Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Rocky spec review day

On Wed, 21 Mar 2018 21:48:40 -0700, Melanie Witt wrote: On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 16:47:58 -0700, Melanie Witt wrote: The past several cycles, we've had a spec review day in the cycle where reviewers focus on specs and iterating quickly with spec authors for the day. Spec freeze is April 19 so I

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] [heat-dashboard] Horizon plugin settings for new xstatic modules

Hi Ivan, Thank you very much. I've confirmed that all of us have been added to xstatic-core. As discussed, we will focus on the followings what we added for heat-dashboard, will not touch other xstatic repos as core. xstatic-angular-material xstatic-angular-notify xstatic-angular-uuid

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral][tempest][congress] import or retain mistral tempest service client

Thank you, Dougal and Ghanshyam for the responses! What I can gather is: service client registration > import service client > retaining copy. So the best thing for Congress to do now is to import the service client. On 3/17/18, 9:00 PM, "Ghanshyam Mann" wrote: >Hi

[openstack-dev] [Congress] updated backlog

Here's an updated backlog following Rocky discussions. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/congress-task-priority Please feel free to comment and suggest additions/deletions and changes in priority. __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack][qa] Changes to devstack LIBS_FROM_GIT

Excerpts from corvus's message of 2018-03-28 13:21:38 -0700: > Hi, > > I've proposed a change to devstack which slightly alters the > LIBS_FROM_GIT behavior. This shouldn't be a significant change for > those using legacy devstack jobs (but you may want to be aware of it). > It is more

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][release] Remove complex ACL changes around releases

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 03:34:32PM +0100, Graham Hayes wrote: > It is more complex than just "joining that team" if the project follows > stable policy. the stable team have to approve the additions, and do > reject people trying to join them. This is true but when we (I) say no I explain what's

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [cyborg] Race condition in the Cyborg/Nova flow

Thanks, Eric. Looks like there are no good solutions even as candidates, but only options with varying levels of unacceptability. It is funny that that the option that is considered the least unacceptable is to let the problem happen and then fail the request (last one in your list). Could I

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][requirements] a plan to stop syncing requirements into projects

We're making good progress. Some of the important parts of the global job changes are in place. There are still a lot of open patches to add the lower-constraints jobs to repos, however. Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2018-03-15 07:03:11 -0400: [...] > What I Want to Do >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Hard fail if you try to rename an AZ with instances in it?

On 03/28/2018 03:35 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 3/27/2018 10:37 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: If we want to actually fix the issue once and for all, we need to make availability zones a real thing that has a permanent identifier (UUID) and store that permanent identifier in the instance (not the

Re: [openstack-dev] Following the new PTI for document build, broken local builds

On Wed, 2018-03-28 at 14:14 -0500, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:43:45AM +, Stephen Finucane wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 09:57 -0500, Sean McGinnis wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 10:49:02AM +, Stephen Finucane wrote: > > > > tl;dr: Make sure you stop using

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] [heat-dashboard] Horizon plugin settings for new xstatic modules

Hi Kuz, Don't worry, we're on the same page with you. I added both you, Xinni and Keichii to the xstatic-core group. Thank you for your contributions! Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny, http://blog.e0ne.info/ On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 5:18 PM, Kaz Shinohara wrote: > Hi Ivan &

[openstack-dev] [devstack][qa] Changes to devstack LIBS_FROM_GIT

Hi, I've proposed a change to devstack which slightly alters the LIBS_FROM_GIT behavior. This shouldn't be a significant change for those using legacy devstack jobs (but you may want to be aware of it). It is more significant for new-style devstack jobs. The change is at

[openstack-dev] [nova] review runways are now live!

Hi Stackers, This is just an standalone announcement that review runways [0] are now live and in active use. Details and instructions are documented on the etherpad. For approved blueprint code authors, please consult the etherpad instructions and add your blueprint to the Queue when your

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Hard fail if you try to rename an AZ with instances in it?

On 3/27/2018 10:37 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: If we want to actually fix the issue once and for all, we need to make availability zones a real thing that has a permanent identifier (UUID) and store that permanent identifier in the instance (not the instance metadata). Or we can continue to paper

Re: [openstack-dev] Following the new PTI for document build, broken local builds

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:43:45AM +, Stephen Finucane wrote: > On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 09:57 -0500, Sean McGinnis wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 10:49:02AM +, Stephen Finucane wrote: > > > tl;dr: Make sure you stop using pbr's autodoc feature before converting > > > them to the new PTI

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [cyborg] Race condition in the Cyborg/Nova flow

Sundar- We're running across this issue in several places right now. One thing that's definitely not going to get traction is automatically/implicitly tweaking inventory in one resource class when an allocation is made on a different resource class (whether in the same or different

Re: [openstack-dev] [PTLS] Project Updates & Project Onboarding

Many apologies for sending this to the openstack-dev list; I thought I had removed the list from my address list but clearly did not. On 28/03/18 14:34 -0400, Tom Barron wrote: Would you be so kind as to add <... snip ...> signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [openstack-dev] [PTLS] Project Updates & Project Onboarding

