On 11/01/17 08:06 AM, William M Edmonds wrote:
>
> After discussing with my team, I think we will need to propose a revert.
> The deprecation process was not followed correctly here. We will start
> working on moving to panko, but we are not sure we can contain that for
> Ocata. Please follow
On Wed, Jan 11 2017, William M Edmonds wrote:
> After discussing with my team, I think we will need to propose a revert.
> The deprecation process was not followed correctly here. We will start
> working on moving to panko, but we are not sure we can contain that for
> Ocata. Please follow the
On 01/10/2017 09:26 AM, gordon chung wrote:
> On 10/01/17 07:27 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 09 2017, William M Edmonds wrote:
> >
> >> I started the conversation on IRC [5], but wanted to send this to the
> >> mailing list and see if others have thoughts/concerns here and figure
out
On 10 Jan 2017, at 15:21, gordon chung >
wrote:
On 10/01/17 07:27 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09 2017, William M Edmonds wrote:
I started the conversation on IRC [5], but wanted to send this to the
mailing list and see if others have
On 10/01/17 07:27 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09 2017, William M Edmonds wrote:
>
>> I started the conversation on IRC [5], but wanted to send this to the
>> mailing list and see if others have thoughts/concerns here and figure out
>> what we should do about this going forward.
>
>
On Mon, Jan 09 2017, William M Edmonds wrote:
> I started the conversation on IRC [5], but wanted to send this to the
> mailing list and see if others have thoughts/concerns here and figure out
> what we should do about this going forward.
Nothing? The code has not been removed, it has been
It's just come to my attention that the Newton release notes indicated
deprecation of the events support in favor of Panko [1] and that it has
already been removed in master [2]. But I don't believe there were any
deprecation warnings for this in the Newton code, which is the typical way
many