On 4 June 2015 at 10:40, Jens Rosenboom j.rosenb...@x-ion.de wrote:
2015-06-03 14:25 GMT+02:00 John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com:
On 3 June 2015 at 12:52, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/03/2015 02:34 AM, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 06/03/2015 12:16 AM, Jens Rosenboom wrote:
I'm
2015-06-03 14:25 GMT+02:00 John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com:
On 3 June 2015 at 12:52, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/03/2015 02:34 AM, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 06/03/2015 12:16 AM, Jens Rosenboom wrote:
I'm wondering though whether the current API behaviour here should be
changed
On 06/03/2015 02:34 AM, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 06/03/2015 12:16 AM, Jens Rosenboom wrote:
I'm wondering though whether the current API behaviour here should be
changed more generally. Is there a plausible reason to silently
discard options that are not allowed for non-admins? For me it would
2015-06-01 13:40 GMT+02:00 John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com:
On 31 May 2015 at 14:15, Xu, Hejie hejie...@intel.com wrote:
Replied in line with prefix [alex]
-Original Message-
...
2)
We also agreed that all micro version bumps need a spec, to help avoid is
adding more bad things
-Original Message-
From: John Garbutt [mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com]
Sent: Monday, June 1, 2015 7:41 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api] New micro-version needed for api bug
fix or not?
On 31 May 2015 at 14
On 06/03/2015 12:16 AM, Jens Rosenboom wrote:
I'm wondering though whether the current API behaviour here should be
changed more generally. Is there a plausible reason to silently
discard options that are not allowed for non-admins? For me it would
make more sense to return an error in that
-Original Message-
From: Jens Rosenboom [mailto:j.rosenb...@x-ion.de]
Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2015 2:17 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api] New micro-version needed for api bug
fix or not?
2015-06-01 13:40
-Original Message-
From: Xu, Hejie [mailto:hejie...@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2015 3:34 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api] New micro-version needed for api bug
fix or not?
-Original
On 3 June 2015 at 12:52, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/03/2015 02:34 AM, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 06/03/2015 12:16 AM, Jens Rosenboom wrote:
I'm wondering though whether the current API behaviour here should be
changed more generally. Is there a plausible reason to silently
On 31 May 2015 at 14:15, Xu, Hejie hejie...@intel.com wrote:
Replied in line with prefix [alex]
-Original Message-
From: John Garbutt [mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com]
1)
We agreed changing a 500 error to an existing error (or making it succeed in
the usual way) is a change that
On 29 May 2015 at 19:58, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/29/2015 05:04 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
On 29 May 2015 at 09:00, Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui
sahid.ferdja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 08:47:01AM +0200, Jens Rosenboom wrote:
As the discussion in
Replied in line with prefix [alex]
-Original Message-
From: John Garbutt [mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 8:05 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api] New micro-version needed for api bug
fix
I also learn that from Sean!
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2015 2:58 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api] New micro-version needed for api bug
fix or not?
On 05/29/2015 05:04 AM, John
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 08:47:01AM +0200, Jens Rosenboom wrote:
As the discussion in https://review.openstack.org/179569 still
continues about whether this is just a bug fix, or an API change
that will need a new micro version, maybe it makes sense to take this
issue over here to the ML.
As the discussion in https://review.openstack.org/179569 still
continues about whether this is just a bug fix, or an API change
that will need a new micro version, maybe it makes sense to take this
issue over here to the ML.
My personal opinion is undecided, I can see either option as being
On 29 May 2015 at 09:00, Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui
sahid.ferdja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 08:47:01AM +0200, Jens Rosenboom wrote:
As the discussion in https://review.openstack.org/179569 still
continues about whether this is just a bug fix, or an API change
that will need a
On 05/29/2015 05:04 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
On 29 May 2015 at 09:00, Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui
sahid.ferdja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 08:47:01AM +0200, Jens Rosenboom wrote:
As the discussion in https://review.openstack.org/179569 still
continues about whether this is just a
17 matches
Mail list logo
