Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][third-party] CI FC passthrough scripts now available on stackforge

Ramy and Patrick - thank you for your work on this. This piece is definitely a challenge for any FC vendors setting up third party CI. On 06/03/2015 09:59 AM, Asselin, Ramy wrote: For anyone working on 3^rd party CI FC drivers: Patrick East and I have been working on making “FC pass-through”

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra][tc][ptl] Scaling up code review process (subdir cores)

I like this idea. I agree, as things grow it is probably easier to find folks that know certain areas a project rather than the full scope. This could be a good way to handle the load and delegate some pieces (such as driver reviews) to a different set of people. On 06/02/2015 04:24 PM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Some Changes to Cinder Core

, May 27, 2015 at 12:07 AM, John Griffith john.griffi...@gmail.com mailto:john.griffi...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com mailto:thin...@gmail.com wrote: This is long overdue, but it gives me great pleasure to nominate Sean

Re: [openstack-dev] Why doesn't Gerrit email me?

I had issues with our mail server filtering them out as spam or something. It wasn't even at my client, so I couldn't do much about it. I eventually ended up using a new mail provider for my OpenStack emails. At the moment, however, I have nothing configured here - and AFAIK I never have

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposing Gorka Eguileor for core

+1 On 08/13/2015 02:13 PM, Mike Perez wrote: It gives me great pleasure to nominate Gorka Eguileor for Cinder core. Gorka's contributions to Cinder core have been much apprecated: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/owner:%22Gorka+Eguileor%22+project:openstack/cinder,p,0035b6410002dd11 60/90

[openstack-dev] [cinder] No meeting Oct 28th

It seems someone always asks during the Summit, so this is an attempt to make sure it is known. Due to the Design Summit taking place next week, Cinder will not be holding its regular Wednesday meeting. We will resume normal meetings the following week. Thanks! Sean McGinnis (smcginnis

Re: [openstack-dev] [third-party] third party ci operators meetup in Tokyo

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 07:08:18PM +, Asselin, Ramy wrote: > Would any 3rd party ci operators like to meetup in Tokyo during the summit? > > I would like to propose we have lunch together at one of the summit lunch > areas on Wednesday, October 28. > > Please reply to this thread. You can

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] [nova] [cinder] Mitaka summit working session: Resource Federation for an Open Cloud

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 03:52:51PM -0400, George Silvis, III wrote: > On 10/22/2015 02:13 PM, Iury Gregory wrote: > > Hi George, can you say day and hour for this working session? Thanks > > I'll present this at: > > https://mitakadesignsummit.sched.org/event/93adfa1e5a023bc37c4de0bf2a999862 >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] meeting place for event Monday night in Tokyo ...

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 02:17:12AM +, Dulko, Michal wrote: > On Sun, 2015-10-25 at 22:27 +0900, Mike Perez wrote: > > On Oct 25, 2015, at 18:19, Mike Perez wrote: > > > > >> On Oct 25, 2015, at 10:48, Mike Perez wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> I

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Sessions on openstack-cinder YouTube channel

Hey everyone, We recently created a YouTube channel for Cinder related activity. We are hoping to use this to build up a library of recordings over time. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJ8Koy4gsISMy0qW3CWZmaQ Starting with this Summit, Walt Boring has done a lot of work making sure each

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Change from Mitaka: Expected UNIX signal to generate Guru Meditation (error) Reports

ed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Sean McGinnis <sean.mcgin...@gmx.com> > wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 02:43:39PM +0200, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > > > Background > > > -- > > > > > > Oslo Guru Meditation (error) Reports (GMR)[*] ar

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Change from Mitaka: Expected UNIX signal to generate Guru Meditation (error) Reports

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 02:43:39PM +0200, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > Background > -- > > Oslo Guru Meditation (error) Reports (GMR)[*] are a useful debugging > mechanism that allows one to capture the current state of a Nova > process/executable (e.g. `nova-compute`, `nova-api`, etc). >

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Mitaka Design Summit Recap

Cinder Mitaka Design Summit Summary Will the Real Block Storage Service Please Stand Up === Should Cinder be usable outside of a full OpenStack environment. There are several solutions out there for providing a Software Defined Storage service with

