On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Alexandre Levine
wrote:
> It is not a problem to update the code in given direction when the
> decision is made. As I understood right now it's not about the code -
> that's why I'd canceled the code review until the blueprint is accepted -
> it's more about archit
Thank you for your reply.
I chould understand instance-tasks-api more clearly.
2013/12/4 Andrew Laski
>
> This is something that's entirely contained within Nova. It's just
> adding a different representation of what is already occurring with
> task_states on an instance.
>
>
I've got it!
Hi All,
Bug 1251055 was "taken" on 14th Nov but there seems to have been no activity
since then (no fixed proposed).
I think I have a fix for this and would like to upload the fix but is it
acceptable to do so when the bug is assigned to somebody else? Can I just
assign it to myself and upload
Le 04/12/2013 06:01, John Wood a écrit :
I was curious if there is an OpenStack project that would be a good example to
follow as we convert Barbican over to oslo messaging.
I've been examining existing OpenStack projects such as Ceilometer and Keystone
to see how they are utilizing oslo messa
I am happy with this as far as it goes. I would like to see it being
made more general, where domains, services and projects can also own and
name roles
regards
David
On 04/12/2013 01:51, Adam Young wrote:
> I've been thinking about your comment that "nested roles are confusing"
>
>
> What if
On Tue, Dec 03 2013, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> Another question that¹s come up recently. Python 3.3 support? Will
> oslo.messaging achieve that? Maybe its a later goal, but it seems like one
> that is required (and should almost be expected of new libraries imho).
> Thoughts? Seems to be mainly event
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 05:01 +, John Wood wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> I was curious if there is an OpenStack project that would be a good
> example to follow as we convert Barbican over to oslo messaging.
>
> I've been examining existing OpenStack projects such as Ceilometer and
> Keystone to s
I have added comments 111 to 122
david
On 03/12/2013 23:58, Tiwari, Arvind wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I have added my comments underneath line # 97 till line #110, it is mostly
> aligned with your proposal with some modification.
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition
04.12.2013 11:57, Christopher Yeoh ?:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Alexandre Levine
mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
It is not a problem to update the code in given direction when the
decision is made. As I understood right now it's not about the
code - that's why I'
Hi
In tempest.conf, Is the parameter "tenant_networks_reachable" affected by
anything other than neutron using ip name-spaces (which is the default setting)
or not, and if not using it - if the tempest host is the same as the neutron
server host?
Regards
Yair Fried
On 04/12/13 08:19 +, David koo wrote:
Hi All,
Bug 1251055 was "taken" on 14th Nov but there seems to have been no activity
since then (no fixed proposed).
I think I have a fix for this and would like to upload the fix but is it
acceptable to do so when the bug is assigned to somebody else
I think this bug was considered fixed because at the time once the patch
addressing was merged, the bug automatically went into fix committed.
It should therefore be re-opened. Even if tweaking sql pool parameters
avoids the issue, this should be considered more of a mitigation rather
than a perman
On 04/12/13 10:14 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03 2013, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Another question that¹s come up recently. Python 3.3 support? Will
oslo.messaging achieve that? Maybe its a later goal, but it seems like one
that is required (and should almost be expected of new libraries
Hi Nova cores,
As per the discussion at the Summit I need two (or more) nova cores to sponsor
the BP that allows Guests a chance to shutdown cleanly rather than just yanking
the virtual power cord out -which is approved and targeted for I2
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/35303/
The Non API a
On 04/12/13 01:13 +, Adrian Otto wrote:
Jay is right. What we have is probably close enough to what's in Nova to
qualify for oslo-incubator. The simplifications seem to me to have general
appeal so this code would be more attractive to other projects. One worry I
have is that there is stil
Hi, all:
I have already written a patch[1] which makes ml2 segment more extensible,
where segments can contains more fields other than physical network and
segmentation id, but there is still a lot of work to do to make the ml2
more extensible. Here are some of my thoughts.
First, introduce a new
Hi,
As the development of Tuskar-UI somehow stagnated recently, I have been
focusing more on Horizon project lately to get features we need for
Tuskar-UI. I acknowledge that I haven't been paying enough attention and
reviews in TripleO. The statistics says it all. Although as the
development
Hi load balancing vendors!
I have specific question: how drivers for your solutions
(devices/vms/processes) are going to wire a VIP with external and tenant
networks?
