Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] mod_wsgi support (pike bug?)

Hi Kevin, On 04.09.2017 15:01, Kevin Benton wrote: Yes, unfortunately I didn't make it back to the patch in time to adjust devstack to dump all of the configuration into one file (instead of /etc/neutron/neutron.conf /etc/neutron/plugins/ml2.conf etc). You don't have to put everything into

[openstack-dev] [QA] Meeting Thursday Sep 7th at 8:00 UTC

Hello everyone, Please reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be on Thursday, Sep 7th at 8:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel. The agenda for the meeting can be found here:

[openstack-dev] [solum] Next week's meeting is canceled

Due to the PTG, we will cancel the meeting next week. Cheers, Rong Zhu __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

[openstack-dev] [murano] Next 2 team meetings canceled

Hi Teams, Let's cancel meetings at 12.9 and and 19.9 because of PTG. Cheers, Rong Zhu __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

[openstack-dev] [congress] no congress meeting on 9/14

To accommodate people at PTG __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

[openstack-dev] [Mogan]Tasks update of Mogan Project

Hi, We are glad to present this week's tasks update of Mogan. See the details below: Essential Priorities == 1. Node aggregates (liudong, zhangyang, zhenguo)merged blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mogan/+spec/node-aggregate spec:

Re: [openstack-dev] [PTG] Video interviews at PTG, now scheduling

Just a reminder. Slots are starring to fill up. On Tue, Aug 22, 2017, 10:43 Rich Bowen wrote: > Now that the PTG schedule is up, I'd like to invite you to sign up for > my video interview series. I'll be conducting interviews at the PTG, > with the goal of: > > * Telling our

[openstack-dev] [neutron] no upgrades meeting tomorrow

Hi, I won't be able to chair the meeting because of a conference, so I cancel it. We won't have one the week after that because of PTG either. We will meet the next time in two weeks. Thanks, Ihar __ OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [placement] Modeling SR-IOV with nested resource providers

On Sep 5, 2017, at 10:02 AM, Andrey Volkov wrote: > For example, I have SR-IOV PF with four ports (P_i), two of them are > connected to one switch (SW_1) and other two to another (SW_2). I > would like to get VFs from distinct ports connected to distinct > switches (more

[openstack-dev] [keystone] Additional documentation for mod_auth_mellon

The existing documentation on setting up mod_auth_mellon (https://docs.openstack.org/keystone/latest/advanced-topics/federation/mellon.html) is sparse. Our experience with using mod_auth_mellon either in the context of OpenStack federation or simply as a SAML SP working in conjunction with

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][neutron] checking link integrity in the gate

Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2017-09-06 19:00:05 +: > On 2017-09-06 14:46:54 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote: > [...] > > To be clear, if you can get Sphinx's linkchecker builder to work, > > that's a great option for this. I just don't think you really want > > to run it for

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] multi threads with swift backend

Hey, I would love to see that reviving! Cheers, Arnaud On 6 September 2017 at 21:00, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: > Hey! As you said it's not possible now. > > I implemented the support several years ago, bit unfortunately no one > wanted to review it:

Re: [openstack-dev] [relmgt] Libraries published to pypi with YYYY.X.Z versions

On 2017-09-01 09:51:36 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote: [...] > Yes, for a first batch I propose we clean up the following: > > python-congressclient 2015.1.0 > python-congressclient 2015.1.0rc1 > python-designateclient 2013.1.a8.g3a2a320 > networking-hyperv 2015.1.0 [...] Are we waiting for

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] multi threads with swift backend

Hey! As you said it's not possible now. I implemented the support several years ago, bit unfortunately no one wanted to review it: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218993 If you want, we can revive it. Best, Mike On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 9:05 PM, Clay Gerrard wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][neutron] checking link integrity in the gate

On 2017-09-06 14:46:54 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote: [...] > To be clear, if you can get Sphinx's linkchecker builder to work, > that's a great option for this. I just don't think you really want > to run it for every check or gate job that builds the docs. Running a periodic pipeline job

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][neutron] checking link integrity in the gate

Excerpts from Alexandra Settle's message of 2017-09-06 17:47:44 +: > > > On 9/6/17, 12:10 PM, "Doug Hellmann" wrote: > > Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2017-09-05 13:53:40 -0400: > > Excerpts from Boden Russell's message of 2017-09-05 11:25:34

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] tracking policy community goal for queens

Excerpts from Lance Bragstad's message of 2017-09-06 12:51:47 -0500: > Hey all, > > I reused some of Doug's doc-migration tooling to create a burndown chart To give credit where due, I in turn copied that stuff from something Sean Dague had for the API ref initiative. Doug > specifically for

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] multi threads with swift backend

I'm pretty sure that would only be possible with a code change in glance to move the consumption of the swiftclient abstraction up a layer from the client/connection objects to swiftclient's service objects [1]. I'm not sure if that'd be something that would make a lot of sense to the Image

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] remove uml code from nova tree

On 2017-09-06 13:35:09 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote: [...] > I think this classifies as the kind of thing we can straight remove, and > it will simplify a few things if we do. As someone who maintained very large UML deployments for many years (not via nova), I can't personally imagine anyone

