[openstack-dev] [nova] [scheduler] New filter: AggregateInstanceTypeFilter

Hello: We have developed a new filter for Nova scheduler (SPEC). We have a POC in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/346662/. My question is how to procced with this code: 1) Merge into nova code. This solution seems not to be accepted (see spec co

Re: [openstack-dev] 回复： [Sahara] Error launching a defined domain withXML

Hello, Qiming just added tag [sahara] to the topic of your message. there are several open questions, can you give answers for them? 1. Can you describe your environment? 2. Can you describe templates you are using? Seems like you are creating cluster using CLI, could you please post description

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] libvirt/qemu source install plugin.

On 26.07.2016 17:45, Michele Paolino wrote: > I see. In any case, I am open to discuss further contributions and > improvement to the plugin. Let me know! > > In case this can be useful for you, in the early implementations of the > current devstack plugin (i.e., Patch set 1)[1], it was able to

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][requirements] Re: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/heat failed

Ethan Lynn wrote: Hi Tony, I submit a patch to use upper-constraints for review, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/347639/ . Let’s wait for the feedback and results. Why is it sent to liberty? isn’t master affected too? I see no constraints applied in master: https://github.com/openstac

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] service validation during deployment steps

Hi Emilien, On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 03:59:33PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > I would love to hear some feedback about $topic, thanks. Sorry for the slow response, we did dicuss this on IRC, but providing that feedback and some other comments below: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Emilien Ma

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Capacity table

Hello Vitaly, Thank you for this answer. The main question here is the business logic. Do we have to use new design or don’t. With best regards, Dmitry > On 26 Jul 2016, at 17:47, Vitaly Kramskikh wrote: > > Hi, Dmitry, > > Your design seems to be similar to one of our attempts to fix this bu

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] ui-cookiecutter

Hi everyone, I have uploaded cookiecutter for dashboard plugin [1]. I'm happy if it will be your help, for creation of new plugin. [1]: https://github.com/shu-mutou/ui-cookiecutter The happiest case is that I donate this and the cookiecutter is maintained in Horizon, and the cookiecutter is us

[openstack-dev] [tricircle]agenda of weekly meeting Jul.27

Hi, team, IRC meeting: https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=openstack-meeting on every Wednesday starting from UTC 13:00. There are two rounds of discussion in TC weekly meeting for Tricircle big-tent application, so let's discuss on this: The agenda of this weekly meeting is: # microv

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] tripleo-common bugs, bug tracking and launchpad tags

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:28:10PM +0100, Julie Pichon wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Friday Dougal mentioned on IRC that he hadn't realised there was a >> separate project for tripleo-common bugs on Launchpad [1] and that he'd >> been using the Tripl

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][networking-ovn][networking-odl] Syncing neutron DB and OVN DB

> I'd like to see if we can solve the problems more generally. We've tried before but we very quickly run into competing requirements with regards to eventual consistency. For example, asynchronous background sync doesn't work if someone wants their backend to confirm that port details are accepta

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Modifying just a few values on overcloud redeploy

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 05:23:21PM -0400, Adam Young wrote: >I worked through how to do a complete clone of the templates to do a >deploy and change a couple values here: > >http://adam.younglogic.com/2016/06/custom-overcloud-deploys/ > >However, all I want to do is to set two con

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] repo split

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > I am voting -1 for now, but would likely change my vote after we branch > Newton. I'm not a super big fan of votes way ahead of major events (such > as branching) because a bunch of things could change between now and then > and the v

Re: [openstack-dev] Announcing Gertty 1.4.0

On 07/27/2016 12:39 AM, James E. Blair wrote: > Announcing Gertty 1.4.0 > === > > Gertty is a console-based interface to the Gerrit Code Review system. > > Gertty is designed to support a workflow similar to reading network > news or mail. It syncs information from Gerrit to lo

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack][vitrage] some compress error when deploy OS

Hi, I’m glad that you found a workaround. Someone from vitrage-dashboard team should look at the specific error and tell you what is the best solution. Best Regards, Ifat. From: Yujun Zhang [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 9:11 AM To: OpenStack Development Maili

[openstack-dev] [magnum] Support for bay rollback may break magnum API backward compatibility