Would you be so kind as to add Victoria Martinez de la Cruz and Dustin Schoenbrun to the manila project Onboarding session [1] ? They are confirmed for conference attendance. Thanks much! -- Tom Barron [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [cyborg] Race condition in the Cyborg/Nova flow

Hi Shaohe,   I have responded in the Etherpad. The Cyborg/Nova scheduling spec details the 4 types of user requests . I believe you are looking for more details on

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][kolla-kubernete][tc][openstack-helm]propose retire kolla-kubernetes project

+1 Regards chuck On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 11:47 AM, Jeffrey Zhang wrote: > There are two projects to solve the issue that run OpenStack on > Kubernetes, OpenStack-helm, and kolla-kubernetes. Them both > leverage helm tool for orchestration. There is some different

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][kolla-kubernete][tc][openstack-helm]propose retire kolla-kubernetes project

The OpenStack-Helm team would eagerly welcome contributions from Kolla-Kubernetes team members! Several of the current OSH team come from a Kolla-Kubernetes background, and the project has benefitted greatly from their experience and domain knowledge. Please reach out to me or say hi in

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [cyborg] Race condition in the Cyborg/Nova flow

Hi Eric and all,     I should have clarified that this race condition happens only for the case of devices with multiple functions. There is a prior thread about it. I was trying to get a solution within Cyborg, but

[openstack-dev] [nova][oslo] what to do with problematic mocking in nova unit tests

In the course of preparing the next release of oslo.config, Ben noticed that nova's unit tests fail with oslo.config master [1]. The underlying issue is that the tests mock things that oslo.config is now calling as part of determining where options are being set in code. This isn't an API change

Re: [openstack-dev] Queries about API Extension

On Wed, 28 Mar 2018, 陈汗 wrote: Hi all, Here are my questions: For the projects whose api parts were implemented with Pecan, is there any way(hope it is graceful) to extend these api? I mean, for example, somehow I have to add several extra attributes in Class Chassis in ironic

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][kolla-kubernete][tc][openstack-helm]propose retire kolla-kubernetes project

+1 To consolidate them > Paul Bourke 於 2018年3月29日 上午12:16 寫道： > > +1 > > Thanks Jeffrey for taking the time to investigate. > >> On 28/03/18 16:47, Jeffrey Zhang wrote: >> There are two projects to solve the issue that run OpenStack on >> Kubernetes, OpenStack-helm,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VMware NSX CI - no longer running?

On Wed, 28 Mar 2018, melanie witt wrote: Can anyone from the vmware subteam comment on whether or not the vmware third-party CI is going to be fixed or if it has been abandoned? I've got no substantive information yet, but for the sake of the thread not looking ignored, I can report that the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Rocky community goal: remove the use of mox/mox3 for testing

On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 19:21:24 +0300, Andrey Kurilin wrote: This is a nice goal which revises me the first my patch to OpenStack community. It was a patch to Nova and it was related to removing mox :) PS: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59694/ PS2: it was abandoned due to several -2 :) You

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Rocky community goal: remove the use of mox/mox3 for testing

On 3/28/2018 11:21 AM, Andrey Kurilin wrote: PS: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59694/ PS2: it was abandoned due to several -2 :) Look how nice I was as a reviewer 5 years ago... -- Thanks, Matt __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Rocky community goal: remove the use of mox/mox3 for testing

Hi Melanie and stacker! This is a nice goal which revises me the first my patch to OpenStack community. It was a patch to Nova and it was related to removing mox :) PS: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59694/ PS2: it was abandoned due to several -2 :) 2018-03-27 1:06 GMT+03:00 melanie witt

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] VMware NSX CI - no longer running?

On 3/28/2018 11:07 AM, melanie witt wrote: We were reviewing a bug fix for the vmware driver [0] today and we noticed it appears that the VMware NSX CI is no longer running, not even on only the nova/virt/vmwareapi/ tree. From the third-party CI dashboard, I see some claims of it running but

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][kolla-kubernete][tc][openstack-helm]propose retire kolla-kubernetes project

+1 Thanks Jeffrey for taking the time to investigate. On 28/03/18 16:47, Jeffrey Zhang wrote: There are two projects to solve the issue that run OpenStack on Kubernetes, OpenStack-helm, and kolla-kubernetes. Them both leverage helm tool for orchestration. There is some different perspective at

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][kolla-kubernete][tc][openstack-helm]propose retire kolla-kubernetes project

+1 to consolidate. Thanks, Dims On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 11:47 AM, Jeffrey Zhang wrote: > There are two projects to solve the issue that run OpenStack on > Kubernetes, OpenStack-helm, and kolla-kubernetes. Them both > leverage helm tool for orchestration. There is some

[openstack-dev] [nova] VMware NSX CI - no longer running?