Re: [openstack-dev] Troubleshooting cross-project comms

On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 07:30:51AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > On 10/28/2015 07:15 PM, Anne Gentle wrote: > > Has anyone considered using #openstack-dev, instead of a new meeting > room? #openstack-dev is mostly a ghost town at this point, and deciding > that instead it would be the dedicated

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Cinder Mitaka Deadlines

Cinder Release Schedule After some discussion at the Mitaka Design Summit, the Cinder team will be altering our release schedule for this release to simplify deadlines and closer align with the established OpenStack release schedule. Overall Deadlines for Mitaka [1] * Mitaka-1 (Dec 1-3) *

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Cinder Design Summit Schedule

Hello all, I have the schedule updated for the Design Summit Cinder sessions. Please take a look and let me know if you see any major issues: https://mitakadesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/cinder Some sessions had to be moved around to accomodate presentation schedules. If we have other

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] opening stable/liberty

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 02:30:23PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > One of the first steps for opening stable/liberty is to update the > version settings in the branches to no longer use pre-versioning. > Thierry submitted a bunch of patches to projects [0], and some are > merging now. > > Others

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] [nova] [cinder] Mitaka summit working session: Resource Federation for an Open Cloud

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 12:27:53PM -0400, George Silvis, III wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Since the Liberty summit, we have been working on prototyping the > changes needed for inter-Openstack deployment resource federation[1]. > We now have a demo to show, in which users can attach Cinder

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Rolling upgrades - missing pieces

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 03:10:16PM +, Dulko, Michal wrote: > Hi all, > > One of our priority goals for Liberty was the adoption of > oslo.versionedobjects in order for Cinder to achieve ability to do > rolling upgrades. We weren't successful with that in L, and work got > postponed to Mitaka.

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] RemoteFS drivers refactoring: move code, which works with images to separate classes

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 07:01:45PM +, D'Angelo, Scott wrote: > If you create a blueprint and a spec for this, the details can be discussed > in the spec. Yes, something like this we should definitely have a spec and blueprint for. Please write up a spec and propose to the cinder-specs repo

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] PTL Candidacy

for the cloud. Thank you for your consideration! Sean McGinnis (smcginnis) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Non-Candidacy

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 09:15:44AM -0700, Mike Perez wrote: > Hello all, > > I will not be running for Cinder PTL this next cycle. Each cycle I ran > was for a reason [1][2], and the Cinder team should feel proud of our > accomplishments: Thanks for a couple of awesome cycles Mike!

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] The Absurdity of the Milestone-1 Deadline for Drivers

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:13:04PM -0600, John Griffith wrote: > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Ben Swartzlander > wrote: > > > I've always thought it was a bit strange to require new drivers to merge > > by milestone 1. I think I understand the motivations of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] snapshot and cloning for NFS backend

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 06:26:06AM +, Kekane, Abhishek wrote: > Hi Devs, > > The cinder-specs [1] for snapshot and cloning NFS backend submitted by Eric > was approved in Kilo but due to nova issue [2] it is not implemented in Kilo > and Liberty. > I am discussing about this nova bug with

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] New driver submission deadline

This message is for all new vendors looking to add a new Cinder driver in the Mitaka release as well as any existing vendors that need to add a new protocol/driver to what is already in tree. There has been some discussion on the mailing list and in the IRC channel about changes to our policy

Re: [openstack-dev] [rootwrap] rootwrap and libraries - RFC

> Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2015 at 2:33 PM > From: "Sean Dague" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [rootwrap] rootwrap and libraries - RFC > > On 09/09/2015 02:55 PM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [rootwrap] rootwrap and libraries - RFC

On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 03:33:36PM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > On 09/09/2015 02:55 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > > On 10 September 2015 at 06:45, Matt Riedemann > > wrote: > >> > > So, I realise thats a bit sucky. My suggestion would be to just take > > the tactical

Re: [openstack-dev] [CINDER] [PTL Candidates] Questions

On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 11:30:15AM -0600, John Griffith wrote: > ​PTL nomination emails are good, but I have a few questions that I'd like > to ask to help me in making my vote. Some of these are covered in the > general proposal announcements, but I'd love to hear some more detail. > > It would

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Do we have project scope for cinder?