Hi folks, I am working on a patch [1] to add bay rollback machanism on update failure. But it seems to break magnum API backward compatibility. I'm not sure how to deal with this, can you please give me your suggestion? Thanks! [1]https://review.openstack.org/#/c/343478/ 2016-07-27 Best Re

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][Heat][Tacker][Murano][App-Catalog] [Glance] How to validate your binary data in OpenStack

On 25/07/16 20:03 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote: Thanks for your nice message Mikhail. I, however, wanted to address a small correction to avoid any further presumptions about Glare, Glance and Images API with the tags associated in the email subject herewith. (also adding Glance tag to the list

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] [UI] Version

Hello folks, As the tripleo-ui project is quickly maturing, it might be time to start versioning our code. As of now, the version is set to 0.0.1 and that hardly reflects the state of the project. What do you think? Honza Pokorny

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Heat][Horizon] Glance v2 and custom locations

On 26/07/16 15:45 +, Fox, Kevin M wrote: The app catalog has suffered this change too. We had to force v1 in our suggested download cli lines to make it work when newer clients defaulted to v2 and the previously working command line switches suddenly vanished. As I understand, v2 had a sol

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Heat][Horizon] Glance v2 and custom locations

On 26/07/16 14:32 +0300, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: Hello! As you may know glance v1 is going to be deprecated in Newton cycle. Almost all projects support glance v2 at this moment, Nova uses it by default. Only one thing that blocks us from complete adoption is a possibility to set custom locations

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kolla] [Fuel] [tc] Looks like Mirantis is getting Fuel CCP (docker/k8s) kicked off

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: [snip] The issue is, as I see it, a parallel activity to one of the that is > currently accepted into the Big Tent, aka Containerized Deployment [snip] This seems to be the crux of the matter as best as I can tell. Is it true to say that th

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Independent tag and stable branches

On Tue, Jul 26 2016, Doug Hellmann wrote: > We have not yet automated the process of creating stable branches. When > we do, it's likely to first apply to the cycle-based release models, > since handling those branches is clearer. > > If you don't have permission to create the branch yourself, dro

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Independent tag and stable branches

On Tue, Jul 26 2016, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > You already have a number of existing stable/x.y branches so I'm > curious how this has worked for you in practice up to this point. > Skimming those branches I think you've simply gotten lucky and > haven't run into the issue yet because most have rece

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kolla] [Fuel] [tc] Looks like Mirantis is getting Fuel CCP (docker/k8s) kicked off

Michael, Response inline. From: Michael Still mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 at 5:30 AM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] tripleo-common bugs, bug tracking and launchpad tags

On 19 July 2016 at 16:20, Steven Hardy wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:28:10PM +0100, Julie Pichon wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Friday Dougal mentioned on IRC that he hadn't realised there was a > > separate project for tripleo-common bugs on Launchpad [1] and that he'd > > been using the Triple

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [UI] Version

On 27 July 2016 at 12:41, Honza Pokorny wrote: > Hello folks, > > As the tripleo-ui project is quickly maturing, it might be time to start > versioning our code. As of now, the version is set to 0.0.1 and that > hardly reflects the state of the project. > > What do you think? > Yup, Sounds good

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [UI] Version

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 08:41:32AM -0300, Honza Pokorny wrote: > Hello folks, > > As the tripleo-ui project is quickly maturing, it might be time to start > versioning our code. As of now, the version is set to 0.0.1 and that > hardly reflects the state of the project. > > What do you think? I

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [UI] Version

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 02:08:08PM +0100, Dougal Matthews wrote: >On 27 July 2016 at 12:41, Honza Pokorny wrote: > > Hello folks, > > As the tripleo-ui project is quickly maturing, it might be time to start > versioning our code.  As of now, the version is set to 0.0.1 and th

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Setting kernel args to overcloud nodes

Hello, We are working on SR-IOV & DPDK tripleo integration. In which, setting the kernel args for huge pages, iommu and cpu isolation is required. Earlier we were working on setting of kernel args via IPA [1], reasons being: 1. IPA is installing the boot loader on the overcloud node 2. Ironic know

