> The tricky bit is that RDO does not include patches in our packages
> built from trunk (trunk.rdoproject.org), and for liberty we first check
> if stable/liberty exists, then fallback to master if it does not. So the
> presence of stable/liberty that is not actually the recommended way to
> build
On 02/19/2016 01:29 PM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
Hi,
By removing stable branches you mean stable branches for mitaka and
newer releases or that includes stable/liberty which already exist as
well?
I think the latter is more complicated, I don't think we should drop
stable/liberty like that be
On 02/19/2016 07:29 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> By removing stable branches you mean stable branches for mitaka and
> newer releases or that includes stable/liberty which already exist as
> well?
>
> I think the latter is more complicated, I don't think we should drop
> stable/libe
Hi,
By removing stable branches you mean stable branches for mitaka and
newer releases or that includes stable/liberty which already exist as
well?
I think the latter is more complicated, I don't think we should drop
stable/liberty like that because other people (apart from TripleO) may
also depe
Hi all!
Initially we didn't plan on having stable branches for IPA at all. Our
gate is using the prebuilt image generated from the master branch even
on Ironic/Inspector stable branches. The branch in question was added by
request of RDO folks, and today I got a request from trown to remove it
