[openstack-dev] [all][requirements] Freeze is coming next week

So get your changes in or get left behind :D -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) signature.asc Description: PGP signature __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

[openstack-dev] [Nova][Ironic][API] Service Management API Design

Hi Nova Developers, I am working on adding a service management API in Ironic [1][2]. This spec adds a new API /conductors to list, enable/disable an ironic-conductor service. I am struggling to understand the difference between shutting down a service manually and disabling it. So my question

Re: [openstack-dev] [os-vif]

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:24 AM, Sriharsha Basavapatna < sriharsha.basavapa...@broadcom.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:46 PM, Stephen Finucane > wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 16:30 +0530, Sriharsha Basavapatna wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 2:20 PM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] Community Goals for Rocky

2018-01-17 0:29 GMT+08:00 Emilien Macchi : > Here's an update so we can hopefully, as a community, take a decision > in the next days or so. > > > * Migration to StoryBoard > > Champion: Kendall Nelson > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/513875/ > Some projects already

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] heads up to users of Aggregate[Core|Ram|Disk]Filter: behavior change in >= Ocata

On Jan 16, 2018, at 7:21 PM, Zhenyu Zheng wrote: > Thanks for the info, so it seems we are not going to implement aggregate > overcommit ratio in placement at least in the near future? I would go so far as to say that we are not going to implement aggregate

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] heads up to users of Aggregate[Core|Ram|Disk]Filter: behavior change in >= Ocata

Thanks for the info, so it seems we are not going to implement aggregate overcommit ratio in placement at least in the near future? On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 9:19 AM, Zhenyu Zheng wrote: > Thanks for the info, so it seems we are not going to implement aggregate >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] heads up to users of Aggregate[Core|Ram|Disk]Filter: behavior change in >= Ocata

Thanks for the info, so it seems we are not going to implement aggregate overcommit ratio in placement at least in the near future? On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 5:24 AM, melanie witt wrote: > Hello Stackers, > > This is a heads up to any of you using the AggregateCoreFilter, >

[openstack-dev] Merging feature/zuulv3 into master

Hi, On Thursday, January 18, 2018, we will merge the feature/zuulv3 branches of both Zuul and Nodepool into master. If you continuously deploy Zuul or Nodepool from master, you should make sure you are prepared for this. The current version of the single_node_ci pattern in puppet-openstackci

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Rocky PTG planning

Hey, I kicked-off an etherpad for PTG planning: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-ptg-rocky It's basic now but feel free to add your ideas of topics. We'll work on the agenda during the following weeks. Thanks! -- Emilien Macchi

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ptl][goals][storyboard] tracking the rocky goals with storyboard

Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2018-01-12 15:37:42 -0500: > Since we are discussing goals for the Rocky cycle, I would like to > propose a change to the way we track progress on the goals. > > We've started to see lots and lots of changes to the goal documents, > more than anticipated

[openstack-dev] [nova] heads up to users of Aggregate[Core|Ram|Disk]Filter: behavior change in >= Ocata

Hello Stackers, This is a heads up to any of you using the AggregateCoreFilter, AggregateRamFilter, and/or AggregateDiskFilter in the filter scheduler. These filters have effectively allowed operators to set overcommit ratios per aggregate rather than per compute node in <= Newton.

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] adding Gage Hugo to keystone core

+100 -- congratulations, Gage! On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Raildo Mascena de Sousa Filho < rmasc...@redhat.com> wrote: > +1 > > Congrats Gage, very well deserved! > > Cheers, > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 4:02 PM Lance Bragstad > wrote: > >> Hey folks, >> >> In today's

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] storyboard evaluation

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 9:01 AM, James E. Blair wrote: [...] > We're currently using tags like "zuulv3.0" and "zuulv3.1" to make this > automatic board: > > https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/board/53 Yeah I guess using worklists & tags would probably be our best bet now.

