Re: [openstack-dev] Adding Custom Meters in Kilo Ceilometer

basically, you need to inherit the base class and impl the get_samples interface, then registry it in setup.cfg. see an example in kilo: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/145819/ this patch adds some new meters polling by compute agent On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Murali Krishna

[openstack-dev] OpenStack Developer Mailing List Digest April 2-8

HTML rendering: http://www.openstack.org/blog/2016/04/openstack-developer-mailing-list-digest-20160408/ SuccessBot Says === * Ttx: Design Summit placeholder sessions pushed to the Austin official * schedule. * Pabelanger: Launched our first ubuntu-xenial job with node pool! *

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stackalytics] Gaming the Stackalytics stats

Thanks to Dims and Steve for bringing this up. It has long been my opinion that +0's are invaluable for the question asking, and for getting to understand software, and unfortunately +0's are lost in the noise. So a while ago, I posted to the ML [1] asking about making +0's more

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stackalytics] Gaming the Stackalytics stats

I have a quick question: How is anyone hurt out harmed by the practice? I agree it isn't helpful. But it isn't harming either. It could be gaming and it could be ignorance - mistakes by not knowing. I'm asking because I see the same predictable personalities making passive aggressive accusations

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stackalytics] Gaming the Stackalytics stats

On Apr 9, 2016 12:05, "Ken'ichi Ohmichi" wrote: > > > 2016/04/08 10:55、Anita Kuno : > > >> On 04/08/2016 01:42 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > >> 2016-04-08 19:26 GMT+02:00 Davanum Srinivas : > >> > >>> Team, > >>> > >>> Steve pointed

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stackalytics] Gaming the Stackalytics stats

2016/04/08 10:55、Anita Kuno : >> On 04/08/2016 01:42 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: >> 2016-04-08 19:26 GMT+02:00 Davanum Srinivas : >> >>> Team, >>> >>> Steve pointed out to a problem in Stackalytics: >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api] Recently accepted API-WG guidelines

I much prefer this lib work. Thanks, Chris 2016/04/08 4:32、Chris Dent >> On Thu, 7 Apr 2016, michael mccune wrote: >> >> 1. version discover guideline for API microversions >> https://review.openstack.org/243429 >> >> 2. client interaction guideline for API

Re: [openstack-dev] Constant attempts from Matthew Kassawara to remove Debian from the install-guide

On 04/09/2016 06:21 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > This thread is completely and totally inappropriate. Attacking a person > the mailing list is a violation of our community standards. Monty, I don't take it lightly either. Please think twice about who's behavior is inappropriate. Because I've seen

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] Results of the TC Election

On Apr 8, 2016, at 2:21 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: > Another approach to consider would be to continue to offer the ATC > pass for a single commit, but to require a little more participation > in order to vote in TC/PTL elections (modulo Foundation bye-laws etc.) +1 on this. A

Re: [openstack-dev] Constant attempts from Matthew Kassawara to remove Debian from the install-guide

This thread is completely and totally inappropriate. Attacking a person the mailing list is a violation of our community standards. I'm going to respond to a different email in the chain because Anne asks a question. However, this approach to this problem is categorically unacceptable in

[openstack-dev] [nova] Newton Instance Snapshot Capability Extended

Hi All, I have proposed a blueprint (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/instance-memory-snapshot) and nova spec (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/295415/) to improve the current snapshot capability. In the past this topic has been introduced and several times it has been left behind.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][trove] Trove bug scrub

Thanks Amrith for going through the list and triaging the bugs. I think it's a great thing that we now have bugs assigned as 'low-hanging-fruit'. It should make it easier for newcomers to pick bugs and get started. Regards, Mariam. From: Amrith Kumar To: "OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stackalytics] Gaming the Stackalytics stats

On 4/8/2016 5:54 PM, Jay Faulkner wrote: I know a lot of folks explicitly avoid a +0 vote with a comment because you don't get "credit" for it in statistics. Whether or not that should matter is another discussion, but there is a significant disincentive to no-voting right now. - Jay

Re: [openstack-dev] Constant attempts from Matthew Kassawara to remove Debian from the install-guide

On Apr 9, 2016 11:51 AM, Tom Fifield wrote: > The standing issue that I recall that raises the maintenance burden is > the use of debconf rather than/in addition to manual config file edits > as per the other distros. I can't remember whether you already tried a > version

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stackalytics] Gaming the Stackalytics stats

On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 11:39 PM, Diana Clarke wrote: > On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: >> To that effect, i am capturing stuff here: >> https://davanum.wordpress.com/2016/04/08/new-to-openstack-reviews-start-here/ > > Here

Re: [openstack-dev] Constant attempts from Matthew Kassawara to remove Debian from the install-guide

As I've commented on Matthew's patch to the guide, you may just ask apt not to ask questions provided by debconf, by prepending DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive to it. Of course you will need to add more options in case of an upgrade if you want to get rid of all the questions, like adding

Re: [openstack-dev] Constant attempts from Matthew Kassawara to remove Debian from the install-guide

Tom, Would you elaborate more? - Original Message - From: "Tom Fifield" To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Saturday, April 9, 2016 6:20:31 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Constant attempts from Matthew Kassawara to remove Debian from the install-guide On

Re: [openstack-dev] Constant attempts from Matthew Kassawara to remove Debian from the install-guide

On 09/04/16 14:49, Thomas Goirand wrote: I still don't have any idea what's wrong with the Debian guide. The standing issue that I recall that raises the maintenance burden is the use of debconf rather than/in addition to manual config file edits as per the other distros. I can't remember

Re: [openstack-dev] Constant attempts from Matthew Kassawara to remove Debian from the install-guide

On 04/08/2016 11:57 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: > Sorry it didn't come across as a joke, but that's what the '/s' was for. Maybe I'm getting old, but that's the first time I read that '/s' means joke. Does it stand for "" ? > I will be at summit in Austin at a bunch of the cross project stuff >

Re: [openstack-dev] Constant attempts from Matthew Kassawara to remove Debian from the install-guide

On 04/09/2016 02:05 AM, Anne Gentle wrote: > I have another idea for a way forward that doesn't require consensus > across teams. Now that we have the governance in place for debian > packaging, let's move the debian install guide to a new repo that can go > under the packaging project, and you