-net.org
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Eren Türkay <er...@skyatlas.com> wrote:
> On 17-11-2015 10:40, Federico Michele Facca wrote:
> > Hi Eren,
>
> Hello Federico
>
> > afaik, with the new plugin architecture, in fuel 7/8 it should be easy to
> > create a plugi
Hi Eren,
afaik, with the new plugin architecture, in fuel 7/8 it should be easy to
create a plugin for achieve your goal.
in case of manual job, depending on your cloud architecture there are
different options, the main ones are:
- you keep a single keystone in a datacenter and register the new
/community/openstack-training
--
Dr. Federico M. Facca
CREATE-NET
Via alla Cascata 56/D
38123 Povo Trento (Italy)
P +39 0461 312471
M +39 334 6049758
E federico.fa...@create-net.org
T @chicco785
W www.create-net.org
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Federico Michele Facca <
federico.fa...@cre
gested is very interesting but I did not
> find a link to download the vm appliance for vmware.
> Regards
> Ignazio
>
> 2015-09-24 11:25 GMT+02:00 Federico Michele Facca <
> federico.fa...@create-net.org>:
>
>> you may have a look also at this project which uses a vm insid
Hi Miko,
it is possible to develop a neutron extension for achieveing your goal.
Indeed for a customer we developed a ML2 driver that creates the needed
portgroups and connect them to the right vlan in vCenter and hence when
VMware VMs are created connect them to the create portgroups. The
As early mentioned this week, Mark's option is a valid alternative
(separate regions). @ Mark, I wonder if this excpert from your pointer is
still valid:
"VDS-based networking has limitations, including the inability of tenants
to create their own private L2 networks, and the inability to deliver
; I think openstack with kvm is a good start point but we have hunderds
>> applications on vmware.
>> A good compromise could be kvm and vmware with openstack but I am not sure
>> it is a good idea because vmware seems to me limited in this scenario.
>>
>> Il giorn
