[openstack-dev] [ceilometer] When do we import aodh?

2015-06-16 Thread Julien Danjou
Hi there, The alarm code split blueprint¹ has been approved, and I finished the split of the code base. It's available online at: https://github.com/jd/aodh tox -e pep8,py27,docs passes. To me the next step is to: 1. Someone cares and review what I've done in the repository 2. import the

[openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] Re: [Openstack-operators] How do your end users use networking?

2015-06-16 Thread Jay Pipes
Adding -dev because of the reference to the Neutron Get me a network spec. Also adding [nova] and [neutron] subject markers. Comments inline, Kris. On 05/22/2015 09:28 PM, Kris G. Lindgren wrote: During the Openstack summit this week I got to talk to a number of other operators of large

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][nova][ironic] Microversion API HTTP header

2015-06-16 Thread Jay Pipes
On 06/16/2015 08:00 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: 16 июня 2015 г. 13:52 пользователь Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com написал: On 06/16/2015 04:36 AM, Alex Xu wrote: So if our min_version is 2.1 and the max_version is 2.50. That means alternative implementations need

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Fuel API settings reference

2015-06-16 Thread Oleg Gelbukh
Andrew, I've also noticed that incompatible changes are being introduced in JSON schemas for different objects in almost every release. I hope that explicit reference that lists and explains all parameters will discourage such modifications, or at least will increase their visibility and allow to

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] drop monolithic plugins in neutron module

2015-06-16 Thread Emilien Macchi
The patch has been merged: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/190395 These plugins are now deleted from puppet-neutron: * monolithic OVS (replaced in favor of ML2 with openvswitch mechanism driver) * monolithic Linux Bridge (replaced in favor of ML2 with linuxbridge mechanism driver) On 06/12/2015

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [Nova] [Ironic] [Magnum] Microversion guideline in API-WG

2015-06-16 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 08:56:37AM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 06/04/2015 08:58 AM, Xu, Hejie wrote: Hi, guys, I’m working on adding Microversion into the API-WG’s guideline which make sure we have consistent Microversion behavior in the API for user. The Nova and Ironic already have

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] Device {UUID}c not defined on plugin

2015-06-16 Thread Alvise Dorigo
Hi, I forgot to attach some relevant config files: /etc/neutron/plugins/ml2/ml2_conf.ini : [ml2] type_drivers = gre tenant_network_types = gre mechanism_drivers = openvswitch [ml2_type_flat] [ml2_type_vlan] [ml2_type_gre] tunnel_id_ranges = 1:1000 [ml2_type_vxlan] [securitygroup]

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][release] summit session summary: Release Versioning for Server Applications

2015-06-16 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Timur Nurlygayanov's message of 2015-06-16 12:49:02 +0300: Hi Doug, I suggest to use some version for neutron-*aas plugins, probably, 1.0.0 just to have one pattern for all components. If we will not use numbers for the first releases (or release candidates) it will be hard to

[openstack-dev] [all] FYI - dropping non RabbitMQ support in devstack

2015-06-16 Thread Sean Dague
FYI, One of the things that came out of the summit for Devstack plans going forward is to trim it back to something more opinionated and remove a bunch of low use optionality in the process. One of those branches to be trimmed is all the support for things beyond RabbitMQ in the rpc layer.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] FYI - dropping non RabbitMQ support in devstack

2015-06-16 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 Sean. -- dims On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: FYI, One of the things that came out of the summit for Devstack plans going forward is to trim it back to something more opinionated and remove a bunch of low use optionality in the process. One of those

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [Nova] [Ironic] [Magnum] Microversion guideline in API-WG

2015-06-16 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 06/16/2015 03:47 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 08:56:37AM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 06/04/2015 08:58 AM, Xu, Hejie wrote: Hi, guys, I’m working on adding Microversion into the API-WG’s guideline which make sure we have consistent Microversion behavior in the API

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][nova][ironic] Microversion API HTTP header

2015-06-16 Thread Jay Pipes
On 06/16/2015 04:12 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: 2015-06-16 2:07 GMT+09:00 Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com: It has come to my attention in [1] that the microversion spec for Nova [2] and Ironic [3] have used the project name -- i.e. Nova and Ironic -- instead of the name of the API -- i.e.

