Hi!
I did not find any usage "virtual_interfaces" with try...except block, so
we can easily change error code without new microversion.
I'm +1 for proper code.
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi
wrote:
> 2016-03-06 15:41 GMT-08:00 Jay Pipes
2016-03-06 15:41 GMT-08:00 Jay Pipes :
> On 03/06/2016 02:21 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, good point. I think 400 would be best here. And according to our
>> handy-dandy docs [1] it should be OK to do this without a microversion.
>
>
> Yup, 400 is correct and yes,
On 03/06/2016 02:21 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
Thanks, good point. I think 400 would be best here. And according to our
handy-dandy docs [1] it should be OK to do this without a microversion.
Yup, 400 is correct and yes, you should not need a new microversion
addition to the API.
Best,
-jay
On 3/6/2016 12:47 PM, Chris Dent wrote:
On Sat, 5 Mar 2016, Matt Riedemann wrote:
A GET request from the os-virtual-interfaces API returns a 500 today
if neutron is the networking backend.
It would be more accurate to return a 501, but do we need a
microversion for that?
Keep this in
On Sat, 5 Mar 2016, Matt Riedemann wrote:
A GET request from the os-virtual-interfaces API returns a 500 today if
neutron is the networking backend.
It would be more accurate to return a 501, but do we need a microversion for
that?
Keep this in mind:
On 3/5/2016 8:51 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
A GET request from the os-virtual-interfaces API returns a 500 today if
neutron is the networking backend.
It would be more accurate to return a 501, but do we need a microversion
for that?
I intend on implementing the method for the neutronv2 API
A GET request from the os-virtual-interfaces API returns a 500 today if
neutron is the networking backend.
It would be more accurate to return a 501, but do we need a microversion
for that?
I intend on implementing the method for the neutronv2 API in nova [1]
but it will require a