I am definitely coming, and will moderate anywhere we need. I'm
particularly interested in monitoring, lifecycle mgmt and ceph but happy to
help anywhere.
On 25 Feb 2017 18:36, "Melvin Hillsman" wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Thank you all for signing up to be moderators at the upcoming Operator
> M
Hi All
I'm very pleased to announce the results of the first User Committee
elections, which closed at 21.59UTC on the 17th February 2017.
The two candidates elected to the User Committee are Melvin Hillsman and
Shamail Tahir.
Congratulations to Melvin and Shamail, I know they will both do an
ex
will be voting on two additional seats for
> the UC.
> >>> We have a pool of five vetted candidates:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Yih Leong Sun
> >>>
> >>> Maish Saidel-Keesing
> >>>
Great stuff Melvin ! Look forward to seeing this move forward.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 6:32 AM, Melvin Hillsman
wrote:
> Good day everyone,
>
> As operators we would like to reboot the efforts started around OsOps.
> Initial things that may make sense to work towards are starting back
> meetings
I think one of the problems we're seeing now is that a lot of operators
have actually already scratched some of these missing functionality itches
like quota management and project nesting by handling those scenarios in
external management systems. I know we certainly did at DataCentred. That
proba
Hello All
I've just closed the poll to elect the chairs for the Public Cloud working
group. The results can be found at
http://doodle.com/poll/s63r5s4ghyucmnqu
Given the votes cast, and our desire for wide representation, I'd like to
propose 3 co-chairs for this group :
- M
Hello All
This is a reminder that the second meeting of the public cloud working
group will be held tomorrow ( Wednesday 4th January ) at 1400 UTC in
#openstack-meeting-3.
Draft agenda is on the etherpad at https://etherpad.openstack.
org/p/publiccloud-wg, please feel free to add/comment.
The ma
Hi All
Just a reminder, our weekly IRC meeting is today at 1500UTC in
#openstack-operators. We're now full steam ahead in the organising process
for the next Ops MidCycle in Milan in March, so if you want to get involved
then come along !
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Ops_Meetups_Team
You can
k a slot.
http://doodle.com/poll/be43ysxhg5iq3uha
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 8:21 AM, Adam Kijak wrote:
> I'm interested as well :)
>
> ____
> From: matt Jarvis
> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 11:43 AM
> To: OpenStack Operators; user-com
Just a reminder, in case it wasn't clear enough above - for the Doodle poll
to vote for chairs, please select TWO yes options as we need to elect two
chairs.
Thanks
Matt
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Matt Jarvis wrote:
> Hello All
>
> This is a reminder that the second
Hi All
Just a reminder, our weekly IRC meeting is today at 1500UTC in
#openstack-operators. We're now full steam ahead in the organising process
for the next Ops MidCycle in Milan in March, so if you want to get involved
then come along !
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Ops_Meetups_Team
You can
Hello All
This is a reminder that the second meeting of the public cloud working
group will be held tomorrow ( Wednesday 21st December ) at 1400 UTC in
#openstack-meeting-3.
Draft agenda is on the etherpad at
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/publiccloud-wg, please feel free to
add/comment.
The m
Hi All
Just a reminder that todays meeting has been moved to 1500 UTC, in
openstack-operators as usual.
Matt
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-opera
Are we definitely moving this meeting to 1500 today ?
Matt
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Chris Morgan wrote:
> Please note: all responses regarding timing of weekly openstack operators
> meetups team IRC meetings are in favor (or at least not against) moving the
> meeting to 15:00 UTC. Unless
I'd say using Ceph for ephemeral disks is the most common deployment
pattern, at DataCentred we've been using it for years. It's rock solid and
has been for several releases. There were some edge case issues around
resizing and snapshotting, but I think that's all been fixed in the last
couple of i
back? ;-)
>
> I'm really excited to see who emerges as leaders of this WG, hopefully
> several people will put forward nominations for the co-chair positions.
> Regardless, I'm excited to support and help what the community decides -
> even if it is from the other side of the wo
Hi All
We have the first Public Cloud WG IRC meeting on Wednesday at 1400 UTC on
channel #openstack-meeting-3
The agenda is available here[1]
We'd welcome as much input as possible, please feel free to make notes on
the etherpad[1]. This first meeting will look to define our constituency,
meetin
Awesome work - well done Edgar and team !
