Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][oslo.service] looping.RetryDecorator behavior

Hi Renat, I was more just saying that depending on your situation it might be better to switch to using tenacity (not that the retry decorator is deprecated, though I wouldn't personally use it). As you mentioned in https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.service/+bug/1718635/comments/1 this class

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Why do we apt-get install NEW files/debs/general at job time ?

On 22 September 2017 at 17:21, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 02:31:20PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: >> On 2017-09-22 15:04:43 +0200 (+0200), Attila Fazekas wrote: >> > "if DevStack gets custom images prepped to make its jobs >> > run faster, won't

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

On 09/22/2017 08:34 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Unfortunately I know better on this matter and it is not the matter of > topic dispute as many people on this thread who has been disturbed and > annoyed by the padding/trolling. > > So yes I'm sticking with stupid because it hurts

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][mogan] Need help for replacing the current master

Just confirmed the git history and compared the code with current Mogan master, it is OK!, Thanks a lot for dims to help that. we will very appreciate that Infra team can help us to replace the current Mogan master. -- Best Regards liusheng 2017-09-22 21:53 GMT+08:00 Zhenguo Niu

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 8:34 AM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Unfortunately I know better on this matter and it is not the matter of topic > dispute as many people on this thread who has been disturbed and annoyed by > the padding/trolling. > > So yes I'm sticking

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

Hi Paul, Unfortunately I know better on this matter and it is not the matter of topic dispute as many people on this thread who has been disturbed and annoyed by the padding/trolling. So yes I'm sticking with stupid because it hurts the OpenStack community as a whole and hurts the reputation of

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Why do we apt-get install NEW files/debs/general at job time ?

On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 02:31:20PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-09-22 15:04:43 +0200 (+0200), Attila Fazekas wrote: > > "if DevStack gets custom images prepped to make its jobs > > run faster, won't Triple-O, Kolla, et cetera want the same and where > > do we draw that line?). " > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 10:26:09AM +0800, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > Let's not forget the epic fail earlier on the "contribution.rst fix" that > almost melt down the community CI system. > > For any companies that are doing what Matt mentioned, please be aware that > the dev community of the country

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

A recent extreme example: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/494981/1/specs/version0.8/active_passive_loadbalancer.rst I would love to have a boilerplate statement I can use as a template for things like this. I feel bad -1/-2 these as I want to encourage involvement, but they are a drain on the

[openstack-dev] OpenStack Developer Mailing List Digest September 16-22

PDF: http://www.openstack.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/devdigest-20170922.pdf HTML: https://www.openstack.org/blog/2017/09/openstack-developer-mailing-list-digest-20170922/ # OpenStack Developer Mailing List Digest September 16-22 ## Summaries * [Technical Committee Status update](http

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

Hi Doug, Absolutely glad to help on this matter. We could take this offline first via email or irc chat and then comes up with a solution for the broader community to review On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 2:47 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas (dims)'s

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

On 08:50 Sep 22, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Tom Barron's message of 2017-09-22 08:10:35 -0400: > > > > On 09/21/2017 10:21 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > I just wanted to highlight to people that there seems to be a series of > > > garbage patches in various projects [1] which are

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

On 15:04 Sep 22, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-09-22 14:50:55 + (+), Rajath Agasthya (rajagast) wrote: > > On 9/21/17, 10:19 PM, "Jeremy Freudberg" wrote: > > > 3) Delay spin-up of resource-intensive/long-running CI jobs > > > until after some initial review

[openstack-dev] [Nova][Privsep] Heads up: privsep conversion for nova-compute

Hi, this email is a courtesy message to make sure you're all aware that at the PTG we decided to try to convert all of nova-compute to privsep for the Queens release. This will almost certainly have an impact on out of tree drivers, although I am hoping the fall out is minimal. A change like

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][ptls][install] Install guide vs. tutorial

On 11:33 Sep 21, Alexandra Settle wrote: > > For me, a tutorial is something that teaches. So after I've gone through a > > tutorial I would expect to have learned how installs work and would > > just know > > these things (with an occasional need to reference a few points) going >

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

On 21:21 Sep 21, Matt Riedemann wrote: > I just wanted to highlight to people that there seems to be a series of > garbage patches in various projects [1] which are basically doing things > like fixing a single typo in a code comment, or very narrowly changing http > to https in links within docs.

