Here is the meeting minutes of the meeting.
ServiceVM/device manager
meeting minutes on June 3, 2014:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ServiceVM
next meeting:
June 10, 2014 5:00AM UTC (Tuesday)
agreement:
- include NFV conformance to servicevm project into servicevm project
=> will
I would like to understand how did we get to this 80%/20% distinction.
In other terms, it seems conntrack's RELATED features won't be supported
for non-tcp traffic. What about the ESTABLISHED feature? The blueprint
specs refers to tcp_flags=ack.
Or will that be supported through the source port mat
Hi everybody,
at the Juno Design Summit we held a presentation about using DRBD 9
within OpenStack.
Here's an overview about the situation; I apologize in advance that the
mail got a bit longer, but I think it makes sense to capture all that
information in a single piece.
WHAT WE HAVE
On 05/29/2014 05:30 PM, Musso, Veronica A wrote:
Hello,
During the last Summit the use of AngularJS in Horizon was discussed and there
is the intention to do a better use of it in the dashboards.
I think this blueprint could help
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/django-angular-
Hi All,
Can anyone let me know whether is download_image policy applicable only for V1
api and not for V2 api?
Thanks & Regards,
Abhishek
__
Disclaimer:This email and any attachments are sent in strictest confidence for
the s
Hi, Salvatore
> It is totally correct that most Neutron resources have a sloppy status
> management. Mostly because, as already pointed out, the 'status' for most
> resource was conceived to be a 'network fabric' status rather than a resource
> synchronisation status.
Exactly, I reckon that neu
Here is etherpad to track preparation -
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/sahara-2014.1.1
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
> /me proposing to backport:
>
> Docs:
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/87531/ Change IRC channel name to
> #openstack-sahara
> https://review.opens
On 23 May 2014 10:34, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
> As most of you probably know already, this is one of the topics discussed
> during the Juno summit [1].
> I would like to kick off the discussion in order to move towards a concrete
> design.
>
> Preamble: Considering the meat that's already on the
I agree with Andrew and actually think that we do need to have
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/87573 (Fix running EDP job on
transient cluster) fixed in stable branch.
We also might want to add https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93322/
(Create trusts for admin user with correct tenant name). This i
Okay, it makes sense, I've updated the etherpad -
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/sahara-2014.1.1
Here is the chain of backports for 2014.1.1 -
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:sahara-2014.1.1,n,z
Review appreciate, all changes are cherry-picked and only one conflict
was in https://review.
Hello, Nader!
As for `contributes` attribute, you could override `contribute(self,
data, context)` method in your descendant of `workflows.Step` which by
default simply iterates over all keys in `contributes`.
Either you could use even more flexible approach (which also fits for
`default_steps`):
If anyone has agenda items they'd like to discuss in today's Nova Libvirt
sub-team meeting[1] please add them to the etherpad:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-libvirt-meeting-agenda
Regards,
Daniel
[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Libvirt
--
|: http://berrange.com -o-
Amir Sadoughi wrote:
>Specifically, OVS lacks connection tracking so it won't have a RELATED feature
>or stateful rules
>for non-TCP flows. (OVS connection tracking is currently under development, to
>be released by 2015
It definitely needs a big obvious warning label on this. A stateless fire
mail and any
attachments without any further use,
copying or forwarding
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140603/b4236c77/attachment-0001.html>
_
Yeah, Robert is right. I think, everybody who is approved by his
employer (or is expected to be approved) should enter his constraints.
So realistically enter dates when you would be able to attend.
Personal view: after Aug 11th, we will have about 3 weeks to feature
freeze which is very lat
Hi Andrey,
Thanks a ton for putting together this blog on using tempest + rally.
I followed all the steps listed and managed to get tempest successfully
installed.
However, I was not able to proceed beyond and couldn't manage to run
tempest even once. I am getting the below error:
om@desktop2:~
> I was wondering about the progress of KMIP support in Barbican?
As John pointed out, JHU/APL is working on adding KMIP support to Barbican.
We submitted the first CR to add a Secret Store interface into Barbican.
The next step is to add a KMIP implementation of the Secret Store.