As we're working on creating a suite for third-party testing, we would like
to make sure that scenarios that we create fits usage p
On Dec 4, 2013 5:41 AM, "Maru Newby" wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 4, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
> > Excerpts from Maru Newby's message of 2013-12-03 08:08:09 -0800:
> >> I've been investigating a bug that is preventing VM's from receiving
IP addresses when a Neutron service is under high load
Hi guys.
There was a blueprint on adding advanced validation for configuration
options:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo/+spec/oslo-config-options-validation
I'm glad to announce that I have finished implementation for that and I
invite everybody interested for a review:
https://review
Hi, everyone.
Which do you think is the best way of coding test skipping, "writing
cls.skipException statement in setUpClass method" or "skipIf annotation
for each test method" ?
This question comes to me in reviewing
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59759/ . I think that work itself is
great and
On 12/03/2013 11:21 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-03 16:05:47 -0800:
>> On 12/03/2013 06:13 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
>>> On 2013-12-03 17:09, Sean Dague wrote:
On 12/03/2013 05:50 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 16:23 -0600, Ben Nemec
Hi,
first stable/havana release 2013.2.1 is scheduled[1] to be released
next week on December 12th, so freeze on stable/havana goes into
effect tomorrow EOD, one week before the release.
Everybody is welcome to help review proposed changes[2] taking into
account criteria for stable fixes[3].
Chee
I agree, preference should be to the function level skip vs. the class
exception. Especially as I have some sample fixture code from Robert
that will remove setUpClass in the future (we do have a long term goal
of getting rid of it in favor of proper fixtures). It also gives us an
actual count of t
>>
>> I think this conversation has gotten away from our incubation request
>>and
>> into an argument about what makes a good library and when and how
>>projects
>> should choose between oslo and other options. I¹m happy to have the
>>second
>> one in another thread, but that seems like a longer
TL;DR: Gate is failing 23% of the time due to bugs in nova, neutron and
tempest. We need help fixing these bugs.
Hi All,
Before going any further we have a bug that is affecting gate and stable,
so its getting top priority here. elastic-recheck currently doesn't track
unit tests because we don't
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Adam Young wrote:
> The #1 pain point I hear from people in the field is that they need to
> consume read only LDAP but have service users in something Keystone
> specific. We are close to having this, but we have not closed the loop.
> This was something that
Hi Abbass,
I guess you read the blueprint Russell referred to. I think you actually are
saying the same - but please read steps below and tell me if they don't cover
what you want.
This is what it will do:
1. Add a column to the compute_nodes table for a JSON blob
2. Add plug-in f
> While I am all for adding a new program, I think we should only add one
>if we
> rule out all existing programs as a home. With that in mind why not add
>this
> to the keystone program? Perhaps that may require a tweak to keystones
>mission
> statement, but that is doable. I saw a partial an
Hi,
As part of the Icehouse nova-networking parity effort, we need to
describe how nova-networking managers work and how the behavior is
mapped to neutron. The benefits are:
1. It aides migration: deployers who are nova-network savvy can see how
functionality maps from one to the other.
2.
On 04/12/13 12:07 +0100, Jiri Tomasek wrote:
Hi,
As the development of Tuskar-UI somehow stagnated recently, I have been
focusing more on Horizon project lately to get features we need for
Tuskar-UI. I acknowledge that I haven't been paying enough attention and
reviews in TripleO. The stat
I am in favor of class level exceptions for the obvious reasons:
+ It reduces code duplication. Copy/pasting a SkipIf decorator on every test
method in the class is tedious and possibly error prone. Adding the exception
as a guard in the setUpClass() makes for a more elegant solution
+ functi
Greetings,
I'd like to give a heads up about the status of the migration to
oslo.messaging. Glance migration to oslo.messaging just landed and
it'll be part of the I-1 cut.
Remaining projects are:
- Nova
- Cinder
- Trove
- Keystone
- Heat
- Ceilometer
- Neutron
- Horizon
I know most of the pro
On Dec 4, 2013, at 8:55 AM, Carl Baldwin wrote:
> Stephen, all,
>
> I agree that there may be some opportunity to split things out a bit.
