My apologies if you receive this twice. I seems to have problems with my
gmail account.
Hi Neutron LBaaS folks,
I have been getting up to speed on the Neutron LBaaS implementation and
have been wondering how to make it fit our needs in HP public cloud as well
as as an enterprise-grade load ba
Hi Neutron LBaaS folks,
I have been getting up to speed on the Neutron LBaaS implementation and
have been wondering how to make it fit our needs in HP public cloud as well
as as an enterprise-grade load balancer service for HP Openstack
implementations. We are currently using Libra as our LBaaS i
Hi Susanne,
a couple of comments inline:
>
> We would like to discuss adding the concept of "managed services" to the
> Neutron LBaaS either directly or via a Neutron LBaaS plug-in to Libra/HA
> proxy. The latter could be a second approach for some of the software
> load-balancers e.g. HA prox
Eugene,
Thanks for your comments,
See inline:
Susanne
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Eugene Nikanorov
wrote:
> Hi Susanne,
>
> a couple of comments inline:
>
>
>
>>
>> We would like to discuss adding the concept of "managed services" to the
>> Neutron LBaaS either directly or via a Neutron
enough to warrant a separate driver.
From: Susanne Balle [sleipnir...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 4:59 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Neutron LBaaS, Libra and "ma
ough to
> warrant a separate driver.
> From: Susanne Balle [sleipnir...@gmail.com (mailto:sleipnir...@gmail.com)]
> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 4:59 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Neutron LBaaS,
ivers that do a lot of similar things but are just
> different enough to warrant a separate driver.
> --
> *From:* Susanne Balle [sleipnir...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, March 24, 2014 4:59 PM
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Subject:* Re: [opens
>
> One example where the managed service approach for the HA proxy load
>>> balancer is different from the current Neutron LBaaS roadmap is around HA
>>> and resiliency. The 2 LB HA setup proposed (
>>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/lbaas-ha-haproxy) isn't
>>> appropriate for serv
e Balle [sleipnir...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, March 24, 2014 4:59 PM
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Neutron LBaaS, Libra and
> "managed services"
>
> Eugene,
>
> Thanks for
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Eugene Nikanorov
wrote:
>
>
>>
>>> That for sure can be implemented. I only would recommend to implement
>>> such kind of management system out of Neutron/LBaaS tree, e.g. to only have
>>> client within Libra driver that will communicate with the management
>>
Hi John,
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:26 AM, John Dewey wrote:
> I have a similar concern. The underlying driver may support different
> functionality, but the differentiators need exposed through the top level
> API.
>
Not really, whole point of the service is to abstract the user from
specific
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Eugene Nikanorov
wrote:
> Hi John,
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:26 AM, John Dewey wrote:
>
>> I have a similar concern. The underlying driver may support different
>> functionality, but the differentiators need exposed through the top level
>> API.
>>
> Not r
There are (at least) two ways of expressing differentiation:
- through an API extension, visible to the tenant
- though an internal policy mechanism, with specific policies inferred from
tenant or network characteristics
Both have their place. Please don't fall into the trap of thinking that
dif
ot for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Neutron LBaaS, Libra and "managed
services"
John, Brandon,
I agree that we cannot have a multitude of drivers doing the same thing or
close to because then
e scenarios
>> we have a ton of drivers that do a lot of similar things but are just
>> different enough to warrant a separate driver.
>> --
>> *From:* Susanne Balle [sleipnir...@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Monday, March 24, 2014 4:59 PM
>> *
From: Susanne Balle
>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>>
>> Date: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 6:59 AM
>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
>> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.o
2014 12:57 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Neutron LBaaS, Libra and "managed
services"
Let's discuss it on weekly LBaaS meeting tomorrow.
Thanks,
Eugene.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Susanne Ba
Geoff
I noticed the following two blueprints:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/adv-services-in-vms
This blueprint defines a framework for creating, managing and deploying
Neutron advanced services implemented as virtual machines. The goal is to
enable advanced network services (e
18 matches
Mail list logo