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][nova][ironic] Microversion API HTTP header

2015-06-16 Thread Lucas Alvares Gomes
Hi So if our min_version is 2.1 and the max_version is 2.50. That means alternative implementations need implement all the 50 versions api...that sounds pain... Yes, it's pain, but it's no different than someone who is following the Amazon EC2 API, which cuts releases at a regular

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [Nova] [Ironic] [Magnum] Microversion guideline in API-WG

2015-06-16 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 06/16/2015 08:56 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 06/04/2015 08:58 AM, Xu, Hejie wrote: Hi, guys, I’m working on adding Microversion into the API-WG’s guideline which make sure we have consistent Microversion behavior in the API for user. The Nova and Ironic already have Microversion

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][nova][ironic] Microversion API HTTP header

2015-06-16 Thread Salvatore Orlando
On 16 June 2015 at 14:38, Lucas Alvares Gomes lucasago...@gmail.com wrote: Hi So if our min_version is 2.1 and the max_version is 2.50. That means alternative implementations need implement all the 50 versions api...that sounds pain... Yes, it's pain, but it's no different than

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Online Migrations.

2015-06-16 Thread Mike Bayer
On 6/15/15 8:34 PM, Philip Schwartz wrote: I discussed this a bit earlier with John and we came up with a thought that I was going to present after getting a little bit more documentation and spec around. With out going into too much detail, here is the basics of the idea. Add a new column

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][release] summit session summary: Release Versioning for Server Applications

2015-06-16 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2015-06-16 11:45:51 +0200: Doug Hellmann wrote: [...] I put together a little script [1] to try to count the previous releases for projects, to use that as the basis for their first SemVer-based version number. I pasted the output into an etherpad

[openstack-dev] Device {UUID}c not defined on plugin

2015-06-16 Thread Alvise Dorigo
Hi after a migration of Havana to IceHouse (using controller and network services/agents on the same physical node, and using OVS/GRE) we started facing some network-related problems (the internal tag of the element shown by ovs-vsctl show was set to 4095, which is wrong AFAIK). At the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Cinder] [Tempest] Regarding deleting snapshot when instance is OFF

2015-06-16 Thread Jordan Pittier
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote: On 04/08/2015 11:22 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote: + [Cinder] and [Tempest] in the $subject since this affects them too On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 4:22 AM, Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote: On 04/08/2015 12:01 PM, Deepak

Re: [openstack-dev] Device {UUID}c not defined on plugin

2015-06-16 Thread Alvise Dorigo
Hi, I forgot to attach some relevant config files: /etc/neutron/plugins/ml2/ml2_conf.ini : [ml2] type_drivers = gre tenant_network_types = gre mechanism_drivers = openvswitch [ml2_type_flat] [ml2_type_vlan] [ml2_type_gre] tunnel_id_ranges = 1:1000 [ml2_type_vxlan] [securitygroup]

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] [openstack-qa] [tempest] UUIDs and names in tempest.conf file

2015-06-16 Thread Matthew Treinish
So I need to point out that the openstack-qa list isn't used anymore. We only keep it around so we have a place to send for periodic test results. In the future you should just send things to the openstack-dev ML with a [QA] tag in the subject. On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 05:25:30AM +, Tikkanen,

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] python versions

2015-06-16 Thread Serg Melikyan
Stan, +100500 On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Stan Lagun sla...@mirantis.com wrote: I'd rather go with Heat approach (job first) because it makes easier to track what is left to port to Py34 and track progress in this area Sincerely yours, Stan Lagun Principal Software Engineer @

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][nova][ironic] Microversion API HTTP header

2015-06-16 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
16 июня 2015 г. 13:52 пользователь Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com написал: On 06/16/2015 04:36 AM, Alex Xu wrote: So if our min_version is 2.1 and the max_version is 2.50. That means alternative implementations need implement all the 50 versions api...that sounds pain... Yes, it's pain, but

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] [tests] [dsvm] Tests failed because of timeout during the images upload

2015-06-16 Thread Timur Sufiev
Timur, If old jQuery code (not AngularJS) is still used for processing 'Create Image' form, then the spinner is shown just before submitting the form contents [1] and hidden right after the request completes [2] in case the form is being redrawn or the whole page is redrawn in case of redirect -

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] TLS Support in Magnum

2015-06-16 Thread Fox, Kevin M
Out of the box, vms usually can contact the controllers though the routers nat, but not visa versa. So its preferable for guest agents to make the connection, not the controller connect to the guest agents. No floating ips, security group rules or special networks are needed then. Thanks,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][requirements] Proposing a slight change in requirements.txt syncing output.

