[openstack-dev] [infra] redo gate jobs only

Hi all is there a command on review.openstack.org that triggers a redo of gate jobs but not check jobs (already passed)? `remerge` doesn¹t seem to do anything. Thanks! __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

[openstack-dev] [masakari]I'd like to use identity internal endpoint for authentication.

Hi all, I'd like to use identity internal endpoint for authentication in Masakari. But, I couldn't find correct configurations. Masakari has used admin endpoint. My wish: [user] > [masakari-API] | [Identity Internal endpoint] |

[openstack-dev] [Cyborg]Queens PTL candidacy

Hi Team, Even though Cyborg is not an official project yet, however with an ultimate goal of becoming one it is necessary to conduct our project governance with compliance of OpenStack community general requirements/culture. Therefore I'm initiating the very first PTL election for Cyborg project

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove] Can we move some non-voting broken jobs to the experimental queue?

Matt, we're trying our best to and the reason they were (recently) moved back to NON-experimental is that in moving them to experimental, no one monitored them. Yes, I am trying to get them to voting and like everything else in Trove, we could use some help. Yes, I realize that there are no

[openstack-dev] [election][cinder] Jay Bryant Candidacy for Cinder Queens PTL

Hey OpenStack Community, I would like to submit my name for Cinder PTL for the Queens release. For those of you who may not know me, I have been active in OpenStack since early 2013.Soon after starting with the community I started working with the Cinder Team and was nominated for Core Team

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 02:51:39AM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-08-03 12:43:04 +1000 (+1000), Tony Breeds wrote: > [...] > > I wonder if we should look at publishing the upper-constraints.txt file > > somewhere (other than cgit). If we did something like: > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Proposing TommyLikeHu for Cinder core

Thank you Sean and Cinder team. It's my honor to be a member of the big family, looking forward to work with all of you! Sean McGinnis 于2017年8月3日周四 上午9:21写道： > I'm a little late getting back to it, but I have just added TommyLike > to the Gerrit and Launchpad groups. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][Nova] Editing flavor causing instance flavor display error

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Zhenyu Zheng wrote: > Hi All, > > Horizon provided the feature to allow user edit existing flavors, no > matter it is currently used by any instances or not. While Nova doesn't > provide this kind of ability, Horizon achieved this by

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][tc] IMPORTANT upcoming change to technical elections

On 2017-07-17 16:17:00 + (+), Jeremy Stanley wrote: > If you want to run or vote in upcoming elections for PTL and TC, > make sure your Foundation Individual Membership is active and has at > least one Email address which matches an Email address in your > Gerrit account: log in at

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

On 2017-08-03 12:43:04 +1000 (+1000), Tony Breeds wrote: [...] > I wonder if we should look at publishing the upper-constraints.txt file > somewhere (other than cgit). If we did something like: > > tarballs.o.o/constraints/$series.txt > > We wouldn't have an issue when we EOL a branch and the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 08:00:22AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Dmitry Tantsur's message of 2017-07-29 20:06:18 +0200: > > Just to clarify: we cannot land the tox.ini change until the requirements > > repo > > is actually branched, right? > > Good point. The tests for those

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][release][stable][ptl][infra] Strategic discussion regarding the future of documentation for EOL releases

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 07:05:16PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > That content will now live in the project trees. Perhaps part of marking > branches in those repos EOL needs to include deleting the install tree > from the docs? Now that the docs are in a standard location, that could > be part

[openstack-dev] [Horizon][Nova] Editing flavor causing instance flavor display error

Hi All, Horizon provided the feature to allow user edit existing flavors, no matter it is currently used by any instances or not. While Nova doesn't provide this kind of ability, Horizon achieved this by deleting the old flavor first and create a new flavor with the requested properties. And the

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][release][docs] FFE for openstack-doc-tools

On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 08:44:25PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 2017-08-02 20:34, Matthew Thode wrote: > > On 17-08-02 14:22:35, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > >> We need a new release of openstack-doc-tools to handle the changed > >> behaviour in how we build documents. > >> > >> The tool is only

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Proposing TommyLikeHu for Cinder core

