Re: [openstack-dev] [release][requirements][barbican][octavia][LBaaS][heat] FFE Request for python-barbicanclient library

2017-08-03 Thread Tony Breeds
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 04:26:12PM +, Dave McCowan (dmccowan) wrote: > > > On 8/1/17, 8:02 PM, "Tony Breeds" wrote: > > >On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:58:22PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > >> Excerpts from Dave McCowan (dmccowan)'s message of 2017-08-01 20:48:12 >

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][requirements][barbican][octavia][LBaaS][heat] FFE Request for python-barbicanclient library

2017-08-03 Thread Dave McCowan (dmccowan)
On 8/1/17, 8:02 PM, "Tony Breeds" wrote: >On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:58:22PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> Excerpts from Dave McCowan (dmccowan)'s message of 2017-08-01 20:48:12 >>+: >> > This note is to request a Feature Freeze Exemption (FFE) for the

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][requirements][barbican][octavia][LBaaS][heat] FFE Request for python-barbicanclient library

2017-08-02 Thread Tony Breeds
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 10:02:32AM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:58:22PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Dave McCowan (dmccowan)'s message of 2017-08-01 20:48:12 > > +: > > > This note is to request a Feature Freeze Exemption (FFE) for the > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][requirements][barbican][octavia][LBaaS][heat] FFE Request for python-barbicanclient library

2017-08-01 Thread Tony Breeds
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:58:22PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Dave McCowan (dmccowan)'s message of 2017-08-01 20:48:12 +: > > This note is to request a Feature Freeze Exemption (FFE) for the > > python-barbicanclient library in Pike. > > > > Python-barbicanclient 4.5.0 was

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][requirements][barbican][octavia][LBaaS][heat] FFE Request for python-barbicanclient library

2017-08-01 Thread Matthew Thode
I agree, this does seem like a fairly reasonable, limited impact change, it looks like we'd be adding the block to 4.5.1, when 4.5.2 hits UC.txt doesn't mater as much (unless it has something that NEEDS to be in pike, in which case we should probably be updating the minimum in GR.txt as well). I'm

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][requirements][barbican][octavia][LBaaS][heat] FFE Request for python-barbicanclient library

2017-08-01 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Dave McCowan (dmccowan)'s message of 2017-08-01 20:48:12 +: > This note is to request a Feature Freeze Exemption (FFE) for the > python-barbicanclient library in Pike. > > Python-barbicanclient 4.5.0 was intended to be the Pike release. However, > after it was released,

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][requirements][barbican][octavia][LBaaS][heat] FFE Request for python-barbicanclient library

2017-08-01 Thread Davanum Srinivas
4.5.0 is already blocked. My +1 to block 4.5.1 as well. https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/master/global-requirements.txt The release team was waiting for a good barbicanclient release before branching as mentioned by Doug:

[openstack-dev] [release][requirements][barbican][octavia][LBaaS][heat] FFE Request for python-barbicanclient library

2017-08-01 Thread Dave McCowan (dmccowan)
This note is to request a Feature Freeze Exemption (FFE) for the python-barbicanclient library in Pike. Python-barbicanclient 4.5.0 was intended to be the Pike release. However, after it was released, testing with the Heat and Octavia projects found that it contained an incompatible change