[openstack-dev] [mistral] Proposing time slots for Mistral office hours

Hi, Not so long ago we decided to stop holding weekly meetings in one of the general IRC channel (it was #openstack-meeting-3 for the last several months). The main reason was that we usually didn’t have a good representation of the team there because the team is distributed across the world.

Re: [openstack-dev] [CI][Keystone][Requirements][Release] What happened to the gate on Feb 4th?

On 2018-02-05 05:44, Qiming Teng wrote: > Starting about 24 hours ago, we have been notified CI gate failure > although we haven't changed anything to our project locally. Before that > we have spent quite some time making the out-of-tree tempest plugins > work on gate. What is *your* project?

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] FFE request for --check feature

We have discussed this in glance weekly meeting [1] and most of the core reviewers are inclined towards accepting this FFE. +1 from my side as this --check command will be very helpful for operators. Thank you Bhagyashri for working on this. Abhishek Kekane On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 7:29 PM,

[openstack-dev] [tricircle] Rocky Tricircle PTL candidacy

Hi folks, I would like to announce my self nomination for the PTL candidacy in Tricircle Rocky cycle. My name is Zhiyuan Cai, and my IRC handle is zhiyuan. I am currently the PTL of Tricircle for Queens cycle and have been actively participating in the development of this project since Mitaka

[openstack-dev] [mistral][ptl] PTL candidacy

Hi, I'm Renat Akhmerov. I'm running for PTL of Mistral in Rocky. Mistral is a workflow service developed within the OpenStack community from the ground up. In queens we mainly focused on bugfixing, improving performance and documentation. Performance was again significantly improved (~100%) by

[openstack-dev] [CI][Keystone][Requirements][Release] What happened to the gate on Feb 4th?

Starting about 24 hours ago, we have been notified CI gate failure although we haven't changed anything to our project locally. Before that we have spent quite some time making the out-of-tree tempest plugins work on gate. After checking the log again and again ... we found the following logs

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] PTL candidacy

Thanks for stepping up to take the role, Ben looking forward to making oslo better with your lead . 2018-02-03 2:43 GMT+08:00 Ben Nemec : > Hi, > > I am submitting my candidacy for Oslo PTL. > > I have been an Oslo core since 2014 and although my involvement in the >

Re: [openstack-dev] [api-wg] [api] [cinder] [nova] Support specify action name in request url

As you said RESTful is not a standard but brings guidelines of good practices. Which in turn doesn't preclude adding ideas, as long as respecting RESTful approach. So we get from both sides. Therefore a good schema structure adds to a de-facto standard, once the practice is commonly used.

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] FFE - Feuture Freeze Exception request for Routed Spine and Leaf Deployment

On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 3:28 AM, Harald Jensås wrote: > Requesting: > Feuture Freeze Exception request for Routed Spine and Leaf Deployment > > Blueprints: > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/tripleo-routed-networks- > ironic-inspector >

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirement][cyborg]FFE - pyspdk requirement dependency

Hi, Thank you for your kind reply. I'm not thinking enough about this part of my work. I am sorry for that, please close the FFE of the pyspdk. Thanks, Helloway > 在 2018年1月31日，上午1:54，We We 写道： > >> Hi, > >> I have modified and resubmitted pyspdk to the pypi. Please

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] FFE nfs_ganesha integration

Just to follow up, CI is passing for the three patches outstanding and the last one has a release note for the overall feature. The trick to getting CI to pass was to introduce a new variant Controller role for when we actually deploy with CephNFS and the VIP for the server on the StorageNFS

Re: [openstack-dev] [sdk][release][requirements] FFE request for openstacksdk 0.11.3

On 02/04/2018 01:35 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: On 18-02-04 09:32:25, Monty Taylor wrote: Hi! I'd like to request another FFE to fix several neutron commands in python-openstackclient for queens and also to unbreak python-openstackclient's gate. The release proposal patch is here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [sdk][release][requirements] FFE request for openstacksdk 0.11.3

On 18-02-04 09:32:25, Monty Taylor wrote: > Hi! > > I'd like to request another FFE to fix several neutron commands in > python-openstackclient for queens and also to unbreak > python-openstackclient's gate. > > The release proposal patch is here: > > https://review.openstack.org/540657 > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove] Retiring the trove-integration repository, final call

On 2018-01-26 22:22, Manoj Kumar wrote: > Initial indication was provided in July last year, that the > trove-integration repository was going away. > All the elements have been merged into trove, and are being maintained > there. > > I do not believe anyone spoke up then. If anyone is

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Not running for PTL this cycle

Hi all, I guess it's quite obvious already, but I won't be running for PTL position this time. It's been a challenging and interesting journey, I've learned a lot, and I believe we've achieved a lot together. Now I'd like to get back to calm waters and allow others to driver the project

[openstack-dev] [sdk][release][requirements] FFE request for openstacksdk 0.11.3

Hi! I'd like to request another FFE to fix several neutron commands in python-openstackclient for queens and also to unbreak python-openstackclient's gate. The release proposal patch is here: https://review.openstack.org/540657 The issue at hand was: The osc-functional-devstack-tips job,

[openstack-dev] [cloudkitty] Rocky Cloudkitty PTL candidacy

Hello everyone, I would like to announce my candidacy for PTL of Cloudkitty. During the Queens cycle we have been able open relaunch our community with the integration of a few regular contributors and new core. We also have been to change the way we configure Cloudkitty and the definition of