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] mascot/logo ideas

Looking at the poll we have 4 votes for the wolf, I guess we can go with it. Tardigrade looses by 2 votes. If anyone is against this vote please raise your hand now :-) On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > We have 6 votes in total, results are: > > 2 votes for wolf. > 2 votes

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Support for bay rollback may break magnum API backward compatibility

Hi Wenzhi, Looks like you are adding the new --rollback option to bay-update. If the user does not specify this new option, then bay-update behaves the same as before; in other words, if it fails, then the state of the bay will be left in the partially updated mode. Is this correct? If so

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [UI] Version

On 2016-07-27 14:18, Steven Hardy wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 08:41:32AM -0300, Honza Pokorny wrote: > > Hello folks, > > > > As the tripleo-ui project is quickly maturing, it might be time to start > > versioning our code. As of now, the version is set to 0.0.1 and that > > hardly reflects

[openstack-dev] [ptl][requirements] nomination period started

We've started a period of self nomination in preparation for the requirements project fully moving into project (as it's still under Doug Hellmann). We are gathering the self nominations here before we vote next week. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/requirements-ptl-newton Nominees should also s

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][requirements] nomination period started

On 07/27/2016 08:41 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: > We've started a period of self nomination in preparation for the > requirements project fully moving into project (as it's still under Doug > Hellmann). > > We are gathering the self nominations here before we vote next week. > https://etherpad.openst

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][requirements] nomination period started

w00t!! Glad to see this happen. -- Dims On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: > We've started a period of self nomination in preparation for the > requirements project fully moving into project (as it's still under Doug > Hellmann). > > We are gathering the self nominations here

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo-test-cloud-rh2 local mirror server

On 21 July 2016 at 23:04, Paul Belanger wrote: > Greetings, > > I write today to see how I can remove this server from > tripleo-test-cloud-rh2. I > have an open patch[1] currently to migrate tripleo-ci to use our AFS mirrors > for > centos and epel. However, I'm still struggling to see what el

Re: [openstack-dev] [charms] Project mascot

I suggest horse, fast animal, faster deployment :) . On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Billy Olsen wrote: > I like the idea of the Kraken... > > though I think I like the giant squid over an octopus, but either one > is in the same vein :-) > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 1:27 AM, James Page wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Capacity table

If "new design" is the design you've proposed in the original email, then no - we'll have to reopen the bug and then revert the change again. 2016-07-27 11:36 GMT+03:00 Dmitry Dmitriev : > Hello Vitaly, > > Thank you for this answer. > The main question here is the business logic. > Do we have to

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][requirements] nomination period started

Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2016-07-27 08:41:17 -0500: > We've started a period of self nomination in preparation for the > requirements project fully moving into project (as it's still under Doug > Hellmann). > > We are gathering the self nominations here before we vote next week. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][networking-ovn][networking-odl] Syncing neutron DB and OVN DB

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 5:58 AM, Kevin Benton wrote: > > I'd like to see if we can solve the problems more generally. > > We've tried before but we very quickly run into competing requirements > with regards to eventual consistency. For example, asynchronous background > sync doesn't work if some

[openstack-dev] [nova][rfc] Booting docker images using nova libvirt

*Premise:** * While working with customers, we have realized: - They want to use containers but are wary of using the same host kernel for multiple containers. - They already have a significant investment (including skills) in OpenStack's Virtual Machine workflow and would like to re-use it as

[openstack-dev] [daisycloud-core] About the new meeting channel

Hi, team Our meeting channel request has been approved: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/346534/ . So let's use the new channel for the coming irc meeting. -- Yours, Jason __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for us

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][requirements] nomination period started

On 07/27/2016 09:07 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2016-07-27 08:41:17 -0500: >> We've started a period of self nomination in preparation for the >> requirements project fully moving into project (as it's still under Doug >> Hellmann). >> >> We are gathering the

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][requirements] nomination period started

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:07:20AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > For the record, Anita has agreed to be the primary election official, > and I will assist her. Thanks Doug and Anita! Yours Tony. signature.asc Description: PGP signature __

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][rfc] Booting docker images using nova libvirt

In my opinion, You are loosing so much advantages of the what a container platform already offer. Example (not exhaustive): 1. Glance is becoming your "Image Registry" * No incremental pull * No image layer caching * Decrease in speed * You have to convert from

