Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] z/VM introducing a new config driveformat

Thanks for sharing this info , it make sense to leave a -2 here, I will keep modifying follow on patches and get more reviews. thanks Best Regards! Kevin (Chen) Ji 纪 晨 Engineer, zVM Development, CSTL Notes: Chen CH Ji/China/IBM@IBMCN Internet: jiche...@cn.ibm.com Phone: +86-10-82451493

Re: [openstack-dev] The Forum Schedule is now live

Hi Jimmy, Do you have an update about the API SIG slot? Thanks, Gilles On 28/04/18 02:04, Jimmy McArthur wrote: Hello all - Please take a look here for the posted Forum schedule: https://www.openstack.org/summit/vancouver-2018/summit-schedule#track=224 You should also see it update on

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] The Forum Schedule is now live

On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 7:18 AM, Jimmy McArthur wrote: > Apologies for the delay, Emilien! I should be adding it today, but it's > definitely yours. > Could we change the title of the slot and actually be a TripleO Project Update session? It would have been great to have

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] The Weekly Owl - 19th Edition

Welcome to the nineteenth edition of a weekly update in TripleO world! The goal is to provide a short reading (less than 5 minutes) to learn what's new this week. Any contributions and feedback are welcome. Link to the previous version:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun][k8s] AWS Fargate and OpenStack Zun

Thanks Hongbin, The article is really great! On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 2:40 PM, Kumari, Madhuri wrote: > Thank you Hongbin. The article is very helpful. > > > > Regards, > > Madhuri > > > > *From:* Hongbin Lu [mailto:hongbin...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Sunday, April 29,

[openstack-dev] networking-vpp 18.04 for VPP 18.04 is now available

Hello Everyone, In conjunction with the release of VPP 18.04, we'd like to invite you all to try out networking-vpp 18.04 for VPP 18.04. VPP is a fast userspace forwarder based on the DPDK toolkit, and uses vector packet processing algorithms to minimize the CPU time spent on each packet and

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][placement] Trying to summarize bp/glance-image-traits scheduling alternatives for rebuild

Reminder for Operators, Please provide feedback either way. In cases of rebuilding of an instance using a different image where the image traits have changed between the original launch and the rebuild, is it reasonable to ask to just re-launch a new instance with the new image? The argument for

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] REST limitations and GraghGL inception?

Ok, here are my two cents regarding GraphQL integration within Openstack and some thoughts around this topic. 1°/- Openstack SDK should still exist and should be in my humble opinion a critical focus as it allow following benefits for large and medium companies : • It provide a common and clean

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][docs] documenting openstack "constellations"

> >> > So, is the documentation team willing to add the new "constellations" > >> > repository under their umbrella? Or should we keep it as a TC-owned > >> > repository for now? > >> > >> I'm fine having it as parts of the docs team. The docs PTL should be > >> part of the review team for sure, >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][docs] documenting openstack "constellations"

On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 4:21 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Andreas Jaeger's message of 2018-05-01 21:51:19 +0200: >> On 05/01/2018 04:08 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> > The TC has had an item on our backlog for a while (a year?) to >> > document "constellations" of

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][docs] documenting openstack "constellations"

Excerpts from Andreas Jaeger's message of 2018-05-01 21:51:19 +0200: > On 05/01/2018 04:08 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > The TC has had an item on our backlog for a while (a year?) to > > document "constellations" of OpenStack components to make it easier > > for deployers and users to understand

[openstack-dev] OpenStack PTG Update

Hey everyone, Good news! We have extended the early bird registration for the upcoming PTG in Denver to May 18, 6:59 UTC. After that time, the price will increase from USD $199 to USD $399. Please keep in mind that the OpenStack Foundation doesn’t profit on these events. Our goal is to

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Help with test run

Thanks Clark, I’m pretty sure the UTs would conflict with each other so raising the concurrency is probably a big undertaking. Though it’s definitely worth looking into in the future. Shifting the job timeout a little bit maybe a the simplest solution. Thanks again, Andras

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Help with test run

Thanks Brad for the check. Yes it’s quite consistent. _ From: Brad P. Crochet Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2018 5:13 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Help with test run To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

[openstack-dev] [nova] Virtuozzo CI status

Hi Stackers, Lately, I noticed the Virtuozzo CI has been having some problems, for example on a recent example run [0], the job link is broken: "The requested URL /22/563722/4/check/check-dsvm-tempest-vz7-exe-minimal/d1d1707 was not found on this server." Prior to that, I noticed that the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][docs] documenting openstack "constellations"

On 05/01/2018 04:08 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: The TC has had an item on our backlog for a while (a year?) to document "constellations" of OpenStack components to make it easier for deployers and users to understand which parts they need to have the features they want [1]. John Garbutt has