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Edgar Magana
wrote:
> Team,
>
>
>
> I am gladly informing you that the BoD has just approved our proposal to
> change the OpenStack Bylaws:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QmLOeseAkjBWM_
> TXsUeKBErNaSHnuZp81II0T71
+1 from me for 1500 UTC, or other time later or earlier :)
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Chris Morgan wrote:
> Today's meeting was held at 14:00 UTC, minutes here
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ops_meetups_team/201
> 6/ops_meetups_team.2016-12-06-14.25.html
>
> Actually though the m
sum of their
> (datacentre) parts, and
> 3.) help jointly advertise and make the wider OpenStack *choice* of the
> marketplace known to the world world.
>
> Looking forward to hearing other ideas and building on the above for 2017.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> David F. Flanders
As per the results of the recent Doodle poll, the first meeting of the
Public Cloud Working Group will be held on Wednesday 7th December at 1400
UTC in #openstack-meeting-3, and bi-weekly after that.
If you're unfamiliar with IRC meetings, you can find some documentation on
getting started at http
heir should be a declared time limit and date
> for achieving a public declaration (and close of the WG). See 'Boston Open
> Science Cloud Congress and forthcoming Declaration' efforts.
>
> [2]= As per all my public correspondence, this is me responding in my
> capacity a
put so far
!
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:55 AM, matt Jarvis wrote:
> Whoops, just realised I can't send to these lists with multiple additional
> recipients, so sending again separately ..
>
> Thank you for all of your interest in this proposal. In order to move
> things to the n
ises questions about standards around naming of objects, network creation
patterns and a bunch of other stuff which I think this WG can start to
address.
Matt
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Stefano Maffulli
wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> On 11/15/2016 02:43 AM, matt Jarvis wrote:
> > I&#
tp://doodle.com/poll/be43ysxhg5iq3uha
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:43 AM, matt Jarvis
wrote:
> So after input from a variety of sources over the last few weeks, I'd very
> much like to try and put together a public cloud working group, with the
> very high level goal of representing
So after input from a variety of sources over the last few weeks, I'd very
much like to try and put together a public cloud working group, with the
very high level goal of representing the interests of the public cloud
provider community around the globe.
I'd like to propose that, in line with the
Just a reminder our regular weekly meeting will be at 1400 UTC in
#openstack-operators. If you want to get involved in organising the Ops
MidCycles, join us there ! Also a final reminder that if you want to vote
on the location for the next MidCycle, the doodle poll will close today so
get voting !
I'm back in the game so will be able to make that.
On 4 Nov 2016 18:33, "Chris Morgan" wrote:
Hello All,
When we met last week in Barcelona (some of us) I think there was
consensus around picking up our normal Tuesday IRC meetings as of next
Tuesday, which I see now is the 8th. Someone mentio
> management of customer infrastructure, whereas for Science Clouds turning
> things off and cleaning up data is a policy issue that does not appear to
> have resulted in any common tooling yet.
>
> Cheers,
> Blair
>
> On 22 Sep 2016 6:35 PM, "Matt Jarvis"
> wrote:
&
... how are you defining
> "public" cloud for these purposes?
>
> Cheers,
> Blair
>
> On 21 September 2016 at 18:14, Matt Jarvis
> wrote:
>
>> Given there are quite a few public cloud operators in Europe now, is
>> there any interest in a public cloud gr
Given there are quite a few public cloud operators in Europe now, is there
any interest in a public cloud group meeting as part of the ops meetup in
Barcelona ? I already know many of you, but I think it could be very useful
to share our experiences with a wider group.
--
DataCentred Limited regi
Hello all
We're a bit thin on the ground in the ops meetup team, and could really do
with some more volunteers to help with the work of organising the Summit
and Midcycle Ops Meetups. No previous experience required, enthusiasm and
some time is all that's needed ! We're meeting regularly on
#opens
works too.