> However, I'm not sure what the best way will be. I recall that Mark
> mentioned breaking out the processes that handle API requests and RPC
> from each ot
On 12/04/2013 04:08 AM, David Chadwick wrote:
I am happy with this as far as it goes. I would like to see it being
made more general, where domains, services and projects can also own and
name roles
Domains should be OK, but services would confuse the matter. You'd have
to end up with something
Hello,
There has been a lengthy discussion going on for quite sometime on a review
for swiftclient here :
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/33473/
The review change the way works swiftclient to refuse to connect to
insecure (i.e: self signed) SSL swift proxies unless you are specifying the
--inse
Hi everyone,
Milestone-proposed branches were created for Keystone, Glance, Nova,
Horizon, Neutron, Cinder, Ceilometer, Heat and and Trove in preparation
for the icehouse-1 milestone publication tomorrow.
During this milestone (since the opening of the Icehouse development
cycle) we implemented 6
Hi Eugene,
We currently support out-of-the-box VIP and Nodes on the same network.
The VIP can be associated with a floating IP if need to access from the
"external" network.
We are considering other options but will address as we get to this.
Regards,
-Sam.
From: Eugene Nikanor
Some additional information about the case.
Infra at the moment has a limitation in one VM per jenkins job. So we are
not able to launch two VMs and boot one of them via PXE from another. We
need to start VM and then start another nested VM inside first one.
Besides, nested VM must be qemu, not kv
sensus to leverage the work Sean, Da Zhao have done
> previously and integrate it with the L3 agent efforts brought by Shixiong
> and Randy.
>
>
> Please see below for Webex recording.
>
>
> https://cisco.webex.com/ciscosales/lsr.php?AT=pb&SP=MC&rID=73520027&rKey=8e5
to leverage the work Sean, Da Zhao have done
>> previously and integrate it with the L3 agent efforts brought by Shixiong
>> and Randy.
>>
>>
>> Please see below for Webex recording.
>>
>>
>> https://cisco.webex.com/ciscosales/lsr.php?AT=pb&
Hi
On 4 December 2013 07:12, Robert Collins wrote:
> - Ghe Rivero for -core
>
+1
> - Jan Provaznik for removal from -core
> - Jordan O'Mara for removal from -core
> - Martyn Taylor for removal from -core
> - Jiri Tomasek for removal from -core
> - Jamomir Coufal for removal from -core
>
On 12/04/2013 09:24 AM, Joe Hakim Rahme wrote:
> I am in favor of class level exceptions for the obvious reasons:
>
> + It reduces code duplication. Copy/pasting a SkipIf decorator on every test
> method in the class is tedious and possibly error prone. Adding the
> exception
> as a guard in
Thanks! We touched on this briefly during the chat yesterday, and I will
make sure it gets further attention.
On 12/3/13, 3:54 AM, "Julien Danjou" wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 02 2013, Kurt Griffiths wrote:
>
>> Following up on some conversations we had at the summit, I¹d like to get
>> folks together on
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Maru Newby wrote:
>
> On Dec 4, 2013, at 8:55 AM, Carl Baldwin wrote:
>
> > Stephen, all,
> >
> > I agree that there may be some opportunity to split things out a bit.
> > However, I'm not sure what the best way will be. I recall that Mark
> > mentioned breaking
Sorry to change things up again, but it’s been requested that we move our
meeting to Tuesday at 1500 UTC instead of Monday, since a lot of people’s
Mondays are crazy busy as it is. Unless anyone objects, let’s plan on
doing that starting with our next meeting (Dec 10).
On 11/25/13, 6:22 PM, "Kurt
On 11/19/2013 05:52 PM, Peter Feiner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Chuck Short
> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Peter Feiner wrote:
>>>
>>> A substantive reason for switching from mox to mock is the derelict
>>> state of mox releases. There hasn't been a rel
On 2013-12-02 11:37, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28 2013, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28 2013, Sean Dague wrote:
I'm totally in favor of going further and saying "empty files
shouldn't
have license headers, because their content of emptiness isn't
copyrightable" [1]. That's just no
On 04 Dec 2013, at 17:05, Sean Dague wrote:
> That will require someone signing up to writing that though.
I could do that.
Since you know the code better than me, can you confirm that
tempest/test.py is the best place to define this decorator?
Thanks.
---
Joe H. Rahme
__
How frequent do you imagine these notifications being? There's a wide
variation here between the 'blue moon' case where disk space is low and
frequent notifications of things like OS performance, which you might want
to display in Horizon or another monitoring tool on an every-few-seconds
basis, o
We seem to have bound our config drive file formats to those used by the
operating system we're running, which doesn't seem like the right approach
to take.
