Hello All,
I wanted to start a discussion on floating IP management and ultimately
decide how the LBaaS group wants to handle the association.
There is a need to utilize floating IPs(FLIP) and its API calls to
associate a FLIP to the neutron port that we currently spin up.
See DOCS here:
> h
I am not for this if Octavia is merged into the incubator when LBaaS V2
is, assuming LBaaS V2 will be merged into it before the summit. I'd
rather Octavia get merged into whatever repository it is destined to
whenever it is much more mature. If Octavia is merged into the
incubator too soon, I thi
Hi Kyle,
IMO, that depends entirely on how the incubator project is run. For now,
I'm in favor of remaining separate and letting someone else be the guinea
pig. :/ I think we'll (all) be more productive this way.
Also keep in mind that the LBaaS v2 code is mostly there (just waiting on
reviews),
me other
>>> > backend? Sure, though I’m not sure I’d see the point.
>>> > There are quite a few synergies with other efforts, and we’re
>>> > monitoring them, but not waiting for any of them.
>>> >
>>> >
&
Sure, though I’m not sure I’d see the point.
>>> > There are quite a few synergies with other efforts, and we’re
>>> > monitoring them, but not waiting for any of them.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > And I agree with Brandon’
doug
>
>
>
>
> From: Salvatore Orlando
>
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
> questions)"
>
> Date: Tuesday, September 2, 2014 at 9:05 AM
>
ribe octavia’s
> backends. Feel free to chime in
> here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117701/
>
>
> Thanks,
> doug
>
>
>
>
> From: Salvatore Orlando
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
> questions)"
>
Orlando
>
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Date: Tuesday, September 2, 2014 at 9:05 AM
>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> opens
ch is why I think of them
>>> >> together. This of course can change since we can add whatever
>>> >> layers we want to Octavia.
>>> >>
ilar to the way the A10
> > driver is a separate bit of code from the A10 appliance. To do
> > that though, we need Octavia to be fairly close to fully
> > functional. I believe we can do this because even though the
> > ref
ersation, and I have noticed that quite
>> >> a few people are having the same issue differentiating. In a
>> >> small group, having quite a few people not on the same page is
>> >> a bit scary, so maybe we need to really sit d
Octavia being the refenece implementation for OpenStack LBaaS
> >> (whatever that is). Has that changed while I was on vacation?
> >>
> >>
> >> [Adam] I believe that having the Octavia "driver" (not the
> >>
imilar to the way the A10
>> driver is a separate bit of code from the A10 appliance. To do
>> that though, we need Octavia to be fairly close to fully
>> functional. I believe we can do this because even though the
>> reference driver would then r
+1
-Original Message-
From: Brandon Logan [mailto:brandon.lo...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 8:13 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][octavia]
Hi Susanne and everyone,
My opinions are that keeping it in stackforge
n) available as part of OpenStack core.
>
>
> --Adam
>
>
> https://keybase.io/rm_you
>
>
>
>
> From: Susanne Ba
nne Balle
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Date: Friday, August 29, 2014 9:19 AM
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usa
ist (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][octavia]
Stephen
See inline comments.
Susanne
-
Susanne--
I think you are conflating the difference between "OpenStac
tery [mailto:mest...@mestery.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 6:48 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][octavia]
>
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Kevin Benton wrote:
>> I think we need
ion)
I am hoping you can clarify how this will be shaping up -
Thanks,
German
-Original Message-
From: Kyle Mestery [mailto:mest...@mestery.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 6:48 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neut
Stephen
See inline comments.
Susanne
-
Susanne--
I think you are conflating the difference between "OpenStack incubation"
and "Neutron incubator." These are two very different matters and should be
treated separately. So, addressing each one in
I see. Then if a group's ultimate goal is their own project, would the
Neutron incubator even make sense as a first step?
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Kevin Benton wrote:
> > I think we need some clarification here too about the differ
Susanne--
I think you are conflating the difference between "OpenStack incubation"
and "Neutron incubator." These are two very different matters and should be
treated separately. So, addressing each one individually:
*"OpenStack Incubation"*
I think this has been the end-goal of Octavia all along
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Kevin Benton wrote:
> I think we need some clarification here too about the difference between the
> general OpenStack Incubation and the Neutron incubation. From my
> understanding, the Neutron incubation isn't the path to a separate project
> and independence fro
On 08/28/2014 03:04 PM, Susanne Balle wrote:
> Just for us to learn about the incubator status, here are some of the
> info on incubation:
>
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Approved/Incubation
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/NewProjects
These are not the correct document
quot;
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][octavia]
I think we need some clarification here too about the difference between the
general OpenStack Incubation and the Neutron incubation. From my understanding,
the Neutron incubation isn&
I think we need some clarification here too about the difference between
the general OpenStack Incubation and the Neutron incubation. From my
understanding, the Neutron incubation isn't the path to a separate project
and independence from Neutron. It's a process to get into Neutron. So if
you want
Just for us to learn about the incubator status, here are some of the info
on incubation:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Approved/Incubation
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/NewProjects
Susanne
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Susanne Balle
wrote:
> I would like to disc
I would like to discuss the pros and cons of putting Octavia into the
Neutron LBaaS incubator project right away. If it is going to be the
reference implementation for LBaaS v 2 then I believe Octavia belong in
Neutron LBaaS v2 incubator.
The Pros:
* Octavia is in Openstack incubation right away
101 - 128 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
