Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Relationship between Neutron LBaaS and Libra

2014-01-19 Thread Thomas Herve
> Hi, > > I haven’t read through those (need to go spend time with family so replying > quickly) but given the dates the planning phases for Quantum/Neutron LBaaS > and Libra LBaaS were at the same time. > > There was an internal evaluation of the current LBaaS solutions done at the > time and i

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][Neutron][Tempest][Network] Break down NetworkBasicOps to smaller test cases

2014-01-19 Thread Sean Dague
On 01/19/2014 02:06 AM, Yair Fried wrote: > MT:"Is your issue here that it's just called basic ops and you don't think > that's > reflective of what is being tested in that file anymore" > > No. > My issue is, that the current scenario is, in fact, at least 2 separate > scenarios: > 1. original

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][Neutron][Tempest][Network] Break down NetworkBasicOps to smaller test cases

2014-01-19 Thread Yair Fried
- Original Message - > From: "Sean Dague" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2014 1:53:21 PM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][Neutron][Tempest][Network] Break down > NetworkBasicOps to smaller test cases > > On 01/19/

Re: [openstack-dev] [Diesel] Proposal for new project

2014-01-19 Thread Roshan Agrawal
Diesel seems to be a subset of what Solum delivers. For reference: Solum Wiki: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Solum Solum Roadmap: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Solum/HighLevelRoadmap We should discuss combining efforts instead of duplicating initiatives. _

Re: [openstack-dev] [savanna] savannaclient v2 api

2014-01-19 Thread Matthew Farrellee
On 01/16/2014 08:10 AM, Alexander Ignatov wrote: Matthew, I'm ok with proposed solution. Some comments/thoughts below: - FIX - @rest.post_file('/plugins///convert-config/') - this is an RPC call, made only by a client to do input validation, move to POST /validations/plugins/:name/:vers

Re: [openstack-dev] [savanna] savannaclient v2 api

2014-01-19 Thread Matthew Farrellee
On 01/16/2014 09:19 PM, Andrey Lazarev wrote: My 5 cents: -- REMOVE - @rest.put('/node-group-templates/') - Not Implemented REMOVE - @rest.put('/cluster-templates/') - Not Implemented -- Disagree with that. Samsung people did great job in both savanna/savanna-dashboard to make this imple

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Relationship between Neutron LBaaS and Libra

2014-01-19 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Thomas Herve's message of 2014-01-19 01:52:56 -0800: > > > Hi, > > > > I haven’t read through those (need to go spend time with family so replying > > quickly) but given the dates the planning phases for Quantum/Neutron LBaaS > > and Libra LBaaS were at the same time. > > > > There

Re: [openstack-dev] [Savanna] Spark plugin status

2014-01-19 Thread Matthew Farrellee
On 01/10/2014 04:05 AM, Daniele Venzano wrote: On 01/09/14 19:12, Matthew Farrellee wrote: This is definitely great news! +2 to the things Sergey mentioned below. Additionally, will you fill out the blueprint or wiki w/ details that will help others write integration tests for your plugin? W

[openstack-dev] [Ironic] Third-party drivers and testing

2014-01-19 Thread Devananda van der Veen
Hi all, I've been thinking about how we should treat third-party drivers in Ironic for a while, and had several discussions at the Hong Kong summit and last week at LCA. Cinder, Nova, Neutron, and TripleO are all having similar discussions, too. What follows is a summary of my thoughts and a propo

Re: [openstack-dev] a "common" client library

2014-01-19 Thread Jamie Lennox
On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 09:13 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote: > I like the idea of a fresh start, but I don't think that's > incompatible with the other work to clean up the existing clients. > That cleanup work could help with creating the backwards compatibility > layer, if a new library needs to inclu

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Apparently weird timeout issue

2014-01-19 Thread Salvatore Orlando
I have been seeing in the past 2 days timeout failures on gate jobs which I am struggling to explain. An example is available in [1] These are the usual failure that we associate with bug 1253896, but this time I can verify that: - The floating IP is correctly wired (IP and NAT rules) - The DHCP po

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal for instance-level snapshots in Nova

2014-01-19 Thread Christopher Yeoh
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote: > > On Jan 14, 2014, at 2:10 PM, Jon Bernard wrote: > > > > > > >> As you’ve defined the feature so far, it seems like most of it could > >> be implemented client side: > >> > >> * pause the instance > >> * snapshot the instance > >> * s

[openstack-dev] code review

2014-01-19 Thread 黎林果
Hi all, I'd like you to examine a change. Please visit [neutron] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/63981/ ‘ipt_mgr.ipv6 written in the wrong ipt_mgr.ipv4’ [nova] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64241/ 'Add API schema for v3 multinic API' [python-keystoneclient] https://review.openstack.org/#/c

[openstack-dev] [nova]can someone help me? when I use cmd "nova migration-list" error.

2014-01-19 Thread li zheming
hi all: when I use cmd nova migration-list, it return error,like this: openstack@devstack:/home$ nova migration-list ERROR: 'unicode' object has no attribute 'iteritems' I step the codes and find the codes have some error. python-novaclient/novaclient/base.py class Manager(

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova]can someone help me? when I use cmd "nova migration-list" error.