> Is this waiti
Guys,
In the BP meeting yesterday we briefly discussed the 'Configurable DB
Plugins' BP:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/trove/+spec/configurable-db-plugins
It was clear I needed to hash this one out in greater detail to
optimally discuss the feature with the group - I've done that and you
I'm having trouble determining which parameters may be included in the Create
Server request. In particular, I'm interested in the JSON properties which are
supported by a base installation of Compute V2.
The documentation on the following page is not clear:
http://docs.openstack.org/api/opensta
Bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1324934
TL;DR version of the bug report: A dropped connection during nova->neutron
call to create a port will result in nova deciding that the instance can't
be booted, and therefore terminating it. Nova calls get_ports() from
neutron during this
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:49 AM, YAMAMOTO Takashi
wrote:
> can anyone please review this small fix for ofagent?
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88224/
> it's unfortunate a simple fix like this taking months to be merged.
>
Done, looks like Nachi beat me to it but it's in the check queue
again.
Hi Russell
Thanks
I'm able to solve it now by switching onto havana release on both the
controller node and compute node.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 10:56 AM, abhishek jain
wrote:
> Hi Russell
>
> Below are the details...
>
> controller node...
>
> nova --version
> 2.17.0.122
>
> nova-compute
When considering user interfaces, the choice of task and/or status reporting
methods can have a big impact on the ability to communicate with the user. In
particular, status properties (e.g. in the manner of compute V2 servers)
prevent user interfaces from associating the result of an operation
Hi Stackers,
tl;dr
=
Move CPU and RAM allocation ratio definition out of the Nova scheduler
and into the resource tracker. Remove the calculations for overcommit
out of the core_filter and ram_filter scheduler pieces.
Details
===
Currently, in the Nova code base, the thing that cont
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cinder wipe fails in an insecure manner on Grizzly
- ---
### Summary ###
A configuration error can prevent the secure erase of volumes in Cinder
on Grizzly, potentially allowing a user to recover another user’s data.
### Affected Services / Software
Hey, Om!
Can you launch Rally in debug mode and share logs?
> rally -vd verify start --set image
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 3:49 PM, om prakash pandey
wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> Thanks a ton for putting together this blog on using tempest + rally.
>
> I followed all the steps listed and managed to get
Hi,
Tizy Ninan wrote :
> We have an openstack deployment (Havana on CentOS) in HA mode with
> nova-network service deployed using Mirantis Fuel v4.0 .
> When uploading images with large filesize (more than 1 GB) from dashboard,
> after upload is done the dashboard is showing "504 Gateway Timeout".
How does ovs handle tcp flows? Does it include stateful tracking of tcp --
as your wording below implies -- or does it do stateless inspection of
returning tcp packets? It appears it is the latter. This isn't the same
as providing a stateful ESTABLISHED feature. Many users may not fully
underst
Dear all,
If we have time, I would like to take your attention to my new patch:
Policy-based Scheduling engine
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97503/
This patch implements Policy-Based Scheduler blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/policy-based-scheduler
I presented its prot
Hi all,
I have a patch for this bug ready for review:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/89844/
I also want to know your thought about Santiago's question.
Some time ago I found this bug (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/62088/) where
the decision of deprecate the use
of instance_type_extra_specs
Hi all,
Just a reminder that the first post-summit meeting of the sub-team is scheduled
for Wednesday June 4 @ 1400 UTC in #openstack-meeting.
Agenda:
First meeting!
Meet and greet
Review Mission
Review our current blueprint list and fill in anything we're not tracking
yet
On 05/22/2014 08:16 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
Hi Salvatore
Thank you for your posting this.
IMO, this topic shouldn't be limited for Neutron only.
Users wants consistent API between OpenStack project, right?
In Nova, a server has task_state, so Neutron should do same way.
We're moving away from
I think it becomes more useful the larger your team. With a smaller team it is
easier to keep everyone on the same page just through the mailing list and IRC.
As for where to document design decisions, the trick there is more one of being
diligent about capturing and recording the why of every d
The slides of the Atlanta presentation is here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B598PxJUvPrwMXpWYUtWOGRTckE
It contains our vision on scheduling which sets foot for the integration
with Tetris and Congress.
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Khanh-Toan Tran [mailto:khanh-toan.t...@cloudwatt.
Hi All,
Multiple individuals are travelling this week. This weeks meeting will need
to be cancelled as a result.
