Re: [openstack-dev] Where are all the research papers?

> -Original Message- > From: Joshua Harlow [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 14 June 2015 07:52 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: [openstack-dev] Where are all the research papers? > > Out of curiosity is there any known listing of papers (li

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][cinder]VMware: concurrent create two volumes, one is failed when vcenter session is timout

Sorry for the long delay. This is fixed in oslo.vmware 0.9.0. https://github.com/openstack/oslo.vmware/commit/a229faf8ba59724a4fda3f37d5a7473376f93d9c From: hao wang [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2015 12:40 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.vmware] Bump oslo.vmware to 1.0.0

Dims, There are some problems with exception hierarchy which need to be fixed. -Original Message- From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 7:32 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [oslo.vmware]

[openstack-dev] Starting the M Release Name Poll

Hey everybody! I've started the poll for the M release. By now, you should have gotten an email with a link to the vote. If you did not and think that you should have, please let me know (directly, not to the mailing list please) and I can re-send and/or fix as necessary. Please remember that the

Re: [openstack-dev] Getting rid of suds, which is unmaintained, and which we want out of Debian

On 06/11/2015 10:08 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: > On 11 June 2015 at 10:26, Thomas Goirand > wrote: > > Hi, > > The current maintainer of suds in Debian sent bug reports against all > packages depending on it. We would like to get rid of suds completely. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] Getting rid of suds, which is unmaintained, and which we want out of Debian

On 06/11/2015 11:31 PM, Nikhil Manchanda wrote: > Hi Thomas: > > I just checked and I don't see suds as a requirement for trove. > I don't think it should be a requirement for the trove debian package, > either. > > Thanks, > Nikhil Hi, I fixed the package and removed the Suggests: python-suds

Re: [openstack-dev] Gerrit maintenance concluded

Thanks for doing this! On 6/13/15, 4:26 AM, "Jeremy Stanley" wrote: >Our maintenance has concluded successfully without incident and the >accompanying Gerrit outage was roughly an hour. > >We moved 57 repositories to new Git namespaces: > >stackforge/cookbook-openstack-bare-metal >->

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.vmware] Bump oslo.vmware to 1.0.0

Hi, I agree with Vipin. Can we please address the exception handling. We already have the patches. Thanks Gary On 6/14/15, 12:41 PM, "Vipin Balachandran" wrote: >Dims, > >There are some problems with exception hierarchy which need to be fixed. > >-Original Message- >From: Davanum Sriniva

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Proposing Rossella Sblendido for the Control Plane core team

+1 On 6/13/15, 1:41 AM, "Carl Baldwin" wrote: >+1! > >On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Kevin Benton wrote: >> Hello! >> >> As the Lieutenant of the built-in control plane[1], I would like >>Rossella >> Sblendido to be a member of the control plane core reviewer team. >> >> Her review stats are

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Proposing YAMAMOTO Takashi for the Control Plane core team

+1 From: Kevin Benton mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Thursday, June 11, 2015 at 9:15 PM To: OpenStack List mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Proposing YAMAMOTO Takashi for the Contro

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Proposing Ann Kamyshnikova for the API & DB core reviewer team

+1 From: Akihiro MOTOKI mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Friday, June 12, 2015 at 8:20 AM To: OpenStack List mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Proposing Ann Kamyshnikova for the AP

Re: [openstack-dev] [os-ansible-deployment] Core team nomination

+1 most definitely! On Saturday, June 13, 2015, Kevin Carter wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to nominate Ian Cordasco (sigmavirus24 on IRC) for the > os-ansible-deployment-core team. Ian has been contributing to the OSAD > project for some time now and has always had quality reviews[0], he's >

Re: [openstack-dev] Where are all the research papers?

Tim Bell wrote: -Original Message- From: Joshua Harlow [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 14 June 2015 07:52 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] Where are all the research papers? Out of curiosity is there any known listing of papers

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack][Neutron][OVN] OVN-Neutron - TODO List

Gal, thanks for this summery. Some additional info inline. Salvatore On 12 June 2015 at 19:38, Gal Sagie wrote: > Hello All, > > I wanted to share some of our next working items and hopefully get more > people on board with the project. > I personally would mentor any new comer that wants to g

[openstack-dev] [kolla] Proposal for new core-reviewer Harm Waites

Hey folks, I am proposing Harm Waites for the Kolla core team. He did a fantastic job implementing Designate in a container[1] which I’m sure was incredibly difficult and never gave up even though there were 13 separate patch reviews :) Beyond Harm’s code contributions, he is responsible for

