From: Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 07/04/2014 21:45
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Managing changes to the Hot
Specification (hot_spec.rst)
On 04/07/2014 11:01 AM, Zane Bitter
Hi folks,
There are two problems we should address regarding the growth and change
to the HOT specification.
First our +2/+A process for normal changes doesn't totally make sense
for hot_spec.rst. We generally have some informal bar for controversial
changes (of which changes to
On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 11:23:28AM -0700, Steven Dake wrote:
Hi folks,
There are two problems we should address regarding the growth and
change to the HOT specification.
First our +2/+A process for normal changes doesn't totally make
sense for hot_spec.rst. We generally have some
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 09:30:50AM +0200, Thomas Spatzier wrote:
From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 06/04/2014 22:32
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Managing changes to the Hot
Specification (hot_spec.rst)
On 07/04/14 06:23, Steven
On 06/04/14 14:23, Steven Dake wrote:
Hi folks,
There are two problems we should address regarding the growth and change
to the HOT specification.
First our +2/+A process for normal changes doesn't totally make sense
for hot_spec.rst. We generally have some informal bar for controversial
On 04/07/2014 11:01 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 06/04/14 14:23, Steven Dake wrote:
Hi folks,
There are two problems we should address regarding the growth and change
to the HOT specification.
First our +2/+A process for normal changes doesn't totally make sense
for hot_spec.rst. We generally
Hi folks,
There are two problems we should address regarding the growth and change
to the HOT specification.
First our +2/+A process for normal changes doesn't totally make sense
for hot_spec.rst. We generally have some informal bar for controversial
changes (of which changes to
On 07/04/14 06:23, Steven Dake wrote:
Hi folks,
There are two problems we should address regarding the growth and
change to the HOT specification.
First our +2/+A process for normal changes doesn't totally make sense
for hot_spec.rst. We generally have some informal bar for
controversial