>
> If you have some very large flash array, you may wanna consider single
> socket. You can watch this video where they run DBs etc., on pure
> flash arrays and give some advice
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqlC7S3cUKs . thx will
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 8:01 PM
I was going to review this, but it got merged before I got to it. There's a
couple of fundamental issues with these scripts, the lack of error handling
being one, but more importantly using the existence of apt or yum to check
for OS version is not safe as either can exist on either platform. I'll
Hi Mohammed
Could you give us an idea of what your node hardware looks like, and how
you split it up ? I'm doing some work on the economics of this, so I'd like
to understand the RAM and physical cores split.
On 1 September 2016 at 17:58, Mohammed Naser wrote:
> I proposed a talk for the Summit
lines:
> > reload(sys)
> > sys.setdefaultencoding("utf-8")
> >
> > fixes the problem, I dont have anymore the exception
> > UnicodeEncodeError and I see printed:
> >
> > Server: نواع-پاستاها-و-طرز-ط [3f26242c-440b-4a2e-b3ca-cb6c6c7ee8b2] -
> ACTI
What was your problem to start with ?
On 31 August 2016 at 12:56, Saverio Proto wrote:
> Hello ops,
>
> this patch fixed my problem:
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/361308/
>
> but it is an ugly hack according to:
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3828723/why-should-we-not-use-sys-
> s
Time once again to dredge this topic up and see what the wider operators
community thinks this time :) There were a fair amount of summit
submissions for Barcelona talking about converged and hyper-converged
infrastructure, it seems to be the topic de jour from vendors at the minute
despite feeling
Hey Stig
Have you spoken to the guys at OCF in Sheffield ? Not sure if they do, but
they might, although not sure if any of them lurk on this list.
Matt
On 17 August 2016 at 09:36, Stig Telfer wrote:
> Thanks Blair,
>
> To clarify I’m interested in IB rather than RoCE. There don’t seem to be
Hi Mark
Given we've not got the Eventbrite for the Ops Meetup live yet, is there
any chance you could extend the early bird pricing or give operators who
may be travelling for the Ops Meetup a discount code ? I suspect there may
be quite a lot of interest for those travelling some distance.
Matt
If you look at the user survey (
https://www.openstack.org/user-survey/survey-2016-q1/landing ) you can see
what the current landscape looks like in terms of deployments. Ceph is by
far the most commonly used storage backend for Cinder.
On 21 June 2016 at 08:27, Michael Stang
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I
gt;
> >>
> >>==August Meetup==
> >>Since there really isn't a lot of time left and we have proposals
> >>already, we decided for this time we would not do the open call.
> >>So, gfa, shintano and I will be working behind the scenes with Bestbuy
>
+1 :)
On 2 June 2016 at 17:40, Edgar Magana wrote:
> I love to see the AUC instead of the Non-ATC one!!! Kudos!
>
>
>
> Edgar
>
>
>
> *From: *Shamail Tahir
> *Date: *Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 9:23 AM
> *To: *openstack-operators ,
> user-committee
> *Subject: *[Openstack-operators] [recognitio
Great feedback Anita - thank you :)
On 1 June 2016 at 20:42, Anita Kuno wrote:
> On 06/01/2016 03:29 PM, David Medberry wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 2:12 AM, Matt Jarvis <
> matt.jar...@datacentred.co.uk>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> The general
most operators, given
we also have two summits a year, so maximising useful time is a good thing.
On 1 June 2016 at 20:29, David Medberry wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 2:12 AM, Matt Jarvis > wrote:
>
>>
>> The general consensus in the discussions we've had, an
+1
On 1 June 2016 at 16:54, Edgar Magana wrote:
> I totally second Thierry. That was an excellent description of the
> importance of having the Ops sessions in these events.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Edgar
>
> On 6/1/16, 2:49 AM, "Thierry Carrez" wrote:
>
> >Sam Morrison wrote:
> >> As an operator what s
Hi All
As part of the work we've been doing on the Ops Meetups Team working group,
we've recently had some discussion on the ideal attendee numbers for future
Ops Mid Cycles which we'd like as much feedback as possible on from the
wider community.
The general consensus in the discussions we've ha
Sounds lovely, but could be tricky with multiple tracks and ~150 attendees.