We will resume with the usual schedule next week.
p
Peter J. Pouliot CISSP
Sr. SDET OpenStack
Microsoft
New England Research & Development Center
1 Memorial Drive
Cambridge, MA 02
On 3 June 2014 15:29, Jay Pipes wrote:
> Move CPU and RAM allocation ratio definition out of the Nova scheduler and
> into the resource tracker. Remove the calculations for overcommit out of
> the core_filter and ram_filter scheduler pieces.
Makes sense to me.
I especially like the idea of bei
Hi folks,
Here is a summary of priorities from Summit and some action items for
high the high priority issues. The link to the pad is here:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-summit-sahara-edp
We really did not have any leftover questions from summit, but we need
investigation and develo
Hi all,
I'm struggling a bit to get a test set up working for L2/L3 work (ml2/ovs).
I've been trying multi-host devstack (just controller node for now), and I must
be missing something important because n-sch bombs out. Single node devstack
works fine, but it's not very useful for L2/L3.
Any
>
> It may be useful to have an API query which tells you all the numbers you
> may need - real hardware values, values after using the configured
> overcommit ratios and currently used values.
>
+1 to an exposed admin-API for host resource state and calculations,
especially if this allowed you to
Hi, whats the right way to mock the LOG variable inside the
driver ? I am mocking mock.patch.object(glusterfs, 'LOG') as mock_logger
and then doing...
mock_logger.warning.assert_called_once() - which passes and is
expected to pass per my code
but
mock_logger.debug.assert_called_once() - shud f
On 06/03/2014 07:29 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
Hi Stackers,
tl;dr
=
Move CPU and RAM allocation ratio definition out of the Nova scheduler
and into the resource tracker. Remove the calculations for overcommit
out of the core_filter and ram_filter scheduler pieces.
Makes sense to me.
Chris
__
We decided that we need to pick the name for the splitting of Horizon
properly. From now up to the next meeting on June 10 we will be
collecting name proposals at:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/horizon-name-proposals
After that, until next meeting on June 17, we will be voting for
the proposed
Great, thanks Matthias!
Then, if django-angular is approved for Fedora, do we need to wait for Ubuntu
packages? Or can it be used?
Thanks!
Veronica
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 08:32:43 +0200
From: Matthias Runge
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Subject
Cool, thank you for wrapping up design summit session!
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Trevor McKay wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Here is a summary of priorities from Summit and some action items for
> high the high priority issues. The link to the pad is here:
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ju
Hi everyone!
It's hard to stop polishing things, and today I got an updated review
dashboard. It's sources are merged to Sean Dague's repository [1], so I
expect this to be the final version. Thank you everyone for numerous
comments and suggestions, especially Ruby Loo.
Here is nice link to it: h
On 21:46 Tue 03 Jun , Deepak Shetty wrote:
> Hi, whats the right way to mock the LOG variable inside the
> driver ? I am mocking mock.patch.object(glusterfs, 'LOG') as mock_logger
Please provide a paste[1] of the patch.
[1] - http://paste.openstack.org
--
Mike Perez
__
Tizy Ninan wrote :
> When uploading images with large filesize (more than 1 GB) from dashboard,
> after upload is done the dashboard is showing "504 Gateway Timeout". What
Anyway we've launched a bug for fuel, thank you for the notice.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1326082
--
Regards,
Evg
Why is mocking the LOG object useful/being used?
Testing functionality which depends on LOG triggers/calls imho is bad practice
(and usually means something needs to be refactored).
LOG statements, and calls should be expected to move/be removed often so
testing functionality in tests with them
Hi All,
I’ve recently put together a set of wireframes[1] around Alarm Management that
would support the following blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/ceilometer-alarm-management-page
If you have a chance it would be great to hear any feedback that folks have on
this direc
Hi mohammad,
What I meant in my email is totaly in line with your proposal. My dataplane
driver is your resource driver, whereas my controlplane driver is your
agent driver!
I totally agree that the real challenge is defining a common abstract class
for every resource driver.
My proposal was to bi
This is an LBaaS topic bud I'd like to get some Neutron Core members to
give their opinions on this matter so I've just directed this to Neutron
proper.