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

Excerpts from Ildiko Vancsa's message of 2017-09-22 13:20:31 -0600: > Hi All, > > Another forum we try to put emphasis on this is the Upstream Institute > trainings we have before the Summits and on some smaller events as well. > > We usually try to spend some quality time on review best

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Why do we apt-get install NEW files/debs/general at job time ?

On 22 September 2017 at 11:45, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017, at 08:58 AM, Michał Jastrzębski wrote: >> Another, more revolutionary (for good or ill) alternative would be to >> move gates to run Kolla instead of DevStack. We're working towards >> registry of

Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] PTL duties and Meeting on Sep 29th

Exactly. Thursday the 28th. Thanks. On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 at 17:39 Jeremy Freudberg wrote: > Enjoy the time off. You've earned it. > > Quick note, the cancelled meeting date will actually be Thursday Sept > *28* not 29 (which evidently coincides with Czech Statehood

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] pike time growth in August

On Fri, Sep 22, 2017, at 01:18 PM, Attila Fazekas wrote: > The main offenders reported by devstack does not seams to explain the > growth visible on OpenstackHealth [1] . > The logs also stated to disappear which does not makes easy to figure > out. > > > Which code/infra changes can be related

Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] PTL duties and Meeting on Sep 29th

Enjoy the time off. You've earned it. Quick note, the cancelled meeting date will actually be Thursday Sept *28* not 29 (which evidently coincides with Czech Statehood Day). On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Telles Nobrega wrote: > Hi Saharans and interested parties, > >

[openstack-dev] [devstack] pike time growth in August

The main offenders reported by devstack does not seams to explain the growth visible on OpenstackHealth [1] . The logs also stated to disappear which does not makes easy to figure out. Which code/infra changes can be related ?

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][stable] EOL tags and upper-constraints.txt in tox.ini

On 17-09-22 15:07:14, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2017-09-21 20:20:22 -0500: > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:13:23PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2017-09-21 08:36:39 -0400: > > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 06:08:22PM

[openstack-dev] [sahara] PTL duties and Meeting on Sep 29th

Hi Saharans and interested parties, Next week I will be on PTO, I don't think pointing a temporary PTL is necessary since we have active cores that can handle the work without a problem. Also, since I will on PTO and Thursday is a public holiday in Tchech Republic I'm canceling the meeting.

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

Hi All, Another forum we try to put emphasis on this is the Upstream Institute trainings we have before the Summits and on some smaller events as well. We usually try to spend some quality time on review best practices and on metrics as well. The aim is to make people realize that if they need

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][stable] EOL tags and upper-constraints.txt in tox.ini

Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2017-09-21 20:20:22 -0500: > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:13:23PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2017-09-21 08:36:39 -0400: > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 06:08:22PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > > > > I like the

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas (dims)'s message of 2017-09-22 13:47:06 -0400: > Doug, > Howard (cc'ed) already did a bunch of reaching out especially on > wechat. We should request his help. > > Howard, > Can you please help with communications and follow up? > > Thanks, > Dims Thanks, Dims and

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Why do we apt-get install NEW files/debs/general at job time ?