If you have two sessions scheduled at the same time that have more than 30
people wanting to get into both for example ...
On 20 May 2016 at 15:24, Melvin Hillsman wrote:
> +1
>
> > On May 19, 2016, at 5:52 PM, Shamail
17, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Matt Jarvis <
> matt.jar...@datacentred.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Hi Chris
>>
>> Good round up and a good start on the definition. Don't forget the public
>> cloud operators though, it's not all about private cloud ;)
>>
>> On
Hi Chris
Good round up and a good start on the definition. Don't forget the public
cloud operators though, it's not all about private cloud ;)
On 17 May 2016 at 16:51, Chris Morgan wrote:
> I'm new to this, but here goes:
>
> Meeting held on IRC today at 14:00 UTC to jumpstart a new process for
Very familiar list Tim, and we end up working around a lot of them with
horrible hardware specific code. Our bugbears also include :
Required configuration only being available via a web interface - eg.
setting hostname of the BMC on Supermicro hardware
IPMI hanging and requiring complete removal
We see FWaaS generally being used by customers with larger deployments,
where they want overall firewall rules at the boundary as well as security
groups. Since my original post on this thread, I went to look at the
numbers - it's actually being used more widely than I originally thought on
our pla
I would suspect that quite a lot fall into 1
On 3 May 2016 at 16:33, David Medberry wrote:
> The only reason I can think of is that they are doing nested VMs and don't
> have the right nesting flag enabled in their base flag.
>
> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
> wrote:
>
>>
Thanks for the clarification Kyle.
On 2 May 2016 at 14:33, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Matt Jarvis
> wrote:
> > As some of you on this list may already know, there are issues in the
> > Neutron team with development resources on VPNaas and FWaaS
n Hillsman mrhills...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Please take a moment to reach out to the Neutron team and visit the
> following. Could this resource be of use to address their concern?
> https://osic.org/clusters
>
> On Apr 29, 2016, at 8:01 AM, Matt Jarvis <mailto:matt.
As some of you on this list may already know, there are issues in the
Neutron team with development resources on VPNaas and FWaaS, and there have
been discussions in Austin about deprecating the code from the main Neutron
codebase. The decision is currently that the code will remain for another 6
m
One of the discussion points which came up in the Logging session at the
Ops Summit today was that a lot of operators are running with debug logging
enabled. There was a request from development to understand more about why
that might be needed, ie. under what circumstances are operators not
gettin
Hello All,
Just a reminder for everyone who's participating in the Ops Summit in
Austin, we've got a Ceph Integration session on Monday at 4.40pm that I'm
helping to moderate. We've got some content in the etherpad already, mainly
stuff which came up at the MidCycle session in Manchester, but it w
I could also potentially help with the Ceph session.
On 8 April 2016 at 19:07, Edgar Magana wrote:
> Hello Tom,
>
> I can have one of Workday’s Ceph experts that are going to be attending
> the meeting to volunteer for the Ceph one, so count on it.
>
> Edgar
>
> From: Tom Fifield
> Date: Thursd
Has anyone got any real world experience with on-premise cloud gateway
products that will backend into Ceph ie. Swift or S3 compatible ? Ctera and
Panzura's products look like they do .. we're ideally looking for something
with a fairly rich feature set on the client side - CIFS/NFS, intelligent
ca
Hi Shamail
I'd be happy to volunteer to help with this working group.
Matt
On 28 March 2016 at 20:33, Shamail Tahir wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We had some great discussion on the mailing lists on how to recognize
> operators and other contributors in the OpenStack community who don't
> qualif
We've just patched in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/262740/ on Kilo.
On 8 March 2016 at 17:33, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Perhaps I was confused by the wording I found at
> http://docs.openstack.org/liberty/networking-guide/migration-classic-to-l3ha.html
>
> I was looking for a way to do it on Ki
+1
On 4 March 2016 at 17:21, Robert Starmer wrote:
> If fixing a typo in a document is considered a technical contribution,
> then I think we've already cast the net far and wide. ATC as used has
> become a name implying you're trying to make OpenStack better, more
> useable, and more functional
Isn't this more nuanced than simply 'upstream' and 'downstream' ?