On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 11:44:19AM +, Dulko, Michal wrote: > On Sat, 2015-11-28 at 10:56 +0800, hao wang wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > I notice nova have a clarification of project scope: > > http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/project_scope.html > > > > I want to find cinder's, but

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Rolling upgrades

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 01:09:10PM +0100, Micha?? Dulko wrote: > Hi, > > At the meeting recently it was mentioned that our rolling upgrades > efforts are pursuing an "elusive unicorn" that makes development a lot > more complicated and restricted. I want to try to clarify this a bit, > explain

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Custom fields for versioned objects

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 04:46:02PM +0100, Micha?? Dulko wrote: > On 12/15/2015 04:08 PM, Ryan Rossiter wrote: > > Thanks for the review Michal! As for the bp/bug report, there???s four > > options: > > > > 1. Tack the work on as part of bp cinder-objects > > 2. Make a new blueprint (bp

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][release][all] Automatic .ics generation for OpenStack's and project's deadlines

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 06:20:44PM +, Flavio Percoco wrote: > > With the new home for the release schedule, and it being a good place > for projects to add their own deadlines as well, I believe it would be > good for people that use calendars to have these .ics being generated > and linked

Re: [openstack-dev] [log] LOG.exception should contain an exception message or not?

On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 10:08:42PM +0900, Akihiro Motoki wrote: > Hi, > > # cross-posting to -dev and -operators ML > > In the current most OpenStack implementation, > when we use LOG.exception, we don't pass an exception message to > LOG.exception: > > LOG.exception(_LE("Error while

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] No IRC meeting December 30

Hey all, Do to the holidays and travel there will be no meeting next Wednesday, December 30th. We will resume the following week. Have a good break! Sean (smcginnis) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Mitaka Midcycle Sprint

Cinder Mitaka Midcycle Sprint Dates: January 26-29 (29th will be optional hack day) Location: NetApp Office 7301 Kit Creek Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=35.8578%2C-78.8839#map=16/35.8569/-78.8851 Contact: Tom Barron (tbarron) Nearest airport:

Re: [openstack-dev] [OSSN 0063] Nova and Cinder key manager for Barbican misuses cached credentials

On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 12:52:03PM -0700, Nathan Kinder wrote: > Nova and Cinder key manager for Barbican misuses cached credentials > --- > > ### Summary ### > During the Icehouse release the Cinder and Nova projects added a feature > that supports storage volume encryption using keys stored in

Re: [openstack-dev] Invitation to join Hangzhou Bug Smash

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 08:06:50AM +, Wang, Shane wrote: > Hi, OpenStackers, > > As you know, Huawei, Intel and CESI are hosting the 4th China OpenStack Bug > Smash at Hangzhou, China. > The 1st China Bug Smash was at Shanghai, the 2nd was at Xi'an, and the 3rd > was at Chengdu. > > We are

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [cinder] nova's broken py27/py33 and functional tests

On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 05:15:56PM +0200, Sylvain Bauza wrote: > (titling now accordingly) > > Le 30/05/2016 14:01, Sylvain Bauza a écrit : > >Hi, > > > >For the moment, we have a non-resolved critical bug hitting our > >UTs and functional tests : > >https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1586976 >

Re: [openstack-dev] [grenade] upgrades vs rootwrap

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:19:34AM +, Angus Lees wrote: > So how does rootwrap fit into the "theory of upgrade"? > > The doc talks about deprecating config, but is silent on when new required > config (rootwrap filters) should be installed. By virtue of the way the > grenade code works

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Integration testing for Nova API os-assisted-volume-snapshots

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 07:01:17PM +0200, Jordan Pittier wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Matt Riedemann > wrote: > ... > > Does someone have a link to a successful job run for one of those drivers? > > I'd like to see if they are testing volume snapshot and

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Status of the OpenStack port to Python 3

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:58:23PM -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: +1 from me as well. I get questions on support for these often enough. > +1 from me as well Doug! ("community to set a goal for Ocata to have Python > 3 functional tests running for all projects.") > > -- Dims > > On Thu, Jun

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] No middle-man - when does/will Nova directly connect iSCSI volumes?

