On 23/03/15 09:24 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Li Ma's message of 2015-03-23 18:23:39 +0800:
Hi all,
During previous threads discussing about zeromq driver, a subgroup may
be necessary to exchange knowledge and improve efficiency of
communication and development. In this subgroup,
Excerpts from Li Ma's message of 2015-03-24 23:31:22 +0800:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
The goal we set at the Kilo summit was to have a group of people
interested in zmq start contributing to the driver, and I had hoped to
the library
On 03/24/2015 10:31 AM, Li Ma wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
The goal we set at the Kilo summit was to have a group of people
interested in zmq start contributing to the driver, and I had hoped to
the library overall. How do we feel that is
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
The goal we set at the Kilo summit was to have a group of people
interested in zmq start contributing to the driver, and I had hoped to
the library overall. How do we feel that is going?
That sounds great. I hope so.
By the way, just informing that a general session will be available
for zeromq driver. I'll provide the general architecture of the
current zeromq driver, pros and cons, potential improvements, use
cases for production.
Topic: Distributed Messaging System for OpenStack at Scale
Link:
Excerpts from ozamiatin's message of 2015-03-24 18:57:25 +0200:
Hi,
+1 for subgroup meeting
Does the separate repository mean separate library (python package) with
its own release cycles so on?
Yes, although as an Oslo library it would be subject to our existing
policies about versioning,
From my experience, making fast moving changes is far easier when code is
split out. Changes occur too slowly when integrated.
I'd be +1 on splitting the code out. I expect you will get more done this
way.
Regards,
Eric Windisch
On 24/03/15 11:03 -0500, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 03/24/2015 10:31 AM, Li Ma wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
The goal we set at the Kilo summit was to have a group of people
interested in zmq start contributing to the driver, and I had hoped to
the
Hi,
+1 for subgroup meeting
Does the separate repository mean separate library (python package) with
its own release cycles so on?
As I can see the separate library makes it easy:
1) To support optional (for oslo.messaging) requirements specific for
zmq driver like pyzmq, redis so on
2)
+1 to keep it together.
-- dims
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 24/03/15 11:03 -0500, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 03/24/2015 10:31 AM, Li Ma wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
The goal we set at the Kilo
Excerpts from Li Ma's message of 2015-03-23 18:23:39 +0800:
Hi all,
During previous threads discussing about zeromq driver, a subgroup may
be necessary to exchange knowledge and improve efficiency of
communication and development. In this subgroup, we can schedule a
given topic or just
Hi all,
During previous threads discussing about zeromq driver, a subgroup may
be necessary to exchange knowledge and improve efficiency of
communication and development. In this subgroup, we can schedule a
given topic or just discuss some re-factoring stuff or bugs in irc
room at a fixed time.
12 matches
Mail list logo