2014-01-19 Thread Jay Lau
It is being fixed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/61717/ Thanks, Jay 2014/1/20 li zheming > hi all: > when I use cmd nova migration-list, it return error,like this: >openstack@ devstack:/home$ nova > migration-list >ERROR: 'unicode' object has no attribute 'iteritems' > >I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Third-party drivers and testing

2014-01-19 Thread Christopher Yeoh
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Devananda van der Veen < [email protected]> wrote: > 1. each driver must adhere to the existing driver interfaces. > 2. each driver must have comprehensive unit test coverage and sufficient > inline documentation. > 3. vendors are responsible for fixing bugs

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova]can someone help me? when I use cmd "nova migration-list" error.

2014-01-19 Thread li zheming
Ok .thanks Jay I consider it is error in novaclient before. it is my misunderstand. thank you very much! lizheming 2014/1/20 Jay Lau > It is being fixed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/61717/ > > Thanks, > > Jay > > > 2014/1/20 li zheming > >> hi all: >> when I use cmd nova migration-

Re: [openstack-dev] [wsme] Undefined attributes in WSME

2014-01-19 Thread Kenichi Oomichi
> -Original Message- > From: Kurt Griffiths [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2014 4:47 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [wsme] Undefined attributes in WSME > > FWIW, I believe Nova is loo

Re: [openstack-dev] a "common" client library

2014-01-19 Thread Jesse Noller
On Jan 19, 2014, at 5:37 PM, Jamie Lennox mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 09:13 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote: I like the idea of a fresh start, but I don't think that's incompatible with the other work to clean up the existing clients. That cleanup work could help with

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Disk Eraser

2014-01-19 Thread Alan Kavanagh
+1, that is another point Rob. When I started this thread my main interest was disk and then firmware. It is clear we really need to have a clear discussion on this, as imho I would not be supportive or lease baremetal to tenants if I can not guarantee the service, otherwise the cost of risking

Re: [openstack-dev] [Oslo] First steps towards amqp 1.0

2014-01-19 Thread Allamaraju, Subbu
Hope this thread isn't dead. Mike - thanks for highlighting some really key issues at scale. On a related note, can someone from the Ceilometer comment about the store and forward requirement? Currently scaling RabbitMQ is non-trivial. Though cells help make the problem smaller, as Paul Mathews

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Disk Eraser

2014-01-19 Thread Robert Collins
On 20 January 2014 18:10, Alan Kavanagh wrote: > +1, that is another point Rob. When I started this thread my main interest > was disk and then firmware. It is clear we really need to have a clear > discussion on this, as imho I would not be supportive or lease baremetal to > tenants if I can n

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Discussion of the resource loader support patch

2014-01-19 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Hi CM guys, jd__ wanted to hold off the patch https://review.openstack.org/58747 because he thinks it's not generic enough and want to have a further discussion about the resource loader support. So I put it here my original thought and design about the patch as a start point. The initial inte

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Access-key like authentication with password-rotation

2014-01-19 Thread Allamaraju, Subbu
At work we're currently looking at related use cases, and access keys are useful without keystone actually managing passwords. The only issue with https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/access-key-authentication is that it requires client side code changes, which is a non-starter in man

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Relationship between Neutron LBaaS and Libra

2014-01-19 Thread Andrew Hutchings
On 18 Jan 2014, at 19:02, Jay Pipes wrote: > On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 09:06 +, Andrew Hutchings wrote: >> >> I’m not sure what is public and what isn’t so I won’t name names. >> They are currently talking to us about the best ways of working with >> us. Both companies want to use Libra in dif

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Relationship between Neutron LBaaS and Libra

2014-01-19 Thread Andrew Hutchings
On 19 Jan 2014, at 09:52, Thomas Herve wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I haven’t read through those (need to go spend time with family so replying >> quickly) but given the dates the planning phases for Quantum/Neutron LBaaS >> and Libra LBaaS were at the same time. >> >> There was an internal evaluat

Re: [openstack-dev] [savanna] savannaclient v2 api

2014-01-19 Thread Andrey Lazarev
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Matthew Farrellee wrote: > On 01/16/2014 09:19 PM, Andrey Lazarev wrote: > >> My 5 cents: >> >> -- >> REMOVE - @rest.put('/node-group-templates/') - >> Not Implemented >> REMOVE - @rest.put('/cluster-templates/') - Not >> Implemented >> -- >> Disagree with

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack][Nova][cold migration] Why we need confirm resize after cold migration

2014-01-19 Thread Jay Lau
Hey, I have to bring up this topic again. A patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/66101/ has been uploaded for review to resolve the cold migration auto confirm issue. One question want to get some input from you guys: Do we need to distinguish V2 and V3 API for this behavior? My thinking is tha

Re: [openstack-dev] [savanna] savannaclient v2 api

2014-01-19 Thread Andrey Lazarev
Inlined. Thanks, Andrew. On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Matthew Farrellee wrote: > On 01/16/2014 08:10 AM, Alexander Ignatov wrote: > >> Matthew, >> >> I'm ok with proposed solution. Some comments/thoughts below: >> >> - >> FIX - @rest.post_file('/plugins/// >> convert-config/') >> -