[openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] No meeting today

There is no CCF meeting today since key people are on vacation. Current work can be seen at https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/neutron-classifier. Best regards, Igor D.C. __ OpenStack Development Mailing

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] Asking for feedback regarding Classification Types

Hi Neutron, The CCF team has been discussing what protocols should be supported on the first version of the CCF (Common Classification Framework). A potential list exhaustive list is available at [1]. However, this is likely overkill in terms of protocols that will actually be used for

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] CCF Meeting

Hi all, Reminding that we have the Common Classification Framework meeting today, in about an hour, at #openstack-meeting. It will be a short update about the code and PTG. Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/CommonClassificationFramework#Discussion_Topic_22_August_2017 Best

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] CCF Meeting

Hi all, Reminding that we have the Common Classification Framework meeting today, in about an hour, at #openstack-meeting. It will be a short update about the code and plans for the PTG. Agenda:

[openstack-dev] [[neutron] [classifier] CCF Meeting

Hi all, Reminding that we have the Common Classification Framework meeting today, in about an hour, at #openstack-meeting. We'll talk about the v0 code submission Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/CommonClassificationFramework#Discussion_Topic_25_July_2017 Best regards, Igor.

[openstack-dev] [neutron] No CCF meeting

Hi all, The repository has been updated to pass the gate: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/480199/. There will be no meeting today as we have no outstanding topics to discuss and are still working on submitting the first round of code of the Common Classification Framework, which is due for

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer][networking-sfc] Meters/Statistics for Networking-SFC

Hi Rajeev, there are no meters as far as I know and I'm not aware of any plans at the moment. What else do you have in mind in terms of monitoring? Best regards, Igor. From: rajeev.satyanaray...@wipro.com [mailto:rajeev.satyanaray...@wipro.com] Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2017 1:10 PM To:

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] CCF Meeting

Hi all, Reminding that we have the Common Classification Framework meeting today, in about an hour, at #openstack-meeting. We'll talk about the status of the spec and implementation. Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/CommonClassificationFramework#Discussion_Topic_13_June_2017

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] Common Classification Framework meeting

Hi all, Friendly reminder that there will be a Common Classification Framework meeting in about half an hour at #openstack-meeting. Today's agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/CommonClassificationFramework#Discussion_Topic_30_May_2017 The spec seems to have reached general

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] No meeting today

Hi all, Since David is off and there isn't anything particular to discuss except what's in the spec, there will be no Common Classification Framework IRC meeting today. Best regards, Igor. __ OpenStack Development Mailing

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] CCF Meeting

Hi all, Reminding that the Common Classification Framework meeting is today 1400 UTC @ #openstack-meeting. Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/CommonClassificationFramework#Discussion_Topic_18_April_2017 Feel free to add more topics. Best regards, Igor.

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] CCF Meeting

Hi all, Reminding that the Common Classification Framework meeting is today in about an hour @ #openstack-meeting. Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/CommonFlowClassifier#Discussion_Topic_4_April_2017 Best regards, Igor.

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] About insertion modes and SFC Encapsulation

Below, Best regards, Igor. From: Vikash Kumar [mailto:vikash.ku...@oneconvergence.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 6:29 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>; Duarte Cardoso, Igor <igor.duarte.card...@intel.com>

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] About insertion modes and SFC Encapsulation

- L2 - L3 (default) Correlation: - MPLS - NSH tap-enabled: - False (default) - True Thank

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] About insertion modes and SFC Encapsulation

- MPLS - NSH tap-enabled: - False (default) - True Thanks, Cathy From: Duarte Cardoso, Igor [mailto:igor.duarte.card...@intel.com] Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 8:02 AM To: OpenStack Deve

[openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] About insertion modes and SFC Encapsulation

Hi networking-sfc, At the latest IRC meeting [1] it was agreed to split TAP from the possible insertion modes (initial spec version [2]). I took the ARs to propose coexistence of insertion modes, correlation and (now) a new tap-enabled attribute, and send this email about possible directions.