2015-06-16 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2015-06-16 11:18:55 +1200: At the moment we copy the global-requirements lines verbatim. So if we have two lines in global-requirements.txt: oslotest=1.5.1 # Apache-2.0 PyECLib=1.0.7 # BSD with very different layouts Most

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][nova][ironic] Microversion API HTTP header

2015-06-16 Thread Sean Dague
On 06/16/2015 07:38 AM, Alex Xu wrote: 2015-06-16 18:57 GMT+08:00 Sean Dague s...@dague.net mailto:s...@dague.net: On 06/15/2015 03:45 PM, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote: On Mon, 2015-06-15 at 13:07 -0400, Jay Pipes wrote: The original spec said that the HTTP header should

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][nova][ironic] Microversion API HTTP header

2015-06-16 Thread Sean Dague
On 06/16/2015 08:38 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote: Hi So if our min_version is 2.1 and the max_version is 2.50. That means alternative implementations need implement all the 50 versions api...that sounds pain... Yes, it's pain, but it's no different than someone who is following the

[openstack-dev] [release] Release announcements convergence

2015-06-16 Thread Thierry Carrez
Hi everyone, Release announcements in OpenStack come in various forms and shapes. So far we had: - Integrated release service components being announced on openstack-announce and openstack general lists. - Other service components sometimes being announced on openstack-dev - Oslo libraries

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Proposal for new core-reviewer Harm Waites

2015-06-16 Thread Andre Martin
On Jun 15, 2015, at 02:48, Steven Dake (stdake) std...@cisco.commailto:std...@cisco.com wrote: I am proposing Harm Waites for the Kolla core team. +1 Harm did excellent work on the designate container and does very thorough reviews, the cinder container review being just one example among

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] When do we import aodh?

2015-06-16 Thread Chris Dent
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, Julien Danjou wrote: To me the next step is to: 1. Someone cares and review what I've done in the repository 2. import the code into openstack/aodh Assuming that we'll do whatever is required to finish things after moving it under openstack/ then whatever you've done in

Re: [openstack-dev] [taskflow] Returning information from reverted flow

2015-06-16 Thread Joshua Harlow
Dulko, Michal wrote: -Original Message- From: Joshua Harlow [mailto:harlo...@outlook.com] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 5:49 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [taskflow] Returning information from reverted flow Dulko, Michal

[openstack-dev] [kolla] Add your name and TZ to wiki

2015-06-16 Thread Paul Bourke
Hi all, Steve suggested adding a new table to the Kolla wiki to help us keep track of who's actively working on Kolla along with relevant info such as timezones and IRC names. I'm missing lots of names and timezones so if you'd like to be on this please feel free to update it at

Re: [openstack-dev] How does instance's tap device macaddress generate?

2015-06-16 Thread Tapio Tallgren
On 11.06.2015 18:52, Andreas Scheuring wrote: Maybe this helps (taken from [1]) Actually there is one way that the MAC address of the tap device affects proper operation of guest networking - if you happen to set the tap device's MAC identical to the MAC used by the guest, you will get errors

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Cloud Foundry Service Broker Api in Murano

2015-06-16 Thread Nikolay Starodubtsev
Here is a draft spec for this: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/192250/ Nikolay Starodubtsev Software Engineer Mirantis Inc. Skype: dark_harlequine1 2015-06-16 13:11 GMT+03:00 Nikolay Starodubtsev nstarodubt...@mirantis.com : Hi all, I've started a work on bp:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][release] summit session summary: Release Versioning for Server Applications

2015-06-16 Thread Thierry Carrez
Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2015-06-16 11:45:51 +0200: We also traditionally managed the previously-incubated projects. That would add the following to the mix: barbican 1.0.0 designate 1.0.0 manila 1.0.0 zaqar 1.0.0 Those didn't have the

[openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] Proposal for Glance Artifacts Sub-Team meeting.