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:50:11AM -0700, Preston L. Bannister wrote: > Daniel, Thanks. Looking for a sense of direction. > > Clearly there is some range of opinion, as Walter indicates. :) > > Not sure you are get to 100% direct connection to QEMU. When there is > dedicated hardware to do

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] No middle-man - when does/will Nova directly connect iSCSI volumes?

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:07:43PM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: > On 06/23/2016 10:09 AM, Walter A. Boring IV wrote: > > > >volumes connected to QEMU instances eventually become directly connected? > > > >>Our long term goal is that 100% of all network storage will be connected > >>to directly by

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Should we fix XML request issues?

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 09:08:54AM +0100, Michał Dulko wrote: > On 01/15/2016 07:14 AM, Jethani, Ravishekar wrote: > > Hi Devs, > > > > I have come across a few 500 response issues while sending request > > body as XML to cinder service. For example: > > > > > > > > I can see that XML

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Nominating Scott D'Angelo to Cinder core

to this within the next week. If there are none I will switch Scott over by next week, unless all cores approve prior to then. Thanks! Sean McGinnis (smcginnis) [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/owner:%22Scott+DAngelo+%253Cscott.dangelo%2540hpe.com%253E%22+status:merged [2] http://cinderstats

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Multi-attach, determining when to call os-brick's connector.disconnect_volume

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 03:30:42PM -0700, John Griffith wrote: > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Ildikó Váncsa > wrote: > > > > ​This may still be in fact the easiest way to handle this. The only other > thing I am still somewhat torn on here is that maybe Nova

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Nominating Patrick East to Cinder Core

On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 01:04:58AM +0100, Sean McGinnis wrote: > Patrick has been a strong contributor to Cinder over the last few releases, > both with great code submissions and useful reviews. He also participates > regularly on IRC helping answer questions and providing valuable

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Cinder Mitaka Midcycle Summary

War and Peace or Notes from the Cinder Mitaka Midcycle Sprint January 26-29 Etherpads from discussions: * https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-cinder-midcycle-day-1 * https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-cinder-midcycle-day-2 * https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-cinder-midcycle-day-3 *

Re: [openstack-dev] Announcing Ekko -- Scalable block-based backup for OpenStack

On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 02:04:44PM -0800, Preston L. Bannister wrote: > On a side note, of the folk with interest in this thread, how many are > going to the Austin OpenStack conference? Would you be interested in > presenting as a panel? > > I submitted for a presentation on "State of the Art

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Nominating Patrick East to Cinder Core

Patrick has been a strong contributor to Cinder over the last few releases, both with great code submissions and useful reviews. He also participates regularly on IRC helping answer questions and providing valuable feedback. I would like to add Patrick to the core reviewers for Cinder. Per our

Re: [openstack-dev] Logging and traceback at same time.

On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 02:46:28PM +0800, 王华 wrote: > You can use LOG.exception. Yes, I highly recommend using LOG.exception in this case. That is exactly what it's used for. LOG.exception is pretty much exactly like LOG.error, but with the additional behavior that it will log out the details of

Re: [openstack-dev] Logging and traceback at same time.

On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 10:36:55AM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Wed, Feb 03 2016, Khayam Gondal wrote: > > > Is there a way to do logging the information and traceback at the same > > Let me know if this is correct way? > > Pass exc_info=True in your LOG.() call. Ooo, great tip! > > -- >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] A proposal to separate the design summit

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 05:20:21PM +, Amrith Kumar wrote: > Thierry and all of those who contributed to putting together this write-up, > thank you very much. > > TL;DR: +0 > > Longer version: > > While I definitely believe that the new proposed timing for "OpenStack > Summit" which is

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] adding a new /v3 endpoint for api-microversions

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 07:59:17PM +0200, Duncan Thomas wrote: > > So we can't get users to change endpoints, or write our libraries to have > sensible defaults, but we're somehow going to magically get consumers to do > the much harder job of doing version probes in their code/libraries so that

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] adding a new /v3 endpoint for api-microversions