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] a bad week for CI

Last week was a really bad week for TripleO CI. Several breaking changes (2 of which Fedora package related) kept at least a subset of the jobs down for over half the week. Here is a brief summary of the issues we hit along with links to some of the work arounds. Fedora 21: python-address package

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack][Neutron][OVN] OVN-Neutron - TODO List

Hi Salvatore, Thanks for the comments, added some more information. Gal On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Salvatore Orlando wrote: > Gal, > > thanks for this summery. > Some additional info inline. > > Salvatore > > On 12 June 2015 at 19:38, Gal Sagie wrote: > >> Hello All, >> >> I wanted to s

Re: [openstack-dev] Looking for help getting git-review to work over https

On 12 June 2015 at 10:49, ZZelle wrote: > Indeed, the doc[1] is unclear > > > git-review can be installed using: python setup.py install or pip install . Of those two things we only support "pip install ." - in part because you have much less control over mirrors, proxies and inferior SSL support

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] RPM Packaging for OpenStack IRC Meeting

Hi Joshua, > An example of some specs already doing this (they are built using the > cheetah template engine/style): > > > https://github.com/stackforge/anvil/tree/master/conf/templates/packaging/specs > > They are turned into 'normal' spec files (the compilation part) > during build time. > Rig

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Microversioning work questions and kick-start

On 12 June 2015 at 12:22, Sean Dague wrote: > On 06/11/2015 06:03 PM, Salvatore Orlando wrote: > > As most of you already know, work is beginning to move forward on the > > micro-versioned Neutron API, for which a specification is available at > [1] > > > > From a practical perspective there is o

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Microversioning work questions and kick-start

On 12 June 2015 at 16:58, Henry Gessau wrote: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015, Salvatore Orlando wrote: > > Finally, I received queries from several community members that would be > keen > > on helping supporting this microversioning effort. I wonder if the PTL > and the > > API lieutenants would ok wit

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] shellcheck all .sh scripts in murano-deployment

Since there were no objections, and as a follow-up I’ve created a BP for that in murano: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/murano/+spec/add-shellcheck-jobs --  Kirill Zaitsev Murano team Software Engineer Mirantis, Inc On 10 Jun 2015 at 18:07:19, Filip Blaha ([email protected]) wrote: Thanks fo

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] [Swift] Multiple proxy recipes will create out of sync rings

With respect to using a seed - the facility to supply one to the rebalance operation has recently been added to puppet-swift master branch (commit b8b4434), however the seed parameter is not available to any of the usual calling methods (this looks to be deliberate from the commit message), so

[openstack-dev] [Magnum] Add periodic task threading for conductor server

hi magnum team, I am planing to add periodic task for magnum conductor service, it will be good to sync task status with heat and container service. and I have already have a WIP patch[1], I'd like to start a discussion on the implement. Currently, conductor service is an rpc server, and it h

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Docker Native Networking

Just put here for more comments, thanks! IMHO, there are three different options, worth discussion before the designing: #Opt 1: Magnum as the API. The entire driver layer still leverages the third-party solutions like swarm or kubernetes, then we have to keep compatible with their limitation in n

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] VLAN-aware VMs meeting

On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Ildikó Váncsa wrote: > Hi, > > > > Since we reopened the review for this blueprint we’ve got a large number > of comments. It can be clearly seen that the original proposal has to be > changed, although it still requires some discussion to define a reasonable > d

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Add periodic task threading for conductor server

I think option #3 is the most desired choice in performance’s point of view, because magnum is going to support multiple conductors and all conductors share the same DB. However, if each conductor runs its own thread for periodic task, we will end up to have multiple instances of tasks for doing

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][puppet] Federation using ipsilon

On 06/13/2015 01:37 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 06/12/2015 07:30 PM, Adam Young wrote: On 06/12/2015 04:53 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: I've done a first pass of setting up a puppet module to configure Keystone to use ipsilon for federation, using https://github.com/richm/puppet-apache-auth-mods

[openstack-dev] [Magnum] TLS Support in Magnum

Hi All, This is to bring the blueprint secure-kubernetes in discussion. I have been trying to figure out what could be the possible change area to support this feature in Magnum. Below is just a rough idea on how to proceed further

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] TLS Support in Magnum

Madhuri, On Jun 14, 2015, at 10:30 PM, Madhuri Rai mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi All, This is to bring the blueprint secure-kubernetes in discussion. I have been trying to figure out what could be the possible cha