[openstack-dev] [ironic][nova] Indivisible Resource Providers

While discussing the proposal to add resource_class' to Ironic nodes for interacting with the resource provider system in Nova with Jim on IRC, I voiced my concern about having a resource_class per node. My thoughts were that we could achieve the behaviour we require by every Ironic node resourc

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] Announcing Gertty 1.4.0

Michał Dulko writes: > Just wondering - were there tries to implement syntax highlighting in > diff view? I think that's the only thing that keeps me from switching to > Gertty. I don't know of anyone working on that, but I suspect it could be done using the pygments library. -Jim

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][requirements] nomination period started

Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2016-07-27 09:19:33 -0500: > On 07/27/2016 09:07 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2016-07-27 08:41:17 -0500: > >> We've started a period of self nomination in preparation for the > >> requirements project fully moving int

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] mascot/logo ideas

What's even the relation between a wolf and puppet ? David Moreau Simard Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter] On Jul 27, 2016 9:36 AM, "Emilien Macchi" wrote: > Looking at the poll we have 4 votes for the wolf, I guess we can go > with it. Tardigrade loose

[openstack-dev] [release] reminder to release libraries early and often

We're coming up on the feature and release freeze for libraries, and quite a few of them have unreleased changes. Keep in mind that changes to any branch of the library that are not included in a tagged release are not being used in the functional or integration tests for server projects, so the lo

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Modifying just a few values on overcloud redeploy

On 07/27/2016 06:04 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 05:23:21PM -0400, Adam Young wrote: I worked through how to do a complete clone of the templates to do a deploy and change a couple values here: http://adam.younglogic.com/2016/06/custom-overcloud-deploys/ Howe

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] no neutron-lib meeting today

Myself and dougwig will be unable to attend today. We'll resume as usual next week. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe htt

[openstack-dev] [Kuryr] - Addition of Fuxi as a subproject

Hello everyone, The following is a governance request to add project Fuxi as a storage solution part for Kuryr (part of Kuryr deliverable) [1] I hope this can lead to other initiatives that want to work on drivers and glue code that connects containers orchestration engines and OpenStack projects

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] Announcing Gertty 1.4.0

Hi! On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:50 PM, James E. Blair wrote: > Michał Dulko writes: > >> Just wondering - were there tries to implement syntax highlighting in >> diff view? I think that's the only thing that keeps me from switching to >> Gertty. > > I don't know of anyone working on that, but I s

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] mascot/logo ideas

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:55 AM, David Moreau Simard wrote: > What's even the relation between a wolf and puppet ? https://www.thegiftexperience.co.uk/cms_media/images/600x1000_fitbox-wolf_puppet_a.jpg That's the only thing I found on the Internet. > David Moreau Simard > Senior Software Engin

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Modifying just a few values on overcloud redeploy

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:04:22AM -0400, Adam Young wrote: > On 07/27/2016 06:04 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 05:23:21PM -0400, Adam Young wrote: > > > I worked through how to do a complete clone of the templates to do a > > > deploy and change a couple values here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kolla] [Fuel] [tc] Looks like Mirantis is getting Fuel CCP (docker/k8s) kicked off

Competition is a good thing, when there are good, technical reasons for it. "The architecture of X just doesn't fit for my need Y". "Project X won't address my technical need, so I need to fork/spawn a new project Y to get a solution." I do not believe we're in this situation here. If its just

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] repo split

Martin, Thanks for your feedback. This vote has expired without a consensus. I think we need to try a new vote once the core team gets comfortable with the backporting process I spoke about earlier in a different thread this vote would likely pass. Regards -steve On 7/27/16, 3:09 AM, "Martin A

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][rfc] Booting docker images using nova libvirt

Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to fit into Magnum as well. According to the current mission statement [1], Magnum is for provisioning, scaling, and managing Container Orchestration Engines (i.e. Kubernetes), so managing containers in VM is not consistent with Magnum's mission. It seems there

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][nova] Indivisible Resource Providers

On Jul 27, 2016, at 9:48 AM, Sam Betts (sambetts) wrote: > While discussing the proposal to add resource_class’ to Ironic nodes for > interacting with the resource provider system in Nova with Jim on IRC, I > voiced my concern about having a resource_class per node. My thoughts were > that we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kolla] [Fuel] [tc] Looks like Mirantis is getting Fuel CCP (docker/k8s) kicked off

