On 2018-08-29 07:03, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
I digged into the remaining and will investigate whether we can retire
them:
openstack-infra/zuul-packaging
Paul, should we abandon this one as well?
openstack-infra/featuretracker (together with puppet-featuretracker)
these work together
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 07:03:29AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> I digged into the remaining and will investigate whether we can retire them:
>
> openstack-infra/zuul-packaging
>
> Paul, should we abandon this one as well?
>
Yes
> openstack-infra/featuretracker (together with
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
On 2018-08-28 23:50, Clark Boylan wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2018, at 9:47 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
A quick search with codesearch suggests that these can be retired since
I couldn't find a user:
[...]
openstack-infra/releasestatus (together with puppet-releasestatus,
On Wed, 2018-08-29 at 08:14 +0100, Adam Coldrick wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-08-29 at 07:03 +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > pynotedb
> > I'll reach out to storyboard team.
>
> This is a port of a perl library implementing notedb that never got
> fully
> completed when it was being actively worked
On 2018-08-28 23:50, Clark Boylan wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2018, at 9:47 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> A quick search with codesearch suggests that these can be retired since
>> I couldn't find a user:
>>
>[...]
>> openstack-infra/releasestatus (together with puppet-releasestatus, not
>> listed
On Wed, 2018-08-29 at 07:03 +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> pynotedb
> I'll reach out to storyboard team.
This is a port of a perl library implementing notedb that never got fully
completed when it was being actively worked on.
As far as I'm concerned it can be retired, I don't think any of
I digged into the remaining and will investigate whether we can retire them:
openstack-infra/zuul-packaging
Paul, should we abandon this one as well?
openstack-infra/featuretracker (together with puppet-featuretracker)
these work together with openstack/development-proposals from the
On 2018-08-28 23:50, Clark Boylan wrote:
> [...]
I think these repos can definitely be retired:
# Was part of bitergia work with openstack which is no longer done
openstack-infra/activity-board
# These may have been attempts at having puppet beaker testing play nice with
our CI but we hacked
On 2018-08-28 14:50:40 -0700 (-0700), Clark Boylan wrote:
[...]
> # Project to provide alternate Gerrit UI that never got commits
> openstack-infra/puppet-vinz
> openstack-infra/vinz
> openstack-infra/vinz-webclient
[...]
As an aside, if we ever decide to rename nodepool, recycling this
name gets
On Sun, Aug 19, 2018, at 9:47 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> A quick search with codesearch suggests that these can be retired since
> I couldn't find a user:
>
> openstack-infra/activity-board
> openstack-infra/beaker-localhost
> openstack-infra/beaker-nodepool
> openstack-infra/err2d2
>
On 2018-08-19 23:04, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
Comments on nose related projects : nose-html-output and openstack-nose
I am not sure that no update means non-used.
Thanks for your insight and comments - so, yes, those two need to stay
around,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
Just for the curious ones, of the 1453 repos that I have checked out on
my system, 447 have not seen a change in the last 12 months. Largest
group is fuel with 149 repos.
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409
I've did a quick scripted check to search for repositories that did not
merge a change in the last 12 months and here's the output.
I removed gerrit from the list since it's special.
So, out of 169 repos in openstack-finra, I list below 33 old repos with
the last merge date.
Are there any
13 matches
Mail list logo