On Fri, Sep 22, 2017, at 08:58 AM, Michał Jastrzębski wrote: > Another, more revolutionary (for good or ill) alternative would be to > move gates to run Kolla instead of DevStack. We're working towards > registry of images, and we support most of openstack services now. If > we enable mixed

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

On 09/22/2017 09:26 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 9/22/2017 7:10 AM, Tom Barron wrote: >> FWIW I think it is better not to attribute motivation in these cases. >> Perhaps the code submitter is trying to pad stats, but perhaps they are >> just a new contributor trying to learn the process with a

[openstack-dev] Contributor Portal PTG Recap

# Contributor Portal Next Steps ## Landing Page Mock ups * Current mock up: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxMh9oiou2xMLVRvRWRFVklHa2c/view * Limited click through mock up: https://invis.io/CSDEZTBDJ#/252645774_Landing ## Todo - [ ] thingee: A proposal for the *second level* of what the

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

Doug, Howard (cc'ed) already did a bunch of reaching out especially on wechat. We should request his help. Howard, Can you please help with communications and follow up? Thanks, Dims On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2017-09-22 08:26:31 -0500: > On 9/22/2017 7:10 AM, Tom Barron wrote: > > FWIW I think it is better not to attribute motivation in these cases. > > Perhaps the code submitter is trying to pad stats, but perhaps they are > > just a new contributor trying to

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

Oops hit send to early. 1) git-review shows some community guidelines 2) auto-review of known lower-quality patches And those do relieve some reviewer burden. On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Jeremy Freudberg wrote: > You're right. The amount of wasted reviewer time

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

You're right. The amount of wasted reviewer time is far more drastic+problematic then the amount of "wasted" CI resources. My prior email did contain these suggestions: On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-09-22 14:50:55 + (+), Rajath

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Why do we apt-get install NEW files/debs/general at job time ?

On 22 September 2017 at 07:31, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-09-22 15:04:43 +0200 (+0200), Attila Fazekas wrote: >> "if DevStack gets custom images prepped to make its jobs >> run faster, won't Triple-O, Kolla, et cetera want the same and where >> do we draw that line?). " >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Senlin] Senlin Queens Meetup

I'd love to join you on Oct 14th, but I'm out of town. - Qiming On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 10:04:03PM +0800, YUAN RUIJIE wrote: > Hi all, > > We are going to have a meetup to discuss the features and some other > details about Senlin in Oct. > Tentatively schedule： > Date: 15th Oct. >

[openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-22, September 22-29

Welcome back to our regular release countdown email. Now that the PTG is over, we will send regular weekly countdown emails. Development Focus - Hopefully the PTG last week gave everyone a jump start on Queens development. We are only four weeks out from Queens-1. Team focus

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

On Sep 22, 2017 07:59, "Matt Riedemann" wrote: On 9/22/2017 9:50 AM, Rajath Agasthya (rajagast) wrote: > On 9/21/17, 10:19 PM, "Jeremy Freudberg" > wrote: > > 3) Delay spin-up of resource-intensive/long-running CI jobs until after > some >

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

On 2017-09-22 14:50:55 + (+), Rajath Agasthya (rajagast) wrote: > On 9/21/17, 10:19 PM, "Jeremy Freudberg" wrote: > > 3) Delay spin-up of resource-intensive/long-running CI jobs > > until after some initial review has been added or time has > > passed.

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

On 9/22/2017 9:24 AM, Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) wrote: Isn't it possible to ignore these patches in stackalytics? If the motivation is to look better there, this would solve the problem. That's a technical solution to a social problem. See my reply elsewhere in this thread. How

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

On 9/22/2017 9:59 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Figuring out what is useless or not is probably not worth the effort here. We already skip long running tempest dsvm jobs in certain patches, like with docs or unit test only changes. Updating a code comment in code isn't going to catch that. And

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

On 9/22/2017 9:50 AM, Rajath Agasthya (rajagast) wrote: On 9/21/17, 10:19 PM, "Jeremy Freudberg" wrote: 3) Delay spin-up of resource-intensive/long-running CI jobs until after some initial review has been added or time has passed. Authorized contributors,

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

On 9/21/17, 10:19 PM, "Jeremy Freudberg" wrote: 3) Delay spin-up of resource-intensive/long-running CI jobs until after some initial review has been added or time has passed. Authorized contributors, not necessarily synonymous with cores, can override the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api] POST /api-sig/news