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] New CCF meeting time decided (next tomorrow)

Hi all, After [1], a new meeting time/day has been decided. With 6 votes, Tuesdays at 1400 UTC was the most wanted time slot [2]. Eavesdrop has been updated to reflect this [3] and all up-do-date information can be found at [4]. Due to conflicting times at the IRC channel, the meeting also

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] patch test failed due to "import error: vlanmanager"

wrote: Hi Igor, This is weird. I just did a fresh clone and executed "tox" command. I am getting same error. Am I missing anything here ? There is no private change here. Below is the link for entire log. http://paste.openstack.org/show/601870/ On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] patch test failed due to "import error: vlanmanager"

Hi Vikash, Please stick to pastebin for complete logs. Check your migration files: FAILED: Contract HEAD file does not match migration timeline head, expected: 48072cb59133 Best regards, Igor. From: Vikash Kumar [mailto:vikash.ku...@oneconvergence.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 5:03 PM To:

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] New CCF meeting time

Hi community, The following text was sent earlier to people that were recently engaged on the Common Classification Framework (mainly at the PTG) and also earlier contributors to neutron-classifier, I'm now resending this to the community-scope, in case someone is very interested in joining

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] Common Classification Framework meeting

Hi all, Reminding that the Common Classification Framework meeting today hasn't been canceled. The meeting will be held on 1700 UTC @ #openstack-meeting. Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/CommonFlowClassifier#Discussion_Topic_28_February_2017 Best regards, Igor.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] neutron-classifier (CCF) at the PTG

:39:22 GMT+0100 (CET), Duarte Cardoso, Igor: Hi neutron, Me and David would like to discuss the Common Classification Framework (CCF) (current approach based on openstack/neutron-classifier) at the PTG but we aren’t sure if the main session is the appropriate forum for that or if we should onl

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - Neutron team social in Atlanta on Thursday

+1 Best regards, Igor. From: Vasudevan, Swaminathan (PNB Roseville) [mailto:swaminathan.vasude...@hpe.com] Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 8:30 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] -

[openstack-dev] [neutron] neutron-classifier (CCF) at the PTG

Hi neutron, Me and David would like to discuss the Common Classification Framework (CCF) (current approach based on openstack/neutron-classifier) at the PTG but we aren't sure if the main session is the appropriate forum for that or if we should only have a meeting with the interested people

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] Common Classification Framework meeting

Hi all, Common Classification Framework developers and interested parties are invited for today's meeting. The agenda is below, feel free to add more topics. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/CommonFlowClassifier#Discussion_Topic_14_February_2017 1700 UTC @ #openstack-meeting. Me and

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] What resources can and can't be reused

proxy to re-classify traffic returned from the egress port of a SF, i.e., the SF is NSH-aware and it can receive, process and return the NSH, this restriction does not apply. - Louis From: Duarte Cardoso, Igor [mailto:igor.duarte.card...@intel.com] Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 12:27 PM To: Ope

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] What resources can and can't be reused

nforce the rules or relax the rules/constraints you listed? Could you clarify it? Thanks, Cathy From: Duarte Cardoso, Igor [mailto:igor.duarte.card...@intel.com] Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:12 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [netw

[openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] What resources can and can't be reused

Hi networking-sfc, As part of my work regarding SFC Encapsulation and SFC Graphs, I exercised the API to understand exactly what resources can be reused, to possibly relax a few of the constraints when a chain is encapsulated end-to-end. I'm requesting that the leaders and cores take a look at

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] No Common Classification Framework meeting

Hi, There will be no Common Classification Framework this week. The PTG PoC is still being worked on and is starting to look good, kudos to David for most of the work so far. Best regards, Igor. __ OpenStack Development

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] Common Classification Framework meeting

Hi all, Common Classification Framework developers and interested parties are invited for today's meeting. The agenda is below, feel free to add more topics. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/CommonFlowClassifier#Discussion_Topic_17_January_2017 1700 UTC @ #openstack-meeting. Best

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] Limitation on port chains + flow classifiers

Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] Limitation on port chains + flow classifiers On 10 January 2017 at 14:13, Duarte Cardoso, Igor <igor.duarte.card...@intel.com> wrote: > Hi networking-sfc

[openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] Limitation on port chains + flow classifiers

Hi networking-sfc, While working on the SFC Graphs patch, I observed the following limitation when creating port-chains: http://paste.openstack.org/show/594387/. My objective was to have 2 port-chains acting on the same classification of traffic but from different logical source ports - my

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] No Common Classifier / Classification Framework meeting