Michael Still wrote: On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Fox, Kevin M mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: [snip] The issue is, as I see it, a parallel activity to one of the that is currently accepted into the Big Tent, aka Containerized Deployment [snip] This seems to be the crux of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kolla] [Fuel] [tc] Looks like Mirantis is getting Fuel CCP (docker/k8s) kicked off

On Jul 27, 2016, at 10:51 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: >> Whether to have competing projects in the big tent was debated by the TC >> at the time and my recollection is that we decided that was a good thing >> -- if someone wanted to develop a Nova replacement, then let them do it >> in public with t

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] mascot/logo ideas

Wolf? it's so overrated +1 for tardigrade On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:55 AM, David Moreau Simard > wrote: > > What's even the relation between a wolf and puppet ? > > > https://www.thegiftexperience.co.uk/cms_media/images/600x1000_fitbox

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] repo split

Agreed, it's been a week. The vote can be brought up again when the conclusion of N is closer. -Ryan - Original Message - From: "Steven Dake (stdake)" To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 11:46:44 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-d

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [UI] Version

On Wednesday, 27 July 2016, Steven Hardy wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 02:08:08PM +0100, Dougal Matthews wrote: > >On 27 July 2016 at 12:41, Honza Pokorny > wrote: > > > > Hello folks, > > > > As the tripleo-ui project is quickly maturing, it might be time to > start > > ve

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kolla] [Fuel] [tc] Looks like Mirantis is getting Fuel CCP (docker/k8s) kicked off

Sorry, missed part of this. I do not believe there is overlap between openstack-ansible which uses lxc containerization with thick containers and kolla which uses docker/kubernetes with thin containers. These are architecturally very different things and to reference my other email, there are t

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][requirements] nomination period started

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 08:41:17AM -0500, Matthew Thode wrote: > We've started a period of self nomination in preparation for the > requirements project fully moving into project (as it's still under Doug > Hellmann). > > We are gathering the self nominations here before we vote next week. > https

[openstack-dev] [glance] [oslo] configs help text for glance_store

Hi all, There was a intricate issue [1] when using help text with additive strings for translations, when passed through oslo.config. The error could not be seen on your local test environment or on glance_store docs visibly as it reflected only on glance docs gate. (Well, unless you tested the l

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][rfc] Booting docker images using nova libvirt

Hi Sudipta, There is another approach you can consider which does not need any changes to Nova. The approach works as follows: - Save the container image tar in Swift - Generate a Swift tempURL for the container file - Boot Nova vm and pass instructions for following steps through cloud init /

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Support for volume sharing across multiple VM's

I heard there's been some attention given to and progress made supporting sharing a single volume with multiple VM's. Where are we along the development curve and has anyone been able to get this to work? Thanks! //adam *Adam Lawson* AQORN, Inc. 427 North Tatnall Street Ste. 58461 Wilmington, D

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [UI] Version

On 07/27/2016 11:13 AM, Dougal Matthews wrote: > > > On Wednesday, 27 July 2016, Steven Hardy > wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 02:08:08PM +0100, Dougal Matthews wrote: > >On 27 July 2016 at 12:41, Honza Pokorny > wrote: > > > > Hello f

[openstack-dev] [glance] [glance_store] Removing the S3 driver

Hi all, Just wanted to follow up on the deprecation of S3 driver that Flavio started [1], we are now in the phase of removing the S3 driver from glance_store tree [2]. I've added some documentation to the release notes but have a feeling that operators may be using more than that to read up on gl

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo-test-cloud-rh2 local mirror server

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 02:54:00PM +0100, Derek Higgins wrote: > On 21 July 2016 at 23:04, Paul Belanger wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I write today to see how I can remove this server from > > tripleo-test-cloud-rh2. I > > have an open patch[1] currently to migrate tripleo-ci to use our AFS > >

[openstack-dev] [glance] [glare] Glance virtual midcycle recordings

Hi all, The Glance virtual midcycle was last month and we were able to record the event and write meeting notes. Please see the "Recordings" (line 30 now) sub-title for audio/visual updates and meeting notes at the near bottom of the etherpad linked below. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newto

