[openstack-dev] [TripleO] roles_data.yaml equivalent in containers

Hi, In THT I have an environment file and corresponding puppet service for Veritas HyperScale. https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/blob/master/environments/veritas-hyperscale/veritas-hyperscale-config.yaml

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][horizon] Migration to heat-dashboard: how can we move this forward?

Hi Akihiro, Thanks for your kind following up :) > (1) Patch reviews and approvals in horizon Could you please stop to accept heat-dashboard related patches without critical ones ? According to our discussion in the last PTG, we made heat-dashboard repo taking horizon repo as upstream & now

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][charms][fuel][Packaging-Deb] Remove old numeric branches

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 01:52:11PM -0400, Tony Breeds wrote: > Hello all, > Now we have cleaned up some of the older series based branches I've > taken a look at some of the numeric based branches. > > The projects in $subject are particularly impacted. I've made my best > guess at which

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Preping for the stable/newton EOL

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 05:11:15PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 10:15:56AM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 02:51:06PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: > > > I'll prep the list of repos that will be tagged EOL real soon now for > > > review. > > > > As

[openstack-dev] [heat][horizon] Migration to heat-dashboard: how can we move this forward?

Hi Heat dashboard team, I noticed heat-dashboard repository was created. I have several questions from horizon side. A big question is "When does the switch happen?" This mainly affects two things: (1) Patch reviews and approvals in horizon Should the horizon team stop to accept

Re: [openstack-dev] [os-vif] [nova] Changes to os-vif cores

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 03:32:15PM +0100, Stephen Finucane wrote: > Hey, > > I'm not actually sure what the protocol is for adding/removing cores to a > library project without a PTL, so I'm just going to put this out there: I'd > like to propose the following changes to the os-vif core team.

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][infra][zuul][zuulv3][horizon][neutron] project-specific release job templates

On 2017-10-24 16:24:39 -0700 (-0700), Armando M. wrote: [...] > I hope I represented the conversation correctly! [...] Totally accurate, thanks! -- Jeremy Stanley signature.asc Description: Digital signature __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][infra][zuul][zuulv3][horizon][neutron] project-specific release job templates

On 24 October 2017 at 13:13, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-10-24 11:31:56 -0700 (-0700), Armando M. wrote: > [...] > > the work on neutron-lib is slowly progressing but it's not close enough > to > > allow us to break the dependency that requires neutron sub-projects to >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [stable] [tripleo] [kolla] [ansible] [puppet] Proposing changes in stable policy for installers

I figured that Sydney would be a great opportunity to have face2face discussion around this topic, and I commit to be there and try to make progress on this discussion. I would love to get some people representing their deployment projects and operators as well. Please join us :

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][ptl] Releases repo frozen

Excerpts from Sean McGinnis's message of 2017-10-17 10:37:25 -0500: > Just a heads up that the releases repo is frozen while we work through some > zuul v3 migration issues. Jobs are passing, but some of the important > post-release processing that needs to happen will require a little more >

[openstack-dev] [publiccloud-wg] Reminder meeting PublicCloud WG

Hi everyone, Don't forget tomorrows meeting for the PublicCloudWorkingGroup. November 25th 1400 UTC  in IRC channel #openstack-meeting-3 Etherpad and agenda: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/publiccloud-wg Regards, Tobias Rydberg smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] the workload partition will cause consumer disappeared

On 2017-10-23 09:57 PM, 李田清 wrote: >      We test ceilometer workload partition, and find even with one > rabbitmq server, the ceilometer-pipe >      will lost its consumers. Does anyone know this? >      I configure, batch_size =1, batch_timeout =1, > and pipeline_processing_queues = 1. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][infra][zuul][zuulv3][horizon][neutron] project-specific release job templates

On 2017-10-24 11:31:56 -0700 (-0700), Armando M. wrote: [...] > the work on neutron-lib is slowly progressing but it's not close enough to > allow us to break the dependency that requires neutron sub-projects to add > neutron to the list of required-projects (which I believe the sort of the >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [all] TC Report 43

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > > > Since this is the second [week in a > row](https://anticdent.org/tc-report-42.html) that Josh showed up with > an idea, I wonder what next week will bring? > > ^ That's pretty cool. Thanks for sending this as

Re: [openstack-dev] [policy] AWS IAM session

Gentle reminder that this will be happening tomorrow. See you then! On 10/20/2017 09:46 AM, Lance Bragstad wrote: > I just sent a calendar invite to everyone who responded to this thread > or voted in the agenda. The session will be recorded if you are unable > to make it. > > Thanks! > > On

[openstack-dev] [keystone] Queens-1 Retrospective

Hey all, We're going to hold our queens-1 retrospective next week during the keystone weekly meeting [0]. All information for the retro can be found in Trello [1]. Thanks! [0] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Keystone_Team_Meeting [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][infra][zuul][zuulv3][horizon][neutron] project-specific release job templates

