Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A tool for slurping gerrit changes in to bug updates

2016-05-27 Thread Sean Dague
On 05/26/2016 03:07 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-05-26 14:23:38 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote: > [...] >> It does run on a custom port... so the great firewall of China is still >> probably an issue. > [...] > > I had assumed websockets could be a solution there? > http://jpmens.net/2014/

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A tool for slurping gerrit changes in to bug updates

2016-05-27 Thread Zara Zaimeche
On 26/05/16 14:06, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2016-05-26 11:37:18 +0100 (+0100), Zara Zaimeche wrote: [...] Updating the bug/task-tracker from those changes, however, would be different for each tracker, so you wouldn't be able to do that part in a generic way. Plus, while analyzing the data fro

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A tool for slurping gerrit changes in to bug updates

2016-05-26 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-05-26 14:23:38 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote: [...] > It does run on a custom port... so the great firewall of China is still > probably an issue. [...] I had assumed websockets could be a solution there? http://jpmens.net/2014/07/03/the-mosquitto-mqtt-broker-gets-websockets-support/ >

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A tool for slurping gerrit changes in to bug updates

2016-05-26 Thread Sean Dague
On 05/26/2016 02:11 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 05:55:34PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: >> On 2016-05-26 12:54:49 -0400 (-0400), Matthew Treinish wrote: >>> Just a quick follow-up I started running this on a throwaway server at >>> 15.184.138.236. So you can subscribe to e

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A tool for slurping gerrit changes in to bug updates

2016-05-26 Thread Matthew Treinish
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 05:55:34PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-05-26 12:54:49 -0400 (-0400), Matthew Treinish wrote: > > Just a quick follow-up I started running this on a throwaway server at > > 15.184.138.236. So you can subscribe to events from gerrit. > [...] > > How resource-intens

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A tool for slurping gerrit changes in to bug updates

2016-05-26 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-05-26 12:54:49 -0400 (-0400), Matthew Treinish wrote: > Just a quick follow-up I started running this on a throwaway server at > 15.184.138.236. So you can subscribe to events from gerrit. [...] How resource-intensive is it? Curious whether it makes sense to run something like this directl

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A tool for slurping gerrit changes in to bug updates

2016-05-26 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-05-26 09:57:58 -0700 (-0700), Zaro wrote: > Parts of jeepyb for gerrit and issue tracking functionality should > really be deprecated. Gerrit allows issue tracking integration with > its set of its-* based plugins. There's one for bugzilla, jira, and > even storyboard. [...] That's a ver

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A tool for slurping gerrit changes in to bug updates

2016-05-26 Thread Zaro
Parts of jeepyb for gerrit and issue tracking functionality should really be deprecated. Gerrit allows issue tracking integration with its set of its-* based plugins. There's one for bugzilla, jira, and even storyboard. However those probably won't help since it does need to connect directly to

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A tool for slurping gerrit changes in to bug updates

2016-05-26 Thread Matthew Treinish
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:08:57PM -0400, Matthew Treinish wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 02:43:36PM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > > On 05/25/2016 01:54 PM, Spencer Krum wrote: > > > > > > When working on a previous project, Nikki wrote this tool as a general > > > purpose hook into gerrit: > > >

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A tool for slurping gerrit changes in to bug updates

2016-05-26 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-05-26 11:37:18 +0100 (+0100), Zara Zaimeche wrote: [...] > Updating the bug/task-tracker from those changes, however, would > be different for each tracker, so you wouldn't be able to do that > part in a generic way. Plus, while analyzing the data from the > stream could theoretically be th

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A tool for slurping gerrit changes in to bug updates

2016-05-26 Thread Zara Zaimeche
On 25/05/16 18:44, Anita Kuno wrote: On 05/25/2016 01:13 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2016-05-25 11:43:39 -0500 (-0500), Gregory Haynes wrote: [...] We are considering making a small project to connect to and read from the Gerrit event stream and then update our bug tracker. [...] If we imp

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A tool for slurping gerrit changes in to bug updates

2016-05-25 Thread Matthew Treinish
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 02:43:36PM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > On 05/25/2016 01:54 PM, Spencer Krum wrote: > > > > When working on a previous project, Nikki wrote this tool as a general > > purpose hook into gerrit: > > > > https://github.com/notnownikki/zoidberg > > > > I don't think she is acti

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A tool for slurping gerrit changes in to bug updates

2016-05-25 Thread Ian Wienand
On 05/26/2016 04:43 AM, Sean Dague wrote: One thing I've been thinking a bit about is whether the event stream could get into something like MQTT easily. Although larger in scope than just gerrit, Fedora has something very similar to this with fedmsg [1] It is a pretty cool idea to have everyt

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A tool for slurping gerrit changes in to bug updates

2016-05-25 Thread Sean Dague
On 05/25/2016 01:54 PM, Spencer Krum wrote: > > When working on a previous project, Nikki wrote this tool as a general > purpose hook into gerrit: > > https://github.com/notnownikki/zoidberg > > I don't think she is actively maintaining or using it right now though. One thing I've been thinking

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A tool for slurping gerrit changes in to bug updates

2016-05-25 Thread Spencer Krum
When working on a previous project, Nikki wrote this tool as a general purpose hook into gerrit: https://github.com/notnownikki/zoidberg I don't think she is actively maintaining or using it right now though. -- Spencer Krum n...@spencerkrum.com __

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A tool for slurping gerrit changes in to bug updates

2016-05-25 Thread Anita Kuno
On 05/25/2016 01:13 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-05-25 11:43:39 -0500 (-0500), Gregory Haynes wrote: > [...] >> We are considering making a small project to connect to and read >> from the Gerrit event stream and then update our bug tracker. > [...] >> If we implemented this, would this be s

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A tool for slurping gerrit changes in to bug updates

2016-05-25 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-05-25 11:43:39 -0500 (-0500), Gregory Haynes wrote: [...] > We are considering making a small project to connect to and read > from the Gerrit event stream and then update our bug tracker. [...] > If we implemented this, would this be something the -infra project > would like to have live u

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A tool for slurping gerrit changes in to bug updates

2016-05-25 Thread Gregory Haynes
On Wed, May 25, 2016, at 11:55 AM, Jimmy Mcarthur wrote: > I'm not sure about Infra, but we're in the same boat with one of our bug > trackers. This would be awesome to have and I'm sure we would use it. > > Out of curiosity, what bug tracker are you currently using? GitHub Enterprise, although

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A tool for slurping gerrit changes in to bug updates

2016-05-25 Thread Jimmy Mcarthur
I'm not sure about Infra, but we're in the same boat with one of our bug trackers. This would be awesome to have and I'm sure we would use it. Out of curiosity, what bug tracker are you currently using? Cheers, Jimmy Gregory Haynes wrote: Hello -Infra folks, While setting up an OpenStack-inf