The design for the new API and object model for LBaaS needs to be locked
down before the hackathon in a couple of weeks and there are some
questi
Hi Liz,
The designs look really cool and I think that we should consider a couple of
things (more related to the alarm's implementation made at Ceilometer):
* There are combined alarms, which are a combination of two or more
alarms. We need to see how they work and how we can show/modify
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 05:14:16PM +, Musso, Veronica A wrote:
> Great, thanks Matthias!
>
> Then, if django-angular is approved for Fedora, do we need to wait for Ubuntu
> packages? Or can it be used?
>
> Thanks!
> Veronica
I can not speak for other distributions. My 2ct here:
you'd need
Chuck,
I accidentally uploaded by local.conf changes to gerrit [1]. I
immediately abandoned them so that reviewers wouldn't waste time
thinking I was trying to get changes upstream. But, since they're up
there now, you could take a look.
I am currently running a multi-node devstack on a couple
Thanks Andrey! Please see below the logs(Environment specific output has
been snipped):
2014-06-04 02:32:07.303 1939 DEBUG rally.cmd.cliutils [-] INFO logs from
urllib3 and requests module are hide. run
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/rally/cmd/cliutils.py:137
2014-06-04 02:32:07.363 1939 I
Hi Ajaya,
Thanks for offer to help :)
Are you talking about tempest tests or in-tree keystone tests?
Verifying custom roles can be challenging via API only driven tests such as
tempest – as it requires to have the policies configured accordingly in the
cloud under test (i.e. devstack
Hi Stephen,
We would like all those numbers as well ☺
Additionally, we measure:
· When a lb instance was created, deleted, etc.
· For monitoring we “ping” a load balancers health check and report/act
on the results
· For user’s troubleshooting we make the haproxy logs
Hi,
From deep below in the e-mail chain:
Same here. Cascade-deleting of shared objects should not be allowed in any case.
Being able to delete all lbs and related constructs after a customer leaves
and/or for tests is a pretty important requirements for us. It does not
necessarily have to be ac
Here's a fix that increases haproxy server timeout for Horizon to 48h:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97645/
I've marked the bug as Incomplete for now: we need a confirmation that
only Horizon is affected and Glance isn't. Please try the current
version of the fix, if gateway timeouts disappear,
On 6/3/2014 8:15 AM, abhishek jain wrote:
Hi Russell
Thanks
I'm able to solve it now by switching onto havana release on both the
controller node and compute node.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 10:56 AM, abhishek jain mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Russell
Below are the de
Jay, thanks for raising this up .
+1 for this .
A related question about the CPU and RAM allocation ratio, shall we apply
them when get hypervisor information with command "nova hypervisor-show
${hypervisor-name}"
The output shows like
| memory_mb |
15824
|
| memory_mb_used
Hi Qin Zhao,
Thanks for raising this issue and analysis. According to the issue description
and happen
scenario(https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1pItX9urLd6fmjws3BVovXQvRg_qMdTHS-0JhYfSkkVc/pub?w=960&h=720),
if that's the case, concurrent mutiple KVM spawn instances(with both config
drive
Hi, All :
I've deployed my ironic following this link:
http://ma.ttwagner.com/bare-metal-deploys-with-devstack-and-ironic/ , all
steps is completed.
Now one of my node-show provision_state is active. But why is this
node still in installation state as follow ?
[image: 内嵌图片
Hi All,
I am currently looking at UEFI support for ironic driver blueprints and
writing a design spec for the same.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ironic/+spec/uefi-boot-for-ironic
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ironic/+spec/uefi-gpt-support
I anticipate changes in nova ironic virt driver and
Wrongly sent to Joshua only, hence fwding to the list.
--
Joshua,
If my code has logs warning, error, debug based on diff exceptions or
conditions, its good to test them & have a unit test around it
so that we can catch scenarios where we modified code that ideally shud
have just pu
The below issue was resolved (thanks to akerr on IRC).
It seems called_once_with is not a function of mock and doesn't work
properly
Need to use assertTrue(mock_func.called) and thats working for me.
thanx,
deepak
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote:
> Hi, whats the right way
Excerpts from 严超's message of 2014-06-03 21:23:25 -0700:
> Hi, All :
> I've deployed my ironic following this link:
> http://ma.ttwagner.com/bare-metal-deploys-with-devstack-and-ironic/ , all
> steps is completed.
> Now one of my node-show provision_state is active. But why is this
67 matches
Mail list logo