On 24 October 2017 at 10:35, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2017-10-24 15:05:34 +: > > On 2017-10-24 09:42:25 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote: > > [...] > > > It looks like the publish-to-pypi-neutron template modifies > > >

[openstack-dev] [tc] [all] TC Report 43

# Welcome New TC Members Main news to report about the OpenStack Technical Committee (TC) is that the elections have finished and there are some new members. The three incumbents that ran returned for another year, meaning three new people join. There's more information in a [superuser

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][infra][zuul][zuulv3][horizon][neutron] project-specific release job templates

Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2017-10-24 15:05:34 +: > On 2017-10-24 09:42:25 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote: > [...] > > It looks like the publish-to-pypi-neutron template modifies > > publish-to-pypi by adding openstack/neutron to the required-repositories > > list for the

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [nova] traits discussion call

Sigh, sorry. I forgot that we're moving back to winter time this weekend. I *think* the time is 3pm UTC then. It seems to be 11am eastern US: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20171030T15=37=tz_et. On 10/24/2017 06:00 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: And the winner is

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [nova] traits discussion call

And the winner is Mon, 30 Oct, 2pm UTC! The bluejeans ID is https://bluejeans.com/757528759 (works without plugins in recent FF and Chrome; if it asks to install an app, ignore it and look for a link saying "join with browser") On 10/23/2017 05:02 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: Hi all! I'd like

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Deployment workflow changes for ui/client

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 8:16 AM, James Slagle wrote: > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 6:04 AM, Jiri Tomasek wrote: >> Having a workflow which wraps whole deployment sounds great from the UI side >> too as it allows us to simplify the steps you described

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Tripleo CI Community meeting tomorrow

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Arx Cruz wrote: > Hello > > We are going to have a TripleO CI Community meeting tomorrow 10/25/2017 at 1 > pm UTC time. > The meeting is going to happen on BlueJeans [1] and also on IRC on #tripleo > channel. > > After that, we will hold Office

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Tripleo CI Community meeting tomorrow

Hello We are going to have a TripleO CI Community meeting tomorrow 10/25/2017 at 1 pm UTC time. The meeting is going to happen on BlueJeans [1] and also on IRC on #tripleo channel. After that, we will hold Office Hours starting at 4PM UTC in case someone from community have any questions

[openstack-dev] [FEMDC] Wed. 25. IRC Meeting 15:00 UTC

Dear all, A gentle reminder for our tomorrow meeting at 15:00 UTC A draft agenda is available at line 1413, you are very welcome to add any item. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/massively_distributed_ircmeetings_2017

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Deployment workflow changes for ui/client

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 6:04 AM, Jiri Tomasek wrote: > Having a workflow which wraps whole deployment sounds great from the UI side > too as it allows us to simplify the steps you described above. IIRC the > reason the whole deployment did not get wrapped into a single

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][infra][zuul][zuulv3][horizon][neutron] project-specific release job templates

On 2017-10-24 09:42:25 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote: [...] > It looks like the publish-to-pypi-neutron template modifies > publish-to-pypi by adding openstack/neutron to the required-repositories > list for the release-openstack-python job. That repository was also at > some point added

Re: [openstack-dev] [gnocchi] Redis for storage backend

Hi Gordon， Thanks for your test results， we investigate more on our env, finally it turns out that our ceph cluster isn't work as expected. which made gnocchi performance decrease a lot. On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 1:09 AM, gordon chung wrote: > > > On 2017-10-18 12:15 PM, Yaguang

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election] Question for candidates: How do you think we can make our community more inclusive?

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Colleen Murphy wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Diana Clarke > > > > wrote: > > > > Congrats on being elected to the TC, Colleen! > > >

[openstack-dev] [os-vif] [nova] Changes to os-vif cores

Hey, I'm not actually sure what the protocol is for adding/removing cores to a library project without a PTL, so I'm just going to put this out there: I'd like to propose the following changes to the os-vif core team. - Add 'nova-core' os-vif makes extensive use of objects and we've had a few

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][bilean][cue][poppy] Remove the parameter enforce_type from set_override and set_default

Excerpts from ChangBo Guo's message of 2017-10-24 14:27:11 +0800: > We plan to remove the parameter enforce_type from set_override and > set_default in oslo.config [1]. we have been blocking its usage in > bilean, cue, poppy for a long time. patchs were posted in these projects > [2][3][4].

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election] Question for candidates: How do you think we can make our community more inclusive?

Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2017-10-24 13:47:32 +0200: > Colleen Murphy wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Diana Clarke > > > wrote: > > > > Congrats on being elected to the TC, Colleen! > > > > You

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][infra][zuul][zuulv3][horizon][neutron] project-specific release job templates

Please see below: On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Doug Hellmann wrote: >> [...] >> It feels like we have two related by not necessarily dependent >> policy questions we need to answer before we decide how to proceed: > > I don't have strong

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][infra][zuul][zuulv3][horizon][neutron] project-specific release job templates

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 09:42:25AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > The neutron queens milestone release is held up right now because > some of the repositories are using a release job template that isn't > recognized by the validation code in the releases repository. I'm > trying to decide between

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][infra][zuul][zuulv3][horizon][neutron] project-specific release job templates

Doug Hellmann wrote: > [...] > It feels like we have two related by not necessarily dependent > policy questions we need to answer before we decide how to proceed: I don't have strong opinions on any of those two, I think anything would work. If I had to pick between yes and no, here is my gut

[openstack-dev] [release][infra][zuul][zuulv3][horizon][neutron] project-specific release job templates

The neutron queens milestone release is held up right now because some of the repositories are using a release job template that isn't recognized by the validation code in the releases repository. I'm trying to decide between adding the custom job template to the validation code or changing the

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-ovn] Error while running unit tests(master branch)

Hi Pranab, > I don't see any errors in final results. But, as you can see here [1], > couple of tests are showing ERROR before that. > > [1] http://paste.openstack.org/show/624436/ > Ah, I see what you mean now. Off the top of my head I don't know what is the cause, I will need to some

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][networking] Organizing the networking squad

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Harald Jensas wrote: > Include me as well Brent. > > > // > Harald > > On 16 Oct 2017 3:41 p.m., "Saravanan KR" wrote: > > Thanks for initiating Brent. Yes, I would participate in the networking > squad. > > Regards, >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] ironic and traits

Yeah, a couple of things here. First, as you say, and as its champions have been very adamant about, this isn't what placement was meant for. Second, as I understand it, there's not actually going to be any way for this information to reach the compute node through placement. The provider

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [elections] Technical Committee Election Results

Tony Breeds wrote: > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 09:35:34AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Evrard wrote: > >> I agree, we should care about not repeating this Pike trend. It looks >> like Queens is better in terms of turnout (see the amazing positive >> delta!). However, I can't help but noticing that the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election] Question for candidates: How do you think we can make our community more inclusive?

Colleen Murphy wrote: > On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Diana Clarke > > wrote: > > Congrats on being elected to the TC, Colleen! > > You mentioned earlier in this thread that, "a major problem in the > tech world is

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Deployment workflow changes for ui/client

On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Brad P. Crochet wrote: > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:56 PM James Slagle > wrote: > >> I've been looking at how we can hook up the deployment changes for >> config-download[1] with the existing deployment workflows in

[openstack-dev] roles_data.yaml equivalent in containers

Hi, In THT I have an environment file and corresponding puppet service for Veritas HyperScale. https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/blob/master/environments/veritas-hyperscale/veritas-hyperscale-config.yaml

Re: [openstack-dev] IBM z/VM CI asks for reporting permission to Nova changes

Hi Andreas,   It's very kind of you .Thank you very much for your advice and we have fixed it .   Best Regards!   - Original message - From: Andreas Scheuring To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"

[openstack-dev] [networking-ovn] Error while running unit tests(master branch)

Thanks Lucas for the reply. I don't see any errors in final results. But, as you can see here [1], couple of tests are showing ERROR before that. [1] http://paste.openstack.org/show/624436/ Regards, Pranab __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [elections] Technical Committee Election Results

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Swapnil Kulkarni wrote: > On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 5:29 AM, Kendall Nelson wrote: >> Hello Everyone :) >> >> Please join me in congratulating the 6 newly elected members of the >> Technical Committee (TC)! >> >> Colleen

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [elections] Technical Committee Election Results

On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 5:29 AM, Kendall Nelson wrote: > Hello Everyone :) > > Please join me in congratulating the 6 newly elected members of the > Technical Committee (TC)! > > Colleen Murphy (cmurphy) > Doug Hellmann (dhellmann) > Emilien Macchi (emilienm) > Jeremy

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election] Question for candidates: How do you think we can make our community more inclusive?

On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Diana Clarke wrote: > Congrats on being elected to the TC, Colleen! > > You mentioned earlier in this thread that, "a major problem in the > tech world is not just attracting underrepresented contributors, but > retaining them". > >

[openstack-dev] [neutron] No QoS meeting today

Hello, There will be no QoS meeting today. Next one will be on 7.11.2017. Sorry. — Best regards Slawek Kaplonski sla...@kaplonski.pl __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] ironic and traits

It sounds like Ironic use the Trait to configure the instance https://review.openstack.org/#/c/504952/5/specs/approved/config-template-traits.rst@95 The downside I can see is that the extra burden added to the placement. As the example, used in the spec: * CUSTOM_BM_CONFIG_BIOS_VMX_ON *

[openstack-dev] [oslo][bilean][cue][poppy] Remove the parameter enforce_type from set_override and set_default

We plan to remove the parameter enforce_type from set_override and set_default in oslo.config [1]. we have been blocking its usage in bilean, cue, poppy for a long time. patchs were posted in these projects [2][3][4]. What we can do next, Just remove the Depends-On and go ahead in oslo side

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Preping for the stable/newton EOL

On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 10:15:56AM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 02:51:06PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: > > I'll prep the list of repos that will be tagged EOL real soon now for > > review. > > As promised here's the list. The fomat is new, It's grouped by project > team so