Firstly, the above format doesn't actually work even for Debian-based
systems - if you have a network without ipv6, ipv6 ND will be enabled o
On 12/04/2013 11:32 AM, Joe Hakim Rahme wrote:
> On 04 Dec 2013, at 17:05, Sean Dague wrote:
>> That will require someone signing up to writing that though.
>
> I could do that.
>
> Since you know the code better than me, can you confirm that
> tempest/test.py is the best place to define this d
Hi Russell,
Thank you for your inputs on launchpad. Can you tell me what is
exactly expected in-terms of design detail, so I can ensure that I send you
the correct details in the first go itself.
Best Regards,
Digambar
___
OpenStack-dev mailing l
On 12/04/2013 11:58 AM, Digambar Patil wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
>Thank you for your inputs on launchpad. Can you tell me what is
> exactly expected in-terms of design detail, so I can ensure that I send
> you the correct details in the first go itself.
It looked like you described a schedul
On 2013-12-04 06:07, Sean Dague wrote:
On 12/03/2013 11:21 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-03 16:05:47 -0800:
On 12/03/2013 06:13 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 2013-12-03 17:09, Sean Dague wrote:
On 12/03/2013 05:50 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-03
On 12/04/2013 11:16 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
> Resurrecting this thread because of an interesting review that came up
> yesterday [1].
>
> It seems that our lack of a firm decision on what to do with the mocking
> framework has left people confused. In hope to help - I'll give my view
> of where
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
> 1) Figure out what is the deal with mox3 and decide if owning it will
> really be less trouble than porting nova. To be hones - I was unable to
> even find the code repo for it, only [3]. If anyone has more info -
> please weigh in. We'll al
Have a question regarding calling an external SDN controller in a plugin.
The ML2 model brings up the fact that it is preferred not to call an
external controller within a database session by splitting up each call
into two calls: *_precommit and *_postcommit. Makes sense.
Looking at the existin
Hi Adam,
I have added my comments in line.
As per my request yesterday and David's proposal, following role-def data model
is looks generic enough and seems innovative to accommodate future extensions.
{
"role": {
"id": "76e72a",
"name": "admin", (you can give whatever name you like)
Hi David,
Thanks for your valuable comments.
I have updated https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition
line #118 explaining the rationale behind the field.
I wd also appreciate your thoughts on
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/1Uiwcbfpxq too, which is support
https://bl
On 4 Dec 2013, at 13:28, Dolph Mathews wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Adam Young wrote:
> The #1 pain point I hear from people in the field is that they need to
> consume read only LDAP but have service users in something Keystone
> specific. We are close to having this, but w
Hi Adam
I understand your problem: having projects and services which have the
same name, then the lineage of a role containing this name is not
deterministically known without some other rule or syntax that can
differentiate between the two.
Since domains contain projects which contain services
On 12/04/2013 06:15 PM, Peter Feiner wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
>> 1) Figure out what is the deal with mox3 and decide if owning it will
>> really be less trouble than porting nova. To be hones - I was unable to
>> even find the code repo for it, only [3]. If a
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Robert Collins
wrote:
> In this months review:
> - Ghe Rivero for -core
+1. Has been doing very good reviews.
> - Jan Provaznik for removal from -core
> - Jordan O'Mara for removal from -core
> - Martyn Taylor for removal from -core
> - Jiri Tomasek for remo
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
> On 11/19/2013 05:52 PM, Peter Feiner wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Chuck Short
> wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Peter Feiner
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> A substantive reason for switching from mox
On 04/12/2013 17:28, Tiwari, Arvind wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks for your valuable comments.
>
> I have updated
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition line
> #118 explaining the rationale behind the field.
#119 for my reply
>
> I wd also appreciate your thoughts o
On 12/04/2013 11:56 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
> On 2013-12-04 06:07, Sean Dague wrote:
>> On 12/03/2013 11:21 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>>> Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-03 16:05:47 -0800:
On 12/03/2013 06:13 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
> On 2013-12-03 17:09, Sean Dague wrote:
>> On 1
On Dec 3, 2013, at 9:30 AM, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I opened 2 issues on UX discussion forum with TripleO UI topics:
>
> Resource Management:
> http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com/question/95/tripleo-ui-resource-management/
> - this section was already reviewed before, there is n
Hi David,
The biggest problems in my opinion are,
1. We are overloading and adding extra complexities on role name to maintain
the generalization for role-def data model.