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kolla] [Fuel] [tc] Looks like Mirantis is getting Fuel CCP (docker/k8s) kicked off

On 07/27/2016 09:59 AM, Ed Leafe wrote: On Jul 27, 2016, at 10:51 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: Whether to have competing projects in the big tent was debated by the TC at the time and my recollection is that we decided that was a good thing -- if someone wanted to develop a Nova replacement, then

[openstack-dev] [Kuryr] Questions regarding Kuryr

Hi Amir, Thank You for showing interest in Kuryr!!! One simple approach could be: 1> Have neutron and keystone running. 2> git clone kuryr-libnetwork repo and follow Readme instructions to install kuryr. Hope this helps. If you still face issues, p

[openstack-dev] [glance] glance developers and operators midcycle sync -- recordings

Hi all, We'd a midcycle sync last month with the glance development team and operators team where different individuals from across varied time zones participated. While the scheduling was a challenge and some had to join too early or too late, the event was pretty successful. We'd a ton of produ

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kolla] [Fuel] [tc] Looks like Mirantis is getting Fuel CCP (docker/k8s) kicked off

On Jul 27, 2016, at 12:10 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: > Maybe it boils down to the definition of "gratuitous" competition. Precisely, which is why we have humans and not computer algorithms to decide these things. -- Ed Leafe _

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kolla] [Fuel] [tc] Looks like Mirantis is getting Fuel CCP (docker/k8s) kicked off

On 07/27/2016 10:10 AM, Chris Friesen wrote: On 07/27/2016 09:59 AM, Ed Leafe wrote: On Jul 27, 2016, at 10:51 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: Whether to have competing projects in the big tent was debated by the TC at the time and my recollection is that we decided that was a good thing -- if someo

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kolla] [Fuel] [tc] Looks like Mirantis is getting Fuel CCP (docker/k8s) kicked off

Kolla is providing a public api for docker containers and kubernetes templates though. So its not just a deployment tool issue. Its not specifically rest, but does that matter? Thanks, Kevin From: Jay Pipes [[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2

[openstack-dev] [kolla][kolla-kubernetes]

Hi all, The kolla-kubernetes project is in need of introducing some changes into kolla's globals.yml. This could quickly become an issue because the community does not want to have too many variables exposed and create a mess for any backports. In order to get kolla-kubernetes unblocked, kolla-k

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][requirements] Re: [Openstack-stable-maint] Stable check of openstack/heat failed

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 02:20:38PM +0800, Ethan Lynn wrote: > Hi Tony, > I submit a patch to use upper-constraints for review, > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/347639/ > . Let’s wait for the feedback > and results. Thanks. I see that you have r

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][rfc] Booting docker images using nova libvirt

+1 on this, Still you loose all the great stuff about the containers but it is a first step towards native container orchestration platform. From: Devdatta Kulkarni Sent: July 27, 2016 12:21:30 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

[openstack-dev] [sahara] using 'sahara' cli commands is deprecated, how widely it's used?

Hello, In Mitaka release sahara team marked old cli commands starting with 'sahara' as deprecated, since new openstackclient plugin was implemented ('openstack dataprocessing'), and it has all features that old cli has. The question is the following: is there something that can stop us from remov

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Independent tag and stable branches

On 2016-07-27 14:46:18 +0200 (+0200), Julien Danjou wrote: > If I understand correctly, I think this is what we do to solve what you > describe: > > > https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/project-config/tree/jenkins/jobs/gnocchi.yaml#n25 Yep, I missed that when skimming your jobs, th

[openstack-dev] [new][neutron] neutron-lib 0.3.0 release (newton)

We are high-spirited to announce the release of: neutron-lib 0.3.0: Neutron shared routines and utilities This release is part of the newton release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/neutron-lib With package available at: https://pypi.python.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Proposing Jakub Libosvar for testing core

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Jakub Libosvar wrote: > On 26/07/16 16:56, Assaf Muller wrote: >> >> We've hit critical mass from cores interesting in the testing area. >> >> Welcome Jakub to the core reviewer team. May you enjoy staring at the >> Gerrit interface and getting yelled at by people

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kolla] [Fuel] [tc] Looks like Mirantis is getting Fuel CCP (docker/k8s) kicked off

