On 12/1/2017 2:47 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
Andrew Laski also mentioned in IRC that we didn't replace the original
instance.image_ref with the shelved image id because the shelve
operation should be transparent to the end user, they have the same
image (not really), same volumes, same IPs, etc
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> Andrew Laski also mentioned in IRC that we didn't replace the original
> instance.image_ref with the shelved image id because the shelve operation
> should be transparent to the end user, they have the same image (not
>
On 12/1/2017 1:25 PM, Mathieu Gagné wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
I think we can assert as follows:
2. If we're going to point the instance at an image_ref, we shouldn't delete
that image. I don't have a good reason why besides
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>
> I think we can assert as follows:
>
> 2. If we're going to point the instance at an image_ref, we shouldn't delete
> that image. I don't have a good reason why besides deleting things which
> nova has a reference
I came across this bug during triage today:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1732428
It essentially says that unshelving an instance and then resizing that
instance later, depending on the type of image backend, can fail.
It's pointed out that when we complete the unshelve procedure, we