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] adding Gage Hugo to keystone core

+1 Congrats Gage, very well deserved! Cheers, On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 4:02 PM Lance Bragstad wrote: > Hey folks, > > In today's keystone meeting we made the announcement to add Gage Hugo > (gagehugo) as a keystone core reviewer [0]! Gage has been actively > involved in

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] storyboard evaluation

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 8:29 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2018-01-16 06:55:03 -0800 (-0800), Emilien Macchi wrote: > [...] >> I created a dev instance of storyboard and imported all bugs from >> TripleO so we could have a look at how it would be if we were using >> the tool:

[openstack-dev] [keystone] core adjustments

Hey all, I've been in touch with a few folks from our core team that are no longer as active as they used to be. We've made a mutual decision to remove Steve Martinelli and Brant Knudson from keystone core and Brad Topol from keystone specification core. I'd like to express my gratitude for all

[openstack-dev] [tc] [all] TC Report 18-03

(Blog version: ) If a common theme exists in TC activity in the past week, it is the cloudy nature of leadership and governance and how this relates to what the TC should be doing, as a body, and how TC members, as individuals, should identify what

[openstack-dev] [keystone] adding Gage Hugo to keystone core

Hey folks, In today's keystone meeting we made the announcement to add Gage Hugo (gagehugo) as a keystone core reviewer [0]! Gage has been actively involved in keystone over the last several cycles. Not only does he provide thorough reviews, but he's really stepped up to help move the project

Re: [openstack-dev] PTL Election Season

Thanks for the reminder Luke! I will update my patch to remove Security from the directories setup. -Kendall (diablo_rojo) On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 9:11 AM Luke Hinds wrote: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 5:04 PM, Kendall Nelson > wrote: > >> Election

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are glad to present this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) 1. ironic-lib patches

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] storyboard evaluation

Emmet Hikory writes: > Emilien Macchi wrote: > >> What we need to investigate: >> - how do we deal milestones in stories and also how can we have a >> dashboard with an overview per milestone (useful for PTL + TripleO >> release managers). > >     While the storyboard API

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] storyboard evaluation

Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2018-01-16 16:29:32 +: > On 2018-01-16 06:55:03 -0800 (-0800), Emilien Macchi wrote: > [...] > > I created a dev instance of storyboard and imported all bugs from > > TripleO so we could have a look at how it would be if we were using > > the tool: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] storyboard evaluation

On 2018-01-16 16:29:32 + (+), Jeremy Stanley wrote: [...] > Thankfully, SB was designed from the very beginning in an API-first > manner with the WebUI merely one possible API client (there are also > other clients like the boartty console client and a . [...] Oops, to complete my thought

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] The Weekly Owl - 5th Edition

Note: this is the fifth edition of a weekly update of what happens in TripleO, with a little touch of fun. The goal is to provide a short reading (less than 5 minutes) to learn where we are and what we're doing. Any contributions and feedback are welcome. Link to the previous version:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] Community Goals for Rocky

> > > Champion: Sean McGinnis (unless someone else steps up) > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/532361/ > > This goal is to clean some technical debt in the code. > > It remains a good candidate for Queens. > > > > May I step up for this goal for Rocky release? > I am currently involved with

[openstack-dev] Facing issues with Openstack subnet static routes

Hello everyone, I am working on a task, requirement for which is to share services/VMs provisioned inside tenant X (say: network X-n subnet X-s) with another tenant Y(say: network Y-n and subnet Y-s). Did the following steps: 1) Shared the network X-n using 'openstack network rbac...' with

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] Community Goals for Rocky

Hello Em On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 9:59 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Here's an update so we can hopefully, as a community, take a decision > in the next days or so. > > > * Migration to StoryBoard > > Champion: Kendall Nelson > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/513875/ > Some

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] storyboard evaluation

On 2018-01-16 06:55:03 -0800 (-0800), Emilien Macchi wrote: [...] > I created a dev instance of storyboard and imported all bugs from > TripleO so we could have a look at how it would be if we were using > the tool: [...] Awesome! We do also have a https://storyboard-dev.openstack.org/ deployment

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] Community Goals for Rocky

Here's an update so we can hopefully, as a community, take a decision in the next days or so. * Migration to StoryBoard Champion: Kendall Nelson https://review.openstack.org/#/c/513875/ Some projects already migrated, some projects will migrate soon but there is still a gap of things that

[openstack-dev] ping between 2 instances using an ovs in the middle

Dears, I am writing you this email to look for your help in order to fix a problem, I am facing since a while, related to creating two ubuntu instances in Openstack (Fuel 9.2 for Mitaka) and setting an ovs bridge in each VM. Here is the problem description: I have defined two instances called VM1

[openstack-dev] [neutron][fwaas] YouTube video demoing FWaaS V2 L2

All, With great pleasure I am sharing this link of Chandan’s excellent video showing the new L2 functionality: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBYJIZ4tUaw=youtu.be Psyched and many thanks to Chandan -- German __

