Hi everyone,
The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly
meeting on Tuesday September 16th, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting
Meeting agenda available here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is
welcome to to add agenda items)
Everyone
Howdy,
So we're just about to hit the 400th project hosted by the
infrastructure team (and there are at least a dozen in review). I think
this is great feat although I'm concerned about how our resources are
being used.
Despite stackforge projects meaning to be self-sufficient they do
On 2014-09-15 23:44:39 +1000 (+1000), Joshua Hesketh wrote:
[...]
I'm not sure how this might look. For example, do we need to
closer consider the relevancy of a project; or perhaps if two
projects might be able to be joined together. These metrics can be
ambiguous and require good insight
From: Jeremy Stanley [fu...@yuggoth.org]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 1:06 PM
On 2014-09-15 14:36:59 + (+), Sandy Walsh wrote:
For our group, the greatest value of StackForge is CLA management.
[...]
Out of curiosity, why is that a value to your StackForge project(s)?
About the only
From: Jeremy Stanley [fu...@yuggoth.org]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 2:05 PM
On 2014-09-15 16:47:13 + (+), Sandy Walsh wrote:
It's the Corporate CLA that's needed. The companies that want to
contribute have already vetted and signed the
On 09/15/2014 10:25 AM, Sandy Walsh wrote:
From: Jeremy Stanley [fu...@yuggoth.org]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 2:05 PM
On 2014-09-15 16:47:13 + (+), Sandy Walsh wrote:
It's the Corporate CLA that's needed. The companies that want to
On 2014-09-15 17:25:48 + (+), Sandy Walsh wrote:
Hmm, my understanding was that branches are not accepted without a
signed ICLA. Is that not the default case?
[...]
Yes, but you specifically mentioned desiring enforcement of the
CCLA, not the ICLA. We do have Gerrit configured to
From: Jeremy Stanley [fu...@yuggoth.org]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 2:51 PM
On 2014-09-15 17:25:48 + (+), Sandy Walsh wrote:
Hmm, my understanding was that branches are not accepted without a
signed ICLA. Is that not the default case?
[...]