2. Name spacing the role name is not going to resolve all the issues listed in
BP.
3. All the namespaces are derived from
On 5 December 2013 06:55, James Slagle wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Robert Collins
>> Jan, Jordan, Martyn, Jiri and Jaromir are still actively contributing
>> to TripleO and OpenStack, but I don't think they are tracking /
>> engaging in the code review discussions enough to stay in -c
On 2013-12-04 12:51, Sean Dague wrote:
On 12/04/2013 11:56 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 2013-12-04 06:07, Sean Dague wrote:
On 12/03/2013 11:21 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-03 16:05:47 -0800:
On 12/03/2013 06:13 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 2013-12-03 17:09, Sea
Hi,
I have failed tests in gate-solum-python33 because kesytoneclient fails to
import xmlrpclib.
The exact error is:
"File
"/home/jenkins/workspace/gate-solum-python33/.tox/py33/lib/python3.3/site-packages/
keystoneclient/openstack/common/jsonutils.py", line 42, in
2013-11-28 18:27:12.655 | i
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-04 10:51:16 -0800:
> On 12/04/2013 11:56 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
> > On 2013-12-04 06:07, Sean Dague wrote:
> >> On 12/03/2013 11:21 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> >>> Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-12-03 16:05:47 -0800:
> On 12/03/2013 06:13 PM
Thanks David,
Appended line # 119 with my reply. "endpoint" sounds perfect to me.
In a nutshell we are agreeing on following new data model for role-def.
{
"role": {
"id": "76e72a",
"name": "admin", (you can give whatever name you like)
"scope": {
"id": "---id--", (ID should
On 5 December 2013 12:10, Robert Collins wrote:
-snip-
>
> That said, perhaps we should review these projects.
>
> Tuskar as an API to drive deployment and ops clearly belongs in
> TripleO - though we need to keep pushing features out of it into more
> generalised tools like Heat, Nova and Sol
TLDR: Should Solum log a warning if operators do not use the InnoDB
storage engine with MySQL in Solum's control plane?
Details:
I was looking at: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/57024/
Models.py to be specific.
The default storage engine is InnoDB for MySQL which is good. I took a
quick look
Hi Eugene,
Right now (before the model change discussed during the summit) our
implementation, in regards to your question, can be summarized as follows:
- Whenever a Pool is created, a port on the specific subnet/network is
created and associated to it;
- Whenever a VIP is
- Original Message -
> TLDR: Should Solum log a warning if operators do not use the InnoDB
> storage engine with MySQL in Solum's control plane?
>
>
> Details:
>
> I was looking at: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/57024/
> Models.py to be specific.
>
> The default storage engine is I
On Dec 4, 2013, at 2:44 PM, Lyle, David wrote:
> On 5 December 2013 12:10, Robert Collins wrote:
>
> -snip-
>
>>
>> That said, perhaps we should review these projects.
>>
>> Tuskar as an API to drive deployment and ops clearly belongs in
>> TripleO - though we need to keep pushing features ou
Excerpts from Paul Montgomery's message of 2013-12-04 12:04:06 -0800:
> TLDR: Should Solum log a warning if operators do not use the InnoDB
> storage engine with MySQL in Solum's control plane?
>
>
> Details:
>
> I was looking at: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/57024/
> Models.py to be specifi
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have failed tests in gate-solum-python33 because kesytoneclient fails to
> import xmlrpclib.
> The exact error is:
> "File
> "/home/jenkins/workspace/gate-solum-python33/.tox/py33/lib/python3.3
On 12/04/2013 03:25 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Paul Montgomery's message of 2013-12-04 12:04:06 -0800:
>> TLDR: Should Solum log a warning if operators do not use the InnoDB
>> storage engine with MySQL in Solum's control plane?
>>
>>
>> Details:
>>
>> I was looking at: https://review
For people who's patches got killed earlier today because django 1.6 was
allowed into global requirements, please use the following bug for
recheck - https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1257885
The horizon team is working towards 1.6 compatibility, but it's not
there yet. This will be a good t
Dolph,
Is anyone already focusing on py33 compatibility for python-keystoneclient? Has
that effort been scoped? I'd like to judge whether it's reasonable to expect us
to patch it up to be compatible in the near term, or relax our expectations.
