Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging][rpm] 3rd-party gates promotion to voting gates

Hi, >> Gates that do not leave verified +1 are called non-voting, so >> logically gates that leaves verified +1 are called voting gates. > +1 Eh, what I wanted to +1 was: +1 to promote the check jobs on rpm-packaging from MOS and SUSE CI as voting jobs. Sorry for mixing up definitions and then

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging][rpm] 3rd-party gates promotion to voting gates

Hi, 2016-09-29 14:12 GMT+02:00 Haïkel : > Gates that do not leave verified +1 are called non-voting, so > logically gates that leaves verified +1 are called voting gates. +1 Greetings, Dirk __

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging][rpm] 3rd-party gates promotion to voting gates

On 16-09-29 08:12 AM, Haïkel wrote: 2016-09-26 16:05 GMT+02:00 Anita Kuno : On 16-09-26 07:48 AM, Haïkel wrote: Hi, following our discussions about 3rd party gates in RPM packaging project, I suggest that we vote in order to promote the following gates as voting: - MOS

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging][rpm] 3rd-party gates promotion to voting gates

2016-09-26 16:05 GMT+02:00 Anita Kuno : > On 16-09-26 07:48 AM, Haïkel wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> following our discussions about 3rd party gates in RPM packaging project, >> I suggest that we vote in order to promote the following gates as voting: >> - MOS CI >> - SUSE CI >> >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging][rpm] 3rd-party gates promotion to voting gates

On 16-09-26 07:48 AM, Haïkel wrote: Hi, following our discussions about 3rd party gates in RPM packaging project, I suggest that we vote in order to promote the following gates as voting: - MOS CI - SUSE CI After promotion, all patchsets submitted will have to validate these gates in order to

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging][rpm] 3rd-party gates promotion to voting gates

Hi, Thank you for bringing this topic up! +1 from me. We will do our best to keep services up-and-running from MOS (Mirantis) side. On 09/26/2016 02:48 PM, Haïkel wrote: > Hi, > > following our discussions about 3rd party gates in RPM packaging project, > I suggest that we vote in order to

[openstack-dev] [packaging][rpm] 3rd-party gates promotion to voting gates

Hi, following our discussions about 3rd party gates in RPM packaging project, I suggest that we vote in order to promote the following gates as voting: - MOS CI - SUSE CI After promotion, all patchsets submitted will have to validate these gates in order to get merged. And gates maintainers