2015-06-16 Thread Nikhil Komawar
Hi all, We have planned a fast track development for Glance Artifacts; also it would be our v3 API. To balance pace, knowledge sharing, synchronous discussion on ideas and opinions as well as seeing this great feature through in Liberty: We hereby propose a non-mandatory, open to all, sub-team

[openstack-dev] [devstack] apache wsgi application support

2015-06-16 Thread Sean Dague
I was just looking at the patches that put Nova under apache wsgi for the API, and there are a few things that I think are going in the wrong direction. Largely I think because they were copied from the lib/keystone code, which we've learned is kind of the wrong direction. The first is the fact

Re: [openstack-dev] [javascript] [horizon] [merlin] [refstack] Javascript Linting

2015-06-16 Thread Michael Krotscheck
Just for the sake of clarity- did the Horizon team discuss the tool selection for JSCS with the greater community? I can't find anything on the dev list. Furthermore, there've been situations before (karma) where a patch was landed without appropriate upstream notifications and/or discussion,

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Improvement of the blueprint specs template

2015-06-16 Thread Roman Prykhodchenko
Hi folks! I was reviewing one of specs for Fuel 7.0 and realized the information there is messed up and it’s pretty hard to put it all together. The reason for that is basically that Fuel is a multicomponent project but the template does not consider that — there is a Proposed change section

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] weekly meeting #38

2015-06-16 Thread Emilien Macchi
On 06/15/2015 08:06 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: Hi everyone, Here's an initial agenda for our weekly meeting tomorrow at 1500 UTC in #openstack-meeting-4: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-weekly-meeting-20150616 Please add additional items you'd like to discuss

[openstack-dev] [Ironic] ironic-lib library

2015-06-16 Thread Ruby Loo
Hi, I haven't paid any attention to ironic-lib; I just knew that we wanted to have a library of common code so that we didn't cut/paste. I just took a look[1] and there are files there from 2 months ago. So far, everything is under ironic_lib (ie, no subdirectories to group things). Going

[openstack-dev] [neutron][db] online schema upgrades

2015-06-16 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi neutron folks, I'd like to discuss a plan on getting support for online db schema upgrades in neutron. *What is it even about?* Currently, any major version upgrade, or master-to-master upgrade, requires neutron-server shutdown. After

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Proposal for new core-reviewer Harm Waites

2015-06-16 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
Its unanimous! Welcome to the core reviewer team Harm! Regards -steve From: Steven Dake std...@cisco.commailto:std...@cisco.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: Sunday, June

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] When do we import aodh?

2015-06-16 Thread Julien Danjou
On Tue, Jun 16 2015, Chris Dent wrote: 5. anything in tempest to worry about? Yes, we need to adapt and reenable tempest after. 6. what's that stuff in the ceilometer dir? 6.1. Looks like migration artifacts, what about migration in general? That's a rest of one of the many

[openstack-dev] [puppet] (officially) deprecate stable/{grizzly, havana} branches

2015-06-16 Thread Emilien Macchi
Hi, Some of our modules have stable/grizzly and stable/havana branches. Some of them have the CI broken due to rspec issues that would require some investigation and time if we wanted to fix it. We would like to know who plan to backport some patches in these branches? If nobody plans to do

[openstack-dev] [oslo][all] Request from Oslo team for Liberty Cycle

2015-06-16 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Hello fellow stackers, The Oslo team came up with a handful of requests to the projects that use Oslo-*. Here they are: 0. Check if your project has a Oslo Liaison Please see https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CrossProjectLiaisons#Oslo and volunteer for your project. We meet once a week to go over

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][db] online schema upgrades

2015-06-16 Thread Mike Bayer
On 6/16/15 11:41 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 - - instead of migrating data with alembic rules, migrate it in runtime. There should be a abstraction layer that will make sure that data is migrated into new schema fields and objects, while

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Adopting ironic-lib in Ironic

2015-06-16 Thread Ruby Loo
On 16 June 2015 at 03:12, Dmitry Tantsur dtant...@redhat.com wrote: On 06/16/2015 08:58 AM, Ramakrishnan G wrote: Hi All, Some time back we created a new repository[1] to move all the reusable code components of Ironic to a separate library. The branched out code has changed and there

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][requirements] Proposing a slight change in requirements.txt syncing output.