For Solum, we are trying to make all our code py33
On 12/04/2013 12:40 PM, David Chadwick wrote:
Hi Adam
I understand your problem: having projects and services which have the
same name, then the lineage of a role containing this name is not
deterministically known without some other rule or syntax that can
differentiate between the two.
Since
Looks like there's some recent progress here:
https://github.com/gabrielfalcao/HTTPretty/pull/124
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
> I'd be more willing to toss in and help to maintain/fix appropriately
> on StackForge if that is needed. Though I am very much hoping
>
On Dec 4, 2013, at 12:32 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> On 12/04/2013 03:25 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>> Excerpts from Paul Montgomery's message of 2013-12-04 12:04:06 -0800:
>>> TLDR: Should Solum log a warning if operators do not use the InnoDB
>>> storage engine with MySQL in Solum's control plane?
>
Hi everyone,
I'm looking at changing our weekly QA meeting time to make it more globally
attendable. Right now the current time of 17:00 UTC doesn't really work for
people who live in Asia Pacific timezones. (which includes a third of the
current core review team) There are 2 approaches that I can
On 12/4/13 3:06 PM, "Adrian Otto" wrote:
>
>On Dec 4, 2013, at 12:32 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>
>> On 12/04/2013 03:25 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>>> Excerpts from Paul Montgomery's message of 2013-12-04 12:04:06 -0800:
TLDR: Should Solum log a warning if operators do not use the InnoDB
s
With the comments that we've received, I would recommend that Clayton
remove the option to select the MySQL storage engine from Oslo config and
just "hardcode" InnoDB. I believe it entails just removing a few lines of
code. It doesn't sound like anyone has a reason to use any other storage
engine
Hi,
I am working on unit tests for Solum as a side effect of new unit tests I
found that we use unicode strings in the way which is not compatible with
python3.
Here is an exception form python3 gate:
Server-side error: "global name 'unicode' is not defined". Detail:
2013-12-04 Traceback (most re
Sorry to have taken the discussion on a slight tangent. I meant only
to offer the solution as a stop-gap. I agree that the fundamental
problem should still be addressed.
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Maru Newby wrote:
>
> On Dec 4, 2013, at 1:47 AM, Stephen Gran wrote:
>
>> On 03/12/13 16:08
- Original Message -
> With the comments that we've received, I would recommend that Clayton
> remove the option to select the MySQL storage engine from Oslo config and
> just "hardcode" InnoDB. I believe it entails just removing a few lines of
> code. It doesn't sound like anyone has a r
Am I interpreting this to mean that WSME is calling unicode()?
On Dec 4, 2013, at 1:32 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov
mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
Hi,
I am working on unit tests for Solum as a side effect of new unit tests I found
that we use unicode strings in the way which is not
I have offered up https://review.openstack.org/#/c/60082/ as a
backport to Havana. Interest was expressed in the blueprint for doing
this even before this thread. If there is consensus for this as the
stop-gap then it is there for the merging. However, I do not want to
discourage discussion of o
Matt,
2200 UTC Wed. or Thurs. is fine with me
Cheers
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm looking at changing our weekly QA meeting time to make it more globally
> attendable. Right now the current time of 17:00 UTC doesn't really work for
> people who
No,
This is Solum code:
https://github.com/stackforge/solum/blob/master/solum/api/controllers/v1/assembly.py#L59
Thanks
Georgy
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Adrian Otto wrote:
> Am I interpreting this to mean that WSME is calling unicode()?
>
> On Dec 4, 2013, at 1:32 PM, Georgy Okrokverts
I don't think so. It looks like ./solum/api/controllers/v1/assembly.py
is calling unicode(). It will need to be changed to six.text_type() for
Python 3 compat.
-Ben
On 2013-12-04 15:41, Adrian Otto wrote:
> Am I interpreting this to mean that WSME is calling unicode()?
>
> On Dec 4, 2013
I opened a bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/solum/+bug/1257929 for that issue.
Ben, thank you for a quick fix proposal.
Thanks
Georgy
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
> I don't think so. It looks like ./solum/api/controllers/v1/assembly.py
> is calling unicode(). It will need
Guys,
I really appreciate that all discussion are real open, and you are doing a
great job, discussing all arch stuff of the project. But for such things
there are:
1) IRC chats
2) WIKI pages
3) ehterpads
E.g. in Rally we have 1 page:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Rally_Main that contains all
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