[openstack-dev] [all] tracking policy community goal for queens

Hey all, I reused some of Doug's doc-migration tooling to create a burndown chart specifically for policy work in Queens [0][1]. As some of you might know, I've attempted to update projects that are not impacted by the goal [2]. Another reminder that we will be having two sessions dedicated to

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][neutron] checking link integrity in the gate

On 9/6/17, 12:10 PM, "Doug Hellmann" wrote: Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2017-09-05 13:53:40 -0400: > Excerpts from Boden Russell's message of 2017-09-05 11:25:34 -0600: > > > > On 9/5/17 11:03 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > Is eventlet

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] remove uml code from nova tree

Yes, please. On 09/06/2017 01:35 PM, Sean Dague wrote: As some of the libvirt refactorings have hit recently, especially around privsep, one bit of cruft is UML (user mode linux) support. For people that do not yet have gray hairs, this was the earliest form of upstream "virtualization" that

[openstack-dev] [nova] remove uml code from nova tree

As some of the libvirt refactorings have hit recently, especially around privsep, one bit of cruft is UML (user mode linux) support. For people that do not yet have gray hairs, this was the earliest form of upstream "virtualization" that Linux had. Allowed you to run a kernel as a user process

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][neutron] checking link integrity in the gate

Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2017-09-05 13:53:40 -0400: > Excerpts from Boden Russell's message of 2017-09-05 11:25:34 -0600: > > > > On 9/5/17 11:03 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > Is eventlet being initialized (or partially initialized) when a module > > > from the application is

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are glad to present this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) 1. Review specs in

[openstack-dev] [glance] multi threads with swift backend

Hi all, Is there any chance that glance can use the multiprocessing from swiftclient library (equivalent of xxx-threads options from cli)? If yes, how to enable it? I did not find anything useful in the glance configuration options. And looking at glance_store code make me think that it's not

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][oslo.db][keystone] A POC of Keystone over CockroachDB

Ronan-Alexandre Cherrueau wrote: > Hi folks, > > Recently in the Inria's Discovery initiative[1], we got in touch with > CockroachLabs guys with an idea: make Keystone supports CockorachDB. So > we give it a try and you can find a very first result on our GitHub[2]. > The GitHub project consists

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI Squad Meeting Summary (week 35) - better late than never

If the topics below interest you and you want to contribute to the discussion, feel free to join the next meeting: Time: Thursdays, 14:30-15:30 UTC Place: https://bluejeans.com/4113567798/ Full minutes: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-ci-squad-meeting Here are the topics discussed

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][oslo.db][keystone] A POC of Keystone over CockroachDB

Here's a previous effort at alembic: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/150057/ -- Dims On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Michael Bayer wrote: > On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Ronan-Alexandre Cherrueau > wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> Recently

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][oslo.db][keystone] A POC of Keystone over CockroachDB

On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Ronan-Alexandre Cherrueau wrote: > Hi folks, > > Recently in the Inria's Discovery initiative[1], we got in touch with > CockroachLabs guys with an idea: make Keystone supports CockorachDB. So > we give it a try and you can find

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] Should we continue providing FQDNs for instance hostnames?

On 2017-09-06 10:40:14 +0100 (+0100), Stephen Finucane wrote: [...] > OK, and we do want to use a FQDN as the hostnames inside the > guest? That's my key question. Random ServerFault questions seems > to suggest no clear answer to this [1]. [...] As a data point, the servers maintained by the

[openstack-dev] [ptg] [openstack-ansible] [kolla-ansible] [tripleo] Ansible feedback sharing session

Hello, The OpenStack-Ansible team will have a session to share feedbacks about ansible 2.4 or ansible+python3. Anyone welcomed to share their experience and give insights. It will be on Wednesday 3:30 to 5pm. See you there! Best regards, Jean-Philippe Evrard (evrardjp)

[openstack-dev] [nova] Pike blueprint burndown chart

I sent a similar email after Ocata was released [1] and these are our blueprint burndown chart results for Pike [2]. Comparing to Ocata, the trends and numbers are nearly identical. Things ramp up until the spec freeze, then tail off, with a little spike toward the end which is generally

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg][interop][refstack][all][ironic][cinder]RefStack and Interop WG PTG Agenda

> On Sep 4, 2017, at 1:04 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > > On 09/01/2017 07:07 PM, Chris Hoge wrote: >> The RefStack and Interop WG teams will host a small work room on Monday >> and Tuesday at the PTG. We would like for projects interested in the >> interop guideline

Re: [openstack-dev] Pike release update on driverlog/etc/default_data.json

Hi Sumit, It's just been done in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/500670/3 ("Update Dell EMC drivers info"). Best regards, Ilya 2017-09-06 10:43 GMT+02:00 Shatwara, Sumit : > Hi Team, > > > > When will the details related to Pike release be added in “releases” > section

[openstack-dev] [docs] Documentation meeting Thursday

Hi all, The docs meeting will continue tomorrow, Thursday at 16:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting, as scheduled. For more details, and the agenda, see the meeting page: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/DocTeamMeeting Cheers, pk

