrote:
I'm struggling to think of a way this might help enable discussions between
nominees and voters about their platforms. Since the tooling will send out
the nomination announcements the only real noise that is reduced is the
nomination confirmed type
I'm struggling to think of a way this might help enable discussions between
nominees and voters about their platforms. Since the tooling will send out
the nomination announcements the only real noise that is reduced is the
nomination confirmed type emails.
While I think this sounds really neat,
Hello folks,
as discussed previously, we'd like to improve elections workflow using
gerrit:
* A new repository to manage elections: openstack/election
* Candidates submit their candidacy through a file as a CR, e.g.:
sept-2015-ptl/project_name-candidate_name
* A check job verifies if the
On 2015-08-21 14:20:00 + (+), Tristan Cacqueray wrote:
[...]
* A check job verifies if the candidate is valid (has ATC and
contributor to the project)
[...]
Automated jobs would be great, but the first iteration could be
managed using manual tools.
[...]
Yep, the tricky bit here is
Tristan Cacqueray wrote:
Hello folks,
as discussed previously, we'd like to improve elections workflow using
gerrit:
* A new repository to manage elections: openstack/election
* Candidates submit their candidacy through a file as a CR, e.g.:
sept-2015-ptl/project_name-candidate_name
*
On 2015-08-21 14:32:50 -0400 (-0400), Anita Kuno wrote:
Personally I would recommend that the election officials have
verification permissions on the proposed repo and the automation
step is skipped to begin with as a way of expediting the repo
creation. Getting the workflow in place in enough
On 08/21/2015 03:37 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-08-21 14:32:50 -0400 (-0400), Anita Kuno wrote:
Personally I would recommend that the election officials have
verification permissions on the proposed repo and the automation
step is skipped to begin with as a way of expediting the repo
On 08/21/2015 11:27 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-08-21 14:20:00 + (+), Tristan Cacqueray wrote:
[...]
* A check job verifies if the candidate is valid (has ATC and
contributor to the project)
[...]
Automated jobs would be great, but the first iteration could be
managed using
16 matches
Mail list logo
