I'd say that operators running Glance, which is probably almost everyone,
just put a public glance endpoint in the catalog. Maybe there's some
special cases beyond that but that's the base design.
On Jul 30, 2016 6:22 PM, "Serguei Bezverkhi (sbezverk)"
wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
>
>
>
> I am working on
Doug,
Thanks for doing this. In the interests of transparency and full disclosure, I
was at the leadership training and heard about this idea there (and was
strongly in favor of it then, as I am now).
I think it is very important that OpenStack not devolve into a loose
confederation of bags of
Hi Joseph,
I am working on kolla-kubernetes project, you probably heard about it. At this
point, we have some services, example glance, running on the kubernetes cluster
which we need to expose to external users. My goal is to collect information
about how OpenStack operators provide access for
We let our people access the Glance API. Glance uses Keystone, so user
authentication is done the same way all the other services are done within
OpenStack. We allow the glance api ports to be available to them so they
can use the service.
What are you thinking that would prevent you from offeri
+1
From: Melvin Hillsman
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 9:22:02 PM
To: Steven Dake (stdake); openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [kolla] question of default users for
operators
Personally, if OpenStack default is to have a memb