On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 7:03 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 09/21/2017 11:37 PM, Joe Topjian wrote: > >> >> Microversions also reared their head in the form of a long >> discussion about how SDK developers and users are consuming >> microversions at a very granular

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] TripleO/Ansible PTG session

On 22.9.2017 15:30, Jiri Tomasek wrote: Will it be possible to send Zaqar messages at each deployment step to make the deployment process more interactive? If we go the way of allowing the wrapping playbook to execute per step, i think we could send messages to Zaqar after each step. Mistral

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Why do we apt-get install NEW files/debs/general at job time ?

On 2017-09-22 15:04:43 +0200 (+0200), Attila Fazekas wrote: > "if DevStack gets custom images prepped to make its jobs > run faster, won't Triple-O, Kolla, et cetera want the same and where > do we draw that line?). " > > IMHO we can try to have only one big image per distribution, > where the

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

Hi, Isn't it possible to ignore these patches in stackalytics? If the motivation is to look better there, this would solve the problem. Br, Gerg0 -Original Message- From: Jeremy Stanley [mailto:fu...@yuggoth.org] Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 4:20 PM To: OpenStack Development

[openstack-dev] [kolla] Documentation restructure and refresh

At Queens PTG in Denver, we worked on getting the documentation refreshed, as well as incorporating the new format laid out by the documentation team. To get this started, I have pushed a WIP ToC patch(1) that incorporates all the points we discussed. Also, here is the start for the queens doc

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

On 2017-09-22 08:30:21 -0400 (-0400), Amrith Kumar wrote: [...] > When can we take some concrete action to stop these same kinds of > things from coming up again and again? Technical solutions to social problems rarely do more than increase complexity for everyone involved. Communication,

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-ovn] Support for direct vnic_type

> -Original Message- > From: pranab boruah [mailto:pranabjyotibor...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 5:06 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Cc: Moshe Levi > Subject:

[openstack-dev] [networking-ovn] Support for direct vnic_type

Thanks Moshe for the quick reply. I can definitely use some guidance for contributing on this( a newbie here). Few questions: 1. Do you think this support could be added in queens release cycle? I think blueprints submission for queens is closed right? 2. For adding this support, some changes to

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] team ptg photos

Thanks Kevin. It’s so funny!! :-) Best regards, Yushiro Furukawa From: Kevin Benton [mailto:ke...@benton.pub] Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 10:16 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] team ptg photos https://photos.app.goo.gl/Aqa51E2aVkv5b4ah1

[openstack-dev] [oslo][oslo.config][all] who asked me about versioning or deprecating default values for config options?

Last week at the PTG someone asked me about best practices for changing or deprecating default values for configuration options. Unfortunately I failed to make any notes at the time and I'm embarrassed to say that I don't remember who it was or exactly what the use case was. If that was you, could

Re: [openstack-dev] [os-vif] [passthrough] [VifHostDevice]

The ODL part is still not ready. We need to do code changes in odl to make it work see [1] [2] [1] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/62481/ [2] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/60259/ We try to make the design as generic as possible so if you have a SR-IOV NIC that support

[openstack-dev] [infra][mogan] Need help for replacing the current master

Hi infra, In order to show respect to the original authors, we would like to replace the current mogan master [1] with a new forked repo [2] which includes the history of files which copied from other projects. The detailed discussion is here: http://lists.openstack.

[openstack-dev] [os-vif] [passthrough] [VifHostDevice]

Thanks Sean for such a descriptive answer. It definitely helped. >the hardware offload support for melonox nics is only supported with the >openvswitch or odl >ml2 dirvers [Pranab] Okay. We have the option of using ODL as the mechanism driver too. I am building the cluster with ODL as the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][nova][mogan] How to show respect to the original authors?

