On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Chris Dent wrote:
The problem with the spec is that it doesn't know what to replace
WSME with.
Thanks to everyone who provided some input.
The summary is: A lot of support for Flask. A fair bit of support
for the idea of using JSONSchema and publishing it.
Since this isn
On Aug 28, 2015, at 6:10 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
> It seems like Flask has a reasonable amount of support and there is a good
> ecosystem around it but that aside (as Jay said)... I definitely support
> exposing the schema to the end user; making it easier for the end user to
> validate inp
It seems like Flask has a reasonable amount of support and there is a good
ecosystem around it but that aside (as Jay said)... I definitely support
exposing the schema to the end user; making it easier for the end user to
validate input / model outputs for their integration with OpenStack
services
On 08/28/2015 10:36 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
So at the present moment the [micro]framework that comes to my mind -
without any testing or prototype of any sort - is Flask.
just wanted to add on here, sahara is using flask.
mike
__
On 2015-08-28 11:27:57 -0700 (-0700), Joshua Harlow wrote:
> Out of curiosity how are u using voluptuous (and/or getting it installed?),
> when I tried to propose that to the global requirements requirement
> list/repo I got shot-down (since json-schema does similar things);
Zuul uses voluptuous t
Monty Taylor wrote:
On 08/28/2015 08:32 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28 2015, Chris Dent wrote:
This morning I kicked off a quick spec for replacing WSME in
Ceilometer with ... something:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218155/
This is because not only is WSME not that great, it als
On 08/28/2015 08:32 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28 2015, Chris Dent wrote:
This morning I kicked off a quick spec for replacing WSME in
Ceilometer with ... something:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218155/
This is because not only is WSME not that great, it also results in
con
On 08/28/2015 08:32 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28 2015, Chris Dent wrote:
This morning I kicked off a quick spec for replacing WSME in
Ceilometer with ... something:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218155/
This is because not only is WSME not that great, it also results in
con
On 08/28/2015 07:36 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
Hi,
If you just want to shoot the breeze please respond here. If you
have specific comments on the spec please response there.
I have been thinking about doing it for Ironic as well so I'm looking
for options. IMHO after using WSME I would t
On Fri, Aug 28 2015, Jay Pipes wrote:
> voluptuous may be more Pythonic, as Julien mentioned, but the problem is you
> can't expose the validation schema to the end user via any standard document
> format (like JSONSchema). Using the jsonschema library along with standard
> JSONSchema documents al
I enjoy using validictory for using Jsonschema with Python
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/validictory.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 28, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>
>> On 08/28/2015 07:22 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
>>
>> This morning I kicked off a quick spec for replacing WSME in
>> Ceilom
On 08/28/2015 07:22 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
This morning I kicked off a quick spec for replacing WSME in
Ceilometer with ... something:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218155/
This is because not only is WSME not that great, it also results in
controller code that is inscrutable.
The prob
On Fri, Aug 28 2015, Chris Dent wrote:
> This morning I kicked off a quick spec for replacing WSME in
> Ceilometer with ... something:
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218155/
>
> This is because not only is WSME not that great, it also results in
> controller code that is inscrutable.
>
>
On 08/28/2015 10:36 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> If you just want to shoot the breeze please respond here. If you
>> have specific comments on the spec please response there.
>>
>
> I have been thinking about doing it for Ironic as well so I'm looking
> for options. IMHO after usin
On 08/28/2015 04:36 PM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
Hi,
If you just want to shoot the breeze please respond here. If you
have specific comments on the spec please response there.
I have been thinking about doing it for Ironic as well so I'm looking
for options. IMHO after using WSME I would t
Hi,
> If you just want to shoot the breeze please respond here. If you
> have specific comments on the spec please response there.
>
I have been thinking about doing it for Ironic as well so I'm looking
for options. IMHO after using WSME I would think that one of the most
important criteria we sh
This morning I kicked off a quick spec for replacing WSME in
Ceilometer with ... something:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218155/
This is because not only is WSME not that great, it also results in
controller code that is inscrutable.
The problem with the spec is that it doesn't know wh
17 matches
Mail list logo
