On 29.8.2017 17:12, Emilien Macchi wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 2:14 AM, Jiří Stránský wrote:
[...]
the CI for containerized deployments with Pacemaker is close! In fact, it
works [1][2] (but there are pending changes to merge).
Really good news, thanks for the update!
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 2:14 AM, Jiří Stránský wrote:
[...]
> the CI for containerized deployments with Pacemaker is close! In fact, it
> works [1][2] (but there are pending changes to merge).
Really good news, thanks for the update!
> The way it's proposed in gerrit currently
On 29.8.2017 14:42, Giulio Fidente wrote:
On 08/29/2017 02:33 PM, Jiří Stránský wrote:
A bit of context: Currently our only upgrade check job is non-OVB -
containers-multinode-upgrades-nv. As of late we started hitting
timeouts, and the job only does mixed-version deploy + 1 node AIO
overcloud
On 08/29/2017 02:33 PM, Jiří Stránský wrote:
A bit of context: Currently our only upgrade check job is non-OVB -
containers-multinode-upgrades-nv. As of late we started hitting
timeouts, and the job only does mixed-version deploy + 1 node AIO
overcloud upgrade (just the main step). It doesn't
On 29.8.2017 13:22, Giulio Fidente wrote:
On 08/29/2017 11:14 AM, Jiří Stránský wrote:
Hi owls,
the CI for containerized deployments with Pacemaker is close! In fact,
it works [1][2] (but there are pending changes to merge).
cool :D
I also spotted this which we need for ceph
On 08/29/2017 11:14 AM, Jiří Stránský wrote:
Hi owls,
the CI for containerized deployments with Pacemaker is close! In fact,
it works [1][2] (but there are pending changes to merge).
cool :D
I also spotted this which we need for ceph
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/498356/
but I am not
Hi owls,
the CI for containerized deployments with Pacemaker is close! In fact,
it works [1][2] (but there are pending changes to merge).
The way it's proposed in gerrit currently is to switch the
centos-7-containers-multinode job (featureset010) to deploy with
Pacemaker. What do you think