On 07/27/2016 01:59 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: Kolla is providing a public api for docker containers and kubernetes templates though. So its not just a deployment tool issue. Its not specifically rest, but does that matter? Yes, it matters. Kolla isn't providing a user-interfacing HTTP API for

[openstack-dev] [new][neutron] python-neutronclient 5.0.0 release (newton)

We are high-spirited to announce the release of: python-neutronclient 5.0.0: CLI and Client Library for OpenStack Networking This release is part of the newton release series. With source available at: https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/python-neutronclient With package available at:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Project mascot - propose your choice/cast your vote

On 25 July 2016 at 10:52, Armando M. wrote: > On 14 July 2016 at 10:00, Armando M. wrote: > >> Hi Neutrinos, >> >> Based on proposal [1], I prepared an etherpad to allow us to choose >> collaboratively a set of candidates for our mascot. Propose/vote away on >> [2]. You have time until Friday, J

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SFC stable/mitaka version

On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 12:40:48PM +, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > Is anyone looking at creating a stable/mitaka version? What if someone want > to use this for stable/mitaka? If that's a thing you need it's a matter of Armando asking the release managers to create it. Yours Tony. signature.a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kolla] [Fuel] [tc] Looks like Mirantis is getting Fuel CCP (docker/k8s) kicked off

One correction inside: On 7/27/16, 12:02 PM, "Jay Pipes" wrote: >On 07/27/2016 01:59 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: >> Kolla is providing a public api for docker containers and kubernetes >>templates though. So its not just a deployment tool issue. Its not >>specifically rest, but does that matter? > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kolla] [Fuel] [tc] Looks like Mirantis is getting Fuel CCP (docker/k8s) kicked off

Its not an "end user" facing thing, but it is an "operator" facing thing. I deploy kolla containers today on non kolla managed systems in production, and rely on that api being consistent. I'm positive I'm not the only operator doing this either. This sounds like a consumable api to me. Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][networking-ovn][networking-odl] Syncing neutron DB and OVN DB

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 7:15 AM, Russell Bryant wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 5:58 AM, Kevin Benton wrote: > >> > I'd like to see if we can solve the problems more generally. >> >> We've tried before but we very quickly run into competing requirements >> with regards to eventual consisten

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SFC stable/mitaka version

Tony Breeds wrote: On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 12:40:48PM +, Gary Kotton wrote: Hi, Is anyone looking at creating a stable/mitaka version? What if someone want to use this for stable/mitaka? If that's a thing you need it's a matter of Armando asking the release managers to create it.

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Support for bay rollback may break magnum API backward compatibility

Here is the guideline to evaluate an API change: http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/api-wg/guidelines/evaluating_api_changes.html . In particular, I highlight the followings: """ The following types of changes are acceptable when conditionally added as a new API extension: * Adding an optiona

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Pending removal of X-IO volume driver

The Cinder policy for driver CI requires that all volume drivers have a CI reporting on any new patchset. CI's may have some down time, but if they do not report within a two week period they are considered out of compliance with our policy. This is a notification that the X-IO OpenStack CI is out

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SFC stable/mitaka version

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:23:30PM +0200, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > I only suggest Armando is not dragged into it, the release liaison > (currently me) should be able to handle the request if it comes from the > core team for the subproject. Good point. I defaulted to PTL but you're right the rel

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Support for bay rollback may break magnum API backward compatibility

On Jul 27, 2016, at 1:26 PM, Hongbin Lu mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Here is the guideline to evaluate an API change: http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/api-wg/guidelines/evaluating_api_changes.html . In particular, I highlight the followings: """ The following types of changes are

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Support for bay rollback may break magnum API backward compatibility

On Jul 27, 2016, at 1:26 PM, Hongbin Lu mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Here is the guideline to evaluate an API change: http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/api-wg/guidelines/evaluating_api_changes.html . In particular, I highlight the followings: """ The following types of changes are

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Pending removal of Tintri volume driver

The Cinder policy for driver CI requires that all volume drivers have a CI reporting on any new patchset. CI's may have some down time, but if they do not report within a two week period they are considered out of compliance with our policy. This is a notification that the Tintri OpenStack CI is o

  1   2   >