Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] Status of the project

2017-02-14 Thread Hayes, Graham
On 11/02/17 15:12, Andrea Frittoli wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 7:22 PM Hayes, Graham > wrote: > > The HTML version of this is here: > http://graham.hayes.ie/posts/openstack-designate-where-we-are/ > > I have been asked a few times recently "What

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] Status of the project

2017-02-11 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2017-02-10 11:07:29 -0800: > Fox, Kevin M wrote: > > I'd say kube-dns and designate are very different technologies. > > > > kube-dns is a service discovery mechanism for kubernetes intend to provide > > internal k8s resolution. The fact it uses dns to impl

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] Status of the project

2017-02-11 Thread Andrea Frittoli
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 7:22 PM Hayes, Graham wrote: > The HTML version of this is here: > http://graham.hayes.ie/posts/openstack-designate-where-we-are/ > > I have been asked a few times recently "What is the state of the Designate > project?", "How is Designate getting on?", and by people who kn

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] Status of the project

2017-02-10 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-02-10 17:47:50 + (+), Hayes, Graham wrote: [...] > I am struggling to think of even one) multi tenant DNS management > APIs. [...] I ran http://www.nictool.com/ at a service provider years ago, selected specifically because it's a multi-tenant (or at least could be made reasonably

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] Status of the project

2017-02-10 Thread Brandon B. Jozsa
I’m just catching up with this thread, but I absolutely agree with Jay on documentation and just general messaging. This is not just a Designate issue at all though, this is an issue that many projects have. Well drafted specs, mission, scope, and general messaging are sometimes the bane of grea

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] Status of the project

2017-02-10 Thread Hayes, Graham
n leverage from others, or a huge amount we can offer others. >> Thanks, >> Kevin >> ____________ >> From: Jay Pipes [jaypi...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 9:50 AM >> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] Status of the project

2017-02-10 Thread Hayes, Graham
On 10/02/17 18:10, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Jay Pipes wrote: >> On 02/10/2017 12:21 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: >>> Hayes, Graham wrote: The HTML version of this is here: http://graham.hayes.ie/posts/openstack-designate-where-we-are/ I have been asked a few times recently "What is th

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] Status of the project

2017-02-10 Thread Joshua Harlow
h and ...) by doing so then that's IMHO good. Thanks, Kevin From: Jay Pipes [jaypi...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 9:50 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] Status of the project On 02/10/201

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] Status of the project

2017-02-10 Thread Fox, Kevin M
: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] Status of the project On 02/10/2017 12:21 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Hayes, Graham wrote: >> The HTML version of this is here: >> http://graham.hayes.ie/posts/openstack-designate-where-we-are/ >> >> I

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] Status of the project

2017-02-10 Thread Joshua Harlow
Jay Pipes wrote: On 02/10/2017 12:21 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: Hayes, Graham wrote: The HTML version of this is here: http://graham.hayes.ie/posts/openstack-designate-where-we-are/ I have been asked a few times recently "What is the state of the Designate project?", "How is Designate getting on

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] Status of the project

2017-02-10 Thread Hayes, Graham
On 10/02/17 16:39, Alexandra Settle wrote: > Sorry, I’m top posting to this reply because Outlook is a terrible inline > poster. > > Hey Designaters! > > Have you tried pinging the docs team? (ie: me – Hello! I’m the docs PTL) Hi - We have in the past, and did not get very far. I know things a

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] Status of the project

2017-02-10 Thread Jay Pipes
On 02/10/2017 12:21 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: Hayes, Graham wrote: The HTML version of this is here: http://graham.hayes.ie/posts/openstack-designate-where-we-are/ I have been asked a few times recently "What is the state of the Designate project?", "How is Designate getting on?", and by people

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] Status of the project

2017-02-10 Thread Mike Spreitzer
Joshua Harlow wrote on 02/10/2017 12:21:08 PM: > Knowing where this is at and the issues. It makes me wonder if it is > worthwhile to start thinking about how we can start to look at 'outside > the openstack' projects for DNS. I believe there is a few that are > similar enough to designate (th

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] Status of the project

2017-02-10 Thread Hayes, Graham
On 10/02/17 17:24, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Hayes, Graham wrote: >> The HTML version of this is here: >> http://graham.hayes.ie/posts/openstack-designate-where-we-are/ >> >> I have been asked a few times recently "What is the state of the Designate >> project?", "How is Designate getting on?", and by

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] Status of the project

2017-02-10 Thread Joshua Harlow
Hayes, Graham wrote: The HTML version of this is here: http://graham.hayes.ie/posts/openstack-designate-where-we-are/ I have been asked a few times recently "What is the state of the Designate project?", "How is Designate getting on?", and by people who know what is happening "What are you going

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] Status of the project

2017-02-10 Thread Alexandra Settle
Sorry, I’m top posting to this reply because Outlook is a terrible inline poster. Hey Designaters! Have you tried pinging the docs team? (ie: me – Hello! I’m the docs PTL) Over the last few cycles our team has been able to step in and help with formatting, writing, and organizing documentatio

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] Status of the project

2017-02-10 Thread Hayes, Graham
On 10/02/17 15:48, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2017-02-09 21:33:03 -0500: >> On 02/09/2017 02:19 PM, Hayes, Graham wrote: >> >> >>> Where too now then? >>> === >>> >>> Well, this is where I call out to people who actually use the project - >>> don't

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] Status of the project

2017-02-10 Thread Hayes, Graham
On 10/02/17 02:40, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 02/09/2017 02:19 PM, Hayes, Graham wrote: > > >> Where too now then? >> === >> >> Well, this is where I call out to people who actually use the project - >> don't >> jump ship and use something else because of the picture I have painted. >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] Status of the project

2017-02-10 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2017-02-09 21:33:03 -0500: > On 02/09/2017 02:19 PM, Hayes, Graham wrote: > > > > Where too now then? > > === > > > > Well, this is where I call out to people who actually use the project - > > don't > > jump ship and use something else because

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] Status of the project

2017-02-09 Thread Jay Pipes
On 02/09/2017 02:19 PM, Hayes, Graham wrote: Where too now then? === Well, this is where I call out to people who actually use the project - don't jump ship and use something else because of the picture I have painted. We are a dedicated team, how cares about the project. We ju

[openstack-dev] [designate] Status of the project

2017-02-09 Thread Hayes, Graham
The HTML version of this is here: http://graham.hayes.ie/posts/openstack-designate-where-we-are/ I have been asked a few times recently "What is the state of the Designate project?", "How is Designate getting on?", and by people who know what is happening "What are you going to do about Designate?