Steven Hardy wrote:
> I agree - those nominated by Zane are all highly experienced reviewers and
> as ex-PTLs are well aware of the constraints around stable backports and
> stable release management.
>
> I do agree the requirements around reviews for stable branches are very
> different, but I th
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 10:07:38PM +0530, Rabi Mishra wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 8:44 PM, Matt Riedemann
>wrote:
>
> On 2/15/2017 12:40 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
>
>Traditionally Heat has given current and former PTLs of the project +2
>rights on stable branches fo
On 18/02/17 03:24, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Thomas Herve wrote:
[...]
At any rate, it's a matter of trust, a subject that comes from time to
time, and it's fairly divisive. In this case though, I find it ironic
that I can approve whatever garbage I want on master, it can make its
way into a release
Thomas Herve wrote:
> [...]
> At any rate, it's a matter of trust, a subject that comes from time to
> time, and it's fairly divisive. In this case though, I find it ironic
> that I can approve whatever garbage I want on master, it can make its
> way into a release, but if I want a bugfix backporte
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Herve
[snip]
>> Respecting the guidelines is totally fair, but review stats won't tell
>> you much, at least in my case: I barely do any stable reviews because
>> I don't have approve rights. In the c
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Herve
Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Date: February 17, 2017 at 09:40:23
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][heat] Heat stable-maint additions
>
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 8:44 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> On 2/15/2017 12:40 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
>
>> Traditionally Heat has given current and former PTLs of the project +2
>> rights on stable branches for as long as they remain core reviewers.
>> Usually I've done that by adding them to the he
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> On 2/15/2017 12:40 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
>>
>> Traditionally Heat has given current and former PTLs of the project +2
>> rights on stable branches for as long as they remain core reviewers.
>> Usually I've done that by adding them to the he
On 2/15/2017 12:40 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
Traditionally Heat has given current and former PTLs of the project +2
rights on stable branches for as long as they remain core reviewers.
Usually I've done that by adding them to the heat-release group.
At some point the system changed so that the revi
Traditionally Heat has given current and former PTLs of the project +2
rights on stable branches for as long as they remain core reviewers.
Usually I've done that by adding them to the heat-release group.
At some point the system changed so that the review rights for these
branches are no long
10 matches
Mail list logo
