Hi,
Thanks for your 3 votes. Every vote counts; you've convinced me of the
usefulness of having both tags and traits as separate features. I shall
advocate for you all :)
--ruby
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 5:41 AM, Vladyslav Drok wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 12:19 AM,
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 12:19 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 10/25/2017 12:55 PM, Mathieu Gagné wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Loo, Ruby wrote:
>>
>>> Hello ironic'ers,
>>>
>>> A while ago, we approved a spec to add node tag support to
On 10/25/2017 12:55 PM, Mathieu Gagné wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Loo, Ruby wrote:
Hello ironic'ers,
A while ago, we approved a spec to add node tag support to ironic [1]. The
feature itself did not land yet (although some of the code has). Now that
the
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Loo, Ruby wrote:
> Hello ironic'ers,
>
> A while ago, we approved a spec to add node tag support to ironic [1]. The
> feature itself did not land yet (although some of the code has). Now that
> the (nova) community has come up with
Sending again, I don't think it went to openstack-operators@.
--ruby
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Loo, Ruby wrote:
> Hello ironic'ers,
>
>
>
> A while ago, we approved a spec to add node tag support to ironic [1]. The
> feature itself did not land yet (although some of
Hello ironic'ers,
A while ago, we approved a spec to add node tag support to ironic [1]. The
feature itself did not land yet (although some of the code has). Now that the
(nova) community has come up with traits, ironic wants to support node traits,
and there is a spec proposing that [2]. At