I'm a little late getting back to it, but I have just added TommyLike to the Gerrit and Launchpad groups. Welcome to the Cinder core team TommyLike. We're glad to have you. Sean On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 03:07:08AM -0500, Sean McGinnis wrote: > I am proposing we add TommyLike as a Cinder core. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs] Concerns with docs migration

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 1:20 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Akihiro Motoki's message of 2017-08-03 01:02:59 +0900: >> 2017-08-03 0:52 GMT+09:00 Doug Hellmann : >> > Excerpts from Stephen Finucane's message of 2017-08-02 16:35:23 +0100: >> >>

Re: [openstack-dev] string freeze exception for VMAX driver

I am not sure who is responsible to respond to string freeze exception, but I will comment it as my hat of the i18n team. Looking at "cinder" translation status [1], the best progress is ~73% and 718 of 2932 message are remaining. In other languages the progress is lower. Adding two new messages

[openstack-dev] [requirements][ffe][glance] glance_store minimum bump in pike

On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 08:47:41AM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: > If it turns out to be persistent I'll need some help from the glance > team debugging that so we can take the updates. The persistent failure has been corrected so #winning > The requirements team will discuss the status of these

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][requirements][shade][infra] FFE for zuul-sphinx

On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 04:32:36PM -0500, Monty Taylor wrote: > Heya, > > We'd like to request a requirements feature freeze exception to add the > zuul-sphinx library. > > zuul-sphinx is an Infra-managed Sphinx extension used to process job > documentation for zuul jobs for Zuul v3. Since jobs

[openstack-dev] [all] review.openstack.org downtime and Gerrit upgrade

Hello, The Infra team is planning to upgrade review.openstack.org from Gerrit 2.11 to Gerrit 2.13 on September 18, 2017. This downtime will begin at 1500UTC and is expected to take many hours as we have to perform an offline update of Gerrit's secondary indexes. The outage should be complete by

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][requirements][shade][infra] FFE for zuul-sphinx

On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 05:36:24PM -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > I'd support this FFE for reasons stated above (specifically "only be > used in test-requirements.txt") > > +1 > > Thanks, > Dims > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > > Heya, > > > >

[openstack-dev] [ironic][bifrost] Unable to Enroll Inventory

Hi Bifrost Gurus! I'm following the Brifost docs and am stuck trying to enroll inventory. I have only a passing familiarity with ansible,ironic, and python, which puts me firmly in the "complete ignoramous" category. OS: Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS desktop (fresh install) Sudo User: bifrost Ansibile:

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][requirements][barbican][octavia][LBaaS][heat] FFE Request for python-barbicanclient library

On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 10:02:32AM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:58:22PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Dave McCowan (dmccowan)'s message of 2017-08-01 20:48:12 > > +: > > > This note is to request a Feature Freeze Exemption (FFE) for the > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Interop-wg] [refstack][interop-wg] Non-candidacy for RefStack PTL

Catherine you’ve been an amazing PTL. Thanks for your leadership and hard work. See you around :-) -luzC From: "arkady.kanev...@dell.com" Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date:

[openstack-dev] [requirements] Queens PTL candidacy

I would like to announce my candidacy for PTL of the Requirements project for the Queens cycle. The following will be my goals for the cycle, in order of importance: 1. Continue from the good place tonyb left us at. The primary goal to keep a tight rein on global-requirements and

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][requirements][shade][infra] FFE for zuul-sphinx

On 17-08-02 16:32:36, Monty Taylor wrote: > Heya, > > We'd like to request a requirements feature freeze exception to add the > zuul-sphinx library. > > zuul-sphinx is an Infra-managed Sphinx extension used to process job > documentation for zuul jobs for Zuul v3. Since jobs can be defined in

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][requirements][shade][infra] FFE for zuul-sphinx

I'd support this FFE for reasons stated above (specifically "only be used in test-requirements.txt") +1 Thanks, Dims On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > Heya, > > We'd like to request a requirements feature freeze exception to add the > zuul-sphinx

[openstack-dev] [release][requirements][shade][infra] FFE for zuul-sphinx

Heya, We'd like to request a requirements feature freeze exception to add the zuul-sphinx library. zuul-sphinx is an Infra-managed Sphinx extension used to process job documentation for zuul jobs for Zuul v3. Since jobs can be defined in individual project repos in Zuul v3, generating