2015-06-16 Thread Joshua Harlow
Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2015-06-16 11:18:55 +1200: At the moment we copy the global-requirements lines verbatim. So if we have two lines in global-requirements.txt: oslotest=1.5.1 # Apache-2.0 PyECLib=1.0.7 # BSD with very

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Should logs be deleted when we delete an app?

2015-06-16 Thread Randall Burt
+1 Murali. AFIAK, there is no precedent for what Keith proposes, but that doesn't mean its a bad thing. On Jun 16, 2015, at 12:21 AM, Murali Allada murali.all...@rackspace.com wrote: I agree, users should have a mechanism to keep logs around. I implemented the logs deletion feature after we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] ironic-lib library

2015-06-16 Thread Lucas Alvares Gomes
Hi, I haven't paid any attention to ironic-lib; I just knew that we wanted to have a library of common code so that we didn't cut/paste. I just took a look[1] and there are files there from 2 months ago. So far, everything is under ironic_lib (ie, no subdirectories to group things). Going

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

2015-06-16 Thread Paul Belanger
On 06/16/2015 12:41 PM, Allison Randal wrote: On 06/15/2015 01:43 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: While I agree those points are valid, and going to be helpful, moving under OpenStack (even Stackforge) does also offer the chance to get more test integration upstream (not saying this was the original

Re: [openstack-dev] CLI problem

2015-06-16 Thread Steve Martinelli
What was the command you used? What was the output? Can you try running it with --debug? More information is needed here. It would also probably be quicker to jump on IRC and ask around. Thanks, Steve Martinelli OpenStack Keystone Core Ali Reza Zamani alireza.zam...@cs.rutgers.edu wrote on

Re: [openstack-dev] Getting rid of suds, which is unmaintained, and which we want out of Debian

2015-06-16 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:08:55 +0300 Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote: There's only one cinder driver using it (nimble storage), and it seems to be using only very basic features. There are half a dozen suds forks on pipi, or there's pisimplesoap that the debian maintainer recommends.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Mechanism drivers and Neutron server forking?

2015-06-16 Thread Terry Wilson
Right now I'm leaning toward parent always does nothing + PluginWorker. Everything is forked, no special case for workers==0, and explicit designation of the only one case. Of course, it's still early in the day and I haven't had any coffee. I have updated the patch

[openstack-dev] CLI problem

2015-06-16 Thread Ali Reza Zamani
Hi all, I have a problem in creating the instances. When I create the instances using GUI web interface everything is fine. But when I do it using CLI after spawning it says Error. And the error is: ne __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] (officially) deprecate stable/{grizzly, havana} branches

2015-06-16 Thread Matt Fischer
+1 from me for deprecation. I'd also like to know or have an official policy for future deprecations, such as when will we deprecate Icehouse? On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Emilien Macchi emil...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, Some of our modules have stable/grizzly and stable/havana branches.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] Proposal for Weekly Glance Drivers meeting.

2015-06-16 Thread Nikhil Komawar
FYI, We will be closing the vote on Friday, June 19 at 1700 UTC. On 6/15/15 7:41 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote: Hi, As per the discussion during the last weekly Glance meeting (14:51:42at http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2015/glance.2015-06-11-14.00.log.html ), we will begin a short

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral] Proposal for the Resume Feature

2015-06-16 Thread Dmitri Zimine
+1 great write-up Winson, I propose we move the discussion to an etherpad, and flash out details there so it won’t get lost in a long thread. Winson would you care to create one and post here? Re: ‘error state’: I think it’s not absolutely necessary: pause/resume can be done without enabling

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral] Proposal for the Resume Feature

2015-06-16 Thread W Chan
Here's the etherpad link. I replied to the comments/feedbacks there. Please feel free to continue the conversation there. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mistral-resume __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Network path between admin network and shares