Thanks Sean for the suggestion, os-brick is indeed a good example for sharing codes. Will discuss with the team to see if it's possible to move that code into such a library. On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > > > > > > Luckily, since these things are

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-ovn] Support for direct vnic_type

Hi, From Mellanox perspective supporting direct port in OVN is in the plan. One of the reason that we did not contribute this change to OVN was because of that OVN support geneve tunnel and not vxlan. (Mellanox card don't support hw-offloading of geneve). If you want to contribute please go

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] TripleO/Ansible PTG session

Will it be possible to send Zaqar messages at each deployment step to make the deployment process more interactive? in case of driving separate playbooks from mistral workflow, that would be absolutely possible. As it seems we're more keen on driving everything from wrapping ansible playbook, is

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][nova][mogan] How to show respect to the original authors?

> > > > Luckily, since these things are part of the ABI of Nova, they are > > versioned in many cases, and in all have a well defined interfaces on > > one side. Seems like it should be relatively straight forward to wrap > > the other side of them and call it a library. > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

On 9/22/2017 7:10 AM, Tom Barron wrote: FWIW I think it is better not to attribute motivation in these cases. Perhaps the code submitter is trying to pad stats, but perhaps they are just a new contributor trying to learn the process with a "harmless" patch, or just a compulsive clean-upper who

[openstack-dev] [networking-ovn] Support for direct vnic_type

Hi, I request you to go through this thread : http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-September/122447.html As Sean pointed out that Direct vnic_type is not yet supported in OVN, while it is supported in ODL and OVS. I wanted to know if there is any plan to add this support in OVN

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] TripleO/Ansible PTG session

On 22.9.2017 13:44, Giulio Fidente wrote: On 09/21/2017 07:53 PM, Jiří Stránský wrote: On 21.9.2017 18:04, Marios Andreou wrote: On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Jiří Stránský wrote: [...] That way we could run the whole thing end-to-end via ansible-playbook, or if

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Why do we apt-get install NEW files/debs/general at job time ?

"if DevStack gets custom images prepped to make its jobs run faster, won't Triple-O, Kolla, et cetera want the same and where do we draw that line?). " IMHO we can try to have only one big image per distribution, where the packages are the union of the packages requested by all team, minus the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api] POST /api-sig/news

On 09/21/2017 11:37 PM, Joe Topjian wrote: Microversions also reared their head in the form of a long discussion about how SDK developers and users are consuming microversions at a very granular level. This discussion opened many surprised eyes as we learned how different SDK

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][nova][mogan] How to show respect to the original authors?

@Dims, sure, will make a formal request, thanks! On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > @Zhenguo, > > Can you make a formal request via email? add "[infra]" and "[mogan]" > tags so everyone in mogan is aware of this and the infra folks give > their ok.

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

Excerpts from Tom Barron's message of 2017-09-22 08:10:35 -0400: > > On 09/21/2017 10:21 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > I just wanted to highlight to people that there seems to be a series of > > garbage patches in various projects [1] which are basically doing things > > like fixing a single typo

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][nova][mogan] How to show respect to the original authors?

@Zhenguo, Can you make a formal request via email? add "[infra]" and "[mogan]" tags so everyone in mogan is aware of this and the infra folks give their ok. Then we can ping infra using "infra-root" on the #openstack-infra channel and ask them to replace. Sounds good? Thanks, Dims On Fri, Sep

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][nova][mogan] How to show respect to the original authors?

@Dims, Yes, I think the history is OK, do I need to ping some infra guys or if you can help to replace the repo? On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > @Zhenguo, > > Can you please confirm that the history looks good? > > Thanks, > Dims > > On Fri, Sep

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

Thanks Matt for highlighting this (again). Please also see http://openstack.markmail.org/thread/iaqsha7hbiitwqe2 http://markmail.org/thread/k62gcehxg6gv5ep4 http://markmail.org/thread/n753w3wljii67yug When can we take some concrete action to stop these same kinds of things from coming up again

Re: [openstack-dev] Garbage patches for simple typo fixes

On 09/21/2017 10:21 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > I just wanted to highlight to people that there seems to be a series of > garbage patches in various projects [1] which are basically doing things > like fixing a single typo in a code comment, or very narrowly changing > http to https in links

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] issue with admin_osc.keystone().trustee_domain_id

Hi Greg, Can you revisit your policy configuration and try again? See here: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/magnum/plain/etc/magnum/policy.json?h=stable/newton Cheers, Spyros On 22 September 2017 at 13:49, Waines, Greg wrote: > Just another note on this ...