Hi all, Likewise, no meeting today. The next meeting will be on January 17th. Best regards, Igor. From: Duarte Cardoso, Igor [mailto:igor.duarte.card...@intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 12:21 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] No Common Classifier / Classification Framework meeting

Hi all, Tomorrow, Tuesday 20th December 2016, there will be no Common Classification Framework meeting, as there are no major topics to discuss. Meanwhile we are working on an initial PoC for the framework. As a reminder, please take a look at the respective spec:

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] Common Classifier / Classification Framework meeting

Hi all, Common Classification Framework developers and interested parties are invited for today's meeting. The agenda is below, feel free to add more topics. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/CommonFlowClassifier#Discussion_Topic_6_December_2016 1700 UTC @ #openstack-meeting. Best

[openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] #networking-sfc IRC channel

Hi networking-sfc's leaders, devs and users, What do you think about having an IRC channel dedicated to networking-sfc's discussions and sync? For the time being I have joined #networking-sfc @ freenode, and will stay online to keep it open. Best regards, Igor.

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] Common Classifier + OVS Flow Manager Meeting

Hi all, Common Classifier / OVS Flow Manager developers and interested parties are invited for today's meeting. The agenda is below, feel free to add more topics. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/CommonFlowClassifier#Discussion_Topic_22_November_2016 The time has not changed (still 1700

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] At the Summit: Common Classifier + OVS Flow Management

Hi all, We are at Ballroom B. First table on the right. Best regards, Igor. -Original Appointment- From: Duarte Cardoso, Igor [mailto:igor.duarte.card...@intel.com] Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 3:45 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Miguel Angel

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron team social event in Barcelona

+1 Best regards, Igor. From: Ofer Ben-Yacov [mailto:ofer.benya...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 10:25 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron team social event in

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] At the Summit: Common Classifier + OVS Flow Management

:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:+0100 TZOFFSETTO:+0200 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=3 END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT ORGANIZER;CN="Duarte Cardoso, Igor":MAILTO:igor.duarte.card...@intel.com ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=OpenStack Developme

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] At the Summit: Common Classifier + OVS Flow Management

Hi, Two etherpads were created on the last meeting as placeholders to what can be discussed at the summit regarding the common classification framework/classifier and the OVS flow manager: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-common-classification-framework-barcelona

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] At the Summit: Common Classifier + OVS Flow Management

Hi, Two etherpads were created on the last meeting as placeholders to what can be discussed at the summit regarding the common classification framework/classifier and the OVS flow manager: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-common-classification-framework-barcelona

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] Common Classifier + OVS Flow Management Meeting

Reminder that the meeting is in 1 hour, Best regards, Igor. From: Duarte Cardoso, Igor [mailto:igor.duarte.card...@intel.com] Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 5:14 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: [opensta

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] Common Classifier + OVS Flow Management Meeting

Hi Common Classifier and OVS Flow Management community, Feel free to add topics to the next meeting's agenda at: https://wiki.openstack.org/w/index.php?title=Neutron/CommonFlowClassifier=edit=5 Time, location and recurrence are unchanged, so the next meeting will be tomorrow (11th October) at

Re: [openstack-dev] [tacker] [networking-sfc] Removing required port-id from classifier

Hi Tim, Just about the second part of your email: > how are IETF SFC/NSH related API/plugin changes going? I'm essentially finished with NSH encap support [1], just have to fix a few bugs and write the tests. Then I will work on connecting port-chains together so we can have SFC graphs, kind

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] Common Classifier + OVS Flow Management Meeting

Hi Common Classifier and OVS Flow Management community, Cathy has kindly allowed me to drive the next common classifier/flow management IRC meetings. Time, location and recurrence are unchanged, so the next meeting will be next Tuesday (27th September) at 17:00 UTC [1] on #openstack-meeting

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] Spec detailing both approaches

Vikram On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Duarte Cardoso, Igor <igor.duarte.card...@intel.com<mailto:igor.duarte.card...@intel.com>> wrote: Hi Cathy, Louis, I'll reupload the Neutron spec today to openstack/neutron-specs along with the rst file and the neutron-classifier-inspired approach d

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] Spec detailing both approaches

Hi Cathy, Louis, I'll reupload the Neutron spec today to openstack/neutron-specs along with the rst file and the neutron-classifier-inspired approach detailed, replacing [1] and [2] from openstack/neutron, is that okay? Review from the Neutron community, interested consumers and