Re: [openstack-dev] Overriding project-templates in Zuul

On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 1:23 PM Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 10:02 AM, James E. Blair > wrote: > [...] > > Okay, let's summarize: >> >> Proposal 1: All project-template and project-local job variants matching >> the item's branch must

Re: [openstack-dev] Overriding project-templates in Zuul

cor...@inaugust.com (James E. Blair) writes: > So a job with "files: tests/" and "irrelevant-files: docs/" would > never run because it's impossible to satisfy both. Jeremy pointed out in IRC that that's not what would happen. So... let me rephrase that: > So a job with "files: tests/" and

Re: [openstack-dev] Overriding project-templates in Zuul

On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 10:02 AM, James E. Blair wrote: [...] > Okay, let's summarize: > > Proposal 1: All project-template and project-local job variants matching > the item's branch must also match the item. > > * Files and irrelevant-files on project-template and project

Re: [openstack-dev] Overriding project-templates in Zuul

Joshua Hesketh writes: > I might be misunderstanding at which point a job is chosen to be ran and > therefore when it's too late to dissuade it. However, if possible, would it > make more sense for the project-local copy of a job to overwrite the > supplied files and

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Help with test run

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018, at 2:22 AM, András Kövi wrote: > Hi, > > Can someone please help me with why this build ended with TIMED_OUT? > http://logs.openstack.org/85/527085/8/check/mistral-tox-unit-mysql/3ffae9f/ Reading the job log the job setup only took a few minutes. Then the unittests start

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Help with test run

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 5:23 AM András Kövi wrote: > Hi, > > Can someone please help me with why this build ended with TIMED_OUT? > http://logs.openstack.org/85/527085/8/check/mistral-tox-unit-mysql/3ffae9f/ > > I'm not seeing any particular reason for it. Is it happening

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Mistral Monthly May 2018

Hey Folks! Welcome to the first Mistral Monthly newsletter! # Intro I am going to try sending out a monthly newsletter summarising what is going on in the world of Mistral. This is an experiment, so feedback would be very welcome! If you have something you want me to share for next time, please

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Default scheduler filters survey

Hi Dave, On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 4:30 AM, Dave Holland wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 12:41:21PM -0400, Mathieu Gagné wrote: >> Weighers for baremetal cells: >> * ReservedHostForTenantWeigher [7] > ... >> [7] Used to favor reserved host over non-reserved ones based on

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] The Forum Schedule is now live

Apologies for the delay, Emilien! I should be adding it today, but it's definitely yours. Emilien Macchi May 1, 2018 at 9:03 AM Jimmy, could you please confirm we have the TripleO Project Updates slot? I don't see it in the schedule. Thanks, -- Emilien Macchi

[openstack-dev] [tc][docs] documenting openstack "constellations"

The TC has had an item on our backlog for a while (a year?) to document "constellations" of OpenStack components to make it easier for deployers and users to understand which parts they need to have the features they want [1]. John Garbutt has started writing the first such document [2], but as

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] The Forum Schedule is now live

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 10:25 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 10:05 AM, Jimmy McArthur > wrote: >> >> It looks like we have a spot held for you, but did not receive >> confirmation that TripleO would be moving forward with Project

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] [Elections] Rocky TC Election Results

Excerpts from Kendall Nelson's message of 2018-05-01 00:02:36 +: > Hello Everyone :) > > Please join me in congratulating the 7 newly elected members of the > Technical Committee (TC)! > > >- Thierry Carrez (ttx)] >- Chris Dent (cdent) >- Sean McGinnis (smcginnis) >- Davanum

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun][Kolla][Kolla-ansible] Verify Zun deployment in Kolla gate

Mark, The major constraint here is gate memory (which is maxed at 8gb). This is barely enough to run compute-kit (which is tested). Now that multiple nodes are a thing, it may be possible to run computekit on one node, and other services on other nodes. (IOW the environment has changed, and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Default scheduler filters survey

You may also need something like pre-emptible instances to arrange the clean up of opportunistic VMs when the owner needs his resources back. Some details on the early implementation at http://openstack-in-production.blogspot.fr/2018/02/maximizing-resource-utilization-with.html. If you're in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Default scheduler filters survey

[Resending for a colleague who's not on openstack-dev-- SL.] Yeap, because of the bug [#1677217] in the standard AggregateImagePropertiesIsolation filter, we have written a custom Nova scheduler filter. The filter AggregateImageOsDistroIsolation is a simplified version the

[openstack-dev] [neutron] CI meeting

Hi, I have to cancel today’s Neutron CI meeting because of Public holidays in many countries. Next meeting will be on 8th May. — Best regards Slawek Kaplonski skapl...@redhat.com __ OpenStack Development Mailing List