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Queens PTL candidacy

Hello everyone, I would like to announce my candidacy for PTL of the OpenStack-Ansible project for the Queens cycle. I will focus on the following themes: 1) Improve the usability It can be difficult for a newcomer to fully grasp the way OpenStack-Ansible works, and the first experience can be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Interop-wg] [refstack][interop-wg] Non-candidacy for RefStack PTL

Here here. Thanks Catherine for a great job for many years. From: Egle Sigler [mailto:ushnish...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 3:54 PM To: Catherine Cuong Diep ; openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org; interop...@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs] Concerns with docs migration

Excerpts from Clark Boylan's message of 2017-08-02 13:44:26 -0700: > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017, at 11:37 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > > On 08/02/2017 12:28 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017, at 07:55 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > >> Now that Stephen Finucane is back from enjoying his youth

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs] Concerns with docs migration

Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2017-08-02 14:34:40 -0400: > On 08/02/2017 12:20 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Akihiro Motoki's message of 2017-08-03 01:02:59 +0900: > >> 2017-08-03 0:52 GMT+09:00 Doug Hellmann : > >>> Excerpts from Stephen Finucane's

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [ironic] [nova] Trying again on wait_for_compute in devstack

On 08/02/2017 07:17 AM, Sean Dague wrote: The 3 node scenarios in Neutron (which are still experimental nv) are typically failing to bring online the 3rd compute. In cells v2 you have to explicitly add nodes to the cells. There is a nova-manage command "discover-hosts" that takes all the compute

Re: [openstack-dev] [Interop-wg] [refstack][interop-wg] Non-candidacy for RefStack PTL

Thank you Catherine for all your outstanding leadership and work on RefStack and Interop (defcore). -Egle From: Catherine Cuong Diep Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 2:15 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org;

[openstack-dev] Seeking mentors and mentees for long term mentoring

Hello All! We are excited to kick off the next round of mentoring sponsored by the Women of OpenStack! Anyone can sign up who is interested in mentoring or in need of a mentor! Mentors! We can set you up as a technical mentor based on your areas of expertise within the community or we can

[openstack-dev] [searchlight] Cancelling IRC meeting August 2nd

Hi, Apologies for the short notice, but I'm cancelling the IRC meeting for August 2nd as I have a family commitment tomorrow morning. We'll resume as normal next week. Thanks, Steve __ OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][security] To firewalld, or not to firewalld

On 08/02/2017 03:57 AM, Mark Goddard wrote: > The solution we built used a conf.d/ mechanism layered on top of iptables. An > advantage of this approach is that operators or co-resident software stacks > could add their own rules to the firewall. AFAIK, this is not generally > possible when

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs] Concerns with docs migration

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017, at 11:37 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 08/02/2017 12:28 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017, at 07:55 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > >> Now that Stephen Finucane is back from enjoying his youth and > >> gallivanting all over Europe, and we talked about a few things in

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs] Concerns with docs migration

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > My gut response is to say that if the example uses nova-manage or > one of the nova service executables, then that makes sense to leave > in the nova tree, but otherwise it should go into either the > python-novaclient

[openstack-dev] [refstack][interop-wg] Non-candidacy for RefStack PTL

Hi Everyone, As I had announced in the RefStack IRC meeting a few weeks ago, I will not run for RefStack PTL in the upcoming cycle. I have been PTL for the last 2 years and it is time to pass the torch to a new leader. I would like to thanks everyone for your support and contribution to make

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][release][docs] FFE for openstack-doc-tools

On 2017-08-02 20:34, Matthew Thode wrote: > On 17-08-02 14:22:35, Andreas Jaeger wrote: >> We need a new release of openstack-doc-tools to handle the changed >> behaviour in how we build documents. >> >> The tool is only used by documentation projects for building and nowhere >> else listed in

[openstack-dev] [kolla][PTL][elections] Candidacy for Kolla PTL

Hello everyone, Once more unto the breach dear friends! I would like to run for PTL again for Queens. Pike was very exciting release for Kolla. With strong focus on Kolla-Kubernetes, Kolla-Ansible getting more and more production deployments and Kolla images being successfully consumed by project