Hello everyone, We were reviewing a bug fix for the vmware driver [0] today and we noticed it appears that the VMware NSX CI is no longer running, not even on only the nova/virt/vmwareapi/ tree. From the third-party CI dashboard, I see some claims of it running but when I open the patches,

[openstack-dev] [kolla][kolla-kubernete][tc][openstack-helm]propose retire kolla-kubernetes project

There are two projects to solve the issue that run OpenStack on Kubernetes, OpenStack-helm, and kolla-kubernetes. Them both leverage helm tool for orchestration. There is some different perspective at the beginning, which results in the two teams could not work together. But recently, the

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-infra] Where did the ARA logs go?

On 2018-03-28 09:26:49 -0500 (-0500), Sean McGinnis wrote: [...] > I believe the ARA logs are only captured on failing jobs. Correct. This was a stop-gap some months ago when we noticed we were overrunning our inode capacity on the logserver. ARA was was only one of the various contributors to

[openstack-dev] Queries about API Extension

Hi all, Here are my questions: For the projects whose api parts were implemented with Pecan, is there any way(hope it is graceful) to extend these api? I mean, for example, somehow I have to add several extra attributes in Class Chassis in ironic project. Do you guys have any

[openstack-dev] [tap-as-a-service] publish on pypi

hi, i'm thinking about publishing the latest release of tap-as-a-service on pypi. background: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/555788/ iirc, the naming (tap-as-a-service vs neutron-taas) was one of concerns when we talked about this topic last time. (long time ago. my memory is dim.) do you have

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][release] Remove complex ACL changes around releases

On 26/03/2018 14:33, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Hi! > > TL;DR: > We used to do complex things with ACLs for stable/* branches around > releases. Let's stop doing that as it's not really useful anyway, and > just trust the $project-stable-maint teams to do the right thing. > > > Current

[openstack-dev] Replacing pbr's autodoc feature with sphinxcontrib-apidoc

As noted last week [1], we're trying to move away from pbr's autodoc feature as part of the new docs PTI. To that end, I've created sphinxcontrib-apidoc, which should do what pbr was previously doing for us by via a Sphinx extension. https://pypi.org/project/sphinxcontrib-apidoc/ This works by

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-infra] Where did the ARA logs go?

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 10:58:56AM +0200, András Kövi wrote: > Hi, > > Recently I noticed that ARA logs were published for all CI jobs. It > seems like the reports do not contain the these logs any more. I tried > to research on what happened to them but couldn't find any info. Can > someone

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] [heat-dashboard] Horizon plugin settings for new xstatic modules

Hi Ivan & Horizon folks AFAIK, Horizon team had conclusion that you will add the specific members to xstatic-core, correct ? Can I ask you to add the following members ? # All of tree are heat-dashboard core. Kazunori Shinohara / ksnhr.t...@gmail.com #myself Xinni Ge / xinni.ge1...@gmail.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][release] Remove complex ACL changes around releases

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 09:51:34AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2018-03-26 15:33:03 +0200: > > Hi! > > > > TL;DR: > > We used to do complex things with ACLs for stable/* branches around > > releases. Let's stop doing that as it's not really useful

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][release] Remove complex ACL changes around releases

Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2018-03-26 15:33:03 +0200: > Hi! > > TL;DR: > We used to do complex things with ACLs for stable/* branches around > releases. Let's stop doing that as it's not really useful anyway, and > just trust the $project-stable-maint teams to do the right thing.

[openstack-dev] [publiccloud-wg] Reminder bi-weekly meeting Public Cloud WG

Hi all, Time again for a meeting for the Public Cloud WG - at our new time and channel - tomorrow at 1400 UTC in #openstack-publiccloud Agenda and etherpad at: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/publiccloud-wg Cheers, Tobias Rydberg -- Tobias Rydberg Senior Developer Mobile: +46 733 312780

[openstack-dev] [cyborg]Team Weekly Meeting 2018.03.28

Hi Team, Weekly meeting as usual starting UTC1400 at #openstack-cyborg, initial agenda as follows: * Cyborg GPU support discussion * Clock driver introduction by ZTE team * Rocky dev discussion: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/cyborg -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [cyborg] Race condition in the Cyborg/Nova flow

I have summarize some scenarios for fpga devices request. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cyborg-fpga-request-scenarios Please add more more scenarios to find out the exceptions that placement can not satisfy the filter and weight. IMOH, I refer placement to do filter and weight. If we

[openstack-dev] [openstack-infra] Where did the ARA logs go?

Hi, Recently I noticed that ARA logs were published for all CI jobs. It seems like the reports do not contain the these logs any more. I tried to research on what happened to them but couldn't find any info. Can someone please enlighten me about this change? Thank you, Andras

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Stepping down from OpenStack-Ansible core

Hello, Ahah, gate job breakages? You were the first to break them, but also willing to step in to fix them as soon as you knew. And that's the part I will remember the most. You will be missed, Major. Your next team is lucky to have you! It was a pleasure working with you. And the gifs, omagad!

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][release] Remove complex ACL changes around releases

LGTM __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [vitrage] Next two IRC meetings are canceled

Hi, Most of Vitrage developers will not be available today and next Wednesday, so we’ll skip the next two IRC meetings. We will meet again on Wednesday, April 11. Thanks, Ifat __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for