2015-06-16 Thread Sturdevant, Mark
Yes. I think this is possible with the HP 3PAR. I'd have to test more to be sure, but if I understand the plan correctly, it'll work. However, there are limited resources for doing this, so it'll only work if resources allow. I'm thinking that the administrator config+startup/setup code

Re: [openstack-dev] CLI problem

2015-06-16 Thread Ali Reza Zamani
It is weired. I deleted my devstack and redo everything. I am using the same command and everything is fine. Thanks, Regards, On 06/16/2015 01:03 PM, Steve Martinelli wrote: What was the command you used? What was the output? Can you try running it with --debug? More information is needed

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Proposal for new core-reviewer Harm Waites

2015-06-16 Thread Harm Weites
Thanks guys, both for all the nice words and the acceptance! harmw Op 16-06-15 om 16:32 schreef Steven Dake (stdake): Its unanimous! Welcome to the core reviewer team Harm! Regards -steve From: Steven Dake std...@cisco.com mailto:std...@cisco.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] apache wsgi application support

2015-06-16 Thread Morgan Fainberg
Long term we want to see Keystone move to http://host/identity. However the reason for choosing 5000/35357 for ports was compatibility and avoiding breaking horizon. At the time we did the initial change over, sharing the root 80/443 ports with horizon was more than challenging since horizon

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] (officially) deprecate stable/{grizzly, havana} branches

2015-06-16 Thread Richard Raseley
Matt Fischer wrote: +1 from me for deprecation. I'd also like to know or have an official policy for future deprecations, such as when will we deprecate Icehouse? On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Emilien Macchi emil...@redhat.com mailto:emil...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, Some of our

Re: [openstack-dev] [Security] Nominating Travis McPeak for Security CoreSec

2015-06-16 Thread michael mccune
On 06/16/2015 05:28 AM, Clark, Robert Graham wrote: I’d like to nominate Travis for a CoreSec position as part of the Security project. - CoreSec team members support the VMT with extended consultation on externally reported vulnerabilities. Travis has been an active member of the Security

Re: [openstack-dev] [grenade] future direction on partial upgrade support

2015-06-16 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-06-16 12:58:18 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote: [...] I think the only complexity here is the fact that grenade.sh implicitly drives stack.sh. Which means one of: 1) devstack-gate could build the worker first, then run grenade.sh 2) we make it so grenade.sh can execute in parts

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Quota enforcement

2015-06-16 Thread Carl Baldwin
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote: Do these kinds of test even make sense? And are they feasible at all? I doubt we have any framework for injecting anything in neutron code under test. I was thinking about this in the context of a lot of the fixes we have

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] FYI - dropping non RabbitMQ support in devstack

2015-06-16 Thread Sean Dague
On 06/16/2015 12:49 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-06-16 06:22:23 -0700: FYI, One of the things that came out of the summit for Devstack plans going forward is to trim it back to something more opinionated and remove a bunch of low use optionality in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] (officially) deprecate stable/{grizzly, havana} branches

2015-06-16 Thread David Moreau Simard
+1 for deprecation -- David Moreau Simard On 2015-06-16 11:54 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: Hi, Some of our modules have stable/grizzly and stable/havana branches. Some of them have the CI broken due to rspec issues that would require some investigation and time if we wanted to fix it. We

[openstack-dev] [Keystone][OSC] Keystone v3 user create --project $projid does not add user to project?

2015-06-16 Thread Rich Megginson
Using admin token credentials with the Keystone v2.0 API and the openstackclient, doing this: # openstack project create bar --enable # openstack user create foo --project bar --enable ... The user will be added to the project. Using admin token credentials with the Keystone v3 API and the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Quota enforcement

2015-06-16 Thread Carl Baldwin
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote: I have been then following a different approach. And a set of patches, including a devref one [2], if up for review [3]. This hardly completes the job: more work is required on the testing side, both as unit and

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] FYI - dropping non RabbitMQ support in devstack

2015-06-16 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-06-16 06:22:23 -0700: FYI, One of the things that came out of the summit for Devstack plans going forward is to trim it back to something more opinionated and remove a bunch of low use optionality in the process. One of those branches to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Should logs be deleted when we delete an app?