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs] Concerns with docs migration

> On Aug 2, 2017, at 1:37 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > >> On 08/02/2017 12:28 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017, at 07:55 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >>> Now that Stephen Finucane is back from enjoying his youth and >>> gallivanting all over Europe, and we talked about

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs] Concerns with docs migration

On 08/02/2017 12:28 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017, at 07:55 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >> Now that Stephen Finucane is back from enjoying his youth and >> gallivanting all over Europe, and we talked about a few things in IRC >> this morning on the docs migration for Nova, I wanted

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs] Concerns with docs migration

On 08/02/2017 12:20 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Akihiro Motoki's message of 2017-08-03 01:02:59 +0900: >> 2017-08-03 0:52 GMT+09:00 Doug Hellmann : >>> Excerpts from Stephen Finucane's message of 2017-08-02 16:35:23 +0100: On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 09:28 -0600,

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][release][docs] FFE for openstack-doc-tools

On 17-08-02 14:22:35, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > We need a new release of openstack-doc-tools to handle the changed > behaviour in how we build documents. > > The tool is only used by documentation projects for building and nowhere > else listed in requirements file. > > Please release this and

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][requirements] FFE release for reno 2.5.0

On 17-08-02 23:18:19, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 08:39:07AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > We have a few projects that have modified stable branch release > > notes by editing the files on master, which makes those notes appear > > as part of the current release. Reno has a new

[openstack-dev] string freeze exception for VMAX driver

To whom it may concern, I would like to request a string freeze exception for 2 patches that are on the merge queue for Pike. 1. VMAX driver - align VMAX QOS settings with front end (CI Passed) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/484885/7/cinder/volume/drivers/dell_emc/vmax/rest.py line

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Ansible] Not running for Queens PTL

I couldn't agree more with what others have already said. It's been awesome to see positive things come out of close communication between deployment projects and other project teams. I look forward to seeing the pattern and precedence continue! On 07/31/2017 12:59 PM, Amy Marrich wrote: > Andy,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs] Concerns with docs migration

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017, at 07:55 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >> Now that Stephen Finucane is back from enjoying his youth and >> gallivanting all over Europe, and we talked about a few things in IRC >> this morning on the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tacker] Proposing yanxingan for Tacker core

+2 Thanks Yan for your contribution to Tacker. On Jul 27, 2017 10:15 AM, "gongys2017" wrote: I am proposing we add Yan xingan as a Tacker core. Yanxingan is woking in china mobile, a telecom company which has big requirement on NFV MANO. We are proud of having him on

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs] Concerns with docs migration

On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 09:28 -0700, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017, at 07:55 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > Now that Stephen Finucane is back from enjoying his youth and > > gallivanting all over Europe, and we talked about a few things in IRC > > this morning on the docs migration for

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs] Concerns with docs migration

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017, at 07:55 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Now that Stephen Finucane is back from enjoying his youth and > gallivanting all over Europe, and we talked about a few things in IRC > this morning on the docs migration for Nova, I wanted to dump my > concerns here for broader

[openstack-dev] [all] Rollout of Zuul v3 at the PTG

Hey everybody! The time has come at long last, we're actually aiming at a concrete date for rolling Zuul v3 live. \o/ tl;dr - Assuming things go well we want to do it at the PTG We couldn't be more excited - there are a giant pile of feature requests from folks that we've been responding

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Bogdan Dobrelya core on TripleO / Containers

Congrats! On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 6:29 PM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: > On 31.07.2017 15:51, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Bogdan (bogdando on IRC) has been very active in Containerization of

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs] Concerns with docs migration

Excerpts from Akihiro Motoki's message of 2017-08-03 01:02:59 +0900: > 2017-08-03 0:52 GMT+09:00 Doug Hellmann : > > Excerpts from Stephen Finucane's message of 2017-08-02 16:35:23 +0100: > >> On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 09:28 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: > >> > On 08/02/2017 09:22

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs] Concerns with docs migration