Characterising downstream as "people who help others using OpenStack, by
moderating Ops meetups, by filing bugs, by answering questions on Ask, by
contributing a blogpost, etc...". is an extremely broad church.
My assumption about t
This thread is a great example of the value of the midcycle meetups :)
On 4 March 2016 at 08:09, Saverio Proto wrote:
> Thanks for merging the patch so quickly ! I will try today to build
> new ubuntu packages and and for feedback at UCA.
>
> > But yes, thank you for pointing this out. Bug fixes
+1 for TOC or AOC
On 3 March 2016 at 15:54, Edgar Magana wrote:
> Hello Folks,
>
> I have to admit that I really like these two:
>
> TOC / Technical Ops Contributor
> IRO / I Run OpenStack
>
> Edgar
>
> From: Pierre Freund
> Date: Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 6:57 AM
> To: Edgar Magana
> Cc: "op
+1 for custom T-shirts or hoodies. Actual medals/trophies would also be a
nice idea ;)
On 1 March 2016 at 15:30, Tom Fifield wrote:
> Excellent, excellent.
>
> What's the best place to buy Raspberry Pis these days?
>
> On 22/02/16 21:09, Victoria Martínez de la Cruz wrote:
>
>> Oh I missed this
;
> And I personally am unaware of any service provider that doesn't give you
> network access by default when you stand up a project.
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:06 AM, Matt Jarvis <
> matt.jar...@datacentred.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> As I've already said
initial network and router ?
On 26 February 2016 at 11:36, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2016-02-26 11:21:47 +0000 (+), Matt Jarvis wrote:
> > From a public cloud perspective I'm not convinced that an opt-out
> argument
> > is the right way to go. A router in our context is
>From a public cloud perspective I'm not convinced that an opt-out argument
is the right way to go. A router in our context is a chargeable item,
because it has an external IP address, so automatically creating stuff
without the user specifying it is not an ideal outcome. Personally I'd
rather see
On our public cloud we do exactly as Robert describes - as part of our
customer onboarding process, we automatically create a default network and
router to our provider network, so that a tenant can just spin up a VM if
they want to. Obviously the customer can then delete this if they wish, but
it
I just wanted to say a huge thank you to everyone who attended, moderated
and sponsored the European Ops Meetup. We had a fantastic two days in
Manchester, made a lot of new friends and had some incredibly useful
discussions. Our goals when we put the event together were to engage
European operator
Thanks Carol !
On 1 February 2016 at 16:46, Barrett, Carol L
wrote:
> I can help with the writing User Stories session.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> *From:* Matt Jarvis [mailto:matt.jar...@datacentred.co.uk]
> *Sent:* Monday, February 01, 2016 2:01 AM
> *To:* Shamail Tahir
Thanks Shamail !
On 1 February 2016 at 09:39, Shamail Tahir wrote:
> Thanks Matt!
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Matt Jarvis > wrote:
>
>> That's a very good point !
>>
>> OK, so the ones we definitely don't seem to have anyone modera
mail Tahir wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:47 AM, Matt Jarvis > wrote:
>
>> Hello All
>>
>> The event in Manchester is rapidly approaching, and we're still looking
>> for moderators and presenters for some of these sessions. If you
Tools WG Large Deployment Team
> 15:00 - 15:30 Coffee
>
> 15:30 - 16:00 Breakout Reports
>
> 16:00 - 17:00 Feedback Session
>
>
>
>
>
> There will be a followup email shortly regarding moderators for the
> sessions - thanks to those who volunteered so far!
>
>
&g
Thank you Edgar, you're added to the list !
We're going to need quite a few more moderators, so please volunteer if
you'd like to help out.
On 15 January 2016 at 16:51, Edgar Magana wrote:
> Please, sign me in as moderator for any available session.
>
> Edgar
>
s.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>
--
Matt Jarvis
Head of Cloud Computing
DataCentred
Office: (+44)0161 8703985
Mobile: (+44)07983 725372
Email: matt.jar...@datacentred.co.uk
Website: http://www.datacentred.co.uk
--
DataCentred
ers to moderate
sessions, so if that's something you can help with then let us know.
Happy Holidays !