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] storyboard evaluation

On 01/16/2018 08:55 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: Hey folks, Alex and I spent a bit of time to look at Storyboard, as it seems that some OpenStack projects are migrating from Launchpad to Storyboard. I created a dev instance of storyboard and imported all bugs from TripleO so we could have a look

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][oslo][requirements] oslo.serialization fails with glance

On 18-01-16 19:12:16, ChangBo Guo wrote: > What's the issue for Glance, any bug link ? > > 2018-01-16 0:12 GMT+08:00 Matthew Thode : > > > On 18-01-13 00:41:28, Matthew Thode wrote: > > > https://review.openstack.org/531788 is the review we are seeing it in, > > > but

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] storyboard evaluation

Emilien Macchi wrote: > What we need to investigate: > - how do we deal milestones in stories and also how can we have a > dashboard with an overview per milestone (useful for PTL + TripleO > release managers).     While the storyboard API supports milestones, they don’t work very similarly to

Re: [openstack-dev] [ResMgmt SIG]Proposal to form Resource Management SIG

application filed at https://review.openstack.org/534342 and wiki created at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Res_Mgmt_SIG . On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 12:51 AM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > i think I could do it, but I gotta rely on you guys to attend the Resource > Management WG

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] storyboard evaluation

Hey folks, Alex and I spent a bit of time to look at Storyboard, as it seems that some OpenStack projects are migrating from Launchpad to Storyboard. I created a dev instance of storyboard and imported all bugs from TripleO so we could have a look at how it would be if we were using the tool:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Bug deputy report

Gary, > I need to drop off bug duty on Thursday night so if someone can please swap > me for Friday. I am a bug deputy of the next week. I can start my coverage from this Friday. Thanks, Akihiro 2018-01-16 21:51 GMT+09:00 Gary Kotton : > Hi, > > Things have been relatively

[openstack-dev] Ops Mid Cycle in Tokyo Mar 7-8 2018

Hi all, Broad distribution to make sure folks are aware of the upcoming Ops Meetup in Tokyo. You can help "steer" this meetup by participating in the planning meetings or more practically by editing this page (respectfully): https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/TYO-ops-meetup-2018 Sign up for the

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] not run for PTL

Excerpts from ChangBo Guo's message of 2018-01-16 18:55:26 +0800: > Hi Oslo folks, > > I taken the role of PTL in last 2 cycles, and would like to focus on coding > this cycle. > it's time to let new leader to make oslo better. So I won't be running > for PTL reelection for Rocky cycle.

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Bug deputy report

Hi, Things have been relatively quiet. There are two bugs: 1. https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1743480 - I think that we can leverage tags here so that should address the issue. Would be interesting to know what others thing. 2. https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1743552 - patch in

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] not run for PTL

Thanks for all your help @gcb! On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 5:55 AM, ChangBo Guo wrote: > Hi Oslo folks, > > I taken the role of PTL in last 2 cycles, and would like to focus on coding > this cycle. > it's time to let new leader to make oslo better. So I won't be running > for

[openstack-dev] [watcher] Dublin PTG agenda

Watcher team, We are preparing PTG Agenda here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/rocky-watcher-ptg Feel free to add your topics. I’m going to discuss this content on the next weekly meeting (which will be held tomorrow at 13:00 UTC). Best Regards, Alex

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][oslo][requirements] oslo.serialization fails with glance

What's the issue for Glance, any bug link ? 2018-01-16 0:12 GMT+08:00 Matthew Thode : > On 18-01-13 00:41:28, Matthew Thode wrote: > > https://review.openstack.org/531788 is the review we are seeing it in, > > but 2.22.0 failed as well. > > > > I'm guessing it was

[openstack-dev] [oslo] not run for PTL

Hi Oslo folks, I taken the role of PTL in last 2 cycles, and would like to focus on coding this cycle. it's time to let new leader to make oslo better. So I won't be running for PTL reelection for Rocky cycle. Thanks all of your support and trust in last 2 cycles. -- ChangBo Guo(gcb)

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Adding Adriano Petrich to the core team

Thank you! On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 4:03 AM, Renat Akhmerov wrote: > Adriano, you now have +2 vote and can approve patches :) Welcome! > > Thanks > > Renat Akhmerov > @Nokia > > On 16 Jan 2018, 05:03 +0700, Lingxian Kong , wrote: > > welcome to the