[openstack-dev] [nova] placement/resource providers update 35

Update 35, after a hiatus for travel and the PTG, is playing catchup. # Most Important There was a great deal of discussion about many placement things at the PTG, some near term, some very long term. The most important stuff was that we adjusted some priorities and attitudes so that we're

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] issue with admin_osc.keystone().trustee_domain_id

Just another note on this ... We have · setup a ‘magnum’ domain, and · setup a ‘trustee_domain_admin’ user within that domain, and · gave that user and domain the admin role, and <-- actually not 100% sure about this · referenced these items in magnum.conf

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] TripleO/Ansible PTG session

On 09/21/2017 07:53 PM, Jiří Stránský wrote: > On 21.9.2017 18:04, Marios Andreou wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Jiří Stránský wrote: [...] >>> That way we could run the whole thing end-to-end via >>> ansible-playbook, or >>> if needed one could execute smaller

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][nova][mogan] How to show respect to the original authors?

@Zhenguo, Can you please confirm that the history looks good? Thanks, Dims On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 1:35 AM, Zhenguo Niu wrote: > Thanks dims, that's cool :D > > I'll make sure there's no new patches landed to master before replacing the > repo. > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017

[openstack-dev] [tc] Technical Committee Status update, September 22nd

Hi! This is the weekly update on Technical Committee initiatives. Following feedback at the PTG, I moved the full list of all open topics to a new wiki page. Update your bookmarks to: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Technical_Committee_Tracker If you are working on something (or plan to work on

Re: [openstack-dev] Janney 2.0 "Data Protection in OpenStack" Summary Presentation

Hi Kaitlin, great to hear this, thank you. However I can't access document you have referenced, 'aplweb.jhuapl.edu’s server DNS address could not be found.' On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:15 PM, Farr, Kaitlin M. wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I will be presenting a recap of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] MTU native ovs firewall driver

It could be that too TBH I'm not sure :) On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Sławomir Kapłoński wrote: > Isn't OVS setting MTU automatically MTU for bridge as lowest value from > ports connected to this bridge? > > > > Wiadomość napisana przez Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] MTU native ovs firewall driver

Isn't OVS setting MTU automatically MTU for bridge as lowest value from ports connected to this bridge? > Wiadomość napisana przez Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo w dniu > 22.09.2017, o godz. 10:32: > > I believe that one of the problems is that if you set a certain MTU in an

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] MTU native ovs firewall driver

I believe that one of the problems is that if you set a certain MTU in an OVS switch, new connected ports will be automatically assigned to such MTU the ovs-vswitchd daemon. On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:45 PM, Ian Wells wrote: > Since OVS is doing L2 forwarding, you

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] team ptg photos

Thanks! :) On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Kevin Benton wrote: > https://photos.app.goo.gl/Aqa51E2aVkv5b4ah1 > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] Extending Topology

Thanks Ifat, For guiding me to how to start with contribution on implementation side. Meanwhile, I am looking at blueprints and bugs before attending next meeting. -- *Regards* *Muhammad Usman* Application Engineer LMK Resources (pvt) Limited www.lmkr.com +92 (323) 5599 068 On Fri, Sep 22,

[openstack-dev] [self-healing] When shall have self-healing meeting?

Hi, In Denver there was a session on self-healing and how to give direction to the ambitions around the topic, and some agreement that bi-weekly meeting should be organized. Is there anybody who knows some details about that? Doddle, irc channel etc? Thanks in advance for the answer.