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:40:48PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > I'd vote for the extra round trip and implementation of caching whenever > possible. Using another endpoint is really annoying, I already have > specific stuff for cinder to setup both v1 and v2 endpoint, as v2 > doesn't fully

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] audience for release notes

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:03:49AM -0600, Brant Knudson wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 6:34 AM, Doug Hellmann > wrote: > > > I've had a few conversations recently about "appropriate" content for > > release notes, so I thought it was worth starting a separate thread here

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] A proposal to separate the design summit

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 04:13:56PM +0800, Qiming Teng wrote: > Hi, All, > > After reading through all the +1's and -1's, we realized how difficult > it is to come up with a proposal that makes everyone happy. When we are > discussing this proposal with some other contributors, we came up with a >

Re: [openstack-dev] [os-brick][nova][cinder] os-brick/privsep change is done and awaiting your review

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 02:26:49PM +, John Garbutt wrote: > > My understanding of what came out of the midcycle was: > * current rootwrap system horribly breaks upgrade > * adopting privsep in this "sudo" like form fixes upgrade > * this approach is much lower risk than a full conversion at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [nova] Work flow for detaching a volume

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 06:11:15PM +, Srinivas Sakhamuri wrote: > I want to confirm the correct work flow for detaching a volume, Both nova > and cinder (unpublished, available through cinder.volumes.detach) provides > detach volume API. Only nova seems to have correct work flow in terms of >

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [cinder] How to configure the third party CI to be triggered only when jenkins +1

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 02:07:54AM +, liuxinguo wrote: > Thanks for your input John Griffith, it looks like that the code you modify > is not in layout.yaml (). > Could you tell me the exactly filename where you made the change? > > Thanks very much! > Wilson Liu That is with sos-ci.

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] No weekly meeting Jan 27

Just an official notice - there will be no weekly meeting January 27th due to the Mitaka Midcycle. Regular weekly meetings will continue the first week of February. Thanks! Sean McGinnis (smcginnis) __ OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] adding a new /v3 endpoint for api-microversions

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 03:38:39PM +, D'Angelo, Scott wrote: > Cinder team is proposing to add support for API microversions [1]. It came up > at our mid-cycle that we should add a new /v3 endpoint [2]. Discussions on > IRC have raised questions about this [3] > > Please weigh in on the

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] adding a new /v3 endpoint for api-microversions

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:57:38AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > The concern as I understand it is that by extending the v2 API with > microversions the following failure scenario exists > > If: > > 1) a client already is using the /v2 API > 2) a client opt's into using microversions on /v2 > 3)

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] adding a new /v3 endpoint for api-microversions

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 11:28:09AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > On 02/19/2016 11:20 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:57:38AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > >> The concern as I understand it is that by extending the v2 API with > >> microversions the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Multi-attach, determining when to call os-brick's connector.disconnect_volume

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:16:28PM +, Fox, Kevin M wrote: > I think part of the issue is whether to count or not is cinder driver > specific and only cinder knows if it should be done or not. > > But if cinder told nova that particular multiattach endpoints must be > refcounted, that might

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][all][ptl][cinder] preparing to create stable/mitaka branches for libraries

we can wait to avoid having to backport > > > patches, but otherwise we should go ahead and create the branches. > > > > > > I will process each repository as I hear from the owning team. > > > > > > openstack/os-brick 1.1.0 > > > openstack/pyth

Re: [openstack-dev] [cross-project] [all] Quotas -- service vs. library

l;dr; > > I'm writing to request some feedback on whether the cross project Quotas > > work should move ahead as a service or a library or going to a far > > extent I'd ask should this even be in a common repository, would > > projects prefer to implement everything from scrat

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:37:52AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > On 03/14/2016 10:24 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Davanum Srinivas > > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][all][ptl] preparing to create stable/mitaka branches for libraries

ack/os-brick 1.1.0 > openstack/python-cinderclient 1.6.0 Cinder is good to go for these. Thanks! Sean McGinnis (smcginnis) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstac

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Nova PTL for Newton

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 07:22:10PM +, John Garbutt wrote: > Hi, > > It has been greatly rewarding serving you all as Nova PTL over the > Liberty and Mitaka cycles. I thank you all for the support, > encouragement and advice I have been given over the last year. I > really appreciate that.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Mitaka RC1 available

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 09:41:31AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Cinder is the next project team to produce a release candidate for > the end of the Mitaka cycle! You can find the RC1 source code > tarball at: > >

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Newton Summit Sessions

Hey everyone, This was announced in our weekly meeting, but putting it out here to get a wider audience and make sure it's seen. I probably should have start here. We have started an etherpad [1] for planning out our design summit sessions. Please feel free to add any additional topics there. If

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] PTL Candidacy

really feel I'm just getting into the swing of things. I would love the opportunity to serve as PTL for the Newton release. Thank you for your consideration. Sean McGinnis (smcginnis) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not

Re: [openstack-dev] mitaka features

On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 01:24:29PM +0800, Kenny Ji-work wrote: > Hi all, > > > The newest version called mitaka is released, what's the new features of this > version. Or is there some documents to describe it? Thank you! > > > Best regards! > Kenny Ji Hi Kenny, You can find links for

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Newton Midcycle Planning

Hey Cinder team (and those interested), We've had a few informal conversations on the channel and in meetings, but wanted to capture some things here and spread awareness. I think it would be good to start planning for our Newton midcycle. These have been incredibly productive in the past (at

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra] revert new gerrit

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 05:22:34PM -0700, melanie witt wrote: > On Mar 23, 2016, at 16:56, melanie witt wrote: > > > I may have found a workaround for the scroll jumping after reading through > > the upstream issue comments [1]: use the "Slow" setting in the preferences > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Cinder-Nova API meeting

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 09:01:28AM +, Ildikó Váncsa wrote: > Hi All, > > As it was discussed several times on this mailing list there is room for > improvements regarding the Cinder-Nova interaction. To fix these issues we > would like to create a cross-project spec to capture the problems

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Does the OpenStack community(or Cinder team) allow one driver to call another driver's public method?

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 04:05:34AM +, liuxinguo wrote: > Hi Cinder team, > > We are going to implement storage-assisted volume migrate in our driver > between different backend storage array or even different array of different > vendors. > This is really high-efficiency than the host-copy

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] 3.rd Party CI requirements for compliance

On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 06:14:30PM +, Indra Harijono wrote: > Hi, > > I am new in this forum and openstack dev. so please my sincere apology if I > submitted stupid (redundant) questions. > I am writing this to clarify cinder compliance requirements (and 3.rd Party > CI Testing). > We are

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] PTL for Newton and beyond

On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 06:32:42AM -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Team, > > It has been great working with you all as PTL for Oslo. Looks like the > nominations open up next week for elections and am hoping more than > one of you will step up for the next cycle(s). I can show you the > ropes

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Newton Midcycle Planning

at 09:05:18AM -0500, Sean McGinnis wrote: > Hey Cinder team (and those interested), > > We've had a few informal conversations on the channel and in meetings, > but wanted to capture some things here and spread awareness. > > I think it would be good to start planning for o

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Summit Social

The Cinder team (and friends) will be getting together for an informal outing tonight. The plan is to meet at Easy Tiger at 6 tonight: http://easytigeraustin.com/ All are welcome! Sean (smcginnis) __ OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [PTLs][all][mentoring] Mentors needed in specific technical areas

Hi Emily, You have a couple spots in your message that look like they were supposed to be hyperlinks. Do you have those links to the guidelines and sign up form? Great program - glad to see it's taking off! Thanks, Sean On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:24:57AM -0400, Emily K Hugenbruch wrote: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-operators][cinder] max_concurrent_builds in Cinder

On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 05:32:45PM +0300, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: > Hi developers and operators, > I would like to get any feedback from you about my idea before I'll start > work on spec. > > In Nova, we've got max_concurrent_builds option [1] to set 'Maximum number > of instance builds to run

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] I'm going to expire open bug reports older than 18 months.

On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 01:02:29PM +0200, Markus Zoeller wrote: > TL;DR: Automatic closing of 185 bug reports which are older than 18 > months in the week R-13. Skipping specific bug reports is possible. A > bug report comment explains the reasons. FWIW, I did the same thing in Cinder a while

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][Cinder] Nominating Zadara Storage VPSA CI for voting permissions

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 09:47:23AM +0300, Shlomi Avihou wrote: > Hello, > > > > I’d like to nominate Zadara Storage VPSA CI system for voting permissions > in the Cinder program. > > The CI system has been posting comments (non-voting) for the past 24 days. > > > > *Third Party system info:

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Nominating Michał Dulko to Cinder Core

++status:merged Thanks! Sean McGinnis (smcginnis) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Austin Design Summit Recap

At the Design Summit in Austin, the Cinder team met over three days to go over a variety of topics. This is a general summary of the notes captured from each session. We were also able to record most sessions. Please see the openstack-cinder YouTube channel for all its minute and tedious glory:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Nominating Micha?? Dulko to Cinder Core

It has been one week and all very positive feedback. I have now added Michał to the cinder-core group. Welcome Michał! Glad to have your expertise in the group. Sean On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 01:16:59PM -0500, Sean McGinnis wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I would like to nominate Mic

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Newton Midcycle Planning

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 01:30:40PM -0500, Sean McGinnis wrote: > The results are in! > > We took a look at the SurveyMonkey results today, and we have now > formally set the dates and locations for the Cinder Newtone midcycle. > > All are welcome and encouraged to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Doc] place to add API reference

s at the moment. I was just afraid I had missed something from the discussions. Thanks for the clarification. I will watch for the cross project session. Thanks! Sean > > > > On Apr 15, 2016, at 11:02 AM, Sean McGinnis <sean.mcgin...@gmx.com> wrote: > > > >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Doc] place to add API reference

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 09:38:20AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 04/15/2016 08:14 AM, Masahito MUROI wrote: > >Hi Doc team folks, > > > >Congress team plans to add API reference into [1] instead of [2] to > >follow official documentation project. But I found the design session > >about a API

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Newton Midcycle Planning

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 09:05:18AM -0500, Sean McGinnis wrote: All folks interested in attending the Cinder Newton Midcycle - please fill out this survey so we can collect data to help finalize a date and location: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/L2CY3RL Thanks! Sean > Hey Cinder t

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Logo survey

Hey all, During the midcycle we discussed a few options for a new logo mascot. I've taken a few of the top choices and created a survey to get more input: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/G7JRNQB Please vote as soon as possible. These are first come, first served, so we should decide soon and get

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Pending removal of Scality volume driver

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:28:42AM +0200, Jordan Pittier wrote: > Hi Sean, > > Thanks for the heads up. > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:13 PM, Sean McGinnis <sean.mcgin...@gmx.com> > wrote: > > > The Cinder policy for driver CI requires that all volume drivers &

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Pending removal of X-IO volume driver

is out of compliance. It has not reported since March 18th, 2016. The patch for driver removal has been posted here: https://review.openstack.org/348022 If this CI is not brought into compliance, the patch to remove the driver will be approved one week from now. Thanks, Sean McGinnis (smcginnis

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Pending removal of Tintri volume driver

is out of compliance. It has not reported since June 9th, 2016. The patch for driver removal has been posted here: https://review.openstack.org/348026/ If this CI is not brought into compliance, the patch to remove the driver will be approved one week from now. Thanks, Sean McGinnis (smcginnis

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Support for volume sharing across multiple VM's

ndation to support that should make it in soon, so maybe Ocata (or honestly, to be more realistic, the P release) will have that support. Sean McGinnis (smcginnis) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage que

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Pending removal of Scality volume driver

is out of compliance. It has not reported since April 12th, 2016. The patch for driver removal has been posted here: https://review.openstack.org/348032/ If this CI is not brought into compliance, the patch to remove the driver will be approved one week from now. Thanks, Sean McGinnis (smcginnis

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Pending removal of Tegile volume driver

is out of compliance. It has not reported since June 24th, 2016. The patch for driver removal has been posted here: https://review.openstack.org/348032/ If this CI is not brought into compliance, the patch to remove the driver will be approved one week from now. Thanks, Sean McGinnis (smcginnis

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >