On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Steven Dake (stdake)
wrote:
> Kolla operators and developers,
>
> The general consensus of the Core Reviewer team for Kolla is that we
> should embrace a liberal backport policy for the Liberty release. An
> example of liberal -> We add a new
[mailto:sam...@yaple.net]
Sent: Friday, October 9, 2015 4:15 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Backport policy for Liberty
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Steven Dake (stdake)
<std...@cisco.com<mailto:std...@cisco.com&g
thoughts there?
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Steven Dake (stdake) [std...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 12:47 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Backport policy for Liberty
Kolla operators
On 9 October 2015 at 08:47, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
> Kolla operators and developers,
>
> The general consensus of the Core Reviewer team for Kolla is that we should
> embrace a liberal backport policy for the Liberty release. An example of
> liberal -> We add a new server
Kolla operators and developers,
The general consensus of the Core Reviewer team for Kolla is that we should
embrace a liberal backport policy for the Liberty release. An example of
liberal -> We add a new server service to Ansible, we would backport the
feature to liberty. This is in