2017-08-03 0:52 GMT+09:00 Doug Hellmann : > Excerpts from Stephen Finucane's message of 2017-08-02 16:35:23 +0100: >> On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 09:28 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: >> > On 08/02/2017 09:22 AM, Stephen Finucane wrote: >> > > On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 09:55 -0500, Matt

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs] Concerns with docs migration

Thanks for summarizing the concerns. It is really helpful for all projects! 2017-08-02 23:55 GMT+09:00 Matt Riedemann : > Now that Stephen Finucane is back from enjoying his youth and gallivanting > all over Europe, and we talked about a few things in IRC this morning on the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs] Concerns with docs migration

Excerpts from Stephen Finucane's message of 2017-08-02 16:35:23 +0100: > On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 09:28 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: > > On 08/02/2017 09:22 AM, Stephen Finucane wrote: > > > On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 09:55 -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > > 3. The patch for the import of the admin guide

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs] Concerns with docs migration

On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 09:28 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: > On 08/02/2017 09:22 AM, Stephen Finucane wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 09:55 -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > 3. The patch for the import of the admin guide [8] is missing some CLI > > > specific pages which are pretty useful given

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs] Concerns with docs migration

On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, Stephen Finucane wrote: Unfortunately I can't think of any cleverer way to identify these broken links than manual inspection. I'll do this again for all the patches I've authored and try to do them for any others I encounter. if there's access available to the web server

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs] Concerns with docs migration

On 08/02/2017 09:22 AM, Stephen Finucane wrote: On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 09:55 -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: 3. The patch for the import of the admin guide [8] is missing some CLI specific pages which are pretty useful given they aren't documented anywhere else, like the forced_host part of the

[openstack-dev] [trove] Can we move some non-voting broken jobs to the experimental queue?

I don't dabble in Trove-land often but today I pushed a change and was watching it in zuul, and noticed that the change runs 26 jobs in the check queue. Several of those (cassandra, couch, mongo, percona) all failed nearly immediately with something in the diskimage builder, like this:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs] Concerns with docs migration

On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 09:55 -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Now that Stephen Finucane is back from enjoying his youth and > gallivanting all over Europe, and we talked about a few things in IRC > this morning on the docs migration for Nova, I wanted to dump my > concerns here for broader

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs] Concerns with docs migration

On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 09:55 -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Now that Stephen Finucane is back from enjoying his youth and > gallivanting all over Europe, and we talked about a few things in IRC > this morning on the docs migration for Nova, I wanted to dump my > concerns here for broader

Re: [openstack-dev] Trying again on wait_for_compute in devstack

On 8/2/2017 10:04 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: and we're not going to use it in multinode scenarios. Why would you not run this in multinode scenarios? That's the only time this is really a problem, because in the single node case we're discovering and mapping the compute node late enough that

[openstack-dev] [keystone][policy] no policy meeting today 2017-08-02

A lot of the team is focused on getting pike-rc1 out the door and reviews. The agenda is also empty. Let's cancel today and pick up next week or shortly before the PTG to organize our policy sessions there. Thanks, Lance signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [ironic] [nova] Trying again on wait_for_compute in devstack

An issue with the xenserver CI was identified. Once we get this patch in, and backported to ocata, it should also address a frequent grenade multinode fail scenario which is plaguing the gate. -Sean On 08/02/2017 07:17 AM, Sean Dague wrote: The 3 node scenarios in Neutron (which are

Re: [openstack-dev] Trying again on wait_for_compute in devstack

On 8/2/2017 6:17 AM, Sean Dague wrote: and we're not going to use it in multinode scenarios. Why would you not run this in multinode scenarios? That's the only time this is really a problem, because in the single node case we're discovering and mapping the compute node late enough that it's

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Apply for exception to having Storwize cinder Tiramisu replication patch reviewed and merged

This patch was Workflow-1 until after the feature freeze date. At this point I think we will need to wait until Queens opens up to get this through. Sean On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 12:07:06PM +, Xiao Qin SH Li wrote: > dir="ltr" style="font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10.5pt"

[openstack-dev] [nova][docs] Concerns with docs migration

Now that Stephen Finucane is back from enjoying his youth and gallivanting all over Europe, and we talked about a few things in IRC this morning on the docs migration for Nova, I wanted to dump my concerns here for broader consumption. 1. We know we have to fix a bunch of broken links by

Re: [openstack-dev] [elections][tripleo] Queens PTL candidacy

+1 -Original Message- From: Alex Schultz [mailto:aschu...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 8:56 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [elections][tripleo] Queens PTL candidacy I would

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Only 40 days to PTG !