[openstack-dev] [acceleration]No Cyborg Team Meeting today

Hi folks, I'm traveling this week so i won't be sure if I could host the meeting today, but we could still have chats on the IRC channel, i will catch up with the chat history :) -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd

[openstack-dev] [hacking][all] Hacking 1.0.0 release

Hello everyone, Hacking 1.0.0 has been released [0]. There are some new rules available - off by default - so there should be no impact in theory - but please do let the QA team know should you experience any issue with it. You may also want to enable the new rules in your project - they're

Re: [openstack-dev] [Panko] Ways to go through events in the order they appear in database

On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 9:27 PM, gordon chung wrote: > i imagine if we were to support the ability to see event3 even if the > marker is event4, we'd need to do what Jay suggested, and add a > recorded_at/created_at field. supporting sorting by id as i previously > suggested is

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] Should we continue providing FQDNs for instance hostnames?

On Tue, 2017-09-05 at 12:30 -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: > On 09/04/2017 07:48 AM, Stephen Finucane wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 11:51 +, Gary Kotton wrote: > > > On 9/4/17, 11:18 AM, "Stephen Finucane" wrote: > > > > Nova has a feature whereby it will provide instance

[openstack-dev] [horizon] PTG meetup

Hi all, Just wondering who is going to the PTG from the horizon team and whether we want to organise a google hangout group and/or plans for a happy hour or evening for the team to get to know each other better maybe? Looking forward to seeing you there, Beth Elwell (betherly)

[openstack-dev] [vitrage] Vitrage Queens virtual PTG

Hi All, As agreed in Doodle[1] and in today’s IRC meeting[2], We will hold the Vitrage Virtual PTG on the following dates (all times are UTC): Tue, October 17: 6:30-9:30, 10:30-12:00 Wed, October 18: 6:30-9:30 Thu, October 19 (Optional): 6:30-9:30, 10:30-12:00 Feel free to add your name

[openstack-dev] Pike release update on driverlog/etc/default_data.json

Hi Team, When will the details related to Pike release be added in "releases" section of etc/default_data.json file? Reference link: https://github.com/openstack/driverlog/blob/master/etc/default_data.json Regards, Sumit

Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] Collectd - to - Vitrage setup issues

Hi Greg, Can you please send me the vitrage-graph.log? Thanks, Ifat. From: "Waines, Greg" Date: Wednesday, 6 September 2017 at 3:07 To: "Afek, Ifat (Nokia - IL/Kfar Sava)" , "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"

[openstack-dev] [neutron][taas] IRC Meeting Canceled (week of 9/11/2017)

Hi, Next week's TaaS IRC meeting is being canceled because of the week of OpenStack PTG. Regards, Soichi __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] pingtest vs tempest

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Justin Kilpatrick wrote: > Maybe I'm getting a little off topic with this question, but why was > Tempest removed last time? > > I'm not well versed in the history of this discussion, but from what I > understand Tempest in the gate has > been

[openstack-dev] [trove]how to save time of creating instance?

Hi: it will take 8 minutes to create a mysql instance, and will take 16 minutes to create mysql cluster, which have one master and one slave 保密：本函仅供收件人使用，如阁下并非抬头标明的收件人，请您即刻删除本函，勿以任何方式使用及传播，并请您能将此误发情形通知发件人，谢谢！ __ OpenStack

[openstack-dev] [Blazar] Schedule for Denver virtual PTG

Dear Blazar folks, As we discussed in previous weekly meetings, Blazar team will have virtual PTG meetup for Queens cycle because some of core members can't come there. The schedule and topics is available in the etherpad page[1] For the attendances of the PTG, the team reserves a room for

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] pingtest vs tempest

On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Giulio Fidente wrote: [...] > slightly OT but notable mention, scenario001/container is also the one > gating Ceph via ceph-ansible currently :D > > ... soon to convert scenario004/container as well Really good work Giulio and John to make

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] pingtest vs tempest

On 09/05/2017 09:26 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > [...] > >> == Solutions >> >> 1) Switch pingtest to Tempest run on some specific tests, with feature >> parity of what we had with pingtest. >> For example, we could

[openstack-dev] [Blazar] Blazar 0.3.0 (pike) released

Hello everyone, A new release of Blazar project for Pike cycle was released last week. The release is tagged with 0.3.0 tag in each Blazar's repository. The quick summary of the release is following: * support the new instance reservation * support horizon dashboard * support fine-grained

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tacker] Virtual Meetup Schedule poll

+1. Updated the poll. Best Regards, Trinath Somanchi | NXP | HSDC, INDIA From: Dharmendra Kushwaha [mailto:dharmendra.kushw...@nectechnologies.in] Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2017 11:41 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

[openstack-dev] [Tacker] Virtual Meetup Schedule poll

Hi all, As we agreed to proceed with our virtual PTG meetup for Queens on 14th September. I have created 3 timeslots for meetup, Please vote for the time slots as per your availability: https://beta.doodle.com/poll/wkn6phxvnc8r66sv Please do it by Saturday, 9th September. Please let me know if