Hi all,
Right now, behind-the-scenes, we're working on getting a venue for next
ops mid-cycle. It's taking a little longer than normal, but rest assured
it is happening.
Why is it so difficult? As you may have noticed, we're reaching the size
of event where both physically and financially, only t
Backing up guests can be tricky. You could use cinder backups or snapshots, but
you may hit consistency issues if you are not freezing IO.
Since you are using Ceph, you can take snapshots of the RBDs from Ceph too, but
that's not a true backup. Backing up from Ceph to another location is
challe
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Brendan Johnson wrote:
> What are people using to perform image based backups of Windows and Linux VMs
> in OpenStack? I am using KVM as the hypervisor, Ceph for block storage and
> Swift for object storage. I know Cinder can backup volumes that are not in
> u
Not sure about the cinder question, but I can answer the Neutron ones.
>When dnsmasq DHCP leases expire with a still-active VM, how does dnsmasq
know to renew the same IP address to the same machine and what changes to
ensure the IP can be re-assigned?
Dnsmasq is configured by the DHCP agent with
Hi Matt,
Thanks for your response.
Ø I found that this reduced token validation performance by approximately 2x.
Compared to what? Having no revocation events at all?
Ø I did not go into more detail on where the slowness was coming from.
As you know, when list-revoked-tokens is called, we do
I had just a few questions that came up during a class recently and I
didn't have an answer. Can someone confirm these?
1. Does a VM using a particular volume need to be off in order for
cinder-backup to take a snapshot?
2. When dnsmasq DHCP leases expire with a still-active VM, how does
What are people using to perform image based backups of Windows and Linux VMs
in OpenStack? I am using KVM as the hypervisor, Ceph for block storage and
Swift for object storage. I know Cinder can backup volumes that are not in use
(at least in Juno, that may have changed in Kilo). I am look
I'm gonna forward this to my co-workers :) I've been kicking this idea
around for some time now, and it hasn't caught traction. I think it could
work for a modest overcommit, depending on the memory workload. We decided
that it should be possible to do this sanely, but that it needed testing.
I'm h
Hi All:
I have created openstack instances using legacy nova network (this network
is completely a private network not accessible to outside network).
I used floating public IPs to acess this box. (this ips are accessible to
outside public network).
I am able to lauch instances get an IP in pr
Matt Fischer wrote:
This was my action from the puppet meeting this week, so here's my
follow-up:
I discussed this with Tom Fifield. He has no objections to us using the
operators list like that and in
addition he has enabled tags with a new topic called [puppet] so that
folks could sub/ignore i
Subbu Allamaraju wrote:
> Thierry,
>
> Thanks for clarifying in your replies to me and Maish:
>
> 1. Who is providing is not the issue, but the what is being provided is.
> 2. Irrespective of who is providing, there are two types of data - binary and
> structured.
>
> Given this, I don’t think
Thierry,
Thanks for clarifying in your replies to me and Maish:
1. Who is providing is not the issue, but the what is being provided is.
2. Irrespective of who is providing, there are two types of data - binary and
structured.
Given this, I don’t think there is any reason not to converge into
Your setup looks fine.
Please check your security groups configuration. There should be a rule
that allows icmp traffic outside to have a guest pinging out to the
router. And a rule to allow ingress icmp if you want to ping a guest
from the outside world!
In addition, you can debug thing with t
Hi all,
Question up-front:
Do the performance characteristics of modern PCIe attached SSDs
invalidate/challenge the old "don't overcommit memory" with KVM wisdom
(recently discussed on this list and at meetups and summits)? Has
anyone out there tried & tested this?
Long-form:
I'm currently look
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Chris Dent wrote:
Ceilometer contributors and other interested parties,
It's been pointed out that the topic titles at
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ceilometer-liberty-midcycle
and the agenda items and descriptions at
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ceilometer
Hi guys,
I have installed juno openstack installation on Ubuntu 14.04. After
creating the router through neutron API with two interface , I am NOT able
to ping my external network. Router's external interface/gateway status is
DOWN.
*I am adding my content of /etc/neutron/plugins/ml2/ml2_conf.i
Subbu Allamaraju wrote:
> People will starting calling "tc this" and "uc that" only if we present
> two sets of data. I think the right question to ask is why not present
> one unified set, which was my original understanding when I read your
> proposal last year.
Subbu,
It was indeed our propos
Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote:
> 14:26:52 that was my original understanding, we would have a tags
> program and have different groups in the community contribute information
> based on their expertise/experience
> 14:27:06 but it's sounding more and more like two separate programs,
> which is di
Thierry,
People will starting calling "tc this" and "uc that" only if we present two
sets of data. I think the right question to ask is why not present one
unified set, which was my original understanding when I read your proposal
last year.
Subbu
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Thierry Carrez
Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote:
> Specifically after the impression I got from the last meeting was that
> the foundation envisioned these to be one and the same and not
> differentiate between ops-tags and tags.
Yes, we originally hoped the ops workgroup would be OK with reusing the
simple tag frame
Subbu Allamaraju wrote:
> Pardon me for being blunt, but I’m still confused why cycles are being spent
> on semantic wrangling. As you rightly point out, the term is subjective, and
> that’s the point.
>
> Is there a fear a single set of tags that include both dev and operational
> aspects conf
On 06/29/15 08:05, Subbu Allamaraju wrote:
Pardon me for being blunt, but I’m still confused why cycles are being spent on
semantic wrangling. As you rightly point out, the term is subjective, and
that’s the point.
Is there a fear a single set of tags that include both dev and operational
asp
22 matches
Mail list logo