2015-06-16 Thread Adrian Otto
On Jun 15, 2015, at 9:10 PM, Keith Bray keith.b...@rackspace.commailto:keith.b...@rackspace.com wrote: Regardless of what the API defaults to, could we have the CLI prompt/warn so that the user easily knows that both options exist? Is there a precedent within OpenStack for a similar

Re: [openstack-dev] stackforge projects are not second class citizens

2015-06-16 Thread Georgy Okrokvertskhov
In Murano project we do see a positive impact of BigTent model. Since Murano was accepted as a part of BigTent community we had a lot of conversations with potential users. They were driven exactly by the fact that Murano is now officially recognized in OpenStack community. It might be a wrong

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging][zeromq] Next step

2015-06-16 Thread Gordon Sim
On 06/12/2015 09:41 PM, Alec Hothan (ahothan) wrote: One long standing issue I can see is the fact that the oslo messaging API documentation is sorely lacking details on critical areas such as API behavior during fault conditions, load conditions and scale conditions. I very much agree,

[openstack-dev] [Congress] Mid-cycle sprint

2015-06-16 Thread Tim Hinrichs
Hi all, In the last couple of IRCs we've been talking about running a mid-cycle sprint focused on enabling our message bus to span multiple processes and multiple hosts. The message bus is what allows the Congress policy engine to communicate with the Congress wrappers around external services

[openstack-dev] [nova] Plan to consolidate FS-style libvirt volume drivers under a common base class

2015-06-16 Thread Matt Riedemann
The NFS, GlusterFS, SMBFS, and Quobyte libvirt volume drivers are all very similar. I want to extract a common base class that abstracts some of the common code and then let the sub-classes provide overrides where necessary. As part of this, I'm wondering if we could just have a single

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] apache wsgi application support

2015-06-16 Thread Chris Dent
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, Sean Dague wrote: I was just looking at the patches that put Nova under apache wsgi for the API, and there are a few things that I think are going in the wrong direction. Largely I think because they were copied from the lib/keystone code, which we've learned is kind of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [stable] No longer doing stable point releases

2015-06-16 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 06/16/2015 12:06 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: It also removes the stupid encouragement to use all components from the same date. With everything tagged at the same date, you kinda send the message that those various things should be used together. With everything tagged separately, you send te

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

2015-06-16 Thread Allison Randal
On 06/15/2015 01:43 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: While I agree those points are valid, and going to be helpful, moving under OpenStack (even Stackforge) does also offer the chance to get more test integration upstream (not saying this was the original scope). However, this could also be achieved

[openstack-dev] [grenade] future direction on partial upgrade support

2015-06-16 Thread Sean Dague
Back when Nova first wanted to test partial upgrade, we did a bunch of slightly odd conditionals inside of grenade and devstack to make it so that if you were very careful, you could just not stop some of the old services on a single node, upgrade everything else, and as long as the old services

Re: [openstack-dev] [javascript] [horizon] [merlin] [refstack] Javascript Linting

2015-06-16 Thread Tripp, Travis S
I’m copying and pasting from the other thread some info below. I think agreeing on rules is the bigger problem here and I don’t think all the projects should have to agree on rules. We’ve spent a good portion of liberty 1 getting the code base cleaned up to meet the already adopted horizon rules

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Plan to consolidate FS-style libvirt volume drivers under a common base class

2015-06-16 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 6/16/2015 4:21 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: The NFS, GlusterFS, SMBFS, and Quobyte libvirt volume drivers are all very similar. I want to extract a common base class that abstracts some of the common code and then let the sub-classes provide overrides where necessary. As part of this, I'm

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Should logs be deleted when we delete an app?

2015-06-16 Thread Randall Burt
While I agree with what you're saying, the way the OpenStack clients are traditionally written/designed, the CLI *is* the SDK for those users who want to do scripting in a shell rather than in Python. If we go with your suggestion, we'd probably also want to have the ability to suppress those

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Should logs be deleted when we delete an app?

2015-06-16 Thread Keith Bray
Isn't that what the SDK is for? To chip in with a Product Management type hat on, I'd think the CLI should be primarily focused on user experience interaction, and the SDK should be primarily targeted for developer automation needs around programmatically interacting with the service. So, I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Should logs be deleted when we delete an app?