--
Matt Jarvis
Head of Cloud Computing
DataCentred
Office: (+44)0161 8703985
Mobile: (+44)07983 725372
Email: matt.jar...@datacentred.co.uk
Website: http://www.datacentred.co.uk
--
DataCentred L
ing something in
the database.
On 25 November 2015 at 00:21, Assaf Muller wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Matt Jarvis
> wrote:
> > Nope, the HA flag is definitely set to false. Here's another example :
> >
> > root@osnet0:~# neutron l3-agent-list-hostin
9d6d-049b3dee7f6f'
> is the 'HA' flag set to True? Otherwise, this is a really weird bug
> which I've never seen before.
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Matt Jarvis
> wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> > In the last week or so we've seen a couple of
nyone seen this behaviour before ? We are running Juno BTW.
Matt
--
Matt Jarvis
Head of Cloud Computing
DataCentred
Office: (+44)0161 8703985
Mobile: (+44)07983 725372
Email: matt.jar...@datacentred.co.uk
Website: http://www.datacentred.co.uk
--
DataCentred Limited registered in England and Wal
#x27;t work
- at least we learnt something along the way.
On 17 November 2015 at 20:16, JJ Asghar wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 11/17/15 1:34 PM, Matt Jarvis wrote:
> > From my perspective we're happy to put in place anything that
gt; effectiveness upon a midcycle that has already been planned. Perhaps the
> folks that planned this one can weigh in.
>
> ___
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>
stinfo/openstack-operators
> >
> >This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential,
> proprietary and intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please delete it
> immediately.
> >__
list
> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
--
Matt Jarvis
Head of Cloud Computing
DataCentred
Office: (+44)0161 8703985
Mobile: (+44)07983 725372
Email: matt.jar
ps meetups
and notes from the past can be found on the wiki @:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Operations/Meetups
Finally, don't forget to register ASAP!
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/european-openstack-operators-meetup-tickets-19405855436
--
Matt Jarvis
Head of Cloud Computing
DataCentred
Of
> Hash: SHA1
>
> +1
> I'm also interested.
>
>
>
> On 17.09.2015 09:52, Matt Jarvis wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> > Don't know how many European folks are on this list, but just
> wondering if there's any interest in a European Operators meet u
There's still a few people who responded to this thread who haven't added
anything to the etherpad yet - it's at
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/european-ops-meetup-planning if you missed
the new thread I started
On 18 September 2015 at 14:48, Matt Jarvis
wrote:
> I'
: bere...@b1-systems.de
>
> B1 Systems GmbH
> Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de
> GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537
>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> O
OK, let's try this with tags. I've created an initial etherpad
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/european-ops-meetup-planning to start to
gather some information. This is a first pass and obviously not definitive,
so feel free to add sections or suggestions.
--
Matt Jarvis
Head of Cloud
e better to be named around organising ops events in
> general, rather than along geographical lines.
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Tom
>
>
> On 18/09/15 15:43, Matt Jarvis wrote:
>
>> So judging from the responses so far, I'd say there is an appetite for
>> doing
nks!
> VW
>
> From: Tim Bell
> Date: Thursday, September 17, 2015 11:05 AM
> To: Matt Jarvis , Neil Jerram <
> neil.jer...@metaswitch.com>
> Cc: "openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org" <
> openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [Op
'd be very happy to be there.
>
> Neil
>
>
>
> On 17/09/15 13:17, Matt Jarvis wrote:
>
> I'm thinking we'll let this thread run for a day or so and hopefully
> gather a few more interested parties, then take the conversation off-list
> and see what the
> > PhD, Scientific Computing
> > Researcher, IT Department,
> > Uppsala University.
> > Cloud Application Expert,
> > UPPMAX.
> > Visiting Researcher,
> > Helsinki Institute of Physics (HIP).
> > salman.t...@it.uu.se &l
Hi All
Don't know how many European folks are on this list, but just wondering if
there's any interest in a European Operators meet up ?
Matt
--
Matt Jarvis
Head of Cloud Computing
DataCentred
Office: (+44)0161 8703985
Mobile: (+44)07983 725372
Email: matt.jar...@datacentred.co.
96 matches
Mail list logo
