Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] OpenStack's stackalytics is gummed up?

2016-05-03 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-05-04 10:52:56 +1000 (+1000), Michael Still wrote: > The instance of stackalytics run by the openstack-infra team seems to be > gummed up. [...] As is likely noted elsewhere, stackalytics.com is not run by the Infra team but rather by Mirantis. There is a stackalytics.openstack.org

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] OpenStack's stackalytics is gummed up?

2016-05-03 Thread Michael Still
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Michael, > > The stackalytics bots do not have access to gerrit at the moment. We > noticed it last friday and talked to infra folks: > >

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] OpenStack's stackalytics is gummed up?

2016-05-03 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Michael, The stackalytics bots do not have access to gerrit at the moment. We noticed it last friday and talked to infra folks: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-infra/%23openstack-infra.2016-04-29.log.html#t2016-04-29T14:24:07 Ilya Shakat helps a lot with the existing instance

[OpenStack-Infra] OpenStack's stackalytics is gummed up?

2016-05-03 Thread Michael Still
The instance of stackalytics run by the openstack-infra team seems to be gummed up. It alleges that the last time there was a nova code review was April 17, which seems... unlikely. Who looks after this thing so I can ping them gently? Thanks, Michael -- Rackspace Australia

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [OT] Call for speaker submissions

2016-05-03 Thread Elizabeth K. Joseph
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 10:01:06AM -0700, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: >> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Spencer Krum wrote: >> > I think this is a good conversation to have. I would recommend we

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [OT] Call for speaker submissions

2016-05-03 Thread Anita Kuno
On 05/03/2016 02:19 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Paul Belanger > wrote: > >> On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 10:01:06AM -0700, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: >>> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Spencer Krum >> wrote: I

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [OT] Call for speaker submissions

2016-05-03 Thread Morgan Fainberg
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 10:01:06AM -0700, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: > > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Spencer Krum > wrote: > > > I think this is a good conversation to have. I would

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [OT] Call for speaker submissions

2016-05-03 Thread Paul Belanger
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 10:01:06AM -0700, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Spencer Krum wrote: > > I think this is a good conversation to have. I would recommend we start > > a thread-per-conference for simplicity. Folks can use this to

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [OT] Call for speaker submissions

2016-05-03 Thread Elizabeth K. Joseph
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Spencer Krum wrote: > I think this is a good conversation to have. I would recommend we start > a thread-per-conference for simplicity. Folks can use this to coordinate > attendance, ensure we submit unique presentations, and to help each >

[OpenStack-Infra] deleting openstack-hpc list

2016-05-03 Thread Tim Bell
In the past, we have had a dedicated mailing list for high performance computing. With the use of tags on subject lines and the formation of the scientific working group at Austin, it is proposed to delete the HPC list. Activity has been very low with only call for papers on the list since the

[OpenStack-Infra] [StoryBoard] Meetings (and meetup) info

2016-05-03 Thread Zara Zaimeche
Hi all! At the summit, a few people asked us about StoryBoard meetings (and the next StoryBoard meetup). So here are the details: IRC Meetings (text shamelessly copied from wiki): - StoryBoard holds public weekly meetings in #openstack-meeting,

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Test images and libvirt watchdog

2016-05-03 Thread Ferenc Horváth
What options do I have for storing the new watchdog image(s) while they get cached? As I can see all the current images are loaded dynamically from the web, so I guess that I shouldn't add mine directly to any (devstack or tempest) repo. Can [1] be the solution? -- Ferenc [1]

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] UNSTABLE jobs on the periodic-stable pipeline

2016-05-03 Thread Tony Breeds
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 04:57:02PM +1000, Joshua Hesketh wrote: > Hey, > > Yolanda is helping repair this. Basically the log filesystem needs > repairing and should be back shortly. Thanks for the prompt response. Yours Tony. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] UNSTABLE jobs on the periodic-stable pipeline

2016-05-03 Thread Joshua Hesketh
Hey, Yolanda is helping repair this. Basically the log filesystem needs repairing and should be back shortly. Cheers, Josh On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > So the subject says it all really ;P > > The last batch of periodic-stable jobs all failed

[OpenStack-Infra] UNSTABLE jobs on the periodic-stable pipeline

2016-05-03 Thread Tony Breeds
So the subject says it all really ;P The last batch of periodic-stable jobs all failed reporting 'UNSTABLE' as the result. The ones I checked had missing log files. eg http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-stable-maint/2016-May/004275.html I reported this on IRC but just in case