2015-06-16 Thread Keith Bray
That makes sense Randall.. .a sort of Novice mode vs. Expert mode. I definitely want to see OpenStack to get easier to use, and lower the barrier to entry. If projects only cater to developers, progress will be slower than what it could be. -Keith On 6/16/15 4:52 PM, Randall Burt

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] apache wsgi application support

2015-06-16 Thread Adam Young
On 06/16/2015 12:25 PM, Sean Dague wrote: I was just looking at the patches that put Nova under apache wsgi for the API, and there are a few things that I think are going in the wrong direction. Largely I think because they were copied from the lib/keystone code, which we've learned is kind of

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][release] summit session summary: Release Versioning for Server Applications

2015-06-16 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2015-06-16 11:45:51 +0200: Doug Hellmann wrote: [...] I put together a little script [1] to try to count the previous releases for projects, to use that as the basis for their first SemVer-based version number. I pasted the output into an etherpad

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Proposal for changing 1600UTC meeting to 1700 UTC

2015-06-16 Thread Harm Weites
I'm ok with moving to 16:30 UTC instead of staying at 16:00. I actually prefer it in my evening schedule :) Moving to 16:30 would already be a great improvement to the current schedule and should at least allow me to not miss everything. - harmw Op 12-06-15 om 15:44 schreef Steven Dake

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] apache wsgi application support

2015-06-16 Thread Adam Young
On 06/16/2015 12:48 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: Long term we want to see Keystone move to http://host/identity. However the reason for choosing 5000/35357 for ports was compatibility and avoiding breaking horizon. At the time we did the initial change over, sharing the root 80/443 ports with

Re: [openstack-dev] [javascript] [horizon] [merlin] [refstack] Javascript Linting

2015-06-16 Thread Michael Krotscheck
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 10:22 AM Tripp, Travis S travis.tr...@hp.com wrote: I think agreeing on rules is the bigger problem here and I don’t think all the projects should have to agree on rules. I believe we agree there, mostly. I personally feel there is some benefit to setting some rules,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Quota enforcement

2015-06-16 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Some more comments inline. Salvatore On 16 June 2015 at 19:00, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote: On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote: Do these kinds of test even make sense? And are they feasible at all? I doubt we have any framework for injecting

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging][zeromq] Next step

2015-06-16 Thread Alec Hothan (ahothan)
Gordon, These are all great points for RPC messages (also called CALL in oslo messaging). There are similar ambiguous contracts for the other types of messages (CAST and FANOUT). I am worried about the general lack of interest from the community to fix this as it looks like most people assume

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

2015-06-16 Thread Jay Pipes
On 06/15/2015 10:55 AM, James Page wrote: We understand and have communicated from the start of this conversation that we will need to be able to maintain deltas between Debian and Ubuntu - for both technical reasons, in the way the distributions work (think Ubuntu main vs universe), as well as

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Quota enforcement

2015-06-16 Thread Salvatore Orlando
On 16 June 2015 at 18:49, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote: On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote: I have been then following a different approach. And a set of patches, including a devref one [2], if up for review [3]. This hardly completes the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Volume creation fails in Horizon

2015-06-16 Thread Mike Perez
On 13:00 Jun 15, Jayanthi, Swaroop wrote: Hi All, I am trying to create a Volume for VMFS with a Volume Type (selected Volume Type selected has extra_specs).I am receiving an error Volume creation failed incase if the volume-type has extra-specs. Cinder doesn't support Volume

Re: [openstack-dev] Targeting icehouse-eol?

2015-06-16 Thread Alan Pevec
let's release this last one (codename: Farewell ?) point release. I can do this next week after we finish pending reviews. Remaining stable/icehouse reviews[1] have -2 or -1 except https://review.openstack.org/176019 which I've asked neutron-stable-maint to review. Matt, anything else before we

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Plan to consolidate FS-style libvirt volume drivers under a common base class

2015-06-16 Thread Michael Still
I don't think you need a spec for this (its a refactor). That said, I'd be interested in exploring how you deprecate the old flags. Can you have more than one deprecated name for a single flag? Michael On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On

  1   2   >