Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][trunk] objects within transactions

2016-09-05 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, It is unclear what our policy is with objects. My understanding is that an object should handle all of the database interaction. Is that not one of the benefits of the objects? I postedhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/365459 and it has a number

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][trunk] objects within transactions

2016-09-05 Thread Gary Kotton
Thanks! On 9/5/16, 6:20 PM, "Jakub Libosvar" wrote: On 05/09/16 16:45, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > > It is unclear what our policy is with objects. My understanding is that > an object should handle all of the database interaction. Is that not one >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][trunk] objects within transactions

2016-09-05 Thread Jakub Libosvar
On 05/09/16 16:45, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, It is unclear what our policy is with objects. My understanding is that an object should handle all of the database interaction. Is that not one of the benefits of the objects? I posted https://review.openstack.org/#/c/365459 and it has a number of

[openstack-dev] [neutron][trunk] objects within transactions

2016-09-05 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, It is unclear what our policy is with objects. My understanding is that an object should handle all of the database interaction. Is that not one of the benefits of the objects? I posted https://review.openstack.org/#/c/365459 and it has a number of interesting comments – the main is that