On 7 March 2016 at 14:25, Major Hayden wrote:
>
> That seems reasonable. Would it be appropriate to add some documentation
> in the Liberty release that explains how to enable the role with that
> release?
>
Yes, I think that's a perfectly reasonable thing to do.
___
On 03/05/2016 06:40 AM, Jesse Pretorius wrote:
> Liberty is a stable branch and the Mitaka release is just around the corner.
> I think it's a bit late in the game to add it. Consider, also, that deployers
> can easily consume the role with their own playbook to execute it if they
> would like t
On 4 March 2016 at 16:50, Major Hayden wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I have proposed a review[1] which adds the openstack-ansible-security[2]
> role to OpenStack-Ansible's Liberty release. I would really appreciate
> some feedback from deployers on whether this change is desirable in Liberty.
>
> The
Hey folks,
I have proposed a review[1] which adds the openstack-ansible-security[2] role
to OpenStack-Ansible's Liberty release. I would really appreciate some
feedback from deployers on whether this change is desirable in Liberty.
The role applies cleanly to Liberty on Ubuntu 14.04 and the ro