May be good to point out to new folks, the etherpads for discussions are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PTG/Queens/Etherpads Thanks, Dims On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Time flies, and we are just 40 days from the Project

[openstack-dev] [all] Only 40 days to PTG !

Hi everyone, Time flies, and we are just 40 days from the Project Teams Gathering in Denver. Time for a few reminders! 1/ Registration If you haven't registered yet, you should do so[1] ASAP. Beyond securing your slot to the event, it helps us planning for rooms and lunches based on your days

[openstack-dev] [oslo][barbican][sahara] start RPC service before launcher wait?

Oop - didn't reply all -- Forwarded message -- From: Ken Giusti Date: Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 12:51 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][barbican][sahara] start RPC service before launcher wait? To: Adam Spiers Hi Adam, I think there's a

[openstack-dev] [elections][tripleo] Queens PTL candidacy

I would like to nominate myself for the TripleO PTL role for the Queens cycle. I have been a contributor to various OpenStack projects since Liberty. I have spent most of my time working on the deployment of OpenStack and with the engineers who deploy it. As many of you know, I believe the

[openstack-dev] Fwd: ETSI NFV - OpenStack PTG in Denver

Hi All, I was kindly asked by Tetsuya (in cc) to help him distribute the information about an ETSI NFV tutorial & workshop that might be relevant to your work and therefore you might be interested in joining. You can find more information on the wiki page linked below. Please reach out to

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][release][docs] FFE for openstack-doc-tools

On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 02:22:35PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > We need a new release of openstack-doc-tools to handle the changed > behaviour in how we build documents. > > The tool is only used by documentation projects for building and nowhere > else listed in requirements file. > > Please

[openstack-dev] [elections] [puppet] Candidacy for Puppet OpenStack PTL (Queens)

Hey everyone, I would like to nominate myself for the PTL role for the Puppet OpenStack team for the Queens release cycle. I have been directly involved with OpenStack as a deployer and contributor since 2011. I have also personally used the Puppet OpenStack modules for a significant period of

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][requirements] FFE release for reno 2.5.0

On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 08:39:07AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > We have a few projects that have modified stable branch release > notes by editing the files on master, which makes those notes appear > as part of the current release. Reno has a new option to address > that problem by ignoring some

[openstack-dev] [watcher] nominate Aditi Sharma to Watcher Core group

Aditi Sharma (adisky in IRC) has been working on OpenStack Watcher since this March and has done some valuable patches[1] along with Action Plan cancelling blueprint (spec and implementation have been merged). I’d like to nominate Aditi Sharma to Watcher Core group and waiting for your vote.

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][requirements] FFE release for reno 2.5.0

Doug Hellmann wrote: > We have a few projects that have modified stable branch release > notes by editing the files on master, which makes those notes appear > as part of the current release. Reno has a new option to address > that problem by ignoring some note files, and I would like to release >

[openstack-dev] [release][requirements] FFE release for reno 2.5.0

We have a few projects that have modified stable branch release notes by editing the files on master, which makes those notes appear as part of the current release. Reno has a new option to address that problem by ignoring some note files, and I would like to release that version to allow project

[openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Queens PTL candidacy

Hi all, I would like to announce my self nomination for the PTL candidacy in Tricircle Queens cycle. My name is Zhiyuan Cai, and my IRC handle is zhiyuan. As a core reviewer of Tricircle project, I have been actively participating in the development of this project since Mitaka cycle. During the

[openstack-dev] [requirements][release][docs] FFE for openstack-doc-tools

We need a new release of openstack-doc-tools to handle the changed behaviour in how we build documents. The tool is only used by documentation projects for building and nowhere else listed in requirements file. Please release this and take the new version in for requirements repo,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][docs] recruiting for help with documentation tools

Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2017-08-01 15:35:35 -0400: > With the changes we've made to docs processes upstream, every team > is going to need to build up their knowledge of how the new > documentation tools and jobs work. The docs team will still help, > but things will obviously go

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][docs] recruiting for help with documentation tools

Excerpts from Swapnil Kulkarni's message of 2017-08-02 14:35:49 +0530: > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: > > On 01.08.2017 21:35, Doug Hellmann wrote: > >> With the changes we've made to docs processes upstream, every team > >> is going to need to build

Re: [openstack-dev] [SPAM] [all][docs] recruiting for help with documentation tools

Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2017-08-02 14:01:47 +0200: > Doug Hellmann wrote: > > [...] > > The areas we need help are maintaining the doc build jobs, the > > sphinx extensions in oslo.config and oslo.policy, the Sphinx theme, > > and the template build tool in the openstack-manuals

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Apply for exception to having Storwize cinder Tiramisu replication patch reviewed and merged

  Hi all,   There is a Tiramisu replication patch for IBM storwize cinder https://review.openstack.org/#/c/469394. Since it is already passed Pike-3, the deadline for new features. We would like to check if there's a chance to get an exception to have it reviewed and merged?   Thanks a lot!

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Requirements for re-adding Gluster support

Thanks to everyone who replied! I'll try to summarize what we'll try to get from the Gluster Community users that run OpenStack. - find an owner/maintainer for the Gluster driver in Cinder little maintenance seems needed, no recent problems reported - get someone to maintain the gate job(s) in

Re: [openstack-dev] [SPAM] [all][docs] recruiting for help with documentation tools

Doug Hellmann wrote: > [...] > The areas we need help are maintaining the doc build jobs, the > sphinx extensions in oslo.config and oslo.policy, the Sphinx theme, > and the template build tool in the openstack-manuals git repo. These > are all minimally complete, but there is definitely feature

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] PTL non-candidacy

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > Hi All, > As the requirements team knows I will not be running for PTL of > requirements management. I'll still be an active core. > > It's been a blast being the PTL for the last 2 cycles but I need to > focus on

[openstack-dev] [devstack] [ironic] [nova] Trying again on wait_for_compute in devstack

The 3 node scenarios in Neutron (which are still experimental nv) are typically failing to bring online the 3rd compute. In cells v2 you have to explicitly add nodes to the cells. There is a nova-manage command "discover-hosts" that takes all the compute nodes which have checked in, but aren't yet

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][docs] recruiting for help with documentation tools

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: > On 01.08.2017 21:35, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> With the changes we've made to docs processes upstream, every team >> is going to need to build up their knowledge of how the new >> documentation tools and jobs work. The

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][security] To firewalld, or not to firewalld

In my previous job we had to build a firewall solution for our OpenStack control plane. Our research found that firewalld may have a habit of 'fighting' against the rules added by certain OpenStack services. This was over a year ago, so things may have changed. We didn't pursue firewalld as a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][docs] recruiting for help with documentation tools

On 01.08.2017 21:35, Doug Hellmann wrote: > With the changes we've made to docs processes upstream, every team > is going to need to build up their knowledge of how the new > documentation tools and jobs work. The docs team will still help, > but things will obviously go more smoothly if folks

[openstack-dev] [acceleration]Cyborg Weekly Meeting 2017.08.02

Hi Team, As always we will have our weekly meeting today starting UTC 1500 at #openstack-cyborg. Agenda could be found at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/CyborgTeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_meeting -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei

Re: [openstack-dev] [security][barbican] PTG room sharing

On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Dave McCowan (dmccowan) wrote: > > > On 8/1/17, 12:21 PM, "Thierry Carrez" wrote: > > >Luke Hinds wrote: > >> Thanks Dave, I will let Kendall know that we can free up the room from > >> Mon / Tuesday, and instead have

[openstack-dev] [requirements] PTL non-candidacy

Hi All, As the requirements team knows I will not be running for PTL of requirements management. I'll still be an active core. It's been a blast being the PTL for the last 2 cycles but I need to focus on other parts of OpenStack for a while (like stable branch maintenance). The requirements