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] Requesting feedback on typed classifications model

Hi community and common classifier team, In anticipation to the next common classifier meeting, I've added a meeting agenda item to the next meeting's agenda [1] about the proposed "typed classifications" model for the new common classifier. The typed classifications model is described in [2,

Re: [openstack-dev] support of NSH in networking-SFC

Hi Tim, +1 Focus on the plugin and API while improving the n-sfc<->ODL interaction to match that. In parallel, early (non-merged) support in OVS driver itself could be attempted, based on the unofficial April 2016's NSH patches for OVS [1]. After official supports gets merged, it would be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

"But if ODL is not supporting its own NSH capable dataplane, instead expecting the user to run a patched OvS that doesn't have upstream acceptance then I think we would be building a rickety tower by piling networking-sfc on top of that unstable base." ODL requires a patched OvS too [1]. [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

Hi all, As Uri mentioned, there is a concrete proposal for an enhanced SFC API (with support for open, IETF SFC Encapsulation [1] and NSH [2]) that was publicly shared last month as a neutron spec at [3]. Service Function Chaining (SFC) is the effort of normalizing and standardizing

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [networking-sfc] Adding use case to wiki?

e case to wiki? Igor, Add them here https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/ServiceChainUseCases - Louis From: Duarte Cardoso, Igor [mailto:igor.duarte.card...@intel.com] Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 9:14 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [ope

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [networking-sfc] Adding use case to wiki?

Hi networking-sfc, As discussed at the last meeting I was to add the SFC Encapsulation use case to the networking-sfc wiki: #action paul, john igor to add use-cases to wiki Where exactly is the place to insert use cases in the wiki? Is there one already? None of these seem to have any section

[openstack-dev] [group-based-policy] Can PTs move to other PTGs?

Hi GBP, While I was working on the QoS PoC for GBP I observed that policy targets require to be associated to a PTG. They also don't seem to be updatable with a different PTG, at least not with the CLI. However, looking at the API I see, for policy targets: 'policy_target_group_id':

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [networking-sfc] A standards-compliant SFC API

PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc] A standards-compliant SFC API On 20 April 2016 at 09:31, Duarte Cardoso, Igor <igor.duart

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [networking-sfc] A standards-compliant SFC API

ck-dev] [neutron][sfc] A standards-compliant SFC API On 20 April 2016 at 09:31, Duarte Cardoso, Igor <igor.duarte.card...@intel.com<mailto:igor.duarte.card...@intel.com>> wrote: Dear OpenStack Community, We've been investigating options in/around OpenStack for supporting Service

[openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc] A standards-compliant SFC API

Dear OpenStack Community, We've been investigating options in/around OpenStack for supporting Service Function Chaining. The networking-sfc project has made significant progress in this space, and we see lots of value in what has been completed. However, when we looked at the related IETF

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [networking-sfc] Temporary instructions

Hi networking-sfc, What is the recommended place to host the temporary installation instructions? Best regards, Igor. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

[openstack-dev] [group-based-policy] Meeting today

Hi GBP team, Is the meeting today not going to happen due to US Thanksgiving? Best regards, Igor Duarte Cardoso - Intel Research and Development Ireland Limited Registered in Ireland Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare Registered Number: 308263

[openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-sfc] Deploying current networking-sfc

Hi networking-sfc folks, I can't seem to be able to deploy the current networking-sfc using DevStack and my hint is that the latest review stack is dependent on previous patches that have not been updated/rebased yet ([1] and [2]) - and are depending on outdated patches. In [3] you can see

[openstack-dev] [group-based-policy] QoS support in GBP

Hi OpenStack Group-based Policy team, As I unofficially said before, I am interested in bringing basic QoS to GBP via the Neutron QoS API which currently offers bandwidth limitation at the port and network level, since Liberty. I have added the item to today's Meeting Agenda for an initial

Re: [openstack-dev] [Group-based-policy]

Hi Ernesto, Let me answer the first question for you. You can use GBP without OpenDaylight. OpenDaylight has a separate Group-based Policy project, which might make you wonder if you need it to run OpenStack GBP. Don’t worry, you can deploy OpenStack